Summary Background New therapeutic options are needed for patients with psoriasis. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, is being investigated as a treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic ...plaque psoriasis. In this study, we aimed to compare two tofacitinib doses with high-dose etanercept or placebo in this patient population. Methods In this phase 3, randomised, multicentre, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, 12-week, non-inferiority trial, adult patients with chronic stable plaque psoriasis (for ≥12 months) who were candidates for systemic or phototherapy and had a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 12 or higher and a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of moderate or severe, and had failed to respond to, had a contraindication to, or were intolerant to at least one conventional systemic therapy, were enrolled from 122 investigational dermatology centres worldwide. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 3:3:3:1 ratio to receive tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily at about 12 h intervals, etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously twice weekly at about 3–4 day intervals, or placebo. Randomisation was done by a computer-generated randomisation schedule, and all patients and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients at week 12 with at least a 75% reduction in the PASI score from baseline (PASI75 response) and the proportion of patients achieving a PGA score of “clear” or “almost clear” (PGA response), analysed in the full analysis set (all patients who were randomised and received at least one dose of study drug). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01241591. Findings Between Nov 29, 2010, and Sept 13, 2012, we enrolled 1106 eligible adult patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and randomly assigned them to the four treatment groups (330 to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, 332 to tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily, 336 to etanercept 50 mg twice weekly, and 108 to placebo). Of these patients, 1101 actually received their assigned study medication (329 in the tofactinib 5 mg group, 330 in the tofacitinib 10 mg group, 335 in the etanercept group, and 107 in the placebo group). At week 12, PASI75 responses were recorded in 130 (39·5%) of 329 patients in the tofacitinib 5 mg group, 210 (63·6%) of 330 in the tofacitinib 10 mg group, 197 (58·8%) of 335 in the etanercept group, and six (5·6%) of 107 in the placebo group. A PGA response was achieved by 155 (47·1%) of 329 patients in the tofacitinib 5 mg group, 225 (68·2%) of 330 in the tofacitinib 10 mg group, 222 (66·3%) of 335 in the etanercept group, and 16 (15·0%) of 107 in the placebo group. The rate of adverse events was similar across the four groups, with serious adverse events occurring in seven (2%) of 329 patients in the tofacitinib 5 mg group, five (2%) of 330 in the tofacitinib 10 mg group, seven (2%) of 335 in the etanercept group, and two (2%) of 107 in the placebo group. Three (1%) of 329 patients in the tofacitinib 5 mg group, ten (3%) of 330 in the tofacitinib 10 mg group, 11 (3%) of 335 in the etanercept group, and four (4%) of 107 patients in the placebo group discontinued their assigned treatment because of adverse events. Intepretation In patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, the 10 mg twice daily dose of tofacitinib was non-inferior to etanercept 50 mg twice weekly and was superior to placebo, but the 5 mg twice daily dose did not show non-inferiority to etanercept 50 mg twice weekly. The adverse event rates over 12 weeks were similar for tofacitinib and etanercept. This study indicates that in the future tofacitinib could provide a convenient and well-tolerated therapeutic option for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Funding Pfizer Inc.
Background Apremilast works intracellularly to regulate inflammatory mediators. Objective ESTEEM 1 evaluated efficacy/safety of apremilast at 30 mg twice a day for moderate to severe plaque ...psoriasis. Methods This phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized adults (2:1) to apremilast or placebo. At week 16, the placebo group switched to apremilast through week 32, followed by a randomized treatment withdrawal phase to week 52. Binary end points were analyzed using χ2 test; continuous end points used analysis of covariance. Results In all, 844 patients were randomized (n = 282, placebo; n = 562, apremilast). At week 16, significantly more patients taking apremilast achieved 75% or greater reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI-75) (33.1%) versus placebo (5.3%, P < .0001; primary end point). Most (61.0%) patients rerandomized to apremilast at week 32 achieved PASI-75 at week 52 versus 11.7% rerandomized to placebo. Of patients rerandomized to apremilast at week 32, mean percentage change from baseline PASI score was −88% to −81% (weeks 32-52). During the placebo-controlled period, 55.7% and 69.3% of patients randomized to placebo and apremilast, respectively, had 1 or more adverse events. Most adverse events were mild/moderate in severity. No new significant adverse events emerged with continued apremilast exposure versus the placebo-controlled period. Limitations Data were limited to 52 weeks and may not generalize to nonplaque psoriasis. Conclusions Apremilast was effective in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Summary Background We assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ponesimod, an oral, selective, reversible modulator of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1, in patients with moderate to severe ...chronic plaque psoriasis. Methods Between Sept 22, 2010, and Oct 24, 2012, patients with psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) scores higher than 10 were enrolled into this multicentre double-blind, phase 2 study. They received 20 mg or 40 mg ponesimod or placebo once daily for 16 weeks. Those with at least 50% reduction in PASI score at 16 weeks and who were receiving ponesimod were rerandomised to receive maintenance ponesimod therapy or placebo until week 28. The primary endpoint was reduction in PASI score from baseline of at least 75% (PASI75) at week 16. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01208090. Findings Of 326 patients initially randomised (20 mg ponesimod n=126, 40 mg ponesimod n=133, and placebo n=67) PASI75 was achieved at week 16 in 58 (46·0%), 64 (48·1%), and nine (13·4%), respectively. The treatment effect was significant for the two ponesimod doses (both p<0·0001). Of 219 patients who entered the maintenance period, PASI75 was achieved by week 28 in 35 (71·4%) of 49 who continued on 20 mg ponesimod and 41 (77·4%) of 53 on 40 mg ponesimod, and in 19 (42·2%) of 45 who swapped from 20 mg to placebo and 19 (40·4%) of 47 from 40 mg to placebo. Ponesimod was associated with dyspnoea, raised liver enzyme concentrations, and dizziness. Interpretation Significant clinical benefit was seen at week 16 that increased with maintenance therapy. Funding Actelion Pharmaceuticals.
The transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) regulates craniofacial development and epidermal proliferation. We recently showed that IRF6 is a component of a regulatory feedback ...loop that controls the proliferative potential of epidermal cells. IRF6 is transcriptionally activated by p63 and induces its proteasome-mediated down-regulation, thereby limiting keratinocyte proliferative potential. We hypothesized that IRF6 may also be involved in skin carcinogenesis. Hence, we analyzed IRF6 expression in a large series of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and found a strong down-regulation of IRF6 that correlated with tumor invasive and differentiation status. IRF6 down-regulation in SCC cell lines and primary tumors correlates with methylation on a CpG dinucleotide island located in its promoter region. To identify the molecular mechanisms regulating IRF6 potential tumor suppressive activity, we performed a genome-wide analysis by combining ChIP sequencing for IRF6 binding sites and gene expression profiling in primary human keratinocytes after siRNA-mediated IRF6 depletion. We observed dysregulation of cell cycle-related genes and genes involved in differentiation, cell adhesion, and cell–cell contact. Many of these genes were direct IRF6 targets. We also performed in vitro invasion assays showing that IRF6 down-regulation promotes invasive behavior and that reintroduction of IRF6 into SCC cells strongly inhibits cell growth. These results indicate a function for IRF6 in suppression of tumorigenesis in stratified epithelia.
Psoriasis is one of the commonest chronic inflammatory disorders. Its cause is unknown, but a wealth of studies indicate that the disease results from a complex and dynamic interplay between genetic ...and environmental factors that trigger an excessive inflammatory response in the skin. Dendritic cells and effector T-cells are central in the development of the psoriastic lesion, and cytokines produced by these cells stimulate keratinocytes to proliferate and increase the migration of inflammatory cells into the skin, promoting epidermal hyperplasia and inflammation. Understanding the immunology of the psoriatic plaque has led to new therapeutic options and novel candidates for immunomodulation, and has changed the ways psoriatic patients are managed.
Background Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is a major proallergic cytokine that promotes TH 2 responses through dendritic cell (DC) activation. Whether it also plays a role in human autoimmune ...inflammation and associated pathways is not known. Objective In this study we investigated the potential role of several epithelium-derived factors, including TSLP, in inducing IL-23 production by human DCs. We further dissected the role of TSLP in patients with psoriasis, an IL-23–associated skin autoimmune disease. Methods The study was performed in human subjects using primary cells and tissue samples from patients with psoriasis and healthy donors. We analyzed the production of IL-23 in vitro by blood and skin DCs. We studied the function for TSLP and its interaction with other components of the inflammatory microenvironment in situ and ex vivo. Results We found that TSLP synergized with CD40 ligand to promote DC activation and pathogenic IL-23 production by primary blood and skin DCs. In situ TSLP was strongly expressed by keratinocytes of untreated psoriatic lesions but not in normal skin. Moreover, we could demonstrate that IL-4, an important component of the TH 2 inflammation seen in patients with atopic dermatitis, inhibited IL-23 production induced by TSLP and CD40 ligand in a signal transducer and activator of transcription 6–independent manner. Conclusion Our results identify TSLP as a novel player within the complex psoriasis cytokine network. Blocking TSLP in patients with psoriasis might contribute to decreasing DC activation and shutting down the production of pathogenic IL-23.
The human congenital syndromes ectrodactyly ectodermal dysplasia-cleft lip/palate syndrome, ankyloblepharon ectodermal dysplasia clefting, and split-hand/foot malformation are all characterized by ...ectodermal dysplasia, limb malformations, and cleft lip/palate. These phenotypic features are a result of an imbalance between the proliferation and differentiation of precursor cells during development of ectoderm-derived structures. Mutations in the p63 and interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) genes have been found in human patients with these syndromes, consistent with phenotypes. Here, we used human and mouse primary keratinocytes and mouse models to investigate the role of p63 and IRF6 in proliferation and differentiation. We report that the DeltaNp63 isoform of p63 activated transcription of IRF6, and this, in turn, induced proteasome-mediated DeltaNp63 degradation. This feedback regulatory loop allowed keratinocytes to exit the cell cycle, thereby limiting their ability to proliferate. Importantly, mutations in either p63 or IRF6 resulted in disruption of this regulatory loop: p63 mutations causing ectodermal dysplasias were unable to activate IRF6 transcription, and mice with mutated or null p63 showed reduced Irf6 expression in their palate and ectoderm. These results identify what we believe to be a novel mechanism that regulates the proliferation-differentiation balance of keratinocytes essential for palate fusion and skin differentiation and links the pathogenesis of 2 genetically different groups of ectodermal dysplasia syndromes into a common molecular pathway.
Background Psoriasis is a chronic, genetically determined, immune-mediated, inflammatory skin disease affecting approximately 2% to 3% of the Caucasian population. Previously reported data ...demonstrated adalimumab to be an efficacious treatment of psoriatic arthritis and plaque-type psoriasis. Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody IgG1 against tumor necrosis factor alpha. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab, in the treatment of psoriasis patients whose disease is refractory to treatment with other biologic agents. Patients and methods Thirty patients affected by plaque-type psoriasis with or without psoriatic arthritis, unresponsive to conventional and biologic systemic treatments were enrolled. Adalimumab was administered in monotherapy, at a dosage of 40 mg, subcutaneously, once a week. Results At week 12, 26 of 30 patients (87%) achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75; at week 24, 25 of 30 patients (83%) achieved PASI 75. Concerning psoriatic arthritis, at week 24, the mean Health Assessment Questionnaire score improved from 0.99 to 0.2, Ritchie articular index from 10.15 to 2, and Pain Visual Assessment Score from 6.32 to 1.2. Furthermore, therapy with adalimumab considerably enhanced patients' quality of life as assessed by two measures (Dermatology Life Quality Index, Psoriasis Disability Index). Adalimumab was generally safe and well tolerated. Limitations This is not a randomized placebo-controlled study and is restricted to a small number of patients. Conclusions In our experience, although preliminary, monotherapy with adalimumab 40 mg weekly proved to be an effective and safe treatment for the management of plaque-type psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, with a rapid onset of action in patients whose disease had been refractory to both conventional and biologic agents.
PDF
