Activation of the type 1 interferon (IFN1) pathway is a prominent feature of dermatomyositis (DM) muscle and may play a role in the pathogenesis of this disease. However, the relevance of the IFN1 ...pathway in patients with other types of myositis such as the antisynthetase syndrome (AS), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM) is largely unknown. Moreover, the activation of the type 2 interferon (IFN2) pathway has not been comprehensively explored in myositis. In this cross-sectional study, our objective was to determine whether IFN1 and IFN2 pathways are differentially activated in different types of myositis by performing RNA sequencing on muscle biopsy samples from 119 patients with DM, IMNM, AS, or IBM and on 20 normal muscle biopsies.
The expression of IFN1- and IFN2-inducible genes was compared between the different groups.
The expression of IFN1-inducible genes was high in DM, moderate in AS, and low in IMNM and IBM. In contrast, the expression of IFN2-inducible genes was high in DM, IBM, and AS but low in IMNM. The expression of IFN-inducible genes correlated with the expression of genes associated with inflammation and muscle regeneration. Of note,
expression levels alone performed as well as composite scores relying on multiple genes to monitor activation of the IFN1 pathway in myositis muscle biopsies.
IFN1 and IFN2 pathways are differentially activated in different forms of myositis. This observation may have therapeutic implications because immunosuppressive medications may preferentially target each of these pathways.
Abstract Objective In the context of clinical evaluations performed on our prospective myositis cohort, we noted a striking association of severe cardiac disease in myositis patients with ...anti-mitochondrial antibodies. We sought to review all cases of anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) associated myositis in our cohort to describe the clinical features of this disease subset. Methods We identified 7 patients with confirmed anti-mitochondrial antibodies who presented as an inflammatory myopathy. A retrospective chart review was completed to assess their clinical presentation, laboratory, imaging, electrophysiologic and histopathologic features. Results One patient presented with dermatomyositis, and six were classified as polymyositis using Bohan and Peter criteria 1,2. In all but one patient, a chronic course of muscle involvement was appreciated with an average of 6.5 years of weakness prior to presentation. Muscle atrophy was often noted, as well as atypical findings of scapular winging in 2 of the patients. Muscle biopsies were consistent with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy in four patients, dermatomyositis in one, polymyositis in one and non-specific or granulomatous myositis in one patient. Cardiac involvement (including myocarditis, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and cardiomyopathy), was seen in 5 out of 7 (71%) of the patients, and usually preceded the muscle involvement. Coexisting autoimmune conditions were seen in 3/7of the patients and included primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, psoriasis, and Hashimoto′s thyroiditis. Conclusions Anti-mitochondrial antibodies identify a distinct inflammatory myopathy phenotype that is frequently associated with chronic skeletal muscle disease and severe cardiac involvement. Early recognition of this rare entity as an immune-mediated process is important due to implications for treatment. We propose that anti-mitochondrial antibody status should be determined in patients with a compatible clinical picture.
Individual dermatomyositis (DM)-associated autoantibodies are associated with distinct clinical phenotypes. This study was undertaken to explore the association of these autoantibodies with specific ...muscle biopsy features.
DM subjects with a muscle biopsy reviewed at Johns Hopkins had sera screened for autoantibodies recognizing Mi-2, transcriptional intermediary factor 1-γ (TIF1-γ), NXP2, MDA5, Ro52, PM-Scl, and Jo1. We also included anti-Jo1–positive patients with polymyositis (PM) who had a biopsy read at Johns Hopkins. Analyzed histological features included perifascicular atrophy, perivascular inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, primary inflammation, and myofiber necrosis. Duration of disease, biopsy location, and treatment at biopsy were also analyzed.
We studied 91 DM and 7 anti-Jo1–positive patients with PM. In univariate analyses, TIF1-γ+ patients had more mitochondrial dysfunction (47% vs 18%; p = 0.05), NXP2+ patients had less primary inflammation (0% vs 28%; p = 0.01), Mi-2+ patients had more primary inflammation (50% vs 19%; p = 0.03), and PM-Scl+ patients had more primary inflammation (67% vs 18%; p = 0.004) than those who were negative for each autoantibody. Although reliability was limited because of small sample numbers, multivariate analysis confirmed that TIF1-γ+ patients had more mitochondrial dysfunction prevalence ratio (PR) 2.6, 95% CI 1.0–6.5, p = 0.05 and PM-Scl+ patients had more primary inflammation (PR 5.2, 95% CI 2.0–13.4; p = 0.001) independent of disease duration at biopsy, biopsy site, and treatment at biopsy. No differences in muscle biopsy features were noted between anti-Jo1–positive patients diagnosed with DM and PM.
The prevalence of different histological features varies according to autoantibody status in DM. Muscle biopsy features are similar in anti-Jo1 patients with and without a rash.
Objective
Although more than a dozen myositis‐specific autoantibodies (MSAs) have been identified, most patients with myositis are positive for a single MSA. The specific overexpression of a given ...myositis autoantigen in myositis muscle has been proposed as initiating and/or propagating autoimmunity against that particular autoantigen. The present study was undertaken to test this hypothesis.
Methods
In order to quantify autoantigen RNA expression, RNA sequencing was performed on muscle biopsy samples from control subjects, MSA‐positive patients with myositis, regenerating mouse muscles, and cultured human muscle cells.
Results
Muscle biopsy samples were available from 20 control subjects and 106 patients with autoantibodies recognizing hydroxymethylglutaryl‐coenzyme A reductase (n = 40), signal recognition particles (n = 9), Jo‐1 (n = 18), nuclear matrix protein 2 (n = 12), Mi‐2 (n = 11), transcription intermediary factor 1γ (n = 11), or melanoma differentiation–associated protein 5 (n = 5). The increased expression of a given autoantigen in myositis muscle was not associated with autoantibodies recognizing that autoantigen (all q > 0.05). In biopsy specimens from both myositis muscle and regenerating mouse muscles, autoantigen expression correlated directly with the expression of muscle regeneration markers and correlated inversely with the expression of genes encoding mature muscle proteins. Myositis autoantigens were also expressed at high levels in cultured human muscle cells.
Conclusion
Most myositis autoantigens are highly expressed during muscle regeneration, which may relate to the propagation of autoimmunity. However, factors other than overexpression of specific autoantigens are likely to govern the development of unique autoantibodies in individual patients with myositis.
To define the clinical phenotype of patients with myositis with anti-U1-ribonucleoprotein (RNP) autoantibodies.
In this longitudinal cohort study, the prevalence and severity of clinical features at ...disease onset and during follow-up in patients with anti-U1-RNP-positive myositis were compared to those with dermatomyositis (DM), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and the antisynthetase syndrome (AS).
Twenty anti-U1-RNP-positive patients, 178 patients with DM, 135 patients with IMNM, and 132 patients with AS were included. Anti-U1-RNP-positive patients were younger (∼37 years) and more likely to be black (60%) than patients with AS, DM, or IMNM. Muscle weakness was a presenting feature in 15% of anti-U1-RNP-positive patients; 80% eventually developed weakness. Four of 7 anti-U1-RNP-positive patients had necrotizing muscle biopsies. Arthritis occurred in 60% of anti-U1-RNP-positive patients; this was increased compared to DM (18%) or IMNM (6%) (all
< 0.01). DM-specific skin features developed in 60% of anti-U1-RNP-positive patients. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurred in 45% of anti-U1-RNP-positive patients; fewer patients with DM (13%) and IMNM (6%) and more patients with AS (80%) developed ILD (all
< 0.01). Glomerulonephritis and pericarditis occurred in 25% and 40% of anti-U1-RNP-positive patients, respectively, but rarely in the other groups; these features occurred only in those with coexisting anti-Ro52 autoantibodies. No anti-U1-RNP patient had cancer-associated myositis or died during the study period.
Patients with anti-U1-RNP myositis typically present with proximal weakness and necrotizing muscle biopsies. Arthritis, dermatitis, and ILD are the most common extramuscular clinical features. Pericarditis and glomerulonephritis are uniquely found in patients with anti-U1-RNP-positive myositis.
•Oral steroid-sparing agents can be stopped at initiation of rituximab therapy in MG.•Rituximab is an effective treatment across different myasthenia gravis serotypes.•Daily prednisone dosage is ...significantly decreased after rituximab dosing.
Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds CD20 and causes the depletion of B-cell subsets. Although initially designed to treat lymphoma, it has found wide use in the management of various autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis (MG), an autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction. Treated myasthenia patients are often on an oral steroid-sparing agent. To determine the safety of stopping oral steroid-sparing agents at the initiation of rituximab therapy and its effectiveness we reviewed the records of 27 MG patients with rituximab, including 13 with anti-MuSK+ MG, 10 with anti-AChR+ MG, and 4 double seronegative MG patients. All patients that were on an oral steroid-sparing agent (21 of 27) were able to stop it, and they did not require re-introduction of the medication. Also, the daily prednisone dosage was significantly decreased in 20/24 patients across all three serotype groups. MGFA post intervention status analysis also showed 15/27 of all patients achieved minimal manifestation status or remission across all groups. Antibody titers decreased dramatically and promptly in anti-MuSK+ MG patients. Our data suggests that stopping oral steroid-sparing agents at initiation of rituximab therapy is safe. Also, our data indicates that rituximab is highly effective in the management of seropositive MG patients.
The subsarcolemmal accumulation of p62 aggregates in myofibres has been proposed to be characteristic of sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM). The objective of this study was to analyse the ...patterns and prevalence of p62 immunostaining and to quantitate p62 gene expression in muscle biopsies from a large number of patients with different types of myopathic and neurogenic disorders.
For the p62 immunostaining analysis, all patients with a muscle biopsy immunostained for p62 at the Johns Hopkins Neuromuscular Pathology Laboratory from 2013 to 2017 were included (n=303). The prevalence and pattern of p62 immunostaining were compared between patients with histologically normal muscle (n=29), inflammatory myopathies (n=136), non-inflammatory myopathies (n=53), and neurogenic disorders (n=85). p62 expression levels were analysed using an existing RNAseq dataset including data from dermatomyositis (DM; n=39), immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM; n=49), antisynthetase syndrome (AS; n=18), and sIBM (n=23) patients as well as 20 histologically normal muscle biopsies.
p62 staining was absent in normal biopsies, but present in biopsies from those with polymyositis (29%), non-inflammatory myopathies (all <31%), neurogenic disorders (31%), dermatomyositis (57%), sIBM (92%) and IMNM (87%). In all diseases studied, p62 accumulation was more prevalent in biopsies with more severe muscle damage. sIBM biopsies had decreased p62 expression levels compared to the other groups (corrected p<0.04).
p62 accumulation is a general response to muscle injury and not a specific marker for sIBM. Also, in sIBM, p62 RNA levels are decreased, suggesting that, in this disease, p62 aggregation is not due to overexpression.
Objective
To determine if a unique subtype of scleroderma muscle disease exists by comparing the clinical features of systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) patients with predominant fibrosis on ...muscle biopsy to those with inflammatory muscle histopathology.
Methods
This retrospective, cross‐sectional study included SSc patients with muscle weakness and an available muscle biopsy. Biopsies with fibrosis but without inflammation/necrosis were designated as “fibrosing myopathy,” and those with inflammation and/or necrosis were assigned a category of “inflammatory myopathy.” Clinical data, including features of SSc, serum creatine kinase (CK) levels, electromyography, autoantibody profile, and survival, were compared between the 2 groups.
Results
The study population consisted of 37 weak SSc patients, 8 with fibrosing myopathy and 29 with inflammatory myopathy. Compared to those with inflammatory myopathy, patients with fibrosing myopathy were more likely to have diffuse SSc skin subtype (87% versus 62%; P = 0.18), African American race (62.5% versus 37.9%; P = 0.20), and a lower mean ± SD forced vital capacity (55.5 ± 31.9 versus 66.4 ± 17.6; P = 0.23). They also had lower mean ± SD CK values (516 ± 391 versus 2,477 ± 3,511 IU/liter; P = 0.007) and lower aldolase values (13.8 ± 4.7 versus 27.3 ± 4.7; P = 0.01). Patients with fibrosing myopathy had a significantly higher mortality (5 of 8 62.5% versus 4 of 29 14.3%; P = 0.005).
Conclusion
Fibrosing myopathy is a unique histologic subtype of muscle disease among weak patients with SSc and is associated with significantly worse mortality compared to those with inflammation and/or necrosis on muscle biopsy.
PDF
