Fungal nomenclature changes have been a regular occurrence in recent years, eliciting heated debate on whether such changes will confuse clinicians and harm patients. We conducted surveys of ...Australasian laboratory staff and clinicians to assess attitudes, practices, and concerns regarding nomenclatural change. The majority of respondents to both surveys were aware of fungal nomenclatural changes (93.5% laboratories, 79.7% clinicians); 72.8% of laboratories had already implemented nomenclature changes, and 68.7% of clinicians recalled receiving at least one laboratory report utilizing updated fungal nomenclature. The vast majority of clinicians (94%) both within and outside of infection specialties supported laboratories reporting updated species names with inclusion of the previous species name. The importance of including the previous name on reports was demonstrated by 73.3% of clinicians viewing "
(formerly Candida glabrata)" as clinically significant, versus only 38.2% viewing "
" as significant in the absence of its former name. When asked about reporting practices, 73.9% of laboratories would report a Candida krusei isolate as "
(formerly Candida krusei)," with the rest reporting as "Candida krusei
(21.7%) or "
(1.1%) without further explanation. Laboratory concerns included clinicians being confused by reports, commonly used identification platforms continuing to use superseded species names, education of staff, and delays in updating species codes in laboratory information systems. Adopting fungal name changes appears to be well supported by laboratories and clinicians in Australia and New Zealand, and can be achieved safely and unambiguously provided the former name is included on reports.
Recent changes in fungal species names have been contentious, eliciting heated debate on social media. Despite available recommendations on adapting to the changes, concerns include clinicians dismissing pathogens as contaminants with patient harm as a result, and disruption of the literature. Such concerns are understandable, but are not supported by evidence and may represent a vocal minority. This survey of Australasian laboratories and clinicians assesses attitudes and practices relating to changes in fungal nomenclature and found that there is overwhelming support for adopting nomenclature changes.
Legionnaires' disease is under-diagnosed because of inconsistent use of diagnostic tests and uncertainty about whom to test. We assessed the increase in case detection following large-scale ...introduction of routine PCR testing of respiratory specimens in New Zealand.
LegiNZ was a national surveillance study done over 1-year in which active case-finding was used to maximise the identification of cases of Legionnaires' disease in hospitals. Respiratory specimens from patients of any age with pneumonia, who could provide an eligible lower respiratory specimen, admitted to one of 20 participating hospitals, covering a catchment area of 96% of New Zealand's population, were routinely tested for legionella by PCR. Additional cases of Legionnaires' disease in hospital were identified through mandatory notification.
Between May 21, 2015, and May 20, 2016, 5622 eligible specimens from 4862 patients were tested by PCR. From these, 197 cases of Legionnaires' disease were detected. An additional 41 cases were identified from notification data, giving 238 cases requiring hospitalisation. The overall incidence of Legionnaires' disease cases in hospital in the study area was 5·4 per 100 000 people per year, and Legionella longbeachae was the predominant cause, found in 150 (63%) of 238 cases.
The rate of notified disease during the study period was three-times the average over the preceding 3 years. Active case-finding through systematic PCR testing better clarified the regional epidemiology of Legionnaires' disease and uncovered an otherwise hidden burden of disease. These data inform local Legionnaires' disease testing strategies, allow targeted antibiotic therapy, and help identify outbreaks and effective prevention strategies. The same approach might have similar benefits if applied elsewhere in the world.
Health Research Council of New Zealand.
Blood cultures (BC) are the gold standard investigation for bloodstream infection. Standards exist for BC quality assurance, but key quality indicators are seldom measured. The Royal College of ...Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) Key Incident Monitoring and Management Systems (KIMMS) invited laboratories for the first time to participate in an audit to determine adult BC positivity rates, contamination rates, sample fill volumes and the proportion received as a single set. The overall aim of the KIMMS audit was to provide laboratories with a mechanism for peer review and benchmarking. Results from 45 laboratories were analysed. The majority of laboratories (n=28, 62%) reported a positivity rate outside the recommended range of 8–15%. Contamination rates ranged from zero (n=5) to 12.5%, with seven laboratories (15%) reporting a contamination rate greater than the recommended 3%. Fifteen laboratories (33%) reported an average fill volume of less than the recommended 8–10 mL per bottle, with 11 laboratories (24%) reporting fill volumes of 5 mL or less whilst 13 (28%) laboratories were not able to provide any fill volume data. Thirteen laboratories (29%) reported that 50% or more of BC were received as single set, and eight (17%) were not able to report this data. This audit highlights there are deficiencies in BC quality measures across laboratories. To support BC quality improvement efforts, RCPAQAP KIMMS will offer a yearly BC quality assurance audit to encourage laboratories to monitor their BC quality performance.
Abstract
Objectives
In 2016, The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) initiated the formation of a working group comprising medical microbiologists to establish guidelines to assist ...Australian laboratories to implement selective and cascade reporting of antimicrobials—the first guidelines of this type in the world.
Methods
A 2017 audit of antimicrobial reporting in Australian and New Zealand laboratories identified significant opportunities for improvement and standardization of selective reporting.
Results
The first draft of the RCPA Selective Reporting Guidelines was circulated to all RCPA Microbiology fellows for feedback in August 2018 and the first version was published in February 2019. Subsequently, version two of the guidelines has recently been published in Australia, and New Zealand adapted these guidelines for formulation of their own national guidelines to accommodate local needs.
Conclusions
Here we describe the processes, acceptance and challenges associated with the establishment of these guidelines and measurement of their impact.
•Real-time RT-PCR assays for measles wild-type and vaccine strain adapted for use on a high-throughput, random access, continuous loading molecular platform.
In 2019, Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) ...experienced its worst measles outbreak since 1997. Due to declining childhood vaccination rates since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, NZ is at serious risk of another major measles outbreak. Our laboratory provides diagnostic services to NZ's Southern region. In 2019 the Southern region experienced the greatest number of cases outside of Auckland and Northland, however we did not have a validated measles PCR assay in our laboratory.
We sought to develop reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for measles on the Hologic Panther Fusion® System by utilising its open access function.
Previously published real-time RT-PCR assays were modified and optimised to detect wild-type measles virus (LDT-Mea), and the vaccine strain of measles virus (LDT-MeaVacA), on the Hologic Panther Fusion® System. The assays were clinically validated.
The LDT-Mea assay has a limit of detection (LoD) of 0.1 CCID50, while the LDT-MeaVacA assay is less sensitive with a LoD of 1 CCID50. Using 27 samples, the clinical sensitivity and specificity was 100% for both assays. Other common respiratory viruses were found not to cross-react with either the LDT-Mea or LDT-MeaVacA assays.
We have successfully adapted and validated for diagnostic use on the Hologic Panther Fusion® System previously published assays to detect wild-type and vaccine strains of the measles virus. The implementation of measles testing on this system will greatly improve the turn-around time for measles testing, and better support the measles public health response, for our region.
Blood cultures (BC) are the gold standard investigation for bloodstream infection. Standards exist for BC quality assurance, but key quality indicators are seldom measured. The Royal College of ...Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) Key Incidence Monitoring and Management Systems (KIMMS) invited laboratories for the first time to participate in an audit to determine adult BC positivity rates, contamination rates, sample fill volumes and the proportion received as a single set. The overall aim of the KIMMS audit was to provide laboratories with a mechanism for peer review and benchmarking. Results from 45 laboratories were analysed. The majority of laboratories (n=28, 62%) reported a positivity rate outside the recommended range of 8-15%. Contamination rates ranged from zero (n=5) to 12.5%, with seven laboratories (15%) reporting a contamination rate greater than the recommended 3%. Fifteen laboratories (33%) reported an average fill volume of less than the recommended 8-10 mL per bottle, with 11 laboratories (24%) reporting fill volumes of 5 mL or less whilst 13 (28%) laboratories were not able to provide any fill volume data. Thirteen laboratories (29%) reported that 50% or more of BC were received as single set, and eight (17%) were not able to report this data. This audit highlights there are deficiencies in BC quality measures across laboratories. To support BC quality improvement efforts, RCPAQAP KIMMS will offer a yearly BC quality assurance audit to encourage laboratories to monitor their BC quality performance.
PDF
