Misfolded alpha-synuclein (αSyn) aggregates are a hallmark event in Parkinson's disease (PD) and other synucleinopathies. Recently, αSyn seed amplification assays (αSyn-SAAs) have shown promise as a ...test for biochemical diagnosis of synucleinopathies. αSyn-SAAs use the intrinsic self-replicative nature of misfolded αSyn aggregates (seeds) to multiply them in vitro. In these assays, αSyn seeds circulating in biological fluids are amplified by a cyclical process that includes aggregate fragmentation into smaller self-propagating seeds, followed by elongation at the expense of recombinant αSyn (rec-αSyn). Amplification of the seeds allows detection by fluorescent dyes specific for amyloids, such as thioflavin T. Several αSyn-SAA reports have been published in the past under the names 'protein misfolding cyclic amplification' (αSyn-PMCA) and 'real-time quaking-induced conversion'. Here, we describe a protocol for αSyn-SAA, originally reported as αSyn-PMCA, which allows detection of αSyn aggregates in cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients affected by PD, dementia with Lewy bodies or multiple-system atrophy (MSA). Moreover, this αSyn-SAA can differentiate αSyn aggregates from patients with PD versus those from patients with MSA, even in retrospective samples from patients with pure autonomic failure who later developed PD or MSA. We also describe modifications to the original protocol introduced to develop an optimized version of the assay. The optimized version shortens the assay length, decreases the amount of rec-αSyn required and reduces the number of inconclusive results. The protocol has a hands-on time of ~2 h per 96-well plate and can be performed by personnel trained to perform basic experiments with specimens of human origin.
Emerging evidence shows that α-synuclein seed amplification assays (SAAs) have the potential to differentiate people with Parkinson's disease from healthy controls. We used the well characterised, ...multicentre Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort to further assess the diagnostic performance of the α-synuclein SAA and to examine whether the assay identifies heterogeneity among patients and enables the early identification of at-risk groups.
This cross-sectional analysis is based on assessments done at enrolment for PPMI participants (including people with sporadic Parkinson's disease from LRRK2 and GBA variants, healthy controls, prodromal individuals with either rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) or hyposmia, and non-manifesting carriers of LRRK2 and GBA variants) from 33 participating academic neurology outpatient practices worldwide (in Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, the UK, and the USA). α-synuclein SAA analysis of CSF was performed using previously described methods. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the α-synuclein SAA in participants with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls, including subgroups based on genetic and clinical features. We established the frequency of positive α-synuclein SAA results in prodromal participants (RBD and hyposmia) and non-manifesting carriers of genetic variants associated with Parkinson's disease, and compared α-synuclein SAA to clinical measures and other biomarkers. We used odds ratio estimates with 95% CIs to measure the association between α-synuclein SAA status and categorical measures, and two-sample 95% CIs from the resampling method to assess differences in medians between α-synuclein SAA positive and negative participants for continuous measures. A linear regression model was used to control for potential confounders such as age and sex.
This analysis included 1123 participants who were enrolled between July 7, 2010, and July 4, 2019. Of these, 545 had Parkinson's disease, 163 were healthy controls, 54 were participants with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit, 51 were prodromal participants, and 310 were non-manifesting carriers. Sensitivity for Parkinson's disease was 87·7% (95% CI 84·9–90·5), and specificity for healthy controls was 96·3% (93·4–99·2). The sensitivity of the α-synuclein SAA in sporadic Parkinson's disease with the typical olfactory deficit was 98·6% (96·4–99·4). The proportion of positive α-synuclein SAA was lower than this figure in subgroups including LRRK2 Parkinson's disease (67·5% 59·2–75·8) and participants with sporadic Parkinson's disease without olfactory deficit (78·3% 69·8–86·7). Participants with LRRK2 variant and normal olfaction had an even lower α-synuclein SAA positivity rate (34·7% 21·4–48·0). Among prodromal and at-risk groups, 44 (86%) of 51 of participants with RBD or hyposmia had positive α-synuclein SAA (16 of 18 with hyposmia, and 28 of 33 with RBD). 25 (8%) of 310 non-manifesting carriers (14 of 159 9% LRRK2 and 11 of 151 7% GBA) were positive.
This study represents the largest analysis so far of the α-synuclein SAA for the biochemical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Our results show that the assay classifies people with Parkinson's disease with high sensitivity and specificity, provides information about molecular heterogeneity, and detects prodromal individuals before diagnosis. These findings suggest a crucial role for the α-synuclein SAA in therapeutic development, both to identify pathologically defined subgroups of people with Parkinson's disease and to establish biomarker-defined at-risk cohorts.
PPMI is funded by the Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research and funding partners, including: Abbvie, AcureX, Aligning Science Across Parkinson's, Amathus Therapeutics, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Bial Biotech, Biohaven, Biogen, BioLegend, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calico Labs, Celgene, Cerevel, Coave, DaCapo Brainscience, 4D Pharma, Denali, Edmond J Safra Foundation, Eli Lilly, GE Healthcare, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Golub Capital, Insitro, Janssen Neuroscience, Lundbeck, Merck, Meso Scale Discovery, Neurocrine Biosciences, Prevail Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Servier, Takeda, Teva, UCB, VanquaBio, Verily, Voyager Therapeutics, and Yumanity.
Alpha-synuclein seed amplification assays (αSyn-SAAs) are promising diagnostic tools for Parkinson's disease (PD) and related synucleinopathies. They enable detection of seeding-competent ...alpha-synuclein aggregates in living patients and have shown high diagnostic accuracy in several PD and other synucleinopathy patient cohorts. However, there has been confusion about αSyn-SAAs for their methodology, nomenclature, and relative accuracies when performed by various laboratories. We compared αSyn-SAA results obtained from three independent laboratories to evaluate reproducibility across methodological variations. We utilized the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort, with DATSCAN data available for comparison, since clinical diagnosis of early de novo PD is critical for neuroprotective trials, which often use dopamine transporter imaging to enrich their cohorts. Blinded cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples for a randomly selected subset of PPMI subjects (30 PD, 30 HC, and 20 SWEDD), from both baseline and year 3 collections for the PD and HC groups (140 total CSF samples) were analyzed in parallel by each lab according to their own established and optimized αSyn-SAA protocols. The αSyn-SAA results were remarkably similar across laboratories, displaying high diagnostic performance (sensitivity ranging from 86 to 96% and specificity from 93 to 100%). The assays were also concordant for samples with results that differed from clinical diagnosis, including 2 PD patients determined to be clinically inconsistent with PD at later time points. All three assays also detected 2 SWEDD subjects as αSyn-SAA positive who later developed PD with abnormal DAT-SPECT. These multi-laboratory results confirm the reproducibility and value of αSyn-SAA as diagnostic tools, illustrate reproducibility of the assay in expert hands, and suggest that αSyn-SAA has potential to provide earlier diagnosis with comparable or superior accuracy to existing methods.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of α‐synuclein seed amplification assay (αSyn‐SAA) in antemortem and postmortem cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of ...autopsy‐confirmed patients with different distributions of pathological αSyn, co‐pathologies, and clinical diagnoses.
Methods
The αSyn‐SAA was used to test antemortem CSF samples from 119 subjects with a variety of clinical syndromes and standardized neuropathological examinations from Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) and University of California San Diego (UCSD; 56 additional postmortem CSF samples available). The αSyn‐SAA was also applied to frontal cortex and amygdala homogenates. Sensitivity and specificity were compared across distributions of αSyn pathology. Clinical data and co‐pathologies were compared across αSyn‐SAA positive and negative groups.
Results
Fifty‐three individuals without and 66 with αSyn‐pathology (neocortical n = 38, limbic n = 7, and amygdala‐predominant n = 21) were included. There was a sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 98.1% of the αSyn‐SAA to identify patients with limbic/neocortical pathology from antemortem CSF. Sensitivity to detect amygdala‐predominant pathology was only 14.3%. Postmortem CSF and brain tissue αSyn‐SAA analyses also showed higher assay positivity in samples from limbic/neocortical cases.
Interpretation
CSF αSyn‐SAA reliably identifies αSyn seeds in patients with diffuse αSyn pathology in the context of co‐pathology and non‐Lewy body disease (LBD) diagnoses. The analysis of brain homogenates suggests that pathological αSyn in the amygdala might differ from pathological αSyn in the frontal cortex. The αSyn‐SAA might facilitate the differential diagnosis of dementias with mixed pathologies. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:650–662
Aggregation of α-synuclein (α-syn) is a prominent feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) and other synucleinopathies. Currently, α-syn seed amplification assays (SAAs) using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ...represent the most promising diagnostic tools for synucleinopathies. However, CSF itself contains several compounds that can modulate the aggregation of α-syn in a patient-dependent manner, potentially undermining unoptimized α-syn SAAs and preventing seed quantification.
In this study, we characterized the inhibitory effect of CSF milieu on detection of α-syn aggregates by means of CSF fractionation, mass spectrometry, immunoassays, transmission electron microscopy, solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, a highly accurate and standardized diagnostic SAA, and different in vitro aggregation conditions to evaluate spontaneous aggregation of α-syn.
We found the high-molecular weight fraction of CSF (> 100,000 Da) to be highly inhibitory on α-syn aggregation and identified lipoproteins to be the main drivers of this effect. Direct interaction between lipoproteins and monomeric α-syn was not detected by solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, on the other hand we observed lipoprotein-α-syn complexes by transmission electron microscopy. These observations are compatible with hypothesizing an interaction between lipoproteins and oligomeric/proto-fibrillary α-syn intermediates. We observed significantly slower amplification of α-syn seeds in PD CSF when lipoproteins were added to the reaction mix of diagnostic SAA. Additionally, we observed a decreased inhibition capacity of CSF on α-syn aggregation after immunodepleting ApoA1 and ApoE. Finally, we observed that CSF ApoA1 and ApoE levels significantly correlated with SAA kinetic parameters in n = 31 SAA-negative control CSF samples spiked with preformed α-syn aggregates.
Our results describe a novel interaction between lipoproteins and α-syn aggregates that inhibits the formation of α-syn fibrils and could have relevant implications. Indeed, the donor-specific inhibition of CSF on α-syn aggregation explains the lack of quantitative results from analysis of SAA-derived kinetic parameters to date. Furthermore, our data show that lipoproteins are the main inhibitory components of CSF, suggesting that lipoprotein concentration measurements could be incorporated into data analysis models to eliminate the confounding effects of CSF milieu on α-syn quantification efforts.
Synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA) can be challenging to diagnose due to the symptom overlap with, for example, atypical parkinsonisms like ...progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Seed amplification assays (SAA), developed for the detection of α-synuclein (αSyn) aggregates in CSF, have been successful when used as a biomarker evaluation for synucleinopathies. In this study, we investigated the potential of this assay to not only detect αSyn seeds in CSF, but also discriminate between movement disorders.
The αSyn-SAA was tested in a Scandinavian cohort composed of 129 CSF samples from patients with PD (n = 55), MSA (n = 27), CBD (n = 7), and PSP (n = 16), as well as healthy controls (HC, n = 24).
The αSyn seed amplification assay (αSyn-SAA) was able to correctly identify all PD samples as positive (sensitivity of 100%) while also discriminating the PD group from HC (70.8% specificity, p < 0.0001) and tauopathies CBD (71% specificity) and PSP (75% specificity), p < 0.0001). The αSyn-SAA was also able to identify almost all MSA samples as positive for αSyn aggregation (sensitivity of 92.6%). In general, this assay is able to discriminate between the synucleinopathies and tauopathies analyzed herein (p < 0.0001) despite the overlapping symptoms in these diseases.
These findings suggest the αSyn-SAA is a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating between different parkinsonian disorders, although further optimization may be needed.
INTRODUCTION
Lewy body disease, a frequently observed co‐pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD), can be identified antemortem in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by α‐synuclein seed amplification assay ...(αS‐SAA). The prevalence and clinical impact of CSF αS‐SAA positivity in AD are still unknown.
METHODS
αS‐SAA was performed on CSF samples from 240 AD patients (preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages), 85 controls, 84 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), and 21 patients with PD with dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies. In AD patients, associations between αS‐SAA positivity and cognitive changes were also evaluated.
RESULTS
In agreement with available neuropathological studies, αS‐SAA positivity was observed in 30% of AD patients (vs 9% in controls), and was associated with cognitive decline, visuospatial impairment, and behavioral disturbances.
DISCUSSION
αS‐SAA positivity in AD patients reflects the prevalence observed in neuropathological series and is associated with a worse clinical outcome. These data confirm the validity of CSF αS‐SAA positivity as biomarker of synucleinopathy.
PDF
