Current guidelines for management of anorectal abscesses make no recommendations for operative vs bedside incision and drainage (I&D). The purpose of this study was to determine if management in the ...operating room is necessary to adequately drain anorectal abscesses and prevent short-term complications for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).
Patients with perirectal abscesses were identified and divided into two groups based on intervention type: "bedside" or "operative." Demographic, laboratory, and encounter data were obtained from the medical record. Study outcomes included 30-day complications (return to the ED, reintervention, and readmission). Data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses using SPSS (version 28).
A total of 113 patients with anorectal abscesses were identified. Sixty-six (58%) underwent bedside I&D and 47 (42%) operative I&D. The overall complication rate was 10%. A total of 9 patients (6 bedside and 3 operative) returned to the ED. Six of these patients required reintervention (5 bedside and 1 operative), and 1 was readmitted. Two patients from the bedside group required a second I&D during their index admission. Pre-procedure SIRS (
= .02) was found to be associated with 30-day complications. Provider specialty and training level were not associated with 30-day complications.
In this study, for patients presenting to the ED, bedside drainage was found to be an adequate management strategy to achieve complete drainage without a significant increase in the rate of complications when compared to operative drainage.
...with the rapid growth of social media, news has shifted toward platforms such as Twitter (now known as X), Facebook, Instagram, or Tik Tok, with 61% of Americans using these as their regular news ...source.2 Twitter particularly has become a source of real-time information, increasingly utilized by first responders and bystanders in mass shootings.3 Beyond breaking news and serving as a platform for discourse, Twitter may help expand upon existing data sources for firearm violence research, including improved reporting of marginalized populations of firearm victims, which have traditionally received less mainstream media attention.4 In turn, this may have ramifications for how firearm violence is researched, and education/prevention efforts are conducted. Interestingly, the COVID-19 pandemic's narrative, particularly regarding vaccination efforts and lockdown measures, serves as a cautionary tale of the risks associated with the ease of news dissemination on social media.8 The speed at which information is uploaded and shared via social media can reach a high volume of users, leading to news and information overload for the general public and inhibiting quality control historically seen with traditional news outlets.8,9 This is an important constraint that should be noted with increased adoption of social media as a reporting source of firearm violence. ...research is needed to ascertain whether social media is specifically helping to report firearm violence more accurately within marginalized populations, thereby addressing existing inequities.
The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted the collective American psyche. Socioeconomic hardships including social isolation led to an increase in firearm sales. Previous regional studies ...demonstrated increased penetrating trauma during the pandemic but it is unclear if trauma systems were prepared for this influx of penetrating injuries. This study aimed to confirm this increased penetrating trauma trend nationally and hypothesized penetrating trauma patients treated during the pandemic had a higher risk of complications and death, compared to pre-pandemic patients.
The 2017–2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was divided into pre-pandemic (2017–2019) and pandemic years (2020). Bivariate analyses and a multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed controlling for age, comorbidities, injuries, and vitals on arrival.
From 3,525,132 patients, 936,890 (26.6 %) presented during the pandemic. The pandemic patients had a higher rate of stab-wounds (4.8 % vs. 4.5 %, p > 0.001) and gunshot wounds (5.8 % vs. 4.6 %, p < 0.001) compared to pre-pandemic patients. Among penetrating trauma patients, the rate and associated risk of in-hospital complications (5.0 % vs. 5.1 %, p = 0.38) (OR 0.98, CI 0.94–1.02, p = 0.26) was similar between pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts but adjusted risk of mortality decreased during the pandemic (8.3 % vs. 8.3 %, p = 0.45) (OR 0.92, CI 0.89–0.96, p < 0.001).
This national analysis confirms an increased rate of penetrating trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a higher rate of gunshot injuries. However, this did not result in an increased risk of death or complications suggesting that trauma systems across the country were prepared to handle a dual pandemic of COVID and firearm violence.
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) encompasses a spectrum of disability including early cognitive impairment (ECI). The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) suggest mTBI patients can be safely discharged ...from the Emergency Department. Although half of mTBI patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) have evidence of ECI, it is unclear what percentage of these patients' ECI persists after discharge. We hypothesize a significant proportion of trauma patients with mTBI and ECI at presentation have persistent ECI at 30-day follow-up.
A single-center prospective cohort study including adult trauma patients with ICH or skull fracture plus a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 13-15 on arrival was performed. Participants were screened for ECI using the Rancho Los Amigos Scale (RLA), and ECI was defined as a RLA < 8. We compared ECI and non-ECI groups for demographics, injury profile, computed tomography (CT) imaging (e.g., Rotterdam CT score) and outcomes with bivariate analysis. 30-day follow up phone calls were performed to re-evaluate RLA for persistent ECI and concussion symptoms.
From 62 patients with ICH or skull fracture and mTBI, 21 (33.9%) had ECI. Patients with ECI had a higher incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (85.7% versus 46.3%, p=0.003) and higher Rotterdam CT score (p=0.004) compared to those without ECI. On 30-day follow up, 6 of 21 patients (26.6%) had persistent ECI. In addition, 7 (33.3%) patients had continued concussion symptoms.
Over one-third of mTBI patients with ICH had ECI. At 30-day post-discharge follow-up over one-fourth of these patients had persistent ECI and 33% had concussion symptoms. This highlights the importance of identifying ECI prior to discharge as a significant portion may have ongoing difficulties reintegrating into work and society.
Introduction
Massive transfusion protocol (MTP) is often defined as the transfusion of ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) in 24 hours. The purpose of this study is to determine which factors ...most significantly contribute to mortality in patients receiving MTP after trauma.
Methods
An initial database search followed by retrospective chart review was performed on patients treated at four trauma centers in Southern California. Data were collected on all patients who received MTP, defined as at least 10 units PRBCs within the first 24 hours of admission, between January 2015 and December 2019. Patients with isolated head injuries were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine which factors most significantly influenced mortality.
Results
Of 1278 patients who met our inclusion criteria in the database, 596 (46.6%) survived and 682 (53.4%) died. On univariate analysis initial vitals and labs, except for initial hemoglobin and initial platelet count were significant predictors of mortality. A multivariate regression model showed the strongest predictors of mortality were pRBC transfusions at 4 hours (OR 1.073, CI 1.020-1.128, P = .006) and 24 hours (OR 1.045, CI 1.003-1.088, P = .036), and FFP transfusion at 24 hours (OR 1.049, CI 1.016-1.084, P = .003).
Conclusion
Our data indicates that several factors may contribute to mortality in patients receiving MTP. In particular age, mechanism, initial GCS, and PRBC transfusions at 4 and 24 hours provided the strongest correlation. Further multicenter trials are indicated to provide further guidance in deciding when to discontinue massive transfusion.
The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into the general surgery residency recruitment process holds great promise for overcoming limitations inherent to traditional application review ...methods. This study assesses the consistency of AI, particularly ChatGPT, in evaluating medical student performance evaluation (MSPE) letters in comparison to experienced human reviewers. While the results suggest that ChatGPT demonstrates greater consistency in grading than human reviewers, AI still has its limitations. This underscores the necessity for careful refinement and consideration in its implementation. While AI presents opportunities to enhance residency selection procedures, further research is imperative to fully grasp its capabilities and implications.
•We were able to create a successful grading rubric that ChatGPT was able to interpret.•ChatGPT graded MSPEs with less variation in day to day scores compared to human reviewers.•With proper programming and fine-tuning, AI may be a consistent and reliable grading mechanism.
Current guidelines recommend 24-hour telemetry monitoring for isolated sternal fractures (ISFs) with electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities or troponin elevation. However, a single-center study ...suggested ISF patients with minor ECG abnormalities (sinus tachycardia/bradycardia, nonspecific arrhythmia/ST-changes, and bundle branch block) may not require 24-hour telemetry monitoring. This study sought to corroborate this, hypothesizing ISF patients would not develop blunt cardiac injury (BCI).BACKGROUNDCurrent guidelines recommend 24-hour telemetry monitoring for isolated sternal fractures (ISFs) with electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities or troponin elevation. However, a single-center study suggested ISF patients with minor ECG abnormalities (sinus tachycardia/bradycardia, nonspecific arrhythmia/ST-changes, and bundle branch block) may not require 24-hour telemetry monitoring. This study sought to corroborate this, hypothesizing ISF patients would not develop blunt cardiac injury (BCI).A retrospective study was performed at 8 trauma centers (1/2018-8/2020). Patients with ISF (abbreviated injury scale <2 for the head/neck/face/abdomen/extremities) and minor ECG abnormalities or troponin elevations were included. Patients with multiple rib fractures or hemothorax/pneumothorax were excluded. The primary outcome was an echocardiogram confirmed BCI. The secondary outcome was significant BCI defined as cardiogenic shock, dysrhythmia requiring treatment, post-traumatic cardiac structural defects, unexplained hypotension, or cardiac-related procedures. Descriptive statistics were performed.MATERIALS & METHODSA retrospective study was performed at 8 trauma centers (1/2018-8/2020). Patients with ISF (abbreviated injury scale <2 for the head/neck/face/abdomen/extremities) and minor ECG abnormalities or troponin elevations were included. Patients with multiple rib fractures or hemothorax/pneumothorax were excluded. The primary outcome was an echocardiogram confirmed BCI. The secondary outcome was significant BCI defined as cardiogenic shock, dysrhythmia requiring treatment, post-traumatic cardiac structural defects, unexplained hypotension, or cardiac-related procedures. Descriptive statistics were performed.Of 124 ISF patients with minor ECG abnormalities or troponin elevation, 90% were admitted with a mean stay of 35 hours. Echocardiogram was performed for 31.5% of patients, 10 (25.6%) of which had abnormalities. However, no patient had BCI diagnosed on echocardiography. In total, 2 patients (1.6%) had a significant BCI (atrial fibrillation and supraventricular tachycardia at 10 and 82 hours after injury). No patient died.RESULTSOf 124 ISF patients with minor ECG abnormalities or troponin elevation, 90% were admitted with a mean stay of 35 hours. Echocardiogram was performed for 31.5% of patients, 10 (25.6%) of which had abnormalities. However, no patient had BCI diagnosed on echocardiography. In total, 2 patients (1.6%) had a significant BCI (atrial fibrillation and supraventricular tachycardia at 10 and 82 hours after injury). No patient died.Following ISF with minor ECG changes or troponin elevation, <2% suffered significant BCI, and none had an echocardiogram diagnosed BCI, despite >30% receiving echocardiogram. These findings challenge the dogma of mandatory observation periods following ISF with associated ECG abnormalities and support the lack of utility for routine echocardiography in these patients.CONCLUSIONSFollowing ISF with minor ECG changes or troponin elevation, <2% suffered significant BCI, and none had an echocardiogram diagnosed BCI, despite >30% receiving echocardiogram. These findings challenge the dogma of mandatory observation periods following ISF with associated ECG abnormalities and support the lack of utility for routine echocardiography in these patients.
