Background: Surgical or medical castration and antiestrogenic treatment with tamoxifen are common endocrine treatments for premenopausal women with breast cancer. However, tamoxifen therapy induces ...high levels of plasma estradiol, with unknown long-term effects. In this study, we investigated the effect of combining estrogen suppression with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist buserelin and estradiol receptor blockade with tamoxifen to determine whether the high estradiol levels induced by tamoxifen could be reduced and whether the antitumor effects would be better. Methods: In a three-arm, randomized, prospective trial, from 1988 through 1995, a total of 161 premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with buserelin, tamoxifen, or both. Patients with steroid receptor-negative tumors or with tumors of unknown receptor status who had a disease-free interval of less than 2 years were excluded. The median follow-up was 7.3 years, during which 76% of the patients died, all of breast cancer. Patient and tumor characteristics were well balanced among treatment groups. All P values are from two-sided tests. Results: Combined treatment with buserelin and tamoxifen was superior to treatment with buserelin or tamoxifen alone by objective response rate (48%, 34%, and 28% of patients who could be evaluated, respectively; P = .11 χ2 test), median progression-free survival (9.7 months, 6.3 months, and 5.6 months; P = .03), and overall survival (3.7 years, 2.5 years, and 2.9 years; P = .01). Actuarial 5-year survival percentages were 34.2% (95% confidence interval CI = 20.4%–48.0%), 14.9% (95% CI = 3.9%–25.9%), and 18.4% (95% CI = 7.0%–29.8%), respectively. No differences in antitumor effects were observed between single-agent treatment groups. During combined treatment or treatment with buserelin alone, plasma estradiol levels were suppressed equally; in contrast, during treatment with tamoxifen alone, plasma estradiol levels increased threefold to fourfold over pretreatment levels. Conclusion: Combined treatment with buserelin and tamoxifen was more effective and resulted in longer overall survival than treatment with either drug alone.
Background
Patient prognosis and response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer correlate with protein expression of both estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), with poorer outcome in ...patients with ER+/PR− compared to ER+/PR+ tumors.
Methods
To better understand the underlying biology of ER+/PR− tumors, we examined RNA expression (n > 1000 tumors) and DNA copy number profiles from five previously published studies of human breast cancers with clinically assigned hormone receptor status (ER+/PR+, ER+/PR−, and ER−/PR−).
Results
We identified an expression “signature” of genes with either elevated or diminished RNA levels specifically in ER+/PR+ compared to ER−/PR− and ER+/PR− tumors. We similarly identified a gene signature specific to ER−/PR− tumors. ER+/PR− tumors, on the other hand, were a mixture of three different subtypes: tumors manifesting the ER+/PR+ signature, tumors manifesting the ER−/PR− signature, and tumors not associating with ER+/PR+ or ER−/PR− tumors (which we considered “true” ER+/PR−). In analyses of both tamoxifen-treated and untreated patients, ER+/PR− breast cancers defined by RNA profiling were associated with poor patient outcome, worse than those with pure ER+/PR+ patterns; these differences were not observed when using clinical assays to assign ER and PR status. ER+/PR− tumors also showed twice as many DNA copy number gains or losses compared to ER+/PR+ and ER−PR− tumors. Targets of transcriptional up-regulation by specific oncogenic pathways, including PI3 K/Akt/mTOR, were enriched in both ER+/PR− and ER−/PR− compared to ER+/PR+ tumors.
Conclusion
ER+/PR− tumors as defined by RNA profiling represent a distinct subset of breast cancer with aggressive features and poor outcome, despite being clinically ER+. Multigene assays derived from our gene signatures could conceivably provide an improved clinical assay for inferring PR status for prognostic and therapeutic purposes.
To evaluate the prognostic value of cyclin E with a quantitative method for lymph node-negative primary breast cancer patients.
mRNA transcripts of full-length and splice variants of cyclin E1 ...(CCNE1) and cyclin E2 (CCNE2) were measured by real-time PCR in frozen tumor samples from 635 lymph node-negative breast cancer patients who had not received neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy.
None of the PCR assays designed for the specific splice variants of the cyclins gave additional prognosis-related information compared with the common assays able to detect all variants. In Cox multivariate analysis, corrected for the traditional prognostic factors, high levels of cyclin E were independently associated with a short distant metastasis-free survival hazard ratio (HR), 3.40; P < 0.001 for CCNE1 and HR, 1.76; P < 0.001 for CCNE2, respectively. After dichotomizing the tumors at the median level of 70% tumor cells, the multivariate analysis showed particularly strong results for CCNE1 in the group of 433 patients with stroma-enriched primary tumors (HR, 5.12; P < 0.001). In these tumors, the worst prognosis was found for patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors expressing high CCNE1 (HR, 9.89; P < 0.001) and for patients with small (T1) tumors expressing high CCNE1 (HR, 8.47; P < 0.001).
Our study shows that both CCNE1 and CCNE2 qualify as independent prognostic markers for lymph node-negative breast cancer patients, and that CCNE1 may provide additional information for specific subgroups of patients.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the extent of protection offered against breast cancer by prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and to determine to what extent ...risk reduction varies with age at oophorectomy, age at diagnosis, and time elapsed since surgery.
We analyzed 1,439 patients with breast cancer and 1,866 matched controls derived from a registry of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) of breast cancer for having had a bilateral oophorectomy, using conditional logistic regression, matched for parity and for oral contraceptive use.
A previous history of oophorectomy was associated with a significant reduction in breast cancer risk of 56% for BRCA1 carriers (OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.66) and of 46% for BRCA2 carriers (OR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.15). The risk reduction was greater if the oophorectomy was performed before age 40 (OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.64 for BRCA1 carriers) than after age 40 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.91). The protective effect was evident for 15 years post-oophorectomy (OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.57).
Oophorectomy is an effective means of reducing the risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 mutations. The data suggest oophorectomy is protective in BRCA2 carriers as well, but needs to be confirmed in other studies.
In the present study, we investigated the association between tumor tissue levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) and prognosis in patients with primary breast cancer and analyzed ...whether TIMP-1 may be useful as a prognostic marker in combination with urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1).
In cytosolic extracts of 2984 primary breast tumors, total levels of TIMP-1 were determined using an established, validated ELISA. Levels of uPA and PAI-1 have previously been determined in the extracts.
Univariate survival analysis showed a significant relationship between higher levels of TIMP-1 (continuous log-transformed variable) and poor prognosis recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS); P < 0.001. Performing isotonic regression analysis, we identified a cut point to classify tumors as TIMP-1-low or TIMP-1-high. Using this cut point, high levels of TIMP-1 were significantly associated with shorter survival in univariate analysis, both in the total patient group (RFS, OS; P < 0.001), in the node-negative subgroup (RFS, hazard ratio = 1.28, P = 0.006), and in the node-positive subgroup (RFS, hazard ratio = 1.43, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, including uPA and PAI-1, TIMP-1 was significantly associated with shorter RFS, both when included as a continuous log-transformed (P = 0.03) and as a dichotomized variable (P = 0.002).
This study validates previous findings that tumor tissue levels of TIMP-1 are associated with prognosis in patients with primary breast cancer. It confirms that TIMP-1 may be useful as a prognostic marker in combination with uPA/PAI-1 and adds substantial positive information on the use of TIMP-1 as a prognostic marker in breast cancer.
Low-risk breast cancer susceptibility alleles or SNPs confer only modest breast cancer risks ranging from just over 1.0 to 1.3 fold. Yet, they are common among most populations and therefore are ...involved in the development of essentially all breast cancers. The mechanism by which the low-risk SNPs confer breast cancer risks is currently unclear. The breast cancer association consortium BCAC has hypothesized that the low-risk SNPs modulate expression levels of nearby located genes.
Genotypes of five low-risk SNPs were determined for 40 human breast cancer cell lines, by direct sequencing of PCR-amplified genomic templates. We have analyzed expression of the four genes that are located nearby the low-risk SNPs, by using real-time RT-PCR and Human Exon microarrays.
The SNP genotypes and additional phenotypic data on the breast cancer cell lines are presented. We did not detect any effect of the SNP genotypes on expression levels of the nearby-located genes MAP3K1, FGFR2, TNRC9 and LSP1.
The SNP genotypes provide a base line for functional studies in a well-characterized cohort of 40 human breast cancer cell lines. Our expression analyses suggest that a putative disease mechanism through gene expression modulation is not operative in breast cancer cell lines.
To evaluate the predictive value of the disintegrin and metalloproteinases, ADAM-9, ADAM-10, ADAM-11, and ADAM-12, and of the matrix metalloproteinases, MMP-2 and MMP-9, in patients with recurrent ...breast cancer treated with tamoxifen.
A retrospective study was done on 259 frozen specimens of estrogen receptor-positive primary breast carcinomas from patients who developed recurrent disease and were treated with tamoxifen as the first line of therapy. The expression levels of the biological factors were assessed by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR.
Using log-transformed continuous variables, increasing levels of ADAM-9 odds ratio (OR) = 1.41; P = 0.015 and decreasing levels of MMP-9 (OR, 0.81; P = 0.035) predicted favorable disease control independent from the traditional predictive factors. Furthermore, when tumors were dichotomized at the median level of 70% tumor cell nuclei, our univariate analysis showed particularly strong results for the group of 153 patients with primary tumors containing 30% or more stromal cells. Although estrogen receptor levels lost their predictive power for this group of patients, high levels of ADAM-9 (OR, 1.59; P = 0.007) and ADAM-11 (OR, 1.65; P = 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher efficacy of tamoxifen therapy.
Our results show that especially for primary tumors containing stromal elements, the assessment of mRNA expression levels of ADAM-9 and ADAM-11 could be useful to identify patients with recurrent breast cancer who are likely to benefit or fail from tamoxifen therapy.
A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP309T>G) in the intronic promoter of MDM2 was recently found to accelerate carcinogenesis in early-onset cancer cases. This cancer acceleration presumably was due ...to increased SP1 binding, resulting in enhanced MDM2 transcriptional activation by estrogens. We evaluated MDM2 SNP309 in 343 familial breast cancer cases with known mutation status for CHEK2 1100delC, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer acceleration was indeed observed in early-onset familial breast cancer cases (diagnosed <or= 51 years), with 16% of cases carrying the MDM2 SNP309 GG genotype as compared to 4% of late-onset cases (P = 0.029). The cancer acceleration was even more pronounced in the non-mutant familial breast cancer cases, with 17% of early-onset cases carrying MDM2 SNP309 GG as compared to 2% of late-onset cases (n = 214; P = 0.015). There was no evidence for an influence of estrogen signaling in the cancer acceleration by MDM2 SNP309, as there were no differences in the prevalence of MDM2 SNP309 GG among CHEK2 1100delC and BRCA2 mutant cases (with 90% ER-positive cancers) or BRCA1 mutant cases (10% ER-positive cancers). Nor did we observe differences in MDM2 SNP309 frequencies among 75 familial breast cancer cases of our cohort with known ER status. Overall, our data suggest that MDM2 SNP309 accelerates familial breast carcinogenesis, but that this acceleration is not influenced by estrogen signaling.
PDF
