To evaluate the effects of repeated intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) (Ozurdex®) in eyes with macular edema (ME) due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).
We reviewed the charts of patients with ...RVO-related ME, who received repeated Ozurdex IDI (0.7 mg) on an 'as-needed' basis. Main outcome measures included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), retreatment interval, and incidence of side effects.
A total of 33 eyes were included for analysis. Retreatment with Ozurdex was judged necessary after 4.7 ± 1.1 months from the first IDI (1st IDI) and 5.1 ± 1.5 months from the second IDI (2nd IDI). Baseline BCVA was 0.65 ± 0.43 logMAR; it significantly improved to 0.50 ± 0.42 logMAR after 1.4 ± 0.7 months from the 1st IDI (peaking efficacy) (p < 0.001) and to 0.48 ± 0.44 logMAR after 1.8 ± 0.8 months from the 2nd IDI (peaking efficacy) (p < 0.001). CMT decreased from 636 ± 217 µm (baseline) to 300 ± 114 µm, 1.4 ± 0.7 months after the 1st IDI (p < 0.001), and to 298 ± 91 µm, 1.8 ± 0.8 months after the 2nd IDI (p < 0.001). A rebound effect was recorded in 7 eyes after the 1st IDI (mean 168 ± 158 µm) and in 4 eyes after the 2nd IDI (mean 215 ± 199 µm). All eyes with a rebound effect improved again after a 2nd intravitreal Ozurdex injection. No serious adverse events were observed; 12 eyes developed a transient IOP increase, and cataracts were extracted in 2 eyes.
Repeated intravitreal Ozurdex on an 'as-needed' basis, with a retreatment interval <6 months, may produce long-term clinically meaningful benefits in the treatment of ME due to RVO, without other significant side effects than expected after intraocular corticosteroid treatment.
Introduction
We aimed to evaluate the impact of foveal eversion on treatment response and persistent diabetic macular edema (DME).
Methods
The study was designed as interventional and prospective. ...DME eyes were treated with ranibizumab and/or dexamethasone (DEX) implants, or with fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implants. FAc-treated eyes were eventually retreated by additional ranibizumab injections. Main outcome measure was the relationship between foveal eversion and both clinical outcome and persistent DME.
Results
Sixty-eight DME eyes (68 patients) treated by anti-VEGF/DEX and 50 FAc-treated eyes (50 patients) were recruited. The follow-up was 16 ± 3 months. The anti-VEGF/DEX group and FAc-treated group were statistically matched for age, sex, DME duration and previous number of injections (
p
> 0.05). Both groups experienced statistically significant improvements of both BCVA and central macular thickness (
p
< 0.01) at the end of the follow-up. Persistent DME was shown by 46% of anti-VEGF/DEX eyes and 42% of FAc-treated eyes. Foveal eversion was found in 50% of anti-VEGF/DEX eyes and in 44% of FAc-treated eyes. Its presence was associated with worse anatomical and visual outcome and higher persistence of DME in both groups (
p
< 0.01) and with higher retreatment percentages in FAc-treated eyes (
p
< 0.01).
Conclusion
Foveal eversion is associated with worse clinical and morphological outcomes in DME.
To investigate the vasomotor responses and diameter of retinal vessels in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).
A total of 18 eyes of 18 RVO patients were ...consecutively included and compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Participants underwent an examination with optical coherence tomography and dynamic and static retinal vessel analyses using the Dynamic Vessel Analyzer.
Dynamic vessel analysis in RVO showed mean maximum venous and arterial dilation of 2.22 ± 1.23% and 1.87 ± 1.41%, respectively, as compared with 5.05 ± 2.75% (P = 0.001) and 3.95 ± 1.44% (P = 0.0004), respectively, in controls. Static retinal vessel analysis in RVO revealed a mean arteriovenous ratio (AVR) of 0.74 ± 0.09 versus 0.90 ± 0.04 (P < 0.0001) in controls. Mean AVRs of occluded and nonoccluded quadrants in RVO were 0.71 ± 0.13 and 0.85 ± 0.19, respectively; in the corresponding quadrants of controls, mean AVRs were 0.90 ± 0.19 (P < 0.0001) and 0.86 ± 0.17 (P = 0.89), respectively. In branch RVO patients, mean AVRs of occluded versus nonoccluded quadrants were 0.70 ± 0.06 and 0.90 ± 0.22 (P = 0.002), respectively.
In patients with macular edema secondary to RVO, dynamic vessel analysis showed an impairment of both venous and arterial motility and/or reactivity and static vessel analysis showed a reduced AVR indicating a general enlargement of the retinal venous network. Moreover, in branch RVO patients, static analysis demonstrated that retinal vessels could actually be uninvolved by the occlusive process in areas spared by disease.
To study retinal function in asymptomatic Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and no clinical signs of diabetic macular edema.
Thirty-six consecutive ...Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and no diabetic macular edema and 28 healthy controls underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry.
Seventy-one eyes (17 patients with Type 1 and 19 with Type 2 diabetes) were tested, and data from 36 (17 Type 1 and 19 Type 2) eyes were analyzed. Mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.00 ± 0.01 logMAR and 0.00 ± 0.02 logMAR for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.075). Mean central foveal thickness was 234.5 ± 13.7 μm and 256.3 ± 12.7 μm for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.04); the central foveal thickness was statistically different compared with the control groups (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). Mean retinal sensitivity was 18.9 ± 0.5 dB and 17.7 ± 0.4 dB for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively; it was statistically different compared with control groups (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively).
We demonstrated a significantly reduced sensitivity in both nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy groups without diabetic macular edema compared with healthy controls; this reduction was greater in Type 2 diabetic patients. Central foveal thickness was increased in all diabetic patients compared with healthy controls, despite the absence of diabetic macular edema.
The purpose of this study was to investigate a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO) ultra-widefield (UWF) swept-source optical coherence tomography (S-SOCT) in assessment of diabetic ...choroidopathy and to evaluate the agreement of measurements with a spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) instrument.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with diabetes evaluating the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) in the nasal, temporal, and central macula segments of a UWF SS-OCT scan centered to the fovea. UWF pseudocolored fundus images were used for diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity staging. The CVI values were compared between different degrees of severity of DR and different posterior-pole sectors with linear mixed models. Central macula CVI measurements were repeated on SD-OCT scans; the interobserver intraclass coefficient (ICC) was calculated between SS-OCT and SD-OCT.
A total of 151 eyes of 85 patients were included. The CVI values decreased from nonproliferative DR to proliferative DR, with high-risk proliferative DR having significantly lower CVI values than moderate to severe nonproliferative DR (P = 0.03). The central macula region was the most evidently affected; the nasal sector was the least affected. The agreement between SS-OCT and SD-OCT was moderate (ICC = 0.50).
Diabetic choroidopathy progresses with worsening of DR toward proliferative disease; choroidal depletion is more prominent in the macula. Caution is recommended in comparing CVI values between different devices.
Choroidal vascularity informs about the severity of DR and its complications, such as macular edema. The agreement between readers and between instruments may be suboptimal in certain cases.
Objectives to evaluate long-term effectiveness and safety of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant used as second-line treatment in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods ...retrospective data chart review of 241 pseudophakic eyes of 178 patients treated with FAc from July 2017 to December 2021 in 10 medical retinal units in Italy. The primary endpoint was the change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at 2 years. A Student's paired t-test was used. Additional therapies for DME and intraocular pressure (IOP)-related events were also evaluated. Results efficacy of FAc was assessed in a subset of 111 eyes with at least 24 months of follow-up. Mean BCVA increased at 2 years by 5.1 ETDRS letters (95%CI = 2.6–7.5; p < 0.001) while mean CMT decreased by 189 µm (95% CI 151–227; p < 0.001). Thirty-eight of these eyes (34.2%) needed additional intravitreal treatments, mainly anti-VEGF. Safety was evaluated on the entire cohort of 241 eyes treated with FAc. Overall, 66 eyes (27.4%) required emergent IOP-lowering medications (typically within the first-year post FAc) while 14 eyes (5.8%) underwent trabeculectomy, mostly during the second year of follow-up. Conclusion FAc implant provides a substantial long-term functional and anatomical benefit when used as second-line treatment in eyes with DME. IOP rise can be adequately managed with topical agents although some eyes may require IOP-lowering surgery.
To evaluate the effects of a single injection of Ozurdex over 6 months in eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME).
In this retrospective interventional study, 9 patients with decreased ...visual acuity, as a result of persistent DME, received Ozurdex (intravitreal dexamethasone implant 0.7 mg). Main outcome measures included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT).
Nine eyes of 9 patients (5 males, 4 females; mean age 58 years) were included in the analysis. The mean duration of DME was 49.9 months (range 24-85). All patients had undergone previous treatments for DME (intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, steroids or laser photocoagulation) before entering the study. At baseline, the mean BCVA was 0.74 ± 0.33 logMAR, and the mean CRT was 502 ± 222.16 µm. The mean BCVA was unchanged on the third day (0.74 ± 0.38 logMAR, p = 0.5), improved to 0.62 ± 0.32 logMAR (p = 0.02), 0.59 ± 0.26 logMAR (p = 0.02) and 0.63 ± 0.38 logMAR (p = 0.6) after the first, third and fourth months, respectively, and decreased again to 0.73 ± 0.35 logMAR (p = 0.4) at 6 months. The mean CRT improved to 397 ± 115.31 µm (p = 0.17), 271 ± 99.97 µm (p = 0.007), 325 ± 133.05 µm (p = 0.03) and 462 ± 176.48 µm (p = 0.36) on the third day and after 1, 3 and 4 months of follow-up and then increased again to 537 ± 265.42 µm (p = 0.33) at 6 months. Eight patients needed retreatments in the sixth month. One eye developed a transient intraocular pressure (IOP) increase 1 month after injection, which was successfully managed with topical IOP-lowering medication.
In eyes with persistent DME, Ozurdex produces improvement in BCVA and CRT as soon as the first days after the injection. Such improvement is maintained until the fourth month.
To investigate the impact of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) on macular morphology and function in eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.
Twelve ...treatment-naive patients with decreased visual acuity because of central retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema were enrolled in this prospective uncontrolled study. Patients were treated with intravitreal Ozurdex and followed up at 1 month and 3 months for the evaluation of morphologic and functional outcomes, by means of best-corrected visual acuity, microperimetry, multifocal electroretinography, and customized high-resolution enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans.
Twelve eyes of 12 patients (10 men, 2 women; mean age 56.2 ± 13.0 years) were included for analysis. At 1 month, mean best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity (microperimetry), multifocal electroretinography parameters, central macular thickness, and specific neurosensorial retinal measurements improved significantly. We found a significant negative correlation between retinal sensitivity and central macular thickness at 1 month and 3 months (r = -0.831, P = 0.001; r = -0.881, P = 0.001; respectively). Moreover, retinal sensitivity was negatively related to both outer and inner retinal thickness in all four intervals from the fovea. From baseline to Month 1, change in outer retinal thickness was positively related to multifocal electroretinography N1R1 amplitude change (r = 0.698, P = 0.012), whereas change in central macular thickness was negatively related to multifocal electroretinography P1R1 amplitude change (r = -0.701, P = 0.011). At 3 months, improvement of mean retinal sensitivity and central macular thickness slightly decreased.
In eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion, intravitreal dexamethasone provides functional benefits that correlate well with ultrastructural macular changes.
To evaluate the effects of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants in patients affected by diabetic macular edema (DME) with high best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and contraindications to ...therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor over a 12-month follow-up.
In this interventional nonrandomized clinical study, 14 consecutive patients (14 eyes) affected by DME with a BCVA of 0.3 LogMAR or better were prospectively enrolled. All patients were treated with a sustained-release 700-μg DEX implant at baseline, revaluated every 6 weeks, and retreated on a pro re nata basis. Primary outcomes included changes in BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT). Secondary outcomes included number of implants, average period between injections, and incidence of side effects.
At the 12-month examination, a significant improvement in mean BCVA was noted compared to baseline (from 0.25 ± 0.05 to 0.10 ± 0.07 LogMAR; p < 0.001); CMT decreased from 484 ± 127 to 311 ± 51 μm (p < 0.001). No differences in BCVA and CMT improvements were found between treatment- naïve patients and previously treated patients (p = 0.768 and 0.119, respectively). The mean number of implants was 1.71 ± 0.61 (range, 1-3). The mean period between the first and the second implant was 6.1 ± 1.6 months.
The DEX implant on a pro re nata basis can be considered a beneficial approach for DME patients with high BCVA over a 12-month follow-up; functional and anatomical outcome of the patients significantly improved with few injections and a good safety profile.
Introduction
To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and secondary ERM.
...Methods
Retrospective, multicenter study including patients with RVO and ERM who underwent PPV and ERM peeling with or without phacoemulsification. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features were recorded at the time of ERM peeling (baseline). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were longitudinally collected up to 36 months after surgery. Clinical factors associated with BCVA and CMT and disappearance of macular edema during follow-up were investigated.
Results
Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients with a median follow-up of 18 months were included. The BCVA improved significantly after ERM peeling (baseline vs. 24 months,
p
= 0.01). Absence of the external liming membrane/ellipsoid zone on OCT was associated with worse visual outcomes (regression estimate 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.93 0.39–1.48 logMAR,
p
= 0.004). Eyes with disorganization of the inner retinal layers at baseline had higher CMT values at each visit (regression estimate 95% CI = 114.1 78.9–219.4 μm,
p
= 0.004). Older age at the time of RVO (
p
= 0.03) and branch RVO (
p
= 0.04) were risk factors for persistent macular edema after ERM removal.
Conclusion
PPV and ERM removal provided encouraging functional and morphological results in eyes with RVO, with disappearance of macular edema in most eyes. The integrity of the outer retina and preservation of inner retinal segmentation were associated with better visual and anatomical outcomes after ERM removal, respectively.
PDF
