While the negative prognostic role of BRAF V600E mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is well established, the impact of BRAF codons 594 and 596 mutations, occurring in <1% of CRCs, is ...completely unknown. The present work aims to describe clinical, pathological and molecular features and prognosis of BRAF codons 594 and 596 mutant mCRCs, compared with BRAF V600E mutant and wild-type ones.
Patients treated for mCRC at three Italian Institutions between October 2006 and October 2014, with available KRAS and NRAS codon 12, 13, 59, 61, 117 and 146 and BRAF codon 594, 596 and 600 mutational status, as detected by means of direct sequencing or matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight MassArray, were included.
Ten patients bearing BRAF codons 594 or 596 mutated tumors were identified and compared with 77 and 542 patients bearing BRAF V600E mutated and BRAF wild-type tumors, respectively. While BRAF V600E mutated tumors were more frequently right-sided, mucinous and with peritoneal spread, BRAF 594 or 596 mutated were more frequently rectal, nonmucinous and with no peritoneal spread. All BRAF 594 or 596 mutated tumors were microsatellite stable. Patients with BRAF codons 594 or 596 mutated tumors had markedly longer overall survival (OS) when compared with BRAF V600E mutated median OS: 62.0 versus 12.6 months; hazard ratio: 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.20–0.64), P = 0.002, both at univariate and multivariate analyses.
BRAF codon 594 or 596 mutated mCRCs are different from BRAF V600E ones in terms of molecular features, pathological characteristics and clinical outcome. This is consistent with preclinical evidences of a kinase inactivating effect of these mutations. The role of CRAF in transducing the intracellular signal downstream BRAF 594 or 596 mutated proteins opens the way to further preclinical investigation.
Despite major advances in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with liver-only involvement, relapse rates are high and reliable prognostic markers are needed.
To assess the ...prognostic impact of BRAF and RAS mutations in a large series of liver-resected patients, medical records of 3024 mCRC patients were reviewed. Eligible cases undergoing potentially curative liver resection were selected. BRAF and RAS mutational status was tested on primary and/or metastases by means of pyrosequencing and mass spectrometry genotyping assay. Primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS).
In the final study population (N=309) BRAF mutant, RAS mutant and all wild-type (wt) patients were 12(4%), 160(52%) and 137(44%), respectively. Median RFS was 5.7, 11.0 and 14.4 months respectively and differed significantly (Log-rank, P=0.043). At multivariate analyses, BRAF mutant had a higher risk of relapse in comparison to all wt (multivariate hazard ratio (HR)=2.31; 95% CI, 1.09-4.87; P=0.029) and to RAS mutant (multivariate HR=2.06; 95% CI, 1.02-4.14; P=0.044). Similar results were obtained in terms of overall survival. Compared with all wt patients, RAS mutant showed a higher risk of death (HR=1.47; 95% CI, 1.05-2.07; P=0.025), but such effect was lost at multivariate analyses.
BRAF mutation is associated with an extremely poor median RFS after liver resection and with higher probability of relapse and death. Knowledge of BRAF mutational status may optimise clinical decision making in mCRC patients potentially candidate to hepatic surgery. RAS status as useful marker in this setting might require further studies.
Abstract Background BRAF V600E mutation plays a negative prognostic role in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), leading to a median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of 4–6 months with first-line ...conventional treatments. Our group recently reported in a retrospective exploratory analysis of a phase II trial that FOLFOXIRI (5-FU/LV+Oxaliplatin+Irinotecan) plus bevacizumab might allow to achieve remarkable results in terms of PFS and Overall Survival (OS) also in this poor-prognosis subgroup. The aim of this work was to prospectively validate our retrospective finding. Patients and methods This phase II trial was designed to detect an increase in 6 month-Progression Free Rate (6 m-PFR) from 45% to 80% in a population of BRAF mutant mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab. Secondary end-points were PFS, OS, response rate (RR) and the analysis of outcome parameters in the pooled population consisting of both retrospectively and prospectively included patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01437618. Results Two-hundred-fourteen potentially eligible mCRC patients were screened for BRAF mutational status. Fifteen BRAF mutant patients (7%) were included in the validation cohort. At a median follow up of 25.7 months, 6 m-PFR was 73%. Median PFS and OS were 9.2 and 24.1 months, respectively. In the pooled population, at a median follow up of 40.4 months, 6 m-PFR was 84%. Median PFS and OS were 11.8 and 24.1 months, respectively. Overall RR and disease control rate were 72% and 88%, respectively. Conclusion Lacking randomised trials in this specific molecular subgroup, FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab might be a reasonable option for the first-line treatment of BRAF mutant mCRC patients.
KRAS codons 12 and 13 mutations predict resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) in metastatic colorectal cancer. Also, BRAF V600E mutation has been associated with resistance. ...Additional KRAS mutations are described in CRC.
We investigated the role of KRAS codons 61 and 146 and BRAF V600E mutations in predicting resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in a cohort of KRAS codons 12 and 13 wild-type patients.
Among 87 KRAS codons 12 and 13 wild-type patients, KRAS codons 61 and 146 were mutated in 7 and 1 case, respectively. None of mutated patients responded vs 22 of 68 wild type (P=0.096). Eleven patients were not evaluable. KRAS mutations were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS, HR: 0.46, P=0.028). None of 13 BRAF-mutated patients responded vs 24 of 74 BRAF wild type (P=0.016). BRAF mutation was associated with a trend towards shorter PFS (HR: 0.59, P=0.073). In the subgroup of BRAF wild-type patients, KRAS codons 61/146 mutations determined a lower response rate (0 vs 37%, P=0.047) and worse PFS (HR: 0.45, P=0.023). Patients bearing KRAS or BRAF mutations had poorer response rate (0 vs 37%, P=0.0005) and PFS (HR: 0.51, P=0.006) compared with KRAS and BRAF wild-type patients.
Assessing KRAS codons 61/146 and BRAF V600E mutations might help optimising the selection of the candidate patients to receive anti-EGFR moAbs.
The BEBYP trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III study evaluating the continuation or reintroduction of bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy in mCRC patients ...progressed to a first-line therapy containing bevacizumab. The primary end point was PFS. Despite some limitations, mainly due to the premature interruption, the study met its primary end point.
The combination of bevacizumab with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy is a standard first-line treatment option in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied the efficacy of continuing or reintroducing bevacizumab in combination with second-line chemotherapy after progression to bevacizumab-based first-line therapy.
In this phase III study, patients with mCRC treated with fluoropyrimidine-based first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were randomized to receive in second-line mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFIRI (depending on first-line regimen) with or without bevacizumab. The primary end point was progression-free survival. To detect a hazard ratio (HR) for progression of 0.70 with anα andβ error of 0.05 and 0.20, respectively, 262 patients were required.
In consideration of the results of the ML18147 trial, the study was prematurely stopped. Between April 2008 and May 2012, a total of 185 patients were randomized. Bevacizumab-free interval was longer than 3 months in 43% of patients in chemotherapy alone arm and in 50% of patients in the bevacizumab arm. At a median follow-up of 45.3 months, the median progression-free survival was 5.0 months in the chemotherapy group and 6.8 months in the bevacizumab group adjusted HR = 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52–0.95; stratified log-rankP = 0.010. Subgroup analyses showed a consistent benefit in all subgroups analyzed and in particular in patients who had continued or reintroduced bevacizumab. An improved overall survival was also observed in the bevacizumab arm (adjusted HR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.56–1.06; stratified log-rankP = 0.043). Responses (RECIST 1.0) were similar in the chemotherapy and bevacizumab groups (17% and 21%;P = 0.573). Toxicity profile was consistent with previously reported data.
This study demonstrates that the continuation or the reintroduction of bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy beyond first progression improves the outcome and supports the use of this strategy in the treatment of mCRC.
NCT00720512.
Right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have poor prognosis and achieve limited benefit from first-line doublets plus a targeted agent. In this unplanned analysis of the TRIBE study, ...we investigated the prognostic and predictive impact of primary tumor sidedness in mCRC patients and the differential impact of the intensification of the chemotherapy in subgroups defined according to both primary tumor sidedness and RAS and BRAF mutational status.
Patients were randomized to receive upfront 5-fluoruracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab or 5-fluoruracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab. Tumors were defined as right- or left-sided if they originated from the caecum to the transverse colon or within the splenic flexure and beyond, respectively. Patients with available information about both primary sidedness and RAS and BRAF status were included in the present analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and RECIST response rate were assessed according to tumor location and RAS and BRAF mutational status.
Information about primary sidedness and RAS and BRAF status was available for 358 (70.5%) out of 508 randomized patients. Patients with right-sided tumors (N=173) presented shorter OS 23.7 versus 31.0months, HR=1.42 (95% CI 1.09–1.84), P=0.010 and a trend toward shorter PFS 10.2 versus 11.5months, HR=1.24 (95% CI: 0.98–1.56), P=0.083 than those with left-sided tumors (N=185), but these associations were no longer evident when adjusting for RAS and BRAF status. Patients with right-sided tumors achieved more relative benefit from the intensification of the chemotherapy backbone in terms of both PFS (HR=0.59 versus 0.89, P for interaction=0.099) and OS (HR=0.56 versus 0.99, P for interaction=0.030) and this advantage was independent of their RAS and BRAF status.
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab may be regarded as a preferred first-line treatment option for clinically selected patients with right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer irrespective of their RAS and BRAF mutational status. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00719797.
As survival has improved for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is an increasing need for effective and well-tolerated third-line and subsequent-lines of treatment. Despite ...recent advances with the development of new-targeted therapies in this setting, there remains an unmet need to exploit oncogenic drivers of colorectal cancer and overcome acquired resistance. Potential treatment strategies include revisiting old targets such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, RAS, and BRAF and investigating new targets such as c-MET, the PI3 kinase, and Wnt pathways, and also the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we review recent phase III trials exploring approved agents, early trials investigating new drugs for chemorefractory mCRC, and the potential of capturing tumour dynamics during its evolution by liquid biopsy analysis.
Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DoR) predict overall survival (OS) in first-line trials of chemotherapy ± anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). ...These associations and the predictive accuracy of response measurements for survival parameters were investigated in the phase III TRIBE trial of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) versus FOLFIRI plus bev.
A landmark approach was adopted to define the assessable population. The distribution of RECIST response rate, ETS and DoR was compared in the two arms. Associations between response measurements and progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS) and OS were tested by univariate and multivariate Cox models. Prediction performance of each factor was estimated by C-index.
A significantly higher percentage of patients in the FOLFOXIRI plus bev arm achieved ETS ≥20%, when compared with the control arm (62.7% versus 51.9%, P = 0.025). Also the DoR was significantly higher in the triplet plus bev arm (43.4% versus 37.8%, P = 0.003). Both ETS and DoR were associated with PFS, PPS and OS at the univariate analyses and in the multivariate models stratified for other prognostic variables. Both ETS and DoR were able to predict survival as accurately as RECIST response.
FOLFOXIRI plus bev improves ETS and DoR when compared with FOLFIRI plus bev. Achieving rapid and deep tumor shrinkage consistently delays tumor progression and prolongs survival in patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bev. ETS is a promising and valuable end point for clinical trials' design deserving further investigation.
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is a valid option as upfront treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. While several trials investigated the effect of combining bevacizumab with ...different chemotherapy regimens, including fluoropyrimidines monotherapy and oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing doublets, no randomized comparison assessing the impact of the addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOXIRI is available.
A total of 122 mCRC patients received first-line FOLFOXIRI in the phase III trial by the GONO (FOLFOXIRI group) and 252 patients received first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in the TRIBE trial (FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab group). A propensity score-adjusted method was adopted to provide an estimation of the benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOXIRI in terms of survival and activity parameters.
Patients in the FOLFOXIRI group had more frequently Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of one or two, high Köhne score, metachronous and liver-limited disease, had previously received adjuvant treatments and had their primary tumors resected. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.3 months in the FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab group compared with 10.0 months in the FOLFOXIRI group {propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.74 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59–0.94, P = 0.013}. This association was significant also in the multivariable model (P = 0.024). The median OS was 29.8 months in the FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab group compared with 23.6 months in the FOLFOXIRI group propensity score-adjusted HR: 0.72 (95% CI 0.56–0.93), P = 0.014. At the multivariable model, the addition of bevacizumab was still associated with significantly longer OS (P = 0.030). No significant differences in RECIST response rate (RR) 65.1% versus 55.7%; propensity score-adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.29 (95% CI 0.81–2.05), P = 0.280, early RR 62.7% versus 57.8%; OR: 1.14 (95% CI 0.68–1.93), P = 0.619 and median depth of response (42.2% versus 53.8%, P = 0.259) were reported.
Though in the absence of a randomized comparison, the addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOXIRI provides significant benefit in PFS and OS, thus supporting the use of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as upfront treatment for mCRC patients.
NCT01219920 and NCT00719797
Despite the consistent clinical results demonstrated by studies on anti-angiogenic drugs targeted against the vascular endothelial growth factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, no ...specific direct/indirect biomarker of their efficacy has been validated. In this field, circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs) have recently been proposed as noninvasive biomarkers.
The absolute numbers of CEPs, total CECs (tCECs) and their resting (rCECs) and activated subsets were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry in 40 mCRC patients at baseline and before the administration of the third and sixth course of a bevacizumab-based first-line treatment. Fifty healthy subjects were utilized as control.
The overall response rate was 80%, overall clinical benefit was 90% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.8 months. In our patients, tCECs and rCECs were significantly increased compared with healthy subjects. The patients who achieved a radiological response showed, at baseline, a significant decrease of rCECs and a trend in decrease of tCECs in comparison with patients not achieving response. Finally, a baseline absolute number of tCEC and rCEC <40 cells/ml was evidenced in patients with a longer PFS. No correlation was found regarding CEP.
Our study suggests significant correlations between both tCEC and rCEC baseline levels and the antitumor efficacy of a bevacizumab-based combination therapy in mCRC patients, thus confirming that these biomarkers could be used in the clinical setting as an early predictor of tumor response.
PDF
