Summary Background Administration of vaccines by needle-free technology such as jet injection might offer an alternative to needles and syringes that avoids the issue of needle phobia and the risk of ...needle-stick injury. We aimed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of trivalent influenza vaccine given by needle-free jet injector compared with needle and syringe. Methods For this randomised, comparator-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (1:1) healthy adults (aged 18–64 years) who attended one of four employee health clinics in the University of Colorado health system, with stratification by site, to receive one dose of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine Afluria given either intramuscularly with a needle-free jet injector (Stratis; PharmaJet, Golden, CO, USA) or with needle and syringe. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation schedule with a block size of 100. Because of the nature of the study, masking of participants was not possible. Immunogenicity was assessed by measurement of the hemagglutination inhibition antibody titres in serum for the three viral strains included in the vaccine. We included six coprimary endpoints: three strain-specific geometric mean titre ratios and the absolute differences in three strain-specific seroconversion rates. The immune response of the jet injector group was regarded as non-inferior to that of the needle and syringe group if both the upper bound of each of the three 95% CIs for the strain-specific geometric mean titre ratios was 1.5 or less, and the upper bound of the three 95% CIs for the strain-specific seroconversion rate differences was less than 10 percentage points. We used t test for group comparison. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01688921. Findings During the 2012–13 influenza season of the northern hemisphere, we allocated 1250 participants to receive vaccination by needle-free jet injector (n=627) or needle and syringe (n=623). In the intention-to-treat immunogenicity population, all participants with two serum samples were included (575 in the jet injector group and 574 in the needle and syringe group). The immune response to Afluria when given by needle-free jet injector met the criteria for non-inferiority for all six coprimary endpoints. The jet injector group met the geometric mean titre criterion for non-inferiority for the A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains (upper bound of the 95% CI for the geometric mean titre ratios were 1·10 for A/H1N1, 1·17 for A/H3N2, and 1·04 for B strains). The jet injector group met the seroconversion rate criterion for non-inferiority for the A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains (upper bound of the 95% CI of the seroconversion rate differences were 6·0% for A/H1N1, 7·0% for A/H3N2, and 5·7% for B strains). We recorded serious adverse events in three participants, none of which were study related. Interpretation The immune response to influenza vaccine given with the jet injector device was non-inferior to the immune response to influenza vaccine given with needle and syringe. The device had a clinically acceptable safety profile, but was associated with a higher frequency of local injection site reactions than was the use of needle and syringe. The Stratis needle-free jet injector device could be used as an alternative method of administration of Afluria trivalent influenza vaccine. Funding Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), PATH, bioCSL, and PharmaJet.
Background. Chronically ill older adults constitute a population vulnerable for complications associated with influenza. Study of their immunity to influenza virus may help design better strategies ...to stimulate protective immune responses. Methods. Immunogenicity of influenza vaccines and immune protection from natural influenza were assessed in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as part of a vaccine efficacy trial. Subjects received either trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine (TVV) intramuscularly and trivalent live cold-adapted influenza virus vaccine (CAIV-T; n = 1107) intranasally (inl) or TVV and placebo inl (P; n = 1108). Results. In the subsets of study subjects assessed, serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and nasal-wash antihemagglutinin (HA) immunoglobulin (Ig) A and IgG antibody levels and anti-influenza virus CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity increased after immunization. Mean postimmunization nasal-wash IgA antibody levels to influenza A H3/HA and B HA were statistically higher in the TVV + CAIV-T group (n = 957) than in the TVV + P group (n = 951). Postimmunization serum HAI and nasal-wash IgA antibodies to influenza A/H3N2 and B viruses were associated with a reduced relative risk for natural influenza infection. Conclusions. TVV + CAIV-T appeared more immunogenic than TVV + P, but the observed difference may be clinically unimportant. Anti-influenza serum and nasal-wash antibodies were associated with immune protection.
Children who had been randomized to receive one dose of either heptavalent pneumococcal polysaccharide–meningococcal outer membrane protein complex conjugate vaccine (PCV) or 23-valent pneumococcal ...polysaccharide vaccine (PN23) at 12, 15, or 18 months of age were subsequently randomized to receive a booster injection of either PCV or PN23 12 months later. For those children who received a priming dose of PCV (
N=75) compared to PN23 (
N=48) at 12, 15, or 18 months of age, higher serum antibody concentrations were achieved 1 month following a booster injection of either PCV or PN23 for all serotypes tested (
p<0.001). Within the group of children receiving a priming dose of PCV, those children who received a booster dose of PN23 developed higher serum antibody concentrations for four of the seven serotypes tested and similar opsonic antibody titers to serotype 6B, yet more frequent erythema (
p=0.030) and pain or soreness (
p=0.024) at the injection site compared to those boosted with PCV. In conclusion, a single dose of PCV at 12–18 months of age primed for responses to booster doses of either PCV or PN23 12 months later. For those children who received a priming dose of PCV, boosting with PN23 resulted in more frequent injection site pain and erythema than boosting with PCV, yet higher antibody concentrations for most of the serotypes tested.
PDF
