Abstract
Background
frail patients in any age group are more likely to die than those that are not frail. We aimed to evaluate the impact of frailty on clinical mortality, readmission rate and length ...of stay for emergency surgical patients of all ages.
Methods
a multi-centre prospective cohort study was conducted on adult admissions to acute surgical units. Every patient presenting as a surgical emergency to secondary care, regardless of whether they ultimately underwent a surgical procedure was included. The study was carried out during 2015 and 2016.
Frailty was defined using the 7-point Clinical Frailty Scale. The primary outcome was mortality at Day 90. Secondary outcomes included: mortality at Day 30, length of stay and readmission within a Day 30 period.
Results
the cohort included 2,279 patients (median age 54 years IQR 36–72; 56% female). Frailty was documented in patients of all ages: 1% in the under 40’s to 45% of those aged 80+. We found that each incremental step of worsening frailty was associated with an 80% increase in mortality at Day 90 (OR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.61–2.01) supporting a linear dose–response relationship. In addition, the most frail patients were increasingly likely to stay in hospital longer, be readmitted within 30 days, and die within 30 days.
Conclusions
worsening frailty at any age is associated with significantly poorer patient outcomes, including mortality in unselected acute surgical admissions. Assessment of frailty should be integrated into emergency surgical practice to allow prognostication and implementation of strategies to improve outcomes.
Hospital admissions for non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pathology have decreased significantly. It is believed that this may be due to public anxiety about acquiring COVID-19 infection in ...hospital and the subsequent risk of mortality.
To identify patients who acquire COVID-19 in hospital (nosocomial COVID-19 infection (NC)) and their risk of mortality compared to those with community-acquired COVID-19 (CAC) infection.
The COPE-Nosocomial Study was an observational cohort study. The primary outcome was the time to all-cause mortality (estimated with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)), and secondary outcomes were day 7 mortality and the time-to-discharge. A mixed-effects multivariable Cox's proportional hazards model was used, adjusted for demographics and comorbidities.
The study included 1564 patients from 10 hospital sites throughout the UK, and one in Italy, and collected outcomes on patients admitted up to April 28th, 2020. In all, 12.5% of COVID-19 infections were acquired in hospital; 425 (27.2%) patients with COVID died. The median survival time in NC patients was 14 days compared with 10 days in CAC patients. In the primary analysis, NC infection was associated with lower mortality rate (aHR: 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51–0.98). Secondary outcomes found no difference in day 7 mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.47–1.31), but NC patients required longer time in hospital during convalescence (aHR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.37–0.66).
The minority of COVID-19 cases were the result of NC transmission. No COVID-19 infection comes without risk, but patients with NC had a lower risk of mortality compared to CAC infection; however, caution should be taken when interpreting this finding.
Abstract
Background
Frailty is associated with advancing age and may result in adverse postoperative outcomes. A suspected growing elderly population needing emergency colorectal surgery stimulated ...this study of the prevalence and impact of frailty.
Methods
Elderly patients (defined as aged at least 65 years by Medicare and the United States Census Bureau) who underwent emergency colorectal resection between 2012 and 2016 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program population database. The five-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) score was calculated, and patients stratified into groups 0, 1 or 2 +. Main outcome measures were the prevalence of frailty, and its impact on 30-day postoperative morbidity, mortality, reoperation, duration of hospital stay (LOS), discharge destination and readmission.
Results
A total of 10 025 patients were identified with a median age 75 years, of whom 41·8 per cent were men. The majority (87·7 per cent) had an ASA fitness grade of III or greater and 3129 (31·2 per cent) were frail (mFI-5 group 2+). Major morbidity occurred in one-third of patients and the postoperative mortality rate was 15·9 per cent. Some 52·0 per cent of patients had a prolonged hospital stay and 11·0 per cent were readmitted. Although most patients (88·0 per cent) lived independently before surgery, only 45·4 per cent were discharged home directly. Frailty (mFI-5 2+) predicted mortality, overall and major morbidity, reoperation, prolonged LOS, discharge to an institution and readmission, but frailty was independent of sex.
Conclusion
Frailty is associated with morbidity, mortality and loss of independence in elderly patients needing emergency colorectal surgery.
Graphical Abstract
This national evaluation of frailty from a US perspective showed that nearly one-third of elderly patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery are frail. As frailty increases, there is greater risk of postoperative morbidity, mortality and loss of independence. These findings stress the need for routine frailty assessment to drive better outcomes.
Graphical Abstract
Common and costly
Background
Prehabilitation has emerged as a strategy to prepare patients for elective abdominal cancer surgery with documented improvements in postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to ...assess the evidence for prehabilitation interventions of relevance to the older adult.
Methods
Systematic searches were conducted using MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and PsychINFO. Studies of preoperative intervention (prehabilitation) in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery reporting postoperative outcomes were included. Age limits were not set as preliminary searches revealed this would be too restrictive. Articles were screened and selected based on PRISMA guidelines, and assessment of bias was performed. Qualitative, quantitative and meta‐analyses of data were conducted as appropriate.
Results
Thirty‐three studies (3962 patients) were included. Interventions included exercise, nutrition, psychological input, comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimization, smoking cessation and multimodal (two or more interventions). Nine studies purposely selected high‐risk, frail or older patients. Thirty studies were at moderate or high risk of bias. Ten studies individually reported benefits in complication rates, with meta‐analyses for overall complications demonstrating significant benefit: multimodal (risk difference −0·1 (95 per cent c.i. −0·18 to −0·02); P = 0·01, I2 = 18 per cent) and nutrition (risk difference −0·18 (−0·26 to −0·10); P < 0·001, I2 = 0 per cent). Seven studies reported reductions in length of hospital stay, with no differences on meta‐analysis.
Conclusion
The conclusions of this review are limited by the quality of the included studies, and the heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures reported. Exercise, nutritional and multimodal prehabilitation may reduce morbidity after abdominal surgery, but data specific to older patients are sparse.
Antecedentes
La pre‐habilitación ha surgido como una estrategia para preparar a los pacientes para la cirugía electiva del cáncer abdominal con mejoras documentadas en los resultados postoperatorios. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la evidencia sobre las intervenciones de pre‐habilitación relevantes en adultos de edad avanzada.
Métodos
Se realizaron búsquedas sistemáticas utilizando MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL y PsychINFO. Registro PROSPERO: CRD42019120381. Se incluyeron estudios de intervención preoperatoria (pre‐habilitación) en pacientes sometidos a cirugía oncológica abdominal que describiesen resultados postoperatorios. No se fijaron límites en la edad dado que las búsquedas preliminares revelaron que ello sería demasiado restrictivo. Los artículos fueron examinados y seleccionados en base a las guías PRISMA y se realizó una evaluación del sesgo. Se llevó a cabo un análisis cualitativo, cuantitativo y metaanálisis de los datos según fuese apropiado.
Resultados
Se incluyeron 33 estudios (3.962 patients). Las intervenciones incluyeron ejercicio, nutrición, intervención psicológica, evaluación geriátrica global y optimización, abandono del tabaquismo y multimodal (dos o más intervenciones). Nueve estudios seleccionaron expresamente una población de pacientes de elevado riesgo, frágiles o de edad avanzada. Treinta estudios presentaban un riesgo moderado/alto de sesgo. Diez estudios describieron de forma individual beneficios en las tasas de complicaciones con metaanálisis para las complicaciones globales demostrando un beneficio significativo: multimodal (diferencia de riesgo ‐0,1 (i.c. del 95% −0,18 a −0,02); P = 0,01, I2 = 18%) e intervención nutricional (diferencia de riesgo −0,18 (i.c. del 95% −0,26 a −0,10); P < 0,001, I2 = 0%). Siete estudios describieron reducciones en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria, sin diferencias en el metaanálisis.
Conclusión
Las conclusiones de esta revisión están limitadas por la calidad de los estudios incluidos, heterogeneidad de las intervenciones y descripción de las medidas de resultados. Las intervenciones de pre‐habilitación de ejercicio, nutricionales y multimodales puede reducir la morbilidad tras cirugía abdominal, pero los datos concretos en pacientes de edad avanzada son escasos.
This systematic review and meta‐analysis suggests that multimodal and nutrition‐alone prehabilitation interventions may reduce postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. More high‐quality research is needed specifically on prehabilitation for older patients.
Use multimodal prehabilitation to reduce morbidity
The COVID-19 pandemic has placed significant pressure on health and social care. Survivors of COVID-19 may be left with substantial functional deficits requiring ongoing care. We aimed to determine ...whether pre-admission frailty was associated with increased care needs at discharge for patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.
Patients were included if aged over 18 years old and admitted to hospital with COVID-19 between 27 February and 10 June 2020. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was used to assess pre-admission frailty status. Admission and discharge care levels were recorded. Data were analysed using a mixed-effects logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, comorbidities, and admission CRP as a marker of severity of disease.
Thirteen hospitals included patients: 1671 patients were screened, and 840 were excluded including, 521 patients who died before discharge (31.1%). Of the 831 patients who were discharged, the median age was 71 years (IQR, 58-81 years) and 369 (44.4%) were women. The median length of hospital stay was 12 days (IQR 6-24). Using the CFS, 438 (47.0%) were living with frailty (≥ CFS 5), and 193 (23.2%) required an increase in the level of care provided. Multivariable analysis showed that frailty was associated with an increase in care needs compared to patients without frailty (CFS 1-3). The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were as follows: CFS 4, 1.99 (0.97-4.11); CFS 5, 3.77 (1.94-7.32); CFS 6, 4.04 (2.09-7.82); CFS 7, 2.16 (1.12-4.20); and CFS 8, 3.19 (1.06-9.56).
Around a quarter of patients admitted with COVID-19 had increased care needs at discharge. Pre-admission frailty was strongly associated with the need for an increased level of care at discharge. Our results have implications for service planning and public health policy as well as a person's functional outcome, suggesting that frailty screening should be utilised for predictive modelling and early individualised discharge planning.
Background
Colorectal cancer remains a common cause of cancer death in the UK, with surgery being the mainstay of treatment. An objective measurement of the suitability of each patient for surgery, ...and their risk–benefit calculation, would be of great utility. We postulate that sarcopenia (low muscle mass) could fulfil this role as a prognostic indicator. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between sarcopenia and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing elective bowel resection for colorectal cancer.
Methods
One hundred and sixty-three consecutive patients who had elective curative colorectal resection for cancer were eligible for inclusion in the study. Psoas muscle mass was assessed on preoperative computed tomography scan at the level of the L3 vertebra and standardised for patient height (total psoas index, TPI). Sarcopenia (low muscle mass) was defined as < 524 mm
2
/m
2
in males and 385 mm
2
/m
2
in females. In addition to clinical–pathological parameters, postoperative complications were recorded and patients were followed up for mortality for 1 year after surgery.
Results
Sarcopenia was present in 19.6% of the study participants and was significantly related to body mass index (
p
= 0.007), 30-day mortality (
p
= 0.042) and 1-year mortality (
p
= 0.046). In univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (
p
= 0.016), tumour stage (
p
= 0.018) and sarcopenia (
p
= 0.043) were found to be significant independent predictors of 1-year mortality.
Conclusions
This study has found sarcopenia to be prevalent in patients with colorectal cancer having elective surgery. Independent of age, sarcopenia was associated with poorer 30-day mortality and survival at 1 year. Measurement of muscle mass preoperatively could be used to stratify a patient’s risk, allowing targeted strategies such as prehabilitation, to be implemented to modify sarcopenia and improve long-term outcomes for patients.
Uncomplicated acute appendicitis can be managed with non-operative (antibiotic) treatment, but laparoscopic appendicectomy remains the first-line management in the UK. During the COVID-19 pandemic ...the practice altered, with more patients offered antibiotics as treatment. A large-scale observational study was designed comparing operative and non-operative management of appendicitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate 90-day follow-up.
A prospective, cohort study at 97 sites in the UK and Republic of Ireland included adult patients with a clinical or radiological diagnosis of appendicitis that either had surgery or non-operative management. Propensity score matching was conducted using age, sex, BMI, frailty, co-morbidity, Adult Appendicitis Score and C-reactive protein. Outcomes were 90-day treatment failure in the non-operative group, and in the matched groups 30-day complications, length of hospital stay (LOS) and total healthcare costs associated with each treatment.
A total of 3420 patients were recorded: 1402 (41 per cent) had initial antibiotic management and 2018 (59 per cent) had appendicectomy. At 90-day follow-up, antibiotics were successful in 80 per cent (1116) of cases. After propensity score matching (2444 patients), fewer overall complications (OR 0.36 (95 per cent c.i. 0.26 to 0.50)) and a shorter median LOS (2.5 versus 3 days, P < 0.001) were noted in the antibiotic management group. Accounting for interval appendicectomy rates, the mean total cost was €1034 lower per patient managed without surgery.
This study found that antibiotics is an alternative first-line treatment for adult acute appendicitis and can lead to cost reductions.
Aim
Rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) experience physical deterioration and reductions in their quality of life. This feasibility study assessed prehabilitation ...(a walking intervention) before, during and after NACRT to inform a definitive multi‐centred randomized clinical trial (REx trial).
Methods
Patients planned for NACRT followed by potentially curative surgery were approached (August 2014–March 2016) (www.isrctn.com; 62859294). Prior to NACRT, baseline physical and psycho‐social data were recorded using validated tools. Participants were randomized to either the intervention group (exercise counselling session followed by a 13–17 week telephone‐guided walking programme) or a control group (standard care). Follow‐up testing was undertaken 1–2 weeks before surgery.
Results
Of the 296 screened patients, 78 (26%) were eligible and 48 (61%) were recruited. N = 31 (65%) were men with a mean age of 65.9 years (range 33.7–82.6). Mean intervention duration was 14 weeks with 75% adherence. n = 40 (83%) completed follow‐up testing. Both groups recorded reductions in daily walking but the reduction was less in the intervention group although not statistically significant. Participants reported high satisfaction and fidelity to trial procedures.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that prehabilitation is feasible in rectal cancer patients undergoing NACRT. Good recruitment, adherence, retention and patient satisfaction rates support the development of a fully powered trial. The effects of the intervention on physical outcomes were promising.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes aim to standardise perioperative care leading to optimal patient outcomes. Despite these programmes, variation in outcomes still persists. This study ...aimed to assess the influence of lifestyle factors on short-term outcomes after colorectal surgery within this optimal recovery programme.
Consecutive patients enrolled on an ERAS pathway who underwent elective colorectal surgery (June 2013 to July 2014) at one site were included. We used data routinely collected by ERAS nurse specialists and during preassessment to analyse association between patient and lifestyle factors and likelihood of developing postoperative complications or having an increased length of stay.
A total of 199 patients were included: mean age 61.8 years (range 17-90 years) and 53.8% male. Age, sex, deprivation, smoking status, alcohol intake, body mass index or level of comorbidity were not associated with postoperative complications. Patients reporting limited preoperative physical capacity (unable to climb two flights of stairs) were more than four times as likely to have a postoperative complication on univariate analysis and were found to still have increased risk of postoperative complications on multivariate analysis. Patients reporting limited preoperative physical capacity were shown to have significantly longer hospital stay on univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, limited physical capacity was not associated with prolonged length of stay due to confounding factors of age and deprivation.
Limited physical capacity was the only patient and lifestyle factor associated with poorer postoperative complications and prolonged hospital stay after elective colorectal surgery within an ERAS programme. Consideration should be given to individualised prehabilitation that aims to increase physical capacity pre-operatively to improve patient outcomes.
PDF
