Expert consensus guidelines: Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery Brothers, Julie A.; Frommelt, Michele A.; Jaquiss, Robert D.B. ...
Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery/The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery/The journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery,
June 2017, 2017-06-00, 20170601, Letnik:
153, Številka:
6
Journal Article
ACC/AHA Task Force Members Glenn N. Levine, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Patrick T. O’Gara, MD, MACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Immediate Past Chair¶ Sana M. Al-Khatib, MD, ...MHS, FACC, FAHA Joshua A. Beckman, MD, MS, FAHA Kim K. Birtcher, MS, PharmD, AACC Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA¶ Ralph G. Brindis, MD, MPH, MACC¶ Joaquin E. Cigarroa, MD, FACC Anita Deswal, MD, MPH, FACC, FAHA Lesley H. Curtis, PhD, FAHA¶ Lee A. Fleisher, MD, FACC, FAHA Federico Gentile, MD, FACC Samuel Gidding, MD, FAHA¶ Zachary D. Goldberger, MD, MS, FACC, FAHA Mark A. Hlatky, MD, FACC, FAHA John Ikonomidis, MD, PhD, FAHA José A. Joglar, MD, FACC, FAHA Laura Mauri, MD, MSc, FAHA Barbara Riegel, PhD, RN, FAHA Susan J. Pressler, PhD, RN, FAHA¶ Duminda N. Wijeysundera, MD, PhD¶Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort.Table of Contents Preamblee93 Introductione95 1.1.Methodology and Evidence Reviewe95 1.2.Organization of the Writing Committeee95 1.3.Document Review and Approvale95 1.4.Scope of the Guidelinee97 1.5.Abbreviationse99 2. Evidence Gaps and Future Research Needse182 Appendix 1 Author Relationships With Industry and Other Entities (Relevant)e214 Appendix 2 Reviewer Relationships With Industry and Other Entities (Comprehensive)e216 Preamble Since 1980, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) have translated scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines with recommendations to improve cardiovascular health. Adherence to recommendations can be enhanced by shared decision-making between healthcare providers and patients, with patient engagement in selecting interventions based on individual values, preferences, and associated conditions and comorbidities.Methodology and Modernization The ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines (Task Force) continuously reviews, updates, and modifies guideline methodology on the basis of published standards from organizations including the Institute of Medicine (P-1,P-2) and on the basis of internal reevaluation. Publication of new, potentially practice-changing study results that are relevant to an existing or new medication, device, or management strategy will prompt evaluation by the Task Force, in consultation with the relevant guideline writing committee, to determine whether a focused update should be commissioned.
...there is not a significant predisposition for ischemic pain owing to anomalous coronary arteries for one sex over the other, except for the greater frequency and intensity of sports participation ...in men. ...it is a matter of risk of triggers for expression rather than anatomic differences. ...to the foregoing causes of non-atherosclerotic ischemic pain, spontaneous dissection of the coronary arteries is a greater challenge because it can cause acute symptoms in the absence of forewarning exercise-associated chest pain and under circumstances in which considering new onset of chest pain as ischemic might be overlooked. Others, however, are non-specific, such as autonomic intensity, levels of exercise, and recreational drugs. ...it is important for the clinician evaluating patients who may have non-atherosclerotic ischemia to pay particular attention to the most specific markers of potential for coronary artery dissection, including suspicion of connective tissue disorders.
ACC/AHA Task Force Members Glenn N. Levine, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Patrick T. O’Gara, MD, MACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Immediate Past Chair¶ Sana M. Al-Khatib, MD, ...MHS, FACC, FAHA Joshua A. Beckman, MD, MS, FAHA Kim K. Birtcher, MS, PharmD, AACC Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA¶ Ralph G. Brindis, MD, MPH, MACC¶ Joaquin E. Cigarroa, MD, FACC Anita Deswal, MD, MPH, FACC, FAHA Lesley H. Curtis, PhD, FAHA¶ Lee A. Fleisher, MD, FACC, FAHA Federico Gentile, MD, FACC Samuel Gidding, MD, FAHA¶ Zachary D. Goldberger, MD, MS, FACC, FAHA Mark A. Hlatky, MD, FACC, FAHA John Ikonomidis, MD, PhD, FAHA José A. Joglar, MD, FACC, FAHA Laura Mauri, MD, MSc, FAHA Barbara Riegel, PhD, RN, FAHA Susan J. Pressler, PhD, RN, FAHA¶ Duminda N. Wijeysundera, MD, PhD¶Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort.Table of Contents Preamble1679 Introduction1681 1.1.Methodology and Evidence Review1681 1.2.Organization of the Writing Committee1682 1.3.Document Review and Approval1682 1.4.Scope of the Guideline1682 1.5.Abbreviations1684 2. Evidence Gaps and Future Research Needs1725 Appendix 1 Author Relationships With Industry and Other Entities (Relevant)1742 Appendix 2 Reviewer Relationships With Industry and Other Entities (Comprehensive)1744 Preamble Since 1980, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) have translated scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines with recommendations to improve cardiovascular health. Adherence to recommendations can be enhanced by shared decision-making between healthcare providers and patients, with patient engagement in selecting interventions based on individual values, preferences, and associated conditions and comorbidities.Methodology and Modernization The ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines (Task Force) continuously reviews, updates, and modifies guideline methodology on the basis of published standards from organizations including the Institute of Medicine (P-1,P-2) and on the basis of internal reevaluation. Publication of new, potentially practice-changing study results that are relevant to an existing or new medication, device, or management strategy will prompt evaluation by the Task Force, in consultation with the relevant guideline writing committee, to determine whether a focused update should be commissioned.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce hospitalizations and death from heart failure (HF), but their effect on arrhythmia expression has been poorly investigated.
The purpose of ...this study was to evaluate the association of SGLT2is with arrhythmias in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or HF.
We searched PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two independent investigators identified randomized double-blind trials that compared SGLT2is with placebo or active control for adults with T2DM or HF. Primary outcomes were incident atrial arrhythmias, ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and sudden cardiac death (SCD).
We included 34 randomized (25 placebo-controlled and 9 active-controlled) trials with 63,166 patients (35,883 SGLT2is vs 27,273 control: mean age 53-67 years; 63% male). Medications included canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, or ertugliflozin. Except for 1 study of HF, all patients had T2DM. Follow-up ranged from 24 weeks to 5.7 years. The cumulative incidence of events was low: 3.6, 1.4, and 2.5 per 1000 patient-years for atrial arrhythmias, VAs and SCD, respectively. SGLT2i therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of incident atrial arrhythmias (odds ratio 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.95; P = .008) and the "SCD" component of the SCD outcome (odds ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.97; P = .03) compared with control. There was no significant difference in incident VA or the "cardiac arrest" SCD component between groups.
SGLT2is are associated with significantly reduced risks of incident atrial arrhythmias and SCD in patients with T2DM. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm the antiarrhythmic effect of SGLT2is and whether this is a class or drug-specific effect.
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a daunting problem. It is a major public health issue for several reasons: from its prevalence (20% of total mortality in the industrialized world) to the ...devastating psycho-social impact on society and on the families of victims often still in their prime, and it represents a challenge for medicine, and especially for cardiology. This text summarizes the discussions and opinions of a group of investigators with a long-standing interest in this field. We addressed the occurrence of SCD in individuals apparently healthy, in patients with heart disease and mild or severe cardiac dysfunction, and in those with genetically based arrhythmic diseases. Recognizing the need for more accurate registries of the global and regional distribution of SCD in these different categories, we focused on the assessment of risk for SCD in these four groups, looking at the significance of alterations in cardiac function, of signs of electrical instability identified by ECG abnormalities or by autonomic tests, and of the progressive impact of genetic screening. Special attention was given to the identification of areas of research more or less likely to provide useful information, and thereby more or less suitable for the investment of time and of research funds.
The Screening ECG and Cardiac Risks Myerburg, Robert J
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association,
06/2018, Letnik:
319, Številka:
22
Journal Article
PDF
