Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a recognized cause of allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. Unlike AMR in other solid-organ transplant recipients, there are no standardized ...diagnostic criteria or an agreed-upon definition. Hence, a working group was created by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation with the aim of determining criteria for pulmonary AMR and establishing a definition. Diagnostic criteria and a working consensus definition were established. Key diagnostic criteria include the presence of antibodies directed toward donor human leukocyte antigens and characteristic lung histology with or without evidence of complement 4d within the graft. Exclusion of other causes of allograft dysfunction increases confidence in the diagnosis but is not essential. Pulmonary AMR may be clinical (allograft dysfunction which can be asymptomatic) or sub-clinical (normal allograft function). This consensus definition will have clinical, therapeutic and research implications.
In 1990, an international grading scheme for the grading of pulmonary allograft rejection was adopted by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) and was modified in 1995 ...by an expanded group of pathologists. The original and revised classifications have served the lung transplant community well, facilitating communication between transplant centers with regard to both patient management and research. In 2006, under the direction of the ISHLT, a multi-disciplinary review of the biopsy grading system was undertaken to update the scheme, address inconsistencies of use, and consider the current knowledge of antibody-mediated rejection in the lung. This article summarizes the revised consensus classification of lung allograft rejection. In brief, acute rejection is based on perivascular and interstitial mononuclear infiltrates, Grade A0 (none), Grade A1 (minimal), Grade A2 (mild), Grade A3 (moderate) and Grade A4 (severe), as previously. The revised (R) categories of small airways inflammation, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, are as follows: Grade B0 (none), Grade B1R (low grade, 1996, B1 and B2), Grade B2R (high grade, 1996, B3 and B4) and BX (ungradeable). Chronic rejection, obliterative bronchiolitis (Grade C), is described as present (C1) or absent (C0), without reference to presence of inflammatory activity. Chronic vascular rejection is unchanged as Grade D. Recommendations are made for the evaluation of antibody-mediated rejection, recognizing that this is a controversial entity in the lung, less well developed and understood than in other solid-organ grafts, and with no consensus reached on diagnostic features. Differential diagnoses of acute rejection, airway inflammation and chronic rejection are described and technical considerations revisited. This consensus revision of the working formulation was approved by the ISHLT board of directors in April 2007.
Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of renal allografts occurs in two forms. Type 1 ABMR results from persistence and/or a rebound of preexisting donor-specific antibodies in sensitized patients and ...usually occurs early post-transplantation. Type 2 ABMR is associated with de novo donor-specific antibodies and usually occurs over one year post-transplantation. It is generally accepted that types 1 and 2 also differ with regard to certain pathologic features including the frequencies of C4d positivity and concurrent cell-mediated rejection. However, direct comparison of pathologic, serologic, and clinical features of types 1 and 2 ABMR is lacking. Here we compared these features in 80 cases of ABMR (37 type 1, 43 type 2) diagnosed at our center. Compared with type 1, type 2 ABMR occurred later post-transplantation, was more often associated with donor-specific antibodies against Class II HLA, and was associated with more interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and more frequent cell-mediated rejection, although these did not differ with respect to C4d positivity. By univariate analysis, graft survival was lower with type 2 than type 1 ABMR with borderline significance. Still, among these 80 patients, all but one treated for ABMR following diagnosis, the only two independent predictors of graft failure were at least moderate interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and failure of the donor-specific antibody relative intensity scale score, a measure of the combined strength of all donor-specific antibodies present, to decrease in response to therapy.
BACKGROUND.: We have shown that high-dose intravenous immune globulin (IVIG; 2 g/kg x2 doses)+rituximab (1 g x2 doses) was effective in lowering anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and ...improving rates of transplantation. The aim of this report was to evaluate the efficacy of IVIG+rituximab on reduction of anti-HLA antibodies to a level that was permissive for living donor (LD) or deceased donor (DD) transplantation without incurring the risk of antibody-mediated rejection and immediate graft loss. METHODS.: From July 2006 to February 2009, 76 HLA-sensitized (HS) patients who met strict sensitization criteria received kidney transplants after desensitization using IVIG 2 g/kg (days 1 and 30)+rituximab (1 g, day 15). Parameters evaluated included rates of transplantation, previous transplants, panel reactive antibodies, donor specific antibody, crossmatches (CMXs), patient and graft survival, acute rejection, serum creatinines, and infections. RESULTS.: Seventy-six HS CMX treated patients (31 LD/45 DD) were transplanted. For LD and DD recipients, significant reductions were seen in T-cell flow cytometry CMXs from pretreatment (T cell 183.5+/-98.4 mean channel shifts (MCS) for LD and 162.8+/-41 MCS for DD) to time of transplant (T cell 68.2+/-58 MCS for LD P<0.00006 and 125+/-49 for DD P=0.05), respectively. Time on wait list for DD recipients was reduced from 95+/-46 months to 4.2+/-4.5 months after treatment. Twenty-eight patients (37%) experienced acute rejection (29% C4d/8% C4d). Patient and graft survival up to 24 months was 95% and 84%, respectively. The mean serum creatinines, at 12 and 24 months were 1.5+/-1.1 and 1.3+/-0.3 mg/dL, respectively. Viral infections were seen in six patients. CONCLUSIONS.: IVIG and rituximab seems to offer significant benefits in reduction of anti-HLA antibodies allowing improved rates of transplantation for HS patients, especially those awaiting DD, with acceptable antibody-mediated rejection and survival rates at 24 months.
Abstract Angiotensin type I receptor (AT1 R) mediates physiologic and pathophysiologic actions of its ligand, angiotensin II. Overactivity of the AT1 R and angiotensin II interaction results in ...hypertension and vascular remodeling. Antibodies to AT1 R have been implicated in several vascular pathologies. In renal transplantation, elevated levels of anti-AT1 R antibodies have been associated with antibody mediated rejection (AMR) in the absence of donor HLA specific antibodies. In heart transplantation, increased levels of anti-AT1 R antibodies have been associated with cellular and AMR as well as an early onset of microvasculopathy. This review summarizes the current investigations regarding the impact of anti-AT1 R antibodies in solid organ transplantation and provides insight into the humoral response in the presence of non-HLA and HLA specific antibodies.
Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) is a critical player in regulating vasoconstriction, blood pressure, sodium retention. Even though AT1R has limited polymorphism, AT1R antibodies have been ...detected in several diseases. The role of AT1R antibodies in transplantation is first reported in kidney transplant, and then identified in heart and lung transplants. Mechanical circulatory support devices (MCS) can also stimulate production of AT1R antibodies. AT1R antibodies may negatively impact graft or patient survival through mechanisms independent of the classical complement activation.
The presence of donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies has been shown to be associated with graft loss and decreased patient survival, but it is not uncommon that donor-specific HLA ...antibodies are absent in patients with biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection. In this review, we focus on the latest findings on antibodies against non-HLA antigens in kidney and heart transplantation. These non-HLA antigens include myosin, vimentin, Kα1 tubulin, collagen, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor. It is suggested that the detrimental effects of HLA antibodies and non-HLA antibodies synergize together to impact graft outcome. Injury of graft by HLA antibodies can cause the exposure of neo-antigens which in turn stimulate the production of antibodies against non-HLA antigens. On the other hand, the presence of non-HLA antibodies may increase the risk for a patient to develop HLA-specific antibodies. These findings indicate it is imperative to stratify the patient's immunologic risk by assessing both HLA and non-HLA antibodies.
The single antigen test is widely used in the field of transplantation to determine the specificity of HLA antibodies. It will be beneficial to standardize the procedure of the single antigen test ...among HLA laboratories. It is not uncommon that single antigen testing on native sera fails to detect antibodies with very high concentrations. It has been shown that cleavage products of activated complement components may mask strongly binding antibodies in single antigen testing. To overcome inhibition by the activated complement products, sera are pretreated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), dithiothreitol (DTT), or heat inactivation before single antigen testing. However, no studies have been published to systemically compare the impact of these treatments on single antigen testing. The aim of this study is to understand the different effects these treatments may have on single antigen test results. We found that mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) obtained from sera treated with EDTA and heat inactivation were nearly identical, while DTT treatment was less potent to remove the inhibition. In addition, sera dilution did not further increase MFI of antibodies after EDTA treatment. Our results provide guidance to choose a pretreatment reagent for single antigen testing, and to compare studies obtained from laboratories using different treatments.
PDF
