This study was conducted to evaluate the implementation of science literacy-based learning in primary schools. The evaluative quantitative investigation used Stake's Countenance Model to measure the ...implementation of authentic assessments, including three critical stages, namely (1) Antecedent, (2) Process, and (3) Outcomes. A purposive sampling technique was used to select 20 Islamic Elementary Schools (IES) in West Java that participated in the Indonesian Madrasah Competency Assessment (IMCA) result follow-up training programs. Furthermore, data collection methods included observation, interviews, and questionnaires, which were analyzed using a percentage-based analytical approach. This allowed direct understanding into the information disclosed and the identification of specific aspects of the studied problem. Observation and interview data were analyzed using an interactive model, including data collection, display, and conclusion. The results showed that several aspects did not achieve the 100% standard. Planning (Atencedents) in the “Not Good” category with a percentage of 61.40%, while Implementation (Transaction) and Results (Outcomes) stages obtained 70.17% and 52.36% in the “Enough” and the “Very Not Good” categories.
This study was conducted to evaluate the implementation of science literacy-based learning in primary schools. The evaluative quantitative investigation used Stake's Countenance Model to measure the ...implementation of authentic assessments, including three critical stages, namely (1) Antecedent, (2) Process, and (3) Outcomes. A purposive sampling technique was used to select 20 Islamic Elementary Schools (IES) in West Java that participated in the Indonesian Madrasah Competency Assessment (IMCA) result follow-up training programs. Furthermore, data collection methods included observation, interviews, and questionnaires, which were analyzed using a percentage-based analytical approach. This allowed direct understanding into the information disclosed and the identification of specific aspects of the studied problem. Observation and interview data were analyzed using an interactive model, including data collection, display, and conclusion. The results showed that several aspects did not achieve the 100% standard. Planning (Atencedents) in the “Not Good” category with a percentage of 61.40%, while Implementation (Transaction) and Results (Outcomes) stages obtained 70.17% and 52.36% in the “Enough” and the “Very Not Good” categories.
This research was aimed to evaluate the implementation of authentic assessment of elementary school in Province of Yogyakarta and also to know the obstacles of its implementation. This was an ...evaluative research by a Stake's evaluation model approach. The results of observation in compare to the standard of assessment should be criteria to determine the succeed. This research subjects were elementary teachers in Province of Yogyakarta. Observation, interview, and documentation were used to gather data. The research showed that: (1) Planning (antecedents) stage or understanding towards authentic assessment planning has not been fulfilled the standard to be categorized as Good with percentage of 68.75%; (2) Process (transaction) or implementation stage that obtained 63.41% in percentage was classified in Good category; (3) Outcome stage or authentic assessment report showed 68.48% in percentage and should be categorized Good. The implementation of authentic assessment in Province of Yogyakarta elementary schools have not 100% met the standard. Therefore, results from this research finding were expected to be tools to improve performance from all stakeholders.
Penerapan scientific approach dalam group investigation untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa kelas IV SD Ploso I. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir ...kritis ssiwa melalui penerapan scientific approach dalam group investigation. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian tindakna kelas menggunakan desain model Kemmis & Taggart. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas IV berjumlah 35 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi, tes, dan dokumentasi. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan teknik deskriptif komparatif. Pembelajaran dilaksanakan dengan langkah-langkah: (1) Goals, (2) Motivation, (3) Planning Activities; (4) Materials; (5) Group Activities; (6) Closure; (7) Appraisal and Feedback; and (8) Reflection. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa penerapan scientific approach dalam group investigation dapat meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa dalam pembelajaran IPA. Diketahui Presentase keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa mengalami peningkatan pada setiap pertemuannya. Pada siklus I skor rata – rata 23,4 dengan presentase 68,57% berada dalam kategori Cukup. Kemudian mengalami peningkatan pada siklus II yaitu mencapai 29,5 dengan presentase ketercapaian 85,71% dalam kategori Amat Baik. Pada siklus III terus mengalami peningkatan menjadi 32,5 atau 91,42% dalam kategori Amat Baik. Dari hasil tes tersebut diketahui bahwa keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa mengalami peningkatan dan telah mencapai target yang diinginkan yaitu ≥80%.