Background
Ileostomy creation has complications, including rehospitalization for fluid and electrolyte abnormalities. Although studies have identified predictors of this morbidity, readmission rates ...remain high.
Methods
The researchers conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients with ileostomy creation at a tertiary institution from January 2008 to June 2011.
Results
One hundred fifty-four patients (154) were included in this study; 71 (46.1 %) were female. Mean age was 49 ± 17.64 (range 16–91), and mean BMI was 26.9 ± 6.44 (range 13–52). The readmission rate for fluid and electrolyte abnormalities was 20.1 % for the study population; of those readmitted for all diagnoses, dehydration accounted for 40.7 % of all readmissions. Cancer was associated with readmission (
χ
2
= 4.73,
p
= 0.03) as was neoadjuvant therapy (
χ
2
= 9.20,
p
= 0.01). After multivariate analysis, only the use of anti-diarrheals and neoadjuvant therapy remained significant. High stoma output, adjuvant treatment, and postoperative complications were not significant.
Conclusions
Our study found that the use of anti-diarrheals and neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer were associated with readmission. Our findings imply that the use of anti-diarrheals may be a marker for patients at risk for fluid and electrolyte abnormalities; these patients should be strictly monitored at home. Our study also suggests consideration of avoidance of ileostomy creation or different discharge criteria for at-risk patients. Prospective studies focused on stoma monitoring after discharge may help reduce rehospitalizations for fluid and electrolyte abnormalities after ileostomy creation.
Purpose
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways has demonstrated improved outcomes in colorectal surgery. An important component of ERAS is early oral intake. The aim of this study is to ...determine the impact of early oral intake in patients following colorectal surgery.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent colectomy and proctectomy at an academic institution from January 2015 to November 2018 was performed. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who had postoperative day 0 (POD 0) oral intake and those who did not.
Results
A total of 436 ERAS patients had oral intake timing documented. The majority of patients were women (241, 55.3%) and white (313, 71.8%). The mean age was 57 ± 15.09. Patients who had early intake were found to have lower 30-day overall morbidity and length of stay (
p
< 0.05), and no difference in serious adverse events. Additionally, hospital costs were lower in the POD 0 feeding group for all patients (
p
< 0.05).
Conclusion
We have demonstrated that early oral feeding in an established ERAS pathway is associated with improved clinical outcomes as well as decreased total hospital costs. Early postoperative feeding is safe in colorectal patients and should be prioritized to decrease complications and healthcare costs.
For high-risk patients, traditional surgical dogma advises open operations, with short operative times, to "get them off the table" instead of longer minimally invasive surgery approaches.
The aim of ...this study was to compare postoperative outcomes in patients with high-risk colon cancer undergoing elective longer minimally invasive surgery operations compared with shorter open operations.
Retrospective comparative cohort study.
Interventions were performed in hospitals participating in the national surgical database.
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients with colon cancer with ASA class 3 to 4 undergoing right and sigmoid colectomy between 2012 and 2017.
Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared between short open and long minimally invasive groups.
A total of 3775 patients were identified as having undergone long minimally invasive right colectomy and short open right colectomy (33% open, 67% minimally invasive surgery), and 1042 patients were identified as having undergone long minimally invasive sigmoid colectomy and short open sigmoid colectomy (36% open, 64% minimally invasive). Patients undergoing long minimally invasive right colectomy had significantly lower rates of overall morbidity, severe adverse events, mortality, superficial surgical site infections, and wound disruptions, as well as discharge to a higher level of care and shorter length of stay ( p < 0.05). Patients undergoing long minimally invasive sigmoid colectomy had decreased rates of overall morbidity, severe adverse events, and length of stay, as well as discharge to a higher level of care compared with the patients undergoing short open sigmoid colectomy ( p < 0.05).
This study was limited by the retrospective nature and standardized outcome measures.
In high-risk patients undergoing colectomy for colon cancer, outcomes were worse with shorter open compared with longer minimally invasive surgery operations. Focus should shift from getting patients "off the table" faster to longer, but safer, minimally invasive surgery in high-risk patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B642 .
ANTECEDENTES:Para los pacientes de alto riesgo, el dogma quirúrgico tradicional aconseja operaciones abiertas, con tiempos quirúrgicos cortos, con el fin de "sacarlos de la mesa" en lugar de enfoques quirúrgicos mínimamente invasivos más prolongados.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los resultados posoperatorios en pacientes electivos de cáncer de colon de alto riesgo sometidos a operaciones de cirugía mínimamente invasiva más prolongadas en comparación con operaciones abiertas más cortas.DISEÑO:Los resultados posoperatorios de pacientes con cáncer de colon con clase 3-4 de la Sociedad Americana de Anestesiología sometidos a colectomía derecha o sigmoidea se compararon en un análisis multivariado. Se comparó el grupo de colectomía derecha abierta corta (tiempo operatorio <116 minutos) y colectomía derecha mínimamente invasiva larga (tiempo operatorio> 132 minutos). También se compararon la colectomía sigmoidea abierta corta (tiempo operatorio <127 minutos) y la colectomía sigmoidea mínimamente invasiva larga (tiempo operatorio> 161 minutos).ESCENARIO:Las intervenciones se realizaron en hospitales participantes en la base de datos quirúrgica nacional.PACIENTES:La base de datos del Programa Nacional de Mejoramiento de la Calidad Quirúrgica se utilizó para identificar a los pacientes con cáncer de colon con clase 3-4 de la Sociedad Americana de Anestesiología sometidos a colectomía derecha y sigmoidea entre 2012-2017.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se compararon los resultados posoperatorios a los treinta días entre el grupo de procedimientos abiertos cortos y el de mínimamente invasivos largos.RESULTADOS:Se identificó un total de 3.775 pacientes sometidos a colectomía derecha mínimamente invasiva larga y colectomía derecha abierta corta (33% abierta, 67% cirugía mínimamente invasiva) y se identificaron 1042 pacientes sometidos a colectomía sigmoidea mínimamente invasiva larga y colectomía sigmoidea abierta corta (36% abierta, 64% mínimamente invasiva). Los pacientes con colectomía derecha larga mínimamente invasiva tuvieron significativamente menor morbilidad general, eventos adversos graves, mortalidad, infecciones superficiales del sitio quirúrgico, dehiscencia de herida, alta a un nivel más alto de atención y estadía más corta ( p <0.05). Los pacientes con colectomía sigmoidea mínimamente invasiva prolongada tuvieron menor morbilidad general, eventos adversos graves, duración de la estadía y alta a un nivel más alto de atención en comparación con los pacientes con colectomía sigmoidea abierta corta ( p <0.05).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por la naturaleza retrospectiva y las medidas de resultado estandarizadas.CONCLUSIONES:En los pacientes de alto riesgo sometidos a colectomía por cáncer de colon, los resultados fueron peores con operaciones abiertas más cortas en comparación con operaciones mínimamente invasivas más largas. El enfoque debe pasar de hacer que los pacientes "salgan rápido de la mesa quirúrgica" a una cirugía mínimamente invasiva más prolongada pero más segura, en pacientes de alto riesgo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B642 . (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).
A new bibliometric index called the disruption score was recently proposed to identify innovative and paradigm-changing publications.
The goal was to apply the disruption score to the colorectal ...surgery literature to provide the community with a repository of important research articles.
This study is a bibliometric analysis.
The 100 most disruptive and developmental publications in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Colorectal Disease, International Journal of Colorectal Disease, and Techniques in Coloproctology were identified from a validated data set of disruption scores and linked with the iCite National Institutes of Health tool to obtain citation counts.
The primary outcomes measured were the disruption score and citation count.
We identified 12,127 articles published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (n = 8109), International Journal of Colorectal Disease (n = 1912), Colorectal Disease (n = 1751), and Techniques in Coloproctology (n = 355) between 1954 and 2014. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum had the most articles in the top 100 most disruptive and developmental lists. The disruptive articles were in the top 1% of the disruption score distribution in PubMed and were cited between 1 and 671 times. Being highly cited was weakly correlated with high disruption scores (r = 0.09). Developmental articles had disruption scores that were more strongly correlated with citation count (r = 0.18).
This study is subject to the limitations of bibliometric indices, which change over time.
The disruption score identified insightful and paradigm-changing studies in colorectal surgery. These studies include a wide range of topics and consistently identified editorials and case reports/case series as important research. This bibliometric analysis provides colorectal surgeons with a unique archive of research that can often be overlooked but that may have scholarly significance. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B639.UN NUEVO INDICE BIBLIOMÉTRICO: LAS 100 MAS IMPORTANTES PUBLICACIONES EN INNOVACIONES DESESTABILIZADORAS Y DE DESARROLLO EN LAS REVISTAS DE CIRUGÍA COLORRECTALANTECEDENTES:Un nuevo índice bibliométrico llamado innovación desestabilizadora y de desarrollo ha sido propuesto para identificar publicaciones de vanguardia y que pueden romper paradigmas.OBJETIVO:La meta fué aplicar el índice de desestabilización a la literature en cirugía colorectal para aportar a la comunidad con un acervo importante de artículos de investigación.DISEÑO:Un análisis bibliométrico.PARAMETROS:Las 100 publicaciones mas desestabilizadores y de desarrollo en las revistas: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, Colorectal Disease, International Journal of Colorectal Disease, y Techniques in Coloproctology se recuperaron de una base de datos validada con puntuaciones de desestabilización y se ligaron con la herramienta iCite NIH para obtener la cuantificación de citas.PRINCIPAL MEDIDA DE RESULTADO:El índice desestabilizador y la cuantificación de citas.RESULTADOS:Se identificaron 12,127 articulos publicados en Diseases of the Colon and Rectum (n = 8,109), International Journal of Colorectal Disease (n = 1,912), Colorectal Disease (n = 1,751), y Techniques in Coloproctology (n = 355) de 1954-2014. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum representó la mayoría de las publicaciones dentro de la lista de los 100 mas desestabilizadores y de desarrollo. Esta literatura desestabilizadora se encuentra en el principal 1% de la distribución de la puntuacón desestabilizadora en PubMed y se citaron de 1 a 671 veces. El ser citado con frecuencia se relacionó vagamente con las puntuaciones de desastibilización (r = 0.09). Los artículos de desarrollo tuvieron puntuaciones de desestabilización que estuvieron muy correlacionados con la cuantificación de las citas (r = 0.18).LIMITACIONES:Las sujetas a las limitaciones de los índices bibliométricos, que se modifican en el tiempo.DISCUSION:La putuación de desestabilicación identificó trabajos perspicaces, pragmáticos y modificadores de paradigmas en cirugía colorrectal. Es de interés identificar que se incluyeron una gran variedad de temas y en forma consistente editoriales, reportes de casos y series de casos que representaron una investigación importante. Este análisis bibliométrico aporta a los cirujanos colorrectales de un acervo de investigación único que puede con frecuencia pasarse por alto, y sin embargo tener una gran importancia académica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B639. (Traducción- Dr. Miguel Esquivel-Herrera).
The informed consent discussion (ICD) is a compulsory element of clinical practice. Surgical residents are often tasked with obtaining informed consent, but formal instruction is not included in ...standard curricula. This study aims to examine attitudes of surgeons and residents concerning ICD.
A survey regarding ICD was administered to residents and attending surgeons at an academic medical center with an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited general surgery residency.
In total, 44 of 64 (68.75%) residents and 37 of 50 (72%) attending surgeons participated. Most residents felt comfortable consenting for elective (93%) and emergent (82%) cases, but attending surgeons were less comfortable with resident-led ICD (51% elective, 73% emergent). Resident comfort increased with postgraduate year (PGY) (PGY1 = 39%, PGY5 = 85%). A majority of participants (80% attending surgeons, 73% residents) believed resident ICD skills should be formally evaluated, and most residents in PGY1 (61%) requested formal instruction. High percentages of residents (86%) and attendings (100%) believed that ICD skills were best learned from direct observation of attending surgeons.
Resident comfort with ICD increases as residents advance through training. Residents acknowledge the importance of their participation in this process, and in particular, junior residents believe formal instruction is important. Attending surgeons are not universally comfortable with resident-led ICDs, particularly for elective surgeries. Efforts for improving ICD education including direct observation between attending surgeons and residents and formal evaluation may benefit the residency curriculum.
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery has emerged as an improved method of transanal excision of neoplasms because its enhanced visibility, superior optics, and longer reach permit a more complete ...excision and precise closure. This study will show that transanal endoscopic microsurgical treatment of pT1 rectal cancers is safe and achieves low local recurrence and high survival rates.
Retrospective review performed of all pT1 rectal cancers treated by a single surgeon (TS) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery between 1991 and 2003. Patient age, gender, tumor distance from the anal verge, lesion size, operative time, blood loss, complications, recurrence, and survival rates were prospectively recorded.
Fifty-three patients (average age, 65.6 (range, 31-89) years) were studied. Forty-nine percent were male. Average tumor distance from the anal verge was 7 (range, 0-13) cm; average size was 2.4 (range, 1-10) cm. Radiation and/or chemotherapy were not administered. Sixteen patients had pT1 lesions removed piecemeal during colonoscopy; there was no residual tumor after transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection of the polyp site. Mean follow-up was 2.84 years. Fifty-one percent had longer than two-year follow-up. For the entire group, there were four recurrences (7.5 percent) occurring at 9 months, 15 months, 16 months, and 11 years. Two were treated with abdominoperineal resection, one with low anterior resection, and one with fulguration alone. There were no recurrences in the 16 patients who had excision of the polypectomy site. If excluded, recurrence was 11 percent (4/37). Patients were examined at three-month intervals for the first two years and every six months thereafter. There have been no cancer-related deaths.
Transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection of pT1 rectal cancers yields low recurrence rates. Close follow-up permits curative salvage for those that do recur. Transanal excision remains a viable option.
Purpose
Hirschsprung’s disease is primarily a disease of infancy, but in rare cases, adults with this condition require surgery. The aim of this study is to identify the types of operations and ...postoperative outcomes in adults with Hirschsprung’s disease on a national level.
Methods
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to perform a retrospective review of all adult patients diagnosed with Hirschsprung’s disease. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the type of operation: restoration of bowel continuity or diversion of fecal stream; clinicopathologic data and 30-day outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results
A total of 32 patients were analyzed. Fourteen patients (43.8%) underwent diversion and 18 (56.2%) underwent restorative procedures. The median age was 49.5 years old for the diversion group and 23.5 years old for the reconstructive group (
p
= 0.001). The restorative surgery group was more likely to have an ASA 1–2 while the diversion group had a higher frequency of ASA 3–5 (
p
= 0.011). The median length of stay for the diversion surgery was 9.5 days and 5 days for the restoration group (
p
= 0.045). Complications occurred in 57% of patients in the diversion group and in 22% of patients in the restoration group (
p
= 0.049). There were otherwise no statistically significant differences in intraoperative data and postoperative complications.
Conclusion
This is the first study using a national database to evaluate the surgical treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease in adult patients. Complications are common and were more frequent in the older, sicker diversion group, with restoration of continuity being better tolerated in the younger, healthier patient population.
After the impressive response of rectal cancers to neoadjuvant therapy, it seems reasonable to ask: can we can excise the small ulcer locally or avoid a radical resection if there is no gross ...residual tumor? Does gross response reflect what happens to tumor cells microscopically after radiation?
The aim of this study was to identify microscopic tumor cell response to radiation.
This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.
This investigation was conducted at a single tertiary medical center.
Patients were selected who had elective radical resection for rectal cancer after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation performed by 2 colorectal surgeons between 2006 and 2011.
The primary outcome measured was tumor presence after radiation therapy
Of the 75 patients, 20 patients were complete responders and 55 had residual cancer. Of these patients, 28 had no tumor cells seen outside the gross ulcer, and 27 (49.1%) had tumor outside the visible ulcer or microscopic tumor present with no overlying ulcer. Of these tumors, 81.5% were skewed away from the ulcer center. The mean distance of distal scatter was 1.0 cm from the visible ulcer edge to a maximum of 3 cm; 3 patients had tumor cells more than 2 cm distal to the visible ulcer edge. Tumor scatter outside the ulcer was not associated with poor prognostic factors, such as nodal and distant disease, perineural invasion, or mucin; however, it was associated with lymphovascular invasion (χ2 = 4.12, p = 0.038)
There was limited access to clinical information gathered outside our institution.
Our study suggests that 1) after radiation, the gross ulcer cannot be used to determine the sole area of potential residual tumor, 2) cancer cells may be found up to 3 cm distally from the gross ulcer, so the traditional 2-cm margin may not be adequate, and 3) local excision of the ulcer or no excision after apparent complete response appears to be insufficient treatment for rectal cancer.
