Cell surface NKG2D ligands (NKG2DL) bind to the activating NKG2D receptor present on NK cells and subsets of T cells, thus playing a role in initiating an immune response. We examined tumor ...expression and prognostic effect of NKG2DL in breast cancer patients.
Our study population (n = 677) consisted of all breast cancer patients primarily treated with surgery in our center between 1985 and 1994. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was immunohistochemically stained with antibodies directed against MIC-A/MIC-B (MIC-AB), ULBP-1, ULBP-2, ULBP-3, ULBP-4, and ULBP-5.
NKG2DL were frequently expressed by tumors (MIC-AB, 50% of the cases; ULBP-1, 90%; ULBP-2, 99%; ULBP-3, 100%; ULBP-4, 26%; ULBP-5, 90%) and often showed co-expression: MIC-AB and ULBP-4 (p = 0.043), ULBP-1 and ULBP-5 (p = 0.006), ULBP-4 and ULBP-5 (p < 0.001). MIC-AB (p = 0.001) and ULBP-2 (p = 0.006) expression resulted in a statistically significant longer relapse free period (RFP). Combined expression of these ligands showed to be an independent prognostic parameter for RFP (p < 0.001, HR 0.41). Combined expression of all ligands showed no associations with clinical outcome.
We demonstrated for the first time that NKG2DL are frequently expressed and often co-expressed in breast cancer. Expression of MIC-AB and ULBP-2 resulted in a statistically significant beneficial outcome concerning RFP with high discriminative power. Combination of all NKG2DL showed no additive or interactive effect of ligands on each other, suggesting that similar and co-operative functioning of all NKG2DL can not be assumed. Our observations suggest that among driving forces in breast cancer outcome are immune activation on one site and tumor immune escape on the other site.
The purpose of this study was to compare the expression and the prognostic effect of the breast cancer stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 (ALDH1) in young and elderly breast cancer patients.
...The study population (N = 574) consisted of all early breast cancer patients primarily treated with surgery in our center between 1985 and 1994. Median follow-up was 17.9 years (range: 0.1 to 23.5). Tissue microarray slides were immunohistochemically stained for ALDH1 expression and quantified by two independent observers who were blinded to clinical outcome. Assessment of the prognostic effect of ALDH1 expression was stratified according to age and systemic treatment.
Complete lack of expression of ALDH1 was found in 40% of tumors. With increasing age more tumors showed complete absence of ALDH1 expression (P < .001). In patients aged > 65 years, ALDH1 status was not associated with any clinical outcome. Conversely, in patients aged < 65 years, ALDH1 positivity was an independent risk factor of worse outcome for relapse free period (hazard ratio = 1.71 (95% CI, 1.09 to 2.68); P = .021) and relative survival (relative excess risks of death = 2.36 (95% CI, 1.22 to 3.68); P = .016). Ten-year relative survival risk was 57% in ALDH1-positive patients compared to 83% in ALDH1-negative patients.
ALDH1 expression and its prognostic effect are age-dependent. Our results support the hypothesis that breast cancer biology is different in elderly patients compared to their younger counterparts and emphasizes the importance of taking into consideration age-specific interactions in breast cancer research.
We hypothesized that T-cell immune interaction affects tumor development and thus clinical outcome. Therefore, we examined the clinical impact of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I tumor cell ...expression and regulatory T-cell (Treg) infiltration in breast cancer.
Our study population (N = 677) is consisted of all early breast cancer patients primarily treated with surgery in our center between 1985 and 1994. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was immunohistochemically stained using HCA2, HC10, and Foxp3 monoclonal antibodies.
HLA class I expression was evaluated by combining results from HCA2 and HC10 antibodies and classified into three groups: loss, downregulation, and expression. Remarkably, only in patients who received chemotherapy, both presence of Treg (P = 0.013) and higher HLA class I expression levels (P = 0.002) resulted in less relapses, independently of other variables. Treg and HLA class I were not of influence on clinical outcome in patients who did not receive chemotherapy.
We showed that HLA class I and Treg affect prognosis exclusively in chemotherapy-treated patients and are therefore one of the few predictive factors for chemotherapy response in early breast cancer patients. Chemotherapy may selectively eliminate Treg, thus enabling CTLs to kill tumor cells that have retained HLA class I expression. As a consequence, HLA class I and Treg can predict response to chemotherapy with high discriminative power. These markers could be applied in response prediction to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.
P07-A139 Guttae in corneal donor tissue Groeneveld-van Beek, Esther A; Lie, Jessica T; Claessens, Simone A ...
BMJ open ophthalmology,
08/2023, Letnik:
8, Številka:
Suppl 2
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Purpose To report on the occurrence of guttae in corneal donor tissue. Material & Methods Retrospective database study of discard reasons for corneal donor tissue at Amnitrans EyeBank Rotterdam (AER) ...for the period from January 2019 to December 2021 and the outcome of an eight-question survey sent to European Eye Bank Association corresponding members addressing the occurrence of corneal guttae and the practice pattern regarding donor tissue with guttae. Results Between 2019 and 2021 6039 donor corneas were processed at AER. Average discard rate because of guttae in this period was 9 (±4)% (n=552). Most corneas were discarded because of guttae at first evaluation (8%, n=481). Monthly discard rate because of guttae ranged from 3% to 19%. Yearly discard rates related to corneal guttae were 10 (±3)%, 8 (±3)% and 11 (±5)% in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Average endothelial cell density (ECD) at the first evaluation from 2019-2021 was 2486 (±93) cells/mm2, with average monthly ECD ranging from 2343 to 2642 cells/mm2. Twenty-nine eye banks completed the survey, including 4 located outside Europe. 70% reported a guttae-related discard rate of ≤4. The types of microscope used for the evaluation, the geographical location and the number of guttae permitted do not seem to influence the discard rates. 13 eye banks permitted 0 guttae while 10 banks accepted between 1-10 guttae. The 16 eye banks that responded ‘no’ to the question whether the contralateral cornea of a guttae-cornea was automatically discarded did report a lower guttae-related discard rate than the other eye banks. Conclusion The high variability of the discard rate due to guttae in donor corneas (ranging from <1% and >12%) is an indication that it is not always easy to detect guttae in donor corneas. Although transplanting corneal grafts with guttae does not necessarily mean that a re-transplantation will be needed on the short term, a vital method to unequivocally determine the presence of guttae in the eye bank seems essential to prevent unnecessary waste of suspect tissue and unnecessary re-surgeries.
PurposeTo evaluate the effect of graft preparation and organ-culture storage on endothelial cell density (ECD) and viability of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts.MethodsDMEK ...grafts (n=27) were prepared at Amnitrans EyeBank Rotterdam from 27 corneas (15 donors) that were eligible for transplantation but could not be allocated due to the COVID-19-related cancellation of elective surgeries. Cell viability (by Calcein-AM staining) and ECD of 5 grafts originally scheduled for transplantation, were evaluated on the originally planned surgery day, whereas 22 grafts from paired donor corneas were evaluated either directly post-preparation or after 3-7 days of storage. ECD was analyzed by light microscopy (LM ECD) and Calcein-AM staining (Calcein-ECD)ResultsLight microscopy (LM) evaluation of all grafts showed an unremarkable endothelial cell monolayer directly after preparation. However, median Calcein-ECD for the 5 grafts initially allocated for transplantation was 18% (range 9-73%) lower than median LM ECD. For the paired DMEK grafts, Calcein-ECD determined by Calcein-AM staining on the day of graft preparation and after 3-7 days of graft storage showed a median decrease of 1% and 2%, respectively. Median percentage of central graft area populated by viable cells after preparation and after 3-7 days of graft storage was 88% and 92%, respectively.ConclusionsCell viability of most of the grafts will not be affected by preparation and storage. Endothelial cell damage may be observed for some grafts within hours after preparation with insignificant additional ECD changes during 3-7 days of graft storage. Implementing an additional post-preparation step in the eye bank to evaluate cell density before graft release for transplantation may help to reduce postoperative DMEK complications
PurposeTo compare the clinical outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for grafts prepared by the manual no-touch peeling technique and grafts prepared by a modified liquid ...bubble technique.Material and MethodsFor this study, 236 DMEK grafts were included that were prepared at Amnitrans EyeBank Rotterdam by experienced eye bank personnel. 132 grafts were prepared by using the ‘no-touch’ DMEK preparation technique and 104 grafts by using a modified liquid bubble technique. The liquid bubble technique was modified to render it a no-touch technique while maintaining the ability to save the anterior donor button as a potential Deep Anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) or Bowman layer (BL) graft. DMEK surgeries were performed at Melles Cornea Clinic Rotterdam by experienced DMEK surgeons. All patients underwent DMEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Average patient age was 68 (±10) years and average donor age was 69 (±9) years with no difference between the two groups. Endothelial cell density (ECD) was evaluated after graft preparation by light microscopy in the eye bank and at 6-month postoperatively by specular microscopy.ResultsEndothelial cell density (ECD) decreased from 2705 (±146) cells/mm2 (n=132) before to 1570 (±490) cells/mm2 (n=130) at 6 months postoperatively for grafts prepared by the no-touch technique. For grafts prepared by the modifiedliquid bubble technique, ECD decreased from 2627 (±181) cells/mm2 (n=104) before to 1553 (±513) cells/mm2 (n=103) after surgery. Postoperative ECD did not differ for grafts prepared by the two techniques (P=0.79). Central corneal thickness (CCT) decreased from 660 (±124) µm to 513 (±36) µm postoperatively in the no-touch group and from 684 (±116) µm to 515 (±35) µm postoperatively in the modified liquid bubble group, with no postoperative CCT difference between groups (P=0.59). In total 3 eyes underwent re-surgery within the study period (n=2 (1.5%) in the no-touch group, n=1 (1.0%) in the liquid bubble group; P=0.71) and 26 eyes required a re-bubbling procedure for incomplete graft adherence (n=16 (12%) in the no-touch group, n=10 (10%) in the liquid bubble group; P=0.37).ConclusionClinical outcomes after DMEK are comparable for grafts prepared by either the manual no-touch peeling technique or the modified liquid bubble technique. While both techniques are safe and useful techniques to prepare DMEK grafts, the modified liquid bubble technique offers advantages for corneas with scars.
Aim: To evaluate the effect of graft preparation and organ-culture storage on endothelial cell density (ECD) and viability of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts.
Materials and ...methods: DMEK grafts (n = 27) were prepared at Amnitrans EyeBank Rotterdam from 27 corneas (15 donors) that were eligible for transplantation but could not be allocated due to the Covid-19-related cancellation of elective surgeries. Cell viability (by Calcein-AM staining) and ECD of five grafts originally scheduled for transplantation were evaluated on the originally planned surgery day, whereas 22 grafts from paired donor corneas were evaluated either directly post-preparation or after 3-7 days of storage. ECD was analyzed by light microscopy (LM ECD) and Calcein-AM staining (Calcein-ECD).
Results: Light microscopy (LM) evaluation of all grafts showed an unremarkable endothelial cell monolayer directly after preparation. However, median Calcein-ECD for the five grafts initially allocated for transplantation was 18% (range 92-73%) lower than median LM ECD. For the paired DMEK grafts, Calcein-ECD determined by Calcein-AM staining on the day of graft preparation and after 3-7 days of graft storage showed a median decrease of 1% and 2%, respectively. Median percentage of central graft area populated by viable cells after preparation and after 3-7 days of graft storage was 88% and 92%, respectively.
Conclusion: Cell viability of most of the grafts will not be affected by preparation and storage. Endothelial cell damage may be observed for some grafts within hours after preparation, with insignificant additional ECD changes during 3-7 days of graft storage. Implementing an additional post-preparation step in the eye bank to evaluate cell density before graft release for transplantation may help to reduce postoperative DMEK complications.
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of graft preparation and organ‐culture storage on endothelial cell density (ECD) and viability of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts.
Methods
DMEK ...grafts (n = 27) were prepared at Amnitrans EyeBank Rotterdam from 27 corneas (15 donors) that were eligible for transplantation but could not be allocated due to the Covid‐19‐related cancellation of elective surgeries. Cell viability (by Calcein‐AM staining) and ECD of 5 grafts originally scheduled for transplantation, were evaluated on the originally planned surgery day, whereas 22 grafts from paired donor corneas were evaluated either directly post‐preparation or after 3–7 days of storage. ECD was analyzed by light microscopy (LM ECD) and Calcein‐AM staining (Calcein‐ECD)
Results
Light microscopy (LM) evaluation of all grafts showed an unremarkable endothelial cell monolayer directly after preparation. However, median Calcein‐ECD for the 5 grafts initially allocated for transplantation was 18% (range 9–73%) lower than median LM ECD. For the paired DMEK grafts, Calcein‐ECD determined by Calcein‐AM staining on the day of graft preparation and after 3–7 days of graft storage showed a median decrease of 1% and 2%, respectively. Median percentage of central graft area populated by viable cells after preparation and after 3‐7 days of graft storage was 88% and 92%, respectively.
Conclusions
Cell viability of most of the grafts will not be affected by preparation and storage. Endothelial cell damage may be observed for some grafts within hours after preparation with insignificant additional ECD changes during 3–7 days of graft storage. Implementing an additional post‐preparation step in the eye bank to evaluate cell density before graft release for transplantation may help to reduce postoperative DMEK complications
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with a highly variable clinical outcome in which both genetic and epigenetic changes have critical roles. We investigated tumor expression levels of ...histone-modifying enzymes LSD1, HDAC2 and SIRT1 in relation with patient survival and tumor relapse in a retrospective cohort of 460 breast cancer patients. Additionally, we correlated expression levels with tumor differentiation and tumor cell proliferation.
Immunohistochemical staining for LSD1, HDAC2 and SIRT1 was performed on tissue microarrays of tumor and corresponding normal formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from breast cancer patients. Median nuclear expression levels in tumor tissues were used to divide the patients into low and high expression categories. In combined expression analyses, patients were divided into four subgroups: 1, all enzymes below-median; 2, one enzyme above-median; 3, two enzymes above-median; 4, all three enzymes above-median. The Cox proportional hazard model was used for univariate and multivariate survival analyses. The Pearson Chi-square method was used to assess correlation of combined expression levels with tumor cell proliferation and tumor differentiation.
Expression of LSD1 and SIRT1, but not of HDAC2, was significantly increased in tumor tissues compared to their normal counterparts (both p < 0.001). Multivariate survival analyses identified SIRT1 as independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival (RFS) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.34 (95% CI = 1.04-1.74, p = 0.02). For overall survival (OS), no significant differences were found when the individual enzymes were analyzed. Analyses of combined expression levels of the three histone-modifying enzymes correlated with OS (p = 0.03) and RFS (p = 0.006) with a HR of respectively 1.49 (95% CI = 1.07-2.08) and 1.68 (95% CI = 1.16-2.44) in multivariate analyses and were also related to tumor differentiation (p < 0.001) and tumor cell proliferation (p = 0.002).
When the combined expression levels were analyzed, high expression of LSD1, HDAC2 and SIRT1 showed shorter patient survival time and shorter time to tumor relapse and correlated with poor tumor differentiation and a high level of tumor cell proliferation. Expression of these histone-modifying enzymes might therefore be involved in breast cancer pathogenesis.
Signaling via the Insulin-like Growth Factor type 1 Receptor (IGF1R) plays a crucial role in cancer development. In breast cancer (BC), IGF1R and estrogen receptor expression are correlated. In this ...current study we explored the hypothesis that postmenopausal hormone receptor positive (HR+ve) BC patients with high IGF1R tumor expression still have estrogen driven IGF1R stimulated tumor growth when treated with tamoxifen, resulting in detrimental clinical outcome compared to patients treated with exemestane. Additionally, we assessed the added value of metformin as this drug may lower IGF1R stimulation.
Of 2,446 Dutch TEAM patients, randomized to either exemestane for 5 years or sequential treatment (tamoxifen for 2–3 years followed by exemestane for another 3–2 years) tumor tissue microarray sections were immunohistochemically stained for IGF1R. Overall Survival (OS), Breast Cancer specific Survival (BCSS) and Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) were assessed in patient subgroups with low and high IGF1R expression, and in patients with or without metformin use.
High IGF1R tumor expression was significantly associated with exemestane therapy for RFS (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.58–0.95, p = 0.02). In addition, the combination of metformin with exemestane resulted in improved efficacy, yielding a 5-yrs RFS of 95% (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10–1.00, p = 0.02, compared to sequential treatment). No relation was observed in tumors with low IGF-1R expression.
This study suggests IGF1R as a potential biomarker of improved clinical outcome in HR+ve BC patients treated with exemestane. Adding metformin to exemestane treatment may add to this effect.
•Breast tumor tissue sections from Dutch TEAM patients were immunohistochemically stained for IGF1R status.•Part of this cohort was using metformin because of Diabetes type 2.•Breast cancer patients on exemestane harboring high IGF1R tumor expression had significantly less breast cancer relapse.•The addition of metformin to exemestane treatment resulted in improved efficacy.•Dual blockade of insulin- and estrogen-related growth pathway may improve outcome in selective breast cancer patients.
PDF
