Summary In the past 20 years the treatment scenario of multiple sclerosis has radically changed. The increasing availability of effective disease-modifying therapies has shifted the aim of ...therapeutic interventions from a reduction in relapses and disability accrual, to the absence of any sign of clinical or MRI activity. The choice for therapy is increasingly complex and should be driven by an appropriate knowledge of the mechanisms of action of the different drugs and of their risk-benefit profile. Because the relapsing phase of the disease is characterised by inflammation, treatment should be started as early as possible and aim to re-establish the normal complex interactions in the immune system. Before starting a treatment, neurologists should carefully consider the state of the disease, its prognostic factors and comorbidities, the patient's response to previous treatments, and whether the patient is likely to accept treatment-related risks in order to maximise benefits and minimise risks. Early detection of suboptimum responders, thanks to accurate clinical monitoring, will allow clinicians to redesign treatment strategies where necessary.
Summary Background On the basis of various clinical and MRI measurements, the phase 3 Cladribine Tablets Treating Multiple Sclerosis Orally (CLARITY) study in patients with relapsing–remitting ...multiple sclerosis (RRMS) showed that short-course oral treatment with cladribine at cumulative doses of 3·5 and 5·25 mg/kg over 96 weeks was more effective than placebo. Achieving sustained freedom from disease activity is becoming a viable treatment goal in RRMS; we therefore aimed to assess the effects of cladribine on this composite outcome measure by doing a post-hoc analysis of data from the CLARITY study. Methods Freedom from disease activity is composed of three components that are commonly used individually as endpoints in clinical trials; it is defined as the patient having no relapse, no 3-month sustained change in expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score, and no new MRI lesions (no T1 gadolinium-enhancing or active T2 lesions) over a specified period. We assessed the effect of two doses of cladribine tablets versus placebo on the proportion of patients who were free from disease activity based on the individual components, all pair-wise combinations, and the composite of the three components (freedom from disease activity). Freedom from disease activity was analysed at 24, 48, and 96 weeks, and in subgroups of patients stratified according to baseline demographic and disease characteristics (age, disease duration, previous treatment with disease-modifying therapy, T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesion number, T2 lesion volume, EDSS score, number of previous relapses, and highly active disease). Findings Of the 1326 patients randomly assigned to treatment in the CLARITY study, 1192 were assessable for freedom from disease activity at 96 weeks. Over 24 weeks, 266 (67%) of 395 patients in the cladribine 3·5 mg/kg group and 283 (70%) of 406 in the cladribine 5·25 mg/kg group were free from disease activity, versus 145 (39%) of 373 in the placebo group (odds ratio OR 3·31, 95% CI 2·46–4·46 for the 3·5 mg/kg group; and 3·68, 2·73–4·97 for the 5·25 mg/kg group; both p<0·0001). Over 48 weeks, 208 (54%) of 384 patients in the cladribine 3·5 mg/kg group and 222 (56%) of 396 patients in the cladribine 5·25 mg/kg group were free from disease activity, versus 86 (24%) of 360 patients in the placebo group (OR 3·80, 2·77–5·22 for the 3·5 mg/kg group; 4·13, 3·02–5·66 for the 5·25 mg/kg group; both p<0·0001). Over 96 weeks, 178 (44%) of 402 patients in the cladribine 3·5 mg/kg group and 189 (46%) of 411 patients in the cladribine 5·25 mg/kg group were free from disease activity, versus 60 (16%) of 379 patients in the placebo group (OR 4·28, 3·05–6·02 for the 3·5 mg/kg group; 4·62, 3·29–6·48 for the 5·25 mg/kg group; both p<0·0001). The effects of cladribine tablets on freedom from disease activity were significant across all patient subgroups. Interpretation Treatment with cladribine tablets significantly increased the proportion of patients with sustained freedom from disease activity over 96 weeks compared with placebo. Sustained freedom from disease activity could become an important measure of therapeutic response in RRMS. Funding Merck Serono SA–Geneva, Switzerland; an affiliate of Merck, Darmstadt, Germany.
Summary The identification of factors that can affect the efficacy of immunomodulatory drugs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) is important. For the available interferon-beta products, ...neutralising antibodies (NAb) have been shown to affect treatment efficacy. In June, 2009, a panel of experts in MS and NAbs to interferon-beta therapy convened in Amsterdam, Netherlands, under the auspices of the Neutralizing Antibodies on Interferon beta in Multiple Sclerosis consortium, a European-based project of the 6th Framework Programme of the European Commission, to review and discuss data on NAbs and their practical consequences for the treatment of patients with MS on interferon beta. The panel believed that information about NAbs and other markers of biological activity of interferons (ie, myxovirus resistance protein A MxA) can be integrated with clinical and imaging indicators to guide individual treatment decisions. In cases of sustained high-titre NAb positivity and/or lack of MxA bioactivity, a switch to a non-interferon-beta therapy should be considered. In patients who are doing poorly clinically, therapy should be switched irrespective of NAb or MxA bioactivity.
Summary Background Interferon beta is commonly used to treat patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; however, the treatment is only partially effective in reducing relapses and ...progression of disability. Corticosteroids are used to treat relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis. We therefore aimed to investigate the combination of cyclic methylprednisolone and interferon beta for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Methods In 2001, we designed a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group trial, termed the methylprednisolone in combination with interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MECOMBIN) study. Patients were recruited between October, 2002, and March, 2005 from 50 neurology departments in eight countries. We included treatment-naive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who had an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of 4 or less. Patients all started to receive interferon beta-1a and after 3 months were randomly assigned to add-on methylprednisolone or placebo 500 mg/day orally for 3 consecutive days per month for 3–4 years. Placebo tablets were identical to methylprednisolone tablets. Treating physicians, examining physicians, and patients were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were clinically assessed every 3 months and had brain MRI at baseline and 3 years later. The primary outcome was time to onset of disability progression, according to an increase in EDSS score sustained over 6 months. All patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in all planned analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00168766. Findings 341 patients were randomly assigned to methylprednisolone (n=172) or placebo (n=169); 171 patients in the methylprednisolone group and 167 in the placebo group received at least one dose of study drug. 90 patients had sustained disability progression: 44 of 167 in the methylprednisolone group and 46 of 171 in the placebo group. The time to sustained progression did not differ between groups (hazard ratio 0·879, 95% CI 0·566–1·365; p=0·57). There were 1436 adverse events, 24 of which were serious, in the methylprednisolone group and 1070 events, 35 of which were serious, in the placebo group. Interpretation Monthly pulses of methylprednisolone in combination with interferon beta-1a do not seem to affect disability progression any more than interferon beta-1a treatment alone. More research is required to assess whether this treatment regimen might benefit particular subsets of patients. Funding Biogen Idec.
Summary Background Treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with interferon beta is only partly effective. We aimed to establish whether add-on of simvastatin, a statin with ...anti-inflammatory properties, improves this efficacy. Methods We enrolled treatment-naive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group trial of simvastatin (80 mg daily) as add-on treatment to intramuscular interferon beta-1a (30 μg weekly). After starting treatment with interferon beta, patients were randomly assigned (in computer-generated blocks of four patients) to simvastatin 80 mg per day or placebo for 1–3 years. Patients and treating and evaluating physicians were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was annual rate of documented relapses; analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00492765. Findings We randomly assigned 307 patients to interferon beta plus simvastatin (n=151) or plus placebo (n=156). Annual rate of documented relapses was 0·19 (95% CI 0·13 to 0·28) in the simvastatin group and 0·14 (95% CI 0·09 to 0·23) in the placebo group (absolute difference 0·059, 95% CI −0·21 to 0·09; p=0·35). Time to first documented relapse (20th percentile) was 18·1 months in patients on simvastatin and 21·5 months in those on placebo (hazard ratio 1·21, 95% CI 0·74 to 1·99; p=0·51). Mean number of new or enlarging T2 lesions was 2·96 in the simvastatin group and 2·52 in the placebo group (ratio of new lesions, 1·17, 95% CI 8·89 to 1·55; p=0·25). Eight (6%) patients on simvastatin and 17 (13%) on placebo had no disease activity (odds ratio 0·42, 95% CI 0·17 to 1·00; p=0·05). No unexpected adverse events were seen. Generally, adverse events were mild and there were no group differences in infections or musculoskeletal disorders, including myalgia (five 3% patients on simvastatin and nine 6% on placebo). Rhabdomyolysis and myoglobinuria were not reported and there were no differences in serum creatine phosphokinase. Interpretation We found no beneficial effect of simvastatin as add-on therapy to interferon beta-1a. Although unlikely, we can not exclude that combination of other statins with other disease-modifying drugs still could be beneficial. Funding Biogen Idec.
Summary Natalizumab, a highly specific α4-integrin antagonist, is approved for treatment of patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). It is generally recommended for ...individuals who have not responded to a currently available first-line disease-modifying therapy or who have very active disease. The expected benefits of natalizumab treatment have to be weighed against risks, especially the rare but serious adverse event of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. In this Review, we revisit and update previous recommendations on natalizumab for treatment of patients with RRMS, based on additional long-term follow-up of clinical studies and post-marketing observations, including appropriate patient selection and management recommendations.
