Diffuse gliomas are malignant brain tumors that include lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) and glioblastomas. Transformation of low-grade glioma into a higher tumor grade is typically associated with ...contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging. Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (
) gene occur in most LGGs (> 70%). Ivosidenib is an inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) under evaluation in patients with solid tumors.
We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I, dose escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib in patients with m
solid tumors. Ivosidenib was administered orally daily in 28-day cycles.
In 66 patients with advanced gliomas, ivosidenib was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities reported. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 500 mg once per day was selected for the expansion cohort. The grade ≥ 3 adverse event rate was 19.7%; 3% (n = 2) were considered treatment related. In patients with nonenhancing glioma (n = 35), the objective response rate was 2.9%, with 1 partial response. Thirty of 35 patients (85.7%) with nonenhancing glioma achieved stable disease compared with 14 of 31 (45.2%) with enhancing glioma. Median progression-free survival was 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 33.2 months) and 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.9 months) for the nonenhancing and enhancing glioma cohorts, respectively. In an exploratory analysis, ivosidenib reduced the volume and growth rates of nonenhancing tumors.
In patients with m
advanced glioma, ivosidenib 500 mg once per day was associated with a favorable safety profile, prolonged disease control, and reduced growth of nonenhancing tumors.
Lower grade gliomas (LGGs) are malignant brain tumors. Current therapy is associated with short- and long-term toxicity. Progression to higher tumor grade is associated with contrast enhancement on ...MRI. The majority of LGGs harbor mutations in the genes encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (
). Vorasidenib (AG-881) is a first-in-class, brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of the mutant IDH1 and mutant IDH2 enzymes.
We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I, dose-escalation study of vorasidenib in 93 patients with mutant
(m
) solid tumors, including 52 patients with glioma that had recurred or progressed following standard therapy. Vorasidenib was administered orally, once daily, in 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Enrollment is complete; this trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02481154.
Vorasidenib showed a favorable safety profile in the glioma cohort. Dose-limiting toxicities of elevated transaminases occurred at doses ≥100 mg and were reversible. The protocol-defined objective response rate per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria for LGG in patients with nonenhancing glioma was 18% (one partial response, three minor responses). The median progression-free survival was 36.8 months 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.2-40.8 for patients with nonenhancing glioma and 3.6 months (95% CI, 1.8-6.5) for patients with enhancing glioma. Exploratory evaluation of tumor volumes in patients with nonenhancing glioma showed sustained tumor shrinkage in multiple patients.
Vorasidenib was well tolerated and showed preliminary antitumor activity in patients with recurrent or progressive nonenhancing m
LGG.
Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma Mellinghoff, Ingo K; van den Bent, Martin J; Blumenthal, Deborah T ...
The New England journal of medicine,
08/2023, Letnik:
389, Številka:
7
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grade 2 gliomas are malignant brain tumors that cause considerable disability and premature death. Vorasidenib, an oral brain-penetrant inhibitor of mutant IDH1 ...and IDH2 enzymes, showed preliminary activity in IDH-mutant gliomas.
In a double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma who had undergone no previous treatment other than surgery to receive either oral vorasidenib (40 mg once daily) or matched placebo in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival according to blinded assessment by an independent review committee. The key secondary end point was the time to the next anticancer intervention. Crossover to vorasidenib from placebo was permitted on confirmation of imaging-based disease progression. Safety was also assessed.
A total of 331 patients were assigned to receive vorasidenib (168 patients) or placebo (163 patients). At a median follow-up of 14.2 months, 226 patients (68.3%) were continuing to receive vorasidenib or placebo. Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (median progression-free survival, 27.7 months vs. 11.1 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.27 to 0.56; P<0.001). The time to the next intervention was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.43; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 22.8% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in 13.5% of those who received placebo. An increased alanine aminotransferase level of grade 3 or higher occurred in 9.6% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in no patients who received placebo.
In patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma, vorasidenib significantly improved progression-free survival and delayed the time to the next intervention. (Funded by Servier; INDIGO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04164901.).
Vorasidenib and ivosidenib inhibit mutant forms of isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH) and have shown preliminary clinical activity against mIDH glioma. We evaluated both agents in a perioperative phase ...1 trial to explore the mechanism of action in recurrent low-grade glioma (IGG) and select a molecule for phase 3 testing. Primary end-point was concentration of D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), the metabolic product of mIDH enzymes, measured in tumor tissue from 49 patients with mIDH1-R132H nonenhancing gliomas following randomized treatment with vorasidenib (50 mg or 10 mg once daily, q.d.), ivosidenib (500 mg q.d. or 250 mg twice daily) or no treatment before surgery. Tumor 2-HG concentrations were reduced by 92.6% (95% credible interval (CrI), 76.1-97.6) and 91.1% (95% CrI, 72.0-97.0) in patients treated with vorasidenib 50 mg q.d. and ivosidenib 500 mg q.d., respectively. Both agents were well tolerated and follow-up is ongoing. In exploratory analyses, 2-HG reduction was associated with increased DNA 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, reversal of 'proneural' and 'stemness' gene expression signatures, decreased tumor cell proliferation and immune cell activation. Vorasidenib, which showed brain penetrance and more consistent 2-HG suppression than ivosidenib, was advanced to phase 3 testing in patients with mIDH LGGs. Funded by Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC; ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03343197.
Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) remains largely incurable and often requires multiple lines of treatment after becoming refractory to standard therapies. Duvelisib was approved by the Food and ...Drug Administration for relapsed or refractory (RR) chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) and RR follicular lymphoma (FL) after two or more prior systemic therapies. On the basis of the activity of duvelisib, a first-in-class oral dual inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-δ,-γ, in RR iNHL in a phase I study, the safety and efficacy of duvelisib monotherapy was evaluated in iNHL refractory to rituximab and either chemotherapy or radioimmunotherapy.
Eligible patients had measurable iNHL (FL, SLL, or marginal zone B-cell lymphoma) double refractory to rituximab (monotherapy or in combination) and to either chemotherapy or radioimmunotherapy. All were treated with duvelisib 25 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) using the revised International Working Group criteria for malignant lymphoma.
This open-label, global phase II trial enrolled 129 patients (median age, 65 years; median of three prior lines of therapy) with an ORR of 47.3% (SLL, 67.9%; FL, 42.2%; MZL, 38.9%). The estimated median duration of response was 10 months, and the estimated median progression-free survival was 9.5 months. The most frequent any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea (48.8%), nausea (29.5%), neutropenia (28.7%), fatigue (27.9%), and cough (27.1%). Among the 88.4% of patients with at least one grade 3 or greater TEAE, the most common TEAEs were neutropenia (24.8%), diarrhea (14.7%), anemia (14.7%), and thrombocytopenia (11.6%).
In the DYNAMO study, oral duvelisib monotherapy demonstrated clinically meaningful activity and a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated, double-refractory iNHL, consistent with previous observations. Duvelisib may provide a new oral treatment option for this patient population of which many are elderly and in need of additional therapies.
Abstract
Background
Since IDH-mutant (mIDH) low-grade gliomas (LGGs) progress slowly and have a relatively long survival, there is a significant need for earlier measurements of clinical benefit. ...Guidance using the LGG RANO criteria recommends serial bidirectional (2D) measurements on a single slice; however, questions remain as to whether volumetric (3D) measurements are better, since they would allow for more accurate measurements in irregular shaped lesions and allow readers to better assess areas of subtle change.
Methods
Twenty-one (out of 24) non-enhancing, recurrent mIDH1 LGGs were enrolled in a phase I, multicenter, open-label study of oral ivosidenib (NCT02073994), and with imaging pre- and post-treatment as part of this exploratory ad hoc analysis. 2D and 3D measurements on T2-weighted FLAIR images were centrally evaluated at an imaging contract research organization using a paired read and forced adjudication paradigm. The effects of 2D vs 3D measurements on progression-free survival (PFS), growth rate measurement variability, and reader concordance and adjudication rates were quantified.
Results
3D volumetric measurements showed significantly longer estimated PFS (P = .0181), more stable (P = .0063) and considerably slower measures of tumor growth rate (P = .0037), the highest inter-reader agreement (weighted kappa = 0.7057), and significantly lower reader discordance rates (P = .0002) with 2D LGG RANO.
Conclusion
3D volumetric measurements are better for determining response assessment in LGGs due to more stable measures of tumor growth rates (ie, less “yo-yo-ing” of measurements over time), highest inter-reader agreement, and lowest reader discordance rates. Continued evaluation in future studies is warranted to determine whether these measurements reflect clinical benefit.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Astrocytomas are a subset of diffuse gliomas defined by intact 1p and 19q arms. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (mIDH-1) occur in ~70% of grade 2/3 gliomas, leading to ...accumulation of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). Vorasidenib (VOR) is an oral, brain-penetrant dual inhibitor of mIDH1/2 enzymes being investigated in a phase 3 study in non-enhancing gliomas. In an ongoing perioperative study in grade 2/3 gliomas, treatment with VOR was associated with interferon (IFN) signaling activation and increased T-cell infiltration, suggesting adequate 2-HG suppression renders the tumor immune microenvironment for immune checkpoint blockade, and supporting investigation of VOR in combination with an anti-programmed cell death (PD-1) antibody such as pembrolizumab in recurrent IDH-mutant gliomas treatment. This study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of VOR plus pembrolizumab to determine the recommended combination dose (RCD) of VOR, and evaluate CD3+ T-cell infiltration in tumors following preoperative treatment with the combination or VOR.
METHODS
This study will enroll ~70 patients with recurrent or progressive Grade 2/3 mIDH-1 astrocytoma. Key eligibility: enhancing disease, mIDH1-R132H, Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70, eligible for resection (perioperative phase only). Safety lead-in: Cohort 1 (Nf~6): VOR 40 mg QD plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W in 21-day cycles. Based on DLT evaluation, cohort 2 may enroll an additional ~6 patients at VOR 20 mg QD plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W. Randomized, perioperative phase (Nf~60): randomized 1:1:1 to the combination, VOR 40 mg QD, or untreated for 4 weeks preoperatively; all patients can opt to receive the combination postoperatively. Primary objectives: safety and tolerability, and VOR RCD with pembrolizumab; CD3+ T-cell infiltration in resected tumors following presurgical treatment with the combination compared to untreated tumors. Secondary objectives include clinical activity, VOR PK in tumor and blood, 2-HG concentration in tumors, and overall survival. This study will be active in the United States.
Abstract
Since IDH mutant (mIDH) low-grade gliomas (LGGs) progress slowly and patients have a relatively long survival, testing of new therapies in clinical trials based solely on survival can take ...more than 20 years. Guidance on therapeutic evaluation using LGG RANO criteria recommends serial bidirectional (2D) measurements on a single slice; however, questions remain as to the best approach for evaluating LGGs in clinical trials including use of volumetric (3D) measurements, which would theoretically allow for more accurate measurements of irregular shaped lesions and allow readers to better assess areas of change within these tumors. A total of 21 (out of 24) non-enhancing, recurrent mIDH LGGs with imaging pre- and post-treatment enrolled in a phase I, multicenter, open-label study to assess the safety and tolerability of oral ivosidenib (NCT02073994) were included in this exploratory ad hoc analysis. 2D bidirectional and 3D volumetric measurements were centrally evaluated by one of 3 radiologists at an imaging CRO using a paired read and forced adjudication paradigm. The effects of 2D vs. 3D measurements on progression-free survival (PFS), growth rate measurement variability, and reader concordance and adjudication rates were then quantified. 3D volumetric measurements had significantly longer estimates of PFS (P=0.0181), more stable (P=0.0063) and considerably lower measures of tumor growth rate (P=0.0037), the highest inter-reader agreement (weighted Kappa=0.7057), and significantly lower reader discordance rates (P=0.0002) with comparable recommended LGG RANO 2D approaches. In summary, 3D volumetric measurements are better for determining response assessment in LGGs due to longer PFS and more stable measures of tumor growth rates (i.e. less “yo-yo-ing” of measurements over time causing fewer erroneous calls of progression and more accurate growth rates), highest inter-reader agreement, and lowest reader discordance rates. Future studies will focus on validating this in a larger cohort and determining whether these measurements better reflect clinical benefit.
PDF
