Since IHC originally evolved as an extension of special stains in anatomic pathology,1 regulating IHC as a stain made sense. ...EQA programs are not the primary source of objective assay performance ...feedback in clinical pathology. ...of the disparity in CAP checklist requirements, pathologists are not sufficiently empowered with the information they need to identify IHC assay problems. ...there are of course the logistic and economic concerns that implementing the proposed upgraded QA system is too difficult or would cost too much.
The first silicone breast implant was inserted in 1962. In 1997, the first case of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) in association with a silicone breast implant was reported. The authors ...reviewed 37 articles in the world literature reporting on 79 patients and collected another 94 unreported cases as of the date of submission.
The world literature was reviewed. Missing clinical and laboratory information was solicited from the authors and treating physicians. As several different specialties were involved, information was not in one place. Many (but not all) authors and treating physicians were responsive, resulting in incomplete data.
ALCL lesions first presented as late peri-implant seromas, a mass attached to the capsule, tumor erosion through the skin, in a regional node, or discovered during revision surgery. The clinical course varied widely from a single positive cytology result followed by apparent spontaneous resolution, to disseminated treatment-resistant tumor and death. There was no preference for saline or silicone fill or for cosmetic or reconstructive indications. Where implant history was known, the patient had received at least one textured-surface device. Extracapsular dissemination occurred in 18 cases; nine of those were fatal. Histochemical markers were primarily CD-30 and Alk-1. Other markers occurred at a lower frequency. Risk estimates ranged from one in 500,000 to one in 3 million women with implants.
Breast implant-associated ALCL is a novel manifestation of site- and material-specific lymphoma originating in a specific scar location, presenting a wide array of diverse characteristics and suggesting a multifactorial cause.
Antigen Retrieval Immunohistochemistry Shi, Shan-Rong; Shi, Yan; Taylor, Clive R.
Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry,
01/2011, Letnik:
59, Številka:
1
Book Review, Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
As a review for the 20th anniversary of publishing the antigen retrieval (AR) technique in this journal, the authors intend briefly to summarize developments in AR-immunohistochemistry (IHC)–based ...research and diagnostics, with particular emphasis on current challenges and future research directions. Over the past 20 years, the efforts of many different investigators have coalesced in extending the AR approach to all areas of anatomic pathology diagnosis and research and further have led to AR-based protein extraction techniques and tissue-based proteomics. As a result, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archival tissue collections are now seen as a literal treasure of materials for clinical and translational research to an extent unimaginable just two decades ago. Further research in AR-IHC is likely to focus on tissue proteomics, developing a more efficient protocol for protein extraction from FFPE tissue based on the AR principle, and combining the proteomics approach with AR-IHC to establish a practical, sophisticated platform for identifying and using biomarkers in personalized medicine.
Companion diagnostics, tests that purport to classify patients into “responders” and “non-responders” for a specified targeted therapy, demand methods that quantify the actual amount of the ...corresponding target molecule in tumors from these patients. Various methods are employed depending upon the nature of the target. Many of the candidate therapeutic agents target the abnormal expression of a protein, the detection of which lends itself to an immunohistochemistry (IHC) approach. This review focuses on IHC with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues for purely pragmatic reasons; first, the morphologic information pertaining to the tumor is of value and should not be discarded as in extraction type assays; second, FFPE tissues are mostly what we have to hand at the time that the diagnostic question is posed. During the four decades of employment of IHC involving the production of a variety of special stains used in the diagnosis or classification of tumors, we have acquired some bad habits, essentially when judging the IHC result via the perception of a “good” stain that “pleases the eye” of the user pathologist, and nothing more. This review takes, as its basic premise, the notion that IHC can be upgraded from its use as a qualitative special staining method to an accurate and reliable quantitative “tissue-based immunologic assay”. If accomplished, this enhanced IHC assay would serve accurately to quantify proteins in tissue sections, analogous to the use of the ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) method in the clinical laboratory. The necessary steps for converting IHC to a tissue-based ELISA-like immunoassay of immediate practical use are reviewed with constructive suggestions for steps that can be (must be) taken to achieve the practical reality of quantitative in situ proteomics.
For several decades, immunohistochemistry (IHC), more specifically diagnostic IHC (dIHC), has been considered an art rather than a laboratory test. There was no clarity about what test performance ...characteristics are relevant to dIHC, test performance characteristics were not fully defined for dIHC and partly as a consequence of that, there were no standardised controls or reference standards. Herein, we discuss the role of standardisation of external controls for test performance characteristics and the role of standardised controls and reference standards for overall standardisation of IHC.
Most prior studies of primary diagnosis in surgical pathology using whole slide imaging (WSI) versus microscopy have focused on specific organ systems or included relatively few cases. The objective ...of this study was to demonstrate that WSI is noninferior to microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology. A blinded randomized noninferiority study was conducted across the entire range of surgical pathology cases (biopsies and resections, including hematoxylin and eosin, immunohistochemistry, and special stains) from 4 institutions using the original sign-out diagnosis (baseline diagnosis) as the reference standard. Cases were scanned, converted to WSI and randomized. Sixteen pathologists interpreted cases by microscopy or WSI, followed by a wash-out period of ≥4 weeks, after which cases were read by the same observers using the other modality. Major discordances were identified by an adjudication panel, and the differences between major discordance rates for both microscopy (against the reference standard) and WSI (against the reference standard) were calculated. A total of 1992 cases were included, resulting in 15,925 reads. The major discordance rate with the reference standard diagnosis was 4.9% for WSI and 4.6% for microscopy. The difference between major discordance rates for microscopy and WSI was 0.4% (95% confidence interval, -0.30% to 1.01%). The difference in major discordance rates for WSI and microscopy was highest in endocrine pathology (1.8%), neoplastic kidney pathology (1.5%), urinary bladder pathology (1.3%), and gynecologic pathology (1.2%). Detailed analysis of these cases revealed no instances where interpretation by WSI was consistently inaccurate compared with microscopy for multiple observers. We conclude that WSI is noninferior to microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology, including biopsies and resections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, immunohistochemistry and special stains. This conclusion is valid across a wide variety of organ systems and specimen types.