To compare histologic findings of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) at 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (hereafter, vacuum-assisted biopsy) and at 14-gauge, automated, large-core ...breast biopsy (hereafter, large-core biopsy) with findings at histologic examination after surgical biopsy.
Nonpalpable breast lesions were diagnosed as ADH at histologic examination after vacuum-assisted biopsy in 88 lesions in seven institutions and after large-core biopsy in 55 previously reported lesions. Histologic findings at subsequent surgical biopsy were compared for the presence of carcinoma.
On the basis of histologic findings of carcinoma at surgical biopsy, the diagnosis of ADH was not correct in 26 (48%) of 54 lesions sampled at large-core biopsy and in 13 (18%) of 74 lesions sampled at vacuum-assisted biopsy (Fisher exact test, P < .0004). More tissue specimens were obtained at vacuum-assisted biopsy (mean, 15.8 specimens) than at large-core biopsy (mean, 9.7 specimens). Individual specimens were twice as large at vacuum-assisted biopsy (mean, 34 mg) as at large-core biopsy (mean, 17 mg) (previously reported).
ADH was diagnosed 2.7 times more reliably at vacuum-assisted biopsy than at large-core biopsy (with no increase in complications) with most of the improvement as a result of acquisition of more than 10 specimens per lesion, but carcinoma was sufficiently underestimated with both methods to necessitate surgical biopsy.
To determine whether mammographic or histologic features can be used to predict which cases diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without invasion by means of stereotactic core needle biopsy ...(SCNB) will have invasive disease at surgery.
From July 1992 to March 1999, DCIS without invasion was diagnosed by means of SCNB in 59 patients. Seventeen (29%) were found to have invasive disease after surgery. The underestimation rate for SCNB was compared with that obtained by means of open surgical biopsy. Mammographic and histologic features of cases with and those without invasion were compared.
All patients had calcifications on mammograms. There was no significant difference (P: =.26) between the underestimation rate for SCNB with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device and that for open surgical biopsy. No statistically significant differences between cases with and those without invasion were seen in patient age, mean number of core specimens, level of suspicion, size of lesion, distribution and morphology of the calcifications, presence of an associated mass or density, subtype of DCIS, nuclear grade, or presence of necrosis or desmoplasia.
Mammographic and histologic features cannot be used reliably to predict cases that are underestimated with SCNB. However, SCNB with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device was as reliable as open surgical biopsy for diagnosing DCIS without invasion.
To assess the accuracy of stereotactic core-needle biopsy (CNB) of nonpalpable breast lesions within the context of clinically important parameters of anticipated tissue-sampling error and ...concordance with mammographic findings.
CNB was performed in 1,003 patients, with results validated at surgery or clinical and mammographic follow-up. Mammographic findings were scored according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System with a similar correlative scale for histopathologic samples obtained at either CNB or surgery. Agreement of CNB findings with surgical findings or evidence of no change during clinical and mammographic follow-up (median, 24 months) for benign lesions was used to determine results. Three forms of diagnostic discrimination measures (strict, working strict conditioned by tissue sampling error, applied working conditioned by concordance of imaging and CNB findings) were used to evaluate the correlation of CNB, surgical, and follow-up results.
Strict, working, and applied sensitivities were 91% +/- 1.9; 92% +/- 1.8, and 98% +/- 0.9, respectively; strict, working, and applied specificities were 100%, 98% +/- 0.8, and 73% +/- 0.9; strict, working, and applied accuracies were 97%, 96%, and 79%.
Percutaneous stereotactic CNB is an accurate method to establish a histopathologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. Accuracy increases when additional surgery is performed for lesions with anticipated sampling error or when CNB findings are discordant with mammographic findings. An understanding of the interrelationship among these parameters is necessary to properly assess results.
To determine the cost savings of stereotactic core needle biopsy over open surgical biopsy in patient subgroups defined according to mammographic findings.
From July 1992 through February 1995, ...stereotactic core needle biopsy was performed in 356 women with 405 nonpalpable breast lesions (254 were masses and 151 were calcification). Lesions were classified according to mammographic finding, size, and level of suspicion. Two hundred three lesions were classified as indeterminate, 166 as suspicious, and 36 as highly suspicious. Medicare reimbursements for 1995 were used to determine costs and cost savings.
Overall cost savings for stereotactic core biopsy over open surgical biopsy was $741 per case. Average cost savings per case was $807 for masses and $630 for calcifications. The greatest savings occurred in the cases of indeterminate masses, with an average of $856 saved per case. The least savings occurred in the cases of highly suspicious calcifications, with $446 saved per case.
Cost savings of stereotactic core needle biopsy vary in subgroups of patients defined according to mammographic findings. Over-all savings will depend on the distribution of patients among these groups. In this series, cost savings were realized with stereotactic core biopsy over open surgical biopsy for all mammographic subgroups.
•The EHA-IDWP developed an observational registry collecting data on COVID-19 infection in patients who received CAR T-cell therapy.•Prevalence of COVID-19 was 4.8%, and overall mortality was 50%, ...highlighting the need for prevention of infection in these patients.
Abstract Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes high morbidity and mortality among allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Preemptive therapy with oral valganciclovir or intravenous ganciclovir ...has replaced universal prophylaxis. We prospectively studied 19 consecutive adult recipients of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplants from May 2005 through February 2007 to analyze the safety and efficacy of preemptive therapy for the treatment of CMV infection. The antigenemia test was persistently negative in 8 patients (42%) and positive at least once in 11 (58%). Eight patients were treated with oral valganciclovir on an outpatient basis and they all became CMV negative after the first week of treatment. The other 3 patients received intravenous ganciclovir and were also CMV negative after the first week of treatment. No patient abandoned treatment, no severe secondary toxicity was noted, and there was no CMV-associated mortality.
Abstract Introduction Therapeutic decisions and clinical events during the pretransplantation phase of stem cell transplantation (SCT) may influence survival, quality of life, and efficiency of ...health expenses. However, there is a lack of relevant published data. Aims The aims of this study were to identify reasons why the procedure was not performed and to know the waiting time for SCT candidates. Patients and Methods We collected pretransplantation data from 166 consecutive patients evaluated by the SCT Committee of a tertiary center between April 2005 and December 2006. Results One hundred fifty-two of 166 patients were referred for the first time. Additionally, 14 were reconsidered as candidates for a subsequent SCT due to relapse, graft failure, secondary malignancy, or a multiple-graft program. One hundred forty-one were accepted for transplantation, whereas 25 were not. At the time of analysis, 22 patients were still awaiting SCT, 8 were delayed because they required additional courses of treatment, and 32 were excluded because of death (34.4%), poor stem cell mobilization (21.9%), patient refusal (15.6%), relapse/progression (9.4%), comorbidity (6.3%), or absence of a donor (6.3%). The median time between inclusion in the program and transplantation was 3.6 months (range, 0.27–13.43), and 5.7 months ( P < .05) for unrelated allogeneic transplantation. No significant differences were observed in the diagnosis or hospital of origin. Conclusions SCT was not performed in 22% of transplant candidates, mainly due to death, insufficient stem cell mobilization, patient refusal, or disease progression/relapse. The median time between inclusion in the SCT program and transplantation was 3 months, but longer among the unrelated allogeneic transplantations.
PDF
