Background
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and the coronavirus 19 (COVID‐19) pandemic have had a lasting impact on the care of cancer patients. The impact on patients ...with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies remains incompletely understood. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID‐19 on mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost of care among patients with GI malignancies, and identify differences in outcomes based on primary tumor site.
Methods
We analyzed discharge encounters collected from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between March 2020 and December 2020 using propensity score matching (PSM) and COVID‐19 as the treatment effect.
Results
Of the 87,684 patient discharges with GI malignancies, 1892 were positive for COVID‐19 (C+) and eligible for matching in the PSM model. Following PSM analysis, C+ with GI tumors demonstrated increased incidence of mortality compared to their COVID‐19‐negative (C‐) counterparts (21.3% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001). C+ patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) had significantly higher mortality compared to those who were C‐ (40% vs. 24%; p = 0.035). In addition, C+ patients with GI tumors had a longer mean LOS (9.4 days vs. 6.9 days; p < 0.001) and increased cost of care ($26,048.29 vs. $21,625.2; p = 0.001) compared to C‐ patients. C+ patients also had higher odds of mortality secondary to myocardial infarction relative to C‐ patients (OR = 3.54, p = 0.001).
Conclusions
C+ patients with GI tumors face approximately double the odds of mortality, increased LOS, and increased cost of care compared to their C‐ counterparts. Outcome disparities were most pronounced among patients with CRC.
Background
Survival differences between left‐sided colon cancer (LSCC) and right‐sided colon cancer (RSCC) has been previously reported with mixed results, with various study periods not accounting ...for other causes of mortality.
Purpose
We sought to assess the trends in colon cancer cause‐ specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) based on sidedness.
Method
Fine‐Gray competing risk and Cox models were used to analyze Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population‐based cohort from 1975 to 2019. Various interval periods were identified based on the timeline of clinical adoption of modern chemotherapy (1975–1989, interval period A; 1990–2004, B; and 2005–2019, C).
Results
Of the 227,637 patients, 50.1% were female and 46.2% were RSCC. RSCC was more common for African Americans (51.5%), older patients (age ≥65; 51.4%), females (50.4%), while LSCC was more common among Whites (53.1%; p < 0.001), younger patients (age 18–49, 64.6%; 50–64, 62.3%; p < 0.001), males (58.1%; p < 0.001). The Median CSS for LSCC and RCC were 19.3 and 16.7 years respectively for interval period A (1975–1989). Median CSS for interval periods B and C were not reached (more than half of the cohort was still living at the end of the follow‐up period). Adjusted CSS was superior for LSCC versus RSCC for the most recent interval period C (HR 0.89; 0.86–0.92; p < 0.001). LSCC consistently showed superior OS for all study periods. Stage stratification showed worse CSS for localized and regional LSCC in the earlier study periods, but the risk attenuated over time. However, left sided distant disease had superior CSS per stage for all interval periods. OS was better for LSCC irrespective of stage, with gradual improvement over time.
Conclusion
LSCC was associated with superior survival compared to right sided tumors. With the adoption of modern chemotherapy regimens, prognosis between LSCC and RSCC became more divergent in favor of LSCC. Colon cancer clinical trials should strongly consider tumor sidedness as an enrollment factor.
Background and Objectives
Colorectal cancer (CRC) sidedness is recognized as a prognostic factor for survival; left‐sided colorectal cancer is associated with better outcomes than right‐sided colon ...cancer (RsCC). We aimed to evaluate the influence of obesity on CRC sidedness and determine how race, age, and sex affect mortality among overweight and obese individuals.
Methods
A survey‐weighted analysis was conducted using data obtained from the National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2019.
Results
Of the 24 549 patients with a diagnosis of CRC and a reported body mass index (BMI), 13.6% were overweight and 49.9% were obese. The race distribution was predominantly non‐Hispanic Whites (69.7%), followed by Black (15.6%), Hispanic (8.7%), and other race (6.1%). Overweight (BMI: 25−29.9) and obese (BMI: ≥30) individuals were more likely to have RsCC (adjusted OR aOR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.17−1.39, p < 0.001 and aOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.37−1.54, p < 0.001, respectively). Obese Black individuals were more likely to have RsCC as compared to their White counterparts (aOR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.09−1.38).
Conclusions
Obesity is associated with an increased risk of RsCC. In addition, racial disparities in CRC sidedness and outcomes are most pronounced among obese patients.
ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence and factors associated with modern contraceptive (CP) use among women of the reproductive age.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingWe used data from the Multiple ...Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICSs) from 20 African countries collected between 2013 and 2018.ParticipantsData on 1 177 459 women aged 15–49 years old.MethodsMultivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with modern CP use, while controlling simultaneously for independent variables, and accounting for clustering, stratification and sample weights from the complex sampling design. We used random effects meta-analysis to pool adjusted estimates across the 20 countries.ResultsThe overall prevalence of modern CP use was 26% and ranged from 6% in Guinea to 62% in Zimbabwe. Overall, injectable (32%) was the most preferred method of CP, followed by oral pill (27%) and implants (16%). Women were more likely to use a modern CP if they: had a primary (adjusted prevalence odds ratios (aPORs): 1.68, 95% CI: 1.47 to 1.91)) or secondary/higher education (aPOR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.80 to 2.59) compared with women with no formal education; had no delivery in the last 2 years (aPOR: 3.89, 95% CI: 2.76 to 5.47) compared with women who delivered in the last 2 years; were aged 25–34 years (aPOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.47) compared with women aged 15–24 years; were of middle-income status (aPOR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.39) or rich (aPOR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.84) compared with poor women and had two or more antenatal care visits compared with women without a visit. Perceived domestic violence was not associated with modern CP use (aPOR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.05).ConclusionOur findings are relevant in a global context, particularly in the African region, and improve our understanding on relevant factors essential to increasing modern CP use.
Salivary gland carcinomas (SGC) are a rare and variable group of head and neck cancers with historically poor response to cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunotherapy in the recurrent, advanced, and ...metastatic settings. In the last decade, a number of targetable molecular alterations have been identified in SGCs including HER2 upregulation, androgen receptor overexpression, Notch receptor activation, NTRK gene fusions, and RET alterations which have dramatically improved treatment outcomes in this disease. Here, we review the landscape of precision therapy in SGC including current options for systemic management, ongoing clinical trials, and promising future directions.
Background
Cardiovascular events have been reported in the setting of coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19). It has been hypothesized that systemic inflammation may aggravate arrhythmias or trigger ...new‐onset conduction abnormalities. However, the specific type and distribution of electrocardiographic disturbances in COVID‐19 as well as their influence on mortality remain to be fully characterized.
Methods
Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained from 186 COVID‐19‐positive patients at a large tertiary care hospital in Northern Nevada. The following arrhythmias were identified by cardiologists: sinus bradycardia, sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation (A‐Fib), atrial flutter, multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT), premature atrial contraction (PAC), premature ventricular contraction (PVC), atrioventricular block (AVB), and right bundle branch block (RBBB). The mean PR interval, QRS duration, and corrected QT interval were documented. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the ECG features of patients who died during the hospitalization with those who survived. The influence of ECG features on mortality was assessed with multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Results
A‐Fib, atrial flutter, and ST‐segment depression were predictive of mortality. In addition, the mean ventricular rate was higher among patients who died as compared to those who survived. The use of therapeutic anticoagulation was associated with reduced odds of death; however, this association did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusion
The underlying pathogenesis of COVID‐19‐associated arrhythmias remains to be established, but we postulate that systemic inflammation and/or hypoxia may induce potentially lethal conduction abnormalities in affected individuals. Longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the risk factors, pathogenesis, and management of COVID‐19‐associated cardiac arrhythmias.
Background. Several prognostic factors have been used to guide therapy for colon cancer (CC). However, the relationship between CC laterality (sidedness) and prognosis remains under investigation. ...Objectives. To assess the effect of laterality on CC presentation and survival, using a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based cohort. Methods. A retrospective cohort study using data from the SEER program (2007-2015). Results. Of the 163,980 patients with CC, 85,779 (52.3%) presented with right-sided CC (RCC) and 78,201 (47.7%) with left-sided CC (LCC). Stage distributions were as follows: stage I, 24.1%; stage II, 27.3%; stage III, 28.2%; and stage IV, 20.4%. In an adjusted modified Poisson regression approach for risk ratio (RR), patients with LCCs were more likely to be male (RR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.12-1.15, p<0.001). As compared to stage I, stage II cancers (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.87-0.90, p<0.001) were less likely to be LCC. Stage IV CC was slightly less likely to be left-sided (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.98, 0.96-1.00, p = 0.028). The median overall survival (OS) for RCC was 87 months. The median OS for LCC was not established, as more than half of the patients diagnosed with LCC were still living at the time of the analysis. In adjusted Cox proportional Hazard model, individuals with stage I, III, and IV LCCs had superior OS as compared to those with matched-stage RCC (adjusted HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.85-0.88, p<0.001). However, OS was worse among those with stage II disease who presented with LCC (adjusted Hazard ratio aHR = 1.06; 95% CI 1.02-1.11, p = 0.004). CC-specific survival (CSS) was superior for LCC versus RCC for stages III and IV but worse for II. Conclusions. In this population-cohort study, LCC is associated with superior OS and CSS survival. The overall survival advantage was attributed to stage I, III, and IV disease. Individuals presenting with stage II disease exhibit superior survival if the CC is right-sided.
Background
Gastrointestinal extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (GI EPSCCa) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine tumor. Factors affecting survival, including the prognostic significance of primary ...tumor site, remain under investigation.
Methods
Data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program were extracted to identify patients diagnosed with GI EPSCCa between 2000 and 2018. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess prognostic factors based on primary tumor site.
Results
A total of 1687 patients were included in the survival analysis. The distribution of the primary tumor location was as follows: 31.5% colorectum (CRC), 22.1% esophageal, 20.6% pancreatic, 13.3% hepatobiliary (HB), 10.6% stomach, and 1.8% small intestine (SI). Esophagogastric and SI EPSCCa were more common among Black individuals, whereas CRC, HB, and pancreatic EPSCCa were more common among White patients (
p
= 0.012). There were no racial differences in OS for GI EPSCCa. HB EPSCCa was associated with inferior OS compared with esophageal tumors (adjusted hazard ratio aHR 1.21, 95% confidence interval CI 1.00–1.46;
p
= 0.048), and SI EPSCCa was associated with prolonged survival compared with esophageal EPSCCa (aHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.48–1.20;
p
= 0.237) but did not reach statistical significance. Surgical intervention and a treatment period after 2006 were associated with superior OS.
Conclusions
The prognosis for GI ESPCCa varies based on site. Chemotherapy, radiation, and surgical resection are associated with improved outcomes; however, the prognosis for patients with EPSCCa remains dismal. Prospective studies are needed to guide therapy for this aggressive tumor.
PDF
