Summary Background Radiotherapy is the standard care in elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma and the role of primary chemotherapy is poorly defined. We did a randomised trial to compare the ...efficacy and safety of dose-dense temozolomide alone versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Methods Between May 15, 2005, and Nov 2, 2009, we enrolled patients with confirmed anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma, age older than 65 years, and a Karnofsky performance score of 60 or higher. Patients were randomly assigned 100 mg/m2 temozolomide, given on days 1–7 of 1 week on, 1 week off cycles, or radiotherapy of 60·0 Gy, administered over 6–7 weeks in 30 fractions of 1·8–2·0 Gy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. We assessed non-inferiority with a 25% margin, analysed for all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01502241. Findings Of 584 patients screened, we enrolled 412. 373 patients (195 randomly allocated to the temozolomide group and 178 to the radiotherapy group) received at least one dose of treatment and were included in efficacy analyses. Median overall survival was 8·6 months (95% CI 7·3–10·2) in the temozolomide group versus 9·6 months (8·2–10·8) in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio HR 1·09, 95% CI 0·84–1·42, pnon-inferiority =0·033). Median event-free survival (EFS) did not differ significantly between the temozolomide and radiotherapy groups (3·3 months 95% CI 3·2–4·1 vs 4·7 4·2–5·2; HR 1·15, 95% CI 0·92–1·43, pnon-inferiority =0·043). Tumour MGMT promoter methylation was seen in 73 (35%) of 209 patients tested. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with longer overall survival than was unmethylated status (11·9 months 95% CI 9·0 to not reached vs 8·2 months 7·0–10·0; HR 0·62, 95% CI 0·42–0·91, p=0·014). EFS was longer in patients with MGMT promoter methylation who received temozolomide than in those who underwent radiotherapy (8·4 months 95e% CI 5·5–11·7 vs 4·6 4·2–5·0), whereas the opposite was true for patients with no methylation of the MGMT promoter (3·3 months 3·0–3·5 vs 4·6 months 3·7–6·3). The most frequent grade 3–4 intervention-related adverse events were neutropenia (16 patients in the temozolomide group vs two in the radiotherapy group), lymphocytopenia (46 vs one), thrombocytopenia (14 vs four), raised liver-enzyme concentrations (30 vs 16), infections (35 vs 23), and thromboembolic events (24 vs eight). Interpretation Temozolomide alone is non-inferior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma. MGMT promoter methylation seems to be a useful biomarker for outcomes by treatment and could aid decision-making. Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Summary Background Severe forms of primary dystonia are difficult to manage medically. We assessed the safety and efficacy of pallidal neurostimulation in patients with primary generalised or ...segmental dystonia prospectively followed up for 5 years in a controlled multicentre trial. Methods In the parent trial, 40 patients were randomly assigned to either sham neurostimulation or neurostimulation of the internal globus pallidus for a period of 3 months and thereafter all patients completed 6 months of active neurostimulation. 38 patients agreed to be followed up annually after the activation of neurostimulation, including assessments of dystonia severity, pain, disability, and quality of life. The primary endpoint of the 5-year follow-up study extension was the change in dystonia severity at 3 years and 5 years as assessed by open-label ratings of the Burke–Fahn–Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS) motor score compared with the preoperative baseline and the 6-month visit. The primary endpoint was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The original trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT00142259 ). Findings An intention-to-treat analysis including all patients from the parent trial showed significant improvements in dystonia severity at 3 years and 5 years compared with baseline, which corresponded to −20·8 points (SD 17·1; −47·9%; n=40) at 6 months; −26·5 points (19·7; −61·1%; n=31) at 3 years; and −25·1 points (21·3; −57·8%; n=32). The improvement from 6 months to 3 years (–5·7 points SD 8·4; −34%) was significant and sustained at the 5-year follow-up (–4·3 10·4). 49 new adverse events occurred between 6 months and 5 years. Dysarthria and transient worsening of dystonia were the most common non-serious adverse events. 21 adverse events were rated serious and were almost exclusively device related. One patient attempted suicide shortly after the 6-month visit during a depressive episode. All serious adverse events resolved without permanent sequelae. Interpretation 3 years and 5 years after surgery, pallidal neurostimulation continues to be an effective and relatively safe treatment option for patients with severe idiopathic dystonia. This long-term observation provides further evidence in favour of pallidal neurostimulation as a first-line treatment for patients with medically intractable, segmental, or generalised dystonia. Funding Medtronic.
Abstract Background Deep brain stimulation (DBS) within or adjacent to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) currently represents the most common stereotactic procedure performed for Parkinson's disease. ...Better STN imaging is often regarded as a requirement for improving stereotactic targeting. But, remarkably enough, it is unclear whether there is a consensus about the optimal target. Objective and Methods To obtain an expert opinion on the site regarded optimal for 'STN stimulation', movement disorder specialists were asked to indicate their preferred position for an active contact on hardcopies of the Schaltenbrand and Wahren atlas depicting the STN in all three planes. This represented an idealized setting and it mimicked optimal imaging for direct target definition in a perfectly delineated STN. Results The suggested targets were heterogeneous, although some clustering was observed in the dorsolateral STN and subthalamic area. In particular, in the anterior-posterior direction the intended targets differed to a great extent. Most of the indicated targets are thought to also result in concomitant stimulation of structures adjacent to the STN, including the zona incerta, Fields of Forel, and/or the internal capsule. Conclusions This survey illustrates that most sites regarded as optimal for 'STN stimulation' are close to each other, but there appears to be no uniform perception of the optimal anatomical target, possibly influencing surgical results. The anatomical sweet zone for STN stimulation needs further specification since this information is likely to make MRI-based target definition less variable when applied to individual patients.
PDF
