Bleeding related to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) occurs relatively frequently. We retrospectively investigated the incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of periprocedural bleeding ...and transfusion in 10,974 patients who underwent PCI. Bleeding definitions were based on Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria: (1) major bleeding (n = 588; 5.4%): if patients had a hemorrhagic stroke or if hematocrit decreased >15 points or by 10 to 15 points with clinical bleeding; (2) minor bleeding (n = 1,394; 12.7%): if hematocrit decreased <10 points with clinical bleeding or by 10 to 15 points without clinical bleeding; and (3) no bleeding (n = 8,992; 81.9%): if hematocrit decreased <10 points without clinical bleeding. Patients with major bleeding were older than patients with minor or no bleeding (67.8 ± 11 vs 65.9 ± 11 vs 63.6 ± 11 years, respectively; p <0.001) and more often experienced intraprocedural complications, such as emergency use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (13.6% vs 6.5% vs 2.3%, respectively; p <0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (odds ratio OR 3.0, p <0.0001), procedural hypotension (OR 2.9, p <0.001), and age >80 years (OR 1.9 compared with age <50 years, p = 0.001) as the strongest predictors for major bleeding. Patients who had major bleeding had higher in-hospital and 1-year mortality compared with patients with minor or no bleeding. Bleeding was an independent predictor of in-hospital death. Thus, periprocedural major bleeding occurs relatively frequently and is associated with adverse outcomes. Patients >80 years of age who experience intraprocedural complications are at particularly high risk.
There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over angiography-guided PCI. Since the last meta-analysis was ...published, several new studies have been reported. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical impact of IVUS-guided PCI with drug-eluting stent compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI. This meta-analysis included 26,503 patients from 3 randomized and 14 observational studies; 12,499 patients underwent IVUS-guided PCI and 14,004 underwent angiography-guided PCI. Main outcome measures were total mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). IVUS-guided PCI was significantly associated with more stents, longer stents, and larger stents. Regarding clinical outcomes, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of TLR (odds ratio OR 0.81, 95% confidence interval CI 0.66 to 1.00, p = 0.046). In addition, the risk of death (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79, p <0.001), MI (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75, p <0.001), and stent thrombosis (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.75, p <0.001) were also decreased. In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrated that IVUS-guided PCI was associated with lower risk of death, MI, TLR, and stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.
Abstract There is limited data comparing effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with ...non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). We compared the long-term outcomes of the two revascularization strategies in 1,246 patients presented with NSTE-ACS for left main or multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Data were pooled from the BEST, PRECOMBAT, and SYNTAX trials. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two study groups. During the median follow-up of 60 months, the rate of the primary outcome was significantly lower with CABG than with PCI (hazard ratio HR: 0.74; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.56−0.98; P=0.036). This difference was mainly attributed to a significant reduction in the rate of myocardial infarction (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.31−0.82, P=0.006). The superiority of CABG over PCI was consistent across the major subgroups. The individual risks of death from any causes or stroke were not different between the two groups. In contrast, the rate of repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.41−0.75, P < 0.001). In this study, among patients with NSTE-ACS for left main or multivessel CAD, CABG significantly reduces the risk of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared to PCI with DES.
Objectives The goal of this study was to identify clinical and lesion-specific local factors affecting visual-functional mismatch. Background Although lesion severity determined by coronary ...angiography has not been well correlated with physiological significance, the mechanism of the discordance remains poorly understood. Methods The authors assessed quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in a prospective cohort of 1,000 patients with 1,129 coronary lesions. Three-dimensional computational simulation studies were performed. Results Lesions with angiographic diameter stenosis (DS) ≥50% and FFR >0.80 (“mismatches”) were seen in 57% of non–left main lesions and in 35% of the left main lesions, respectively (p = 0.032). Conversely, among the lesions with DS <50% and FFR <0.80 (“reverse mismatches”) 16% were found in the non–left main lesions and 40% in the left main lesions (p < 0.001). The independent predictors for mismatch were advanced age, non–left anterior descending artery location, absence of plaque rupture, short lesion length, large minimal lumen area, smaller plaque burden, and greater minimal lumen diameter. Conversely, reverse mismatch was independently associated with younger age, left anterior descending artery location, the presence of plaque rupture, a smaller minimal lumen area, and larger plaque burden. In a computational simulation study, FFR was influenced by DS, lesion length, different lesion shape, plaque eccentricity, surface roughness, and various shapes of plaque rupture. Conclusions There were high frequencies of visual-functional mismatch between angiography and FFR. The discrepancy was related to the clinical and lesion-specific factors frequently unrecognizable by angiography, thus suggesting that coronary angiography cannot accurately predict FFR. (Natural History of FFR-Guided Deferred Coronary Lesions IRIS FFR-DEFER; NCT01366404 )
Abstract Objectives This study sought to evaluate the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) minimal lumen area (MLA) for functionally significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis using fractional ...flow reserve (FFR) as the standard. Background The evaluation of significant LMCA stenosis remains challenging. Methods We identified 112 patients with isolated ostial and shaft intermediate LMCA stenosis (angiographic diameter stenosis of 30% to 80%) who underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. Results The FFR was ≤0.80 in 66 LMCA lesions (59%); these exhibited smaller reference vessels, smaller minimal lumen diameter, greater diameter of stenosis, longer lesion length, smaller MLA, larger plaque burden, and more frequent plaque rupture. The independent factors of an FFR of ≤0.80 were plaque rupture (odds ratio OR: 4.47; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.35 to 14.8; p = 0.014); body mass index (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.41; p = 0.05), age (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.00; p = 0.031), and IVUS MLA (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.56; p < 0.001). The optimal IVUS MLA cutoff value for an FFR of ≤0.80 was 4.5 mm2 (77% sensitivity, 82% specificity, 84% positive predictive value, 75% negative predictive value, area under the curve: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.96; p < 0.001) overall and 4.1 to 4.5 mm2 in various subgroups. Adjustment for the body surface area, body mass index, and left ventricular mass did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the IVUS MLA. Conclusions In patients with isolated ostial and shaft intermediate LMCA stenosis, an IVUS-derived MLA of ≤4.5 mm2 is a useful index of an FFR of ≤0.80.
Abstract Background The long-term prognosis of patients with variant angina presenting with aborted sudden cardiac death (ASCD) is unknown. Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ...long-term mortality and ventricular tachyarrhythmic events of variant angina with and without ASCD. Methods Between March 1996 and September 2014, 188 patients with variant angina with ASCD and 1,844 patients with variant angina without ASCD were retrospectively enrolled from 13 heart centers in South Korea. The primary endpoint was cardiac death. Results Predictors of ASCD manifestation included age (odd ratio OR: 0.980 by 1 year increase; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.96 to 1.00; p = 0.013), hypertension (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.70; p < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.58; p < 0.001), family history of sudden cardiac death (OR: 3.67; 95% CI: 1.27 to 10.6; p = 0.016), multivessel spasm (OR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.33 to 3.19; p = 0.001), and left anterior descending artery spasm (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.92; p = 0.04). Over a median follow-up of 7.5 years, the incidence of cardiac death was significantly higher in ASCD patients (24.1 per 1,000 patient-years vs. 2.7 per 1,000 patient-years; adjusted hazard ratio HR: 7.26; 95% CI: 4.21 to 12.5; p < 0.001). Death from any cause also occurred more frequently in ASCD patients (27.5 per 1,000 patient-years vs. 9.6 per 1,000 patient-years; adjusted HR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.92 to 4.67; p < 0.001). The incidence rate of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmia in ASCD patients was 32.4 per 1,000 patient-years, and the composite of cardiac death and ventricular tachyarrhythmia was 44.9 per 1,000 patient-years. A total of 24 ASCD patients received implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). There was a nonsignificant trend of a lower rate of cardiac death in patients with ICDs than those without ICDs (p = 0.15). Conclusions The prognosis of patients with variant angina with ASCD was worse than other patients with variant angina. In addition, our findings supported ICDs in these high-risk patients as a secondary prevention because current multiple vasodilator therapy appeared to be less optimal.
Abstract Objectives This study sought to investigate the incidence, management, and clinical relevance of atrial fibrillation (AF) during and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with ...drug-eluting stents (DES) and evaluate outcomes of different antithrombotic strategies. Background Uncertainty exists regarding the optimal antithrombotic strategy in patients with AF who are undergoing PCI with DES. Methods Using a consecutive series of 10,027 patients who underwent DES implantation between 2003 and 2011, we evaluated the overall prevalence and clinical impact of AF. In addition, we compared the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (aspirin plus clopidogrel) and triple therapy (DAPT plus warfarin) among patients with AF. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results Overall, 711 (7.1%) patients had a diagnosis of AF at the index PCI. Patients with AF were older, had more comorbid conditions, and more often had a history of strokes; most patients with AF (88.4%) received DAPT rather than triple therapy (10.5%) at discharge. The rate of primary outcome after PCI during the 6-year follow-up period was significantly higher in patients with AF than in those without AF (22.1% vs. 8.0%; p < 0.001). This trend was consistent for major bleeding (4.5% vs. 1.5%; p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, the presence of AF was significantly associated with a higher risk of primary outcome (hazard ratio HR: 2.33; 95% confidence interval CI: 1.95 to 2.79; p < 0.001) and major bleeding (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.32 to 3.06; p = 0.001). Among patients with AF, adjusted risk for the primary outcome was similar between the DAPT group and the triple therapy group (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.69; p = 0.98), but triple therapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke (HR: 7.73; 95% CI: 2.14 to 27.91; p = 0.002) and major bleeding (HR: 4.48; 95% CI: 1.81 to 11.08; p = 0.001). Conclusions Among patients receiving DES implantation, AF was not rare and was associated with increased ischemic and bleeding risk. In patients with AF, triple therapy was not associated with decreased ischemic events but was associated with increased bleeding risk compared to DAPT.
Objectives The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of the treatment strategies for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of drug-eluting stents (DES) according to the morphologic pattern of ...restenosis. Background Optimal treatment strategies for ISR within DES have not been adequately addressed yet. Methods Patients with ISR of DES were randomized according to the lesion length to compare outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus cutting balloon angioplasty for focal type (≤10 mm) and SES versus everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for diffuse type (>10 mm). The primary endpoint was in-segment late loss at 9 months. Overall 162 patients, 96 with focal ISR and 66 with diffuse ISR, were enrolled. Results In focal lesions, in-segment late loss was significantly higher in the cutting balloon group (n = 48) than in the SES group (n = 48; 0.25 mm, interquartile range IQR: −0.01 to 0.68 mm vs. 0.06 mm, IQR: −0.08 to 0.17 mm; p = 0.04). Consequently, in-segment restenosis rate tended to be higher in the cutting balloon group than in the SES group (20.7% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.06) with comparable incidences of the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization at 12 months of clinical follow up (6.3% vs. 6.3%, p > 0.99). In 66 cases of diffuse ISR, in-segment late loss (0.11 mm, IQR: −0.02 to 0.30 mm; vs. 0.00 mm, IQR: −0.08 to 0.25 mm; p = 0.64), in-segment restenosis rate (5.0% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.32), and the composite incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (9.6% vs. 8.8%, p > 0.99) did not differ between SES group (n = 32) and EES group (n = 34). Conclusions For lesions of focal DES restenosis, repeat implantation of SES is more effective in reducing late luminal loss and subsequent restenosis rate than cutting balloon angioplasty. For diffuse DES restenosis, implantation of SES or EES is comparably effective in terms of angiographic and clinical outcomes.
To evaluate the impact of cilostazol on neointimal hyperplasia after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for long coronary lesions, we performed a randomized multicenter prospective study comparing ...triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol; triple group, n = 250) and dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel; standard group, n = 250) for 6 months in patients with long lesions (≥25 mm) requiring a long DES (≥32 mm). The primary end point was in-stent late loss at 6-month angiography. The 2 groups had similar baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. In-stent late loss (0.22 ± 0.48 mm vs 0.32 ± 0.51 mm, p = 0.031) and in-segment late loss (0.34 ± 0.49 mm vs 0.51 ± 0.49 mm, p = 0.001) at 6-month follow-up angiography were significantly lower in the triple group versus the standard group. There was a trend toward lower rates of in-segment restenosis in the triple group versus the standard group (6.7% vs 11.2%, p = 0.104). Target lesion revascularization (TLR; 2.8% vs 6.8%, p = 0.036) and major adverse cardiac events (2.8% vs 7.6%, p = 0.016), including death, myocardial infarction, and TLR at 9 months were significantly lower in the triple group than in the standard group. At 9 months, the 2 groups had similar rates of stent thrombosis (0.4% vs 0.4%, p = 0.999), death (0% vs 0.8%, p = 0.499), and myocardial infarction (0.4% vs 0.4%, p = 0.999). In conclusion, cilostazol significantly reduced late loss at 6 months after DES implantation and the occurrence of TLR and major adverse cardiac events in patients with long coronary lesions.
A Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Seung-Whan Lee, Seong-Wook Park, Young-Hak Kim, Sung-Cheol Yun, Duk-Woo Park, ...Cheol Whan Lee, Myeong-Ki Hong, Kyoung-Suk Rhee, Jei Keon Chae, Jae-Ki Ko, Jae-Hyeong Park, Jae-Hwan Lee, Si Wan Choi, Jin-Ok Jeong, In-Whan Seong, Yoon Haeng Cho, Nae-Hee Lee, June Hong Kim, Kook-Jin Chun, Hyun-Sook Kim, Seung-Jung Park To compare the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), we randomly compared SES (n = 200) and PES (n = 200) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Six-month in-stent (3.4% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) and in-segment restenosis (4.0% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001) and 9-month target lesion revascularization (2.0% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.017) were significantly lower in the SES versus the PES group. Major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 9 months (2.0% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.010) were lower in the SES versus the PES group. In conclusion, SES significantly reduced angiographic restenosis and improved clinical outcomes in diabetic patients compared with PES implantation.
PDF
