Background Abelmoschus manihot , a single medicament of traditional Chinese medicine, has been widely used to treat kidney disease. This is the first randomized controlled clinical trial to assess ...its efficacy and safety in patients with primary glomerular disease. Study Design Prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Setting & Participants From May 2010 to October 2011, a total of 417 patients with biopsy-proven primary glomerular disease from 26 hospitals participated in the study. Interventions A manihot in the form of a huangkui capsule, 2.5 g, 3 times per day; losartan potassium, 50 mg/d; or combined treatment, a huangkui capsule at 2.5 g 3 times per day, was combined with losartan potassium, 50 mg/d. The duration of intervention was 24 weeks. Outcomes & Measurements The primary outcome was change in 24-hour proteinuria from baseline after treatment. Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline after treatment was a secondary outcome. The 24-hour proteinuria was measured every 4 weeks and eGFR was measured at 0, 4, 12, and 24 weeks. Results Mean baseline urine protein excretion was 1,045, 1,084, and 1,073 mg/d in the A manihot , losartan, and combined groups, respectively, and mean eGFR was 108, 106, and 106 mL/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. After 24 weeks of treatment, mean changes in proteinuria were protein excretion of −508, −376, and −545 mg/d, respectively ( P = 0.003 for A manihot vs losartan and P < 0.001 for the combined treatment vs losartan). Mean eGFR did not change significantly. The incidence of adverse reactions was not different among the 3 groups ( P > 0.05), and there were no severe adverse events in any group. Limitations Results cannot be generalized to those with nephrotic syndrome or reduced eGFR. Conclusions A manihot is a promising therapy for patients with primary kidney disease (chronic kidney disease stages 1-2) with moderate proteinuria.
Objective We compared the anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) plus buccal infiltration (BI) and IANB plus periodontal ligament (PDL) articaine injections in patients with ...irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first molar. Study design Fifty-seven volunteers, patients with irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first molar admitted to the Department of Stomatology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, randomly received conventional IANB, containing 1.7 mL 4% articaine/HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine, plus either BI or PDL injections containing 0.4 mL articaine/HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The patients recorded the pain of the injections and endodontic access on a Heft–Parker visual analog scale (VAS). Results According to the VAS scores, all patients experienced no or mild pain with BI and PDL injections after the application of IANB. Anesthetic success occurred in 81.48% for IANB plus BI (IANB/BI) compared with 83.33% for IANB plus PDL injection (IANB/PDL injection). None of the observed differences between the 2 groups was significant ( P > .05). Conclusion Both injection combinations resulted in high anesthetic success in patients with irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first molar.
Abstract Objective Generic, preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments is increasingly used in health-care decision-making process. However, to our knowledge, no such HRQoL ...instrument has been validated or used in chronic prostatitis. We therefore aimed to assess and compare the psychometric properties of EuroQol (EQ-5D) and Short Form 6D (SF-6D) among chronic prostatitis patients in China. Methods Consenting patients were interviewed using EQ-5D and SF-6D. Convergent and discriminative construct validities were examined with five and two a priori hypotheses, respectively. Sensitivity was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and relative efficiency (RE) statistics. Agreement between instruments was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients and Bland–Altman plot, while factors affecting utility difference were explored with multiple liner regression models. Results In 268 subjects, mean (SD) EQ-5D and SF-6D utility scores were comparable at 0.73 (0.15) and 0.75 (0.10), respectively. Five of the seven hypotheses for construct validity were fulfilled in both instruments. The areas under ROC of them all exceeded 0.5 ( P < 0.001). SF-6D had 9.7–19.9% higher efficiency than EQ-5D at detecting the difference in chronic prostatitis symptom severity. Despite no significant difference in utility scores between two instruments, lack of agreement was observed with low intraclass correlation coefficient (0.218–0.630) and Bland–Altman plot analysis. Chronic prostatitis symptom severity significantly ( P < 0.05) influenced differences in utility scores between EQ-5D and SF-6D. Conclusions Both EQ-5D and SF-6D are demonstrated to be valid and sensitive HRQoL measures in Chinese chronic prostatitis patients, with SF-6D showing better HRQoL dimension coverage, greater sensitivity, lower ceiling effect, and more rational distribution. Further research is needed to determine longitudinal response and reliability.
PDF
