Sparganosis is an infestation caused by a tapeworm belonging to the genus Spirometra. The typical radiologic findings of sparganosis describe elongated, folded, band or tubular, hypoechoic structures ...with surrounding increased echogenicity in ultrasonography. These imaging features have been highly consistent with pathology results. Here, we report an interesting case of axillary sparganosis that manifested changes on ultrasound images over a period of 6 months.
Clinical trial data indicate that omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is feasible and may reduce morbidity for carefully selected patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who ...achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). However, there remains a need to understand how these findings translate to broader clinical practice and to identify which patients benefit most. This study utilizes a national dataset to assess outcomes in axillary management, aiming to inform best practice in axillary de-escalation.
The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify women diagnosed with clinically node-positive invasive breast cancer between 2012 to 2020 who received NCT and subsequent ALND. Associations between clinicopathologic factors and axillary pCR were analyzed statistically.
Of the 59,791 patients included, 8,827 (14.76%) achieved nodal pCR. Patients with HR-negative and HER2-positive receptor status more frequently underwent ALND instead of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Conversely, patients over the age of 70, those with private or public insurance, and cases classified as ypT1 or ypT2 were less likely to undergo ALND.
A subset of patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer received ALND despite achieving axillary pCR following NCT. This highlights an opportunity to enhance precision in identifying candidates for axillary de-escalation, potentially reducing morbidity and tailoring treatment more closely to individual patient needs.
This study aims to determine the extent to which SLNB/TAD after NCT for clinically node-positive patients has been adopted nationally, as well as the factors associated with clinical practice variation related to axillary management.
Purpose
New indications have been found for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in breast cancer treatment, yet the relationship of RNI and lymphedema risk is uncertain. We sought to determine the ...association of RNI and lymphedema.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus for articles in English on humans published from 1995 to 2015, using search terms
breast neoplasm
,
treatment
, and
morbidity
. Two investigators independently selected articles and extracted information, including manuscripts reporting incidence of lymphedema by radiation targets. Meta-analyses, review papers, case–control studies, matched-pair studies, repetitive datasets, and retrospective studies were excluded. A total of 2399 abstracts were identified and 323 corresponding articles reviewed. Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Data were pooled using a random effects mixed model. Network meta-analyses were performed to determine the association of radiation targets alone and radiation targets plus extent of axillary surgery on incidence of lymphedema.
Results
The addition of RNI to breast/CW irradiation was associated with an increased incidence of lymphedema (OR 2.85; 95% CI 1.24–6.55). In patients treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary sampling, there was no association of lymphedema with the addition of RNI to breast/CW irradiation (OR 1.58; 95% CI 0.54–4.66; pooled incidence 5.7 and 4.1%, respectively). Among patients treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), treatment with RNI in addition to breast/CW radiation was associated with a significantly higher risk of lymphedema (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.38–5.44; pooled incidence 18.2 and 9.4%, respectively).
Conclusions
RNI is associated with a significantly higher risk of lymphedema than irradiation of the breast/CW, particularly after ALND.
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery is widely used for nodal staging in early-stage breast cancer. This study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of SLN surgery for patients undergoing neoadjuvant ...chemotherapy versus patients undergoing surgery first.
Controversy exists regarding the timing of SLN surgery in patients planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Proponents of SLN surgery after chemotherapy prefer a single surgical procedure with potential for fewer axillary dissections. Opponents cite early studies with low identification rates and high false-negative rates after chemotherapy.
A total of 3746 patients with clinically node negative T1-T3 breast cancer underwent SLN surgery from 1994 to 2007. Clinicopathologic data were reviewed and comparisons made between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those undergoing surgery first.
Of the patients, 575 (15.3%) underwent SLN surgery after chemotherapy and 3171 (84.7%) underwent surgery first. Neoadjuvant patients were younger (51 vs. 57 years, P < 0.0001) and had more clinical T2-T3 tumors (87.3% vs. 18.8%, P < 0.0001) at diagnosis. SLN identification rates were 97.4% in the neoadjuvant group and 98.7% in the surgery first group (P = 0.017). False-negative rates were similar between groups (5/84 5.9% in neoadjuvant vs. 22/542 4.1% in the surgery first group, P = 0.39). Analyzed by presenting T stage, there were fewer positive SLNs in the neoadjuvant group (T1: 12.7% vs. 19.0%, P = 0.2; T2: 20.5% vs. 36.5%, P < 0.0001; T3: 30.4% vs. 51.4%, P = 0.04). Adjusting for clinical stage revealed no differences in local-regional recurrences, disease-free or overall survival between groups.
SLN surgery after chemotherapy is as accurate for axillary staging as SLN surgery prior to chemotherapy. SLN surgery after chemotherapy results in fewer positive SLNs and decreases unnecessary axillary dissections.
Abstract Purpose Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) are used to assess axillary nodal status in breast cancer, but are invasive procedures associated with ...morbidity, including lymphoedema. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET), with or without computed tomography (CT), for assessment of axillary nodes in early breast cancer. Methods Eleven databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, plus research registers and conference proceedings, were searched in April 2009. Study quality was assessed using the QUality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) checklist. Sensitivity and specificity were meta-analysed using a bivariate random effects approach. Results Across 26 studies evaluating PET or PET/CT ( n = 2591 patients), mean sensitivity was 63% (95% CI: 52–74%; range 20–100%) and mean specificity 94% (95% CI: 91–96%; range 75–100%). Across 7 studies of PET/CT ( n = 862), mean sensitivity was 56% (95% CI: 44–67%) and mean specificity 96% (90–99%). Across 19 studies of PET-only ( n = 1729), mean sensitivity was 66% (50–79%) and mean specificity 93% (89–96%). Mean sensitivity was 11% (5–22%) for micrometastases (≤2 mm; five studies; n = 63), and 57% (47–66%) for macrometastases (>2 mm; four studies; n = 111). Conclusions PET had lower sensitivity and specificity than SLNB. Therefore, replacing SLNB with PET would avoid the adverse effects of SLNB, but lead to more false negative patients at risk of recurrence and more false positive patients undergoing unnecessary ALND. The present evidence does not support the routine use of PET or PET-CT for the assessment of the clinically negative axilla.
Placing clips in nodes with biopsy-confirmed metastasis before initiating neoadjuvant therapy allows for evaluation of response in breast cancer. Our goal was to determine if pathologic changes in ...clipped nodes reflect the status of the nodal basin and if targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which includes sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) and selective localization and removal of clipped nodes, improves the false-negative rate (FNR) compared with SLND alone.
A prospective study of patients with biopsy-confirmed nodal metastases with a clip placed in the sampled node was performed. After neoadjuvant therapy, patients underwent axillary surgery and the pathology of the clipped node was compared with other nodes. Patients undergoing TAD had SLND and selective removal of the clipped node using iodine-125 seed localization. The FNR was determined in patients undergoing complete axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND).
Of 208 patients enrolled in this study, 191 underwent ALND, with residual disease identified in 120 (63%). The clipped node revealed metastases in 115 patients, resulting in an FNR of 4.2% (95% CI, 1.4 to 9.5) for the clipped node. In patients undergoing SLND and ALND (n = 118), the FNR was 10.1% (95% CI, 4.2 to 19.8), which included seven false-negative events in 69 patients with residual disease. Adding evaluation of the clipped node reduced the FNR to 1.4% (95% CI, 0.03 to 7.3; P = .03). The clipped node was not retrieved as an SLN in 23% (31 of 134) of patients, including six with negative SLNs but metastasis in the clipped node. TAD followed by ALND was performed in 85 patients, with an FNR of 2.0% (1 of 50; 95% CI, 0.05 to 10.7).
Marking nodes with biopsy-confirmed metastatic disease allows for selective removal and improves pathologic evaluation for residual nodal disease after chemotherapy.
Background
Axillary surgery is an established part of the management of primary breast cancer. It provides staging information to guide adjuvant therapy and potentially local control of axillary ...disease. Several alternative approaches to axillary surgery are available, most of which aim to spare a proportion of women the morbidity of complete axillary dissection.
Objectives
To assess the benefits and harms of alternative approaches to axillary surgery (including omitting such surgery altogether) in terms of overall survival; local, regional and distant recurrences; and adverse events.
Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE, Pre‐MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov on 12 March 2015 without language restrictions. We also contacted study authors and checked reference lists.
Selection criteria
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including women with clinically defined operable primary breast cancer conducted to compare axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with no axillary surgery, axillary sampling or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB); RCTs comparing axillary sampling with SLNB or no axillary surgery; RCTs comparing SLNB with no axillary surgery; and RCTs comparing ALND with or without radiotherapy (RT) versus RT alone.
Data collection and analysis
Two review authors independently assessed each potentially relevant trial for inclusion. We independently extracted outcome data, risk of bias information and study characteristics from all included trials. We pooled data according to trial interventions, and we used hazard ratios (HRs) for time‐to‐event outcomes and odds ratios (OR) for binary outcomes.
Main results
We included 26 RCTs in this review. Studies were at low or unclear risk of selection bias. Blinding was not done, but this was only considered a source of bias for outcomes with potential for subjectivity in measurements. We found no RCTs of axillary sampling versus SLNB, axillary sampling versus no axillary surgery or SLNB versus no axillary surgery.
No axillary surgery versus ALND
Ten trials involving 3849 participants compared no axillary surgery versus ALND. Moderate quality evidence showed no important differences between overall survival of women in the two groups (HR 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.17; 3849 participants; 10 studies) although no axillary surgery increased the risk of locoregional recurrence (HR ranging from 1.10 to 3.06; 20,863 person‐years of follow‐up; four studies). It was uncertain whether no surgery increased the risk of distant metastasis compared with ALND (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.30; 946 participants; two studies). Low‐quality evidence indicated no axillary surgery decreased the risk of lymphoedema compared with ALND (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.43; 1714 participants; four studies).
Axillary sampling versus ALND
Six trials involving 1559 participants compared axillary sampling versus ALND. Low‐quality evidence indicated similar effectiveness of axillary sampling compared with ALND in terms of overall survival (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.21; 967 participants; three studies) but it was unclear whether axillary sampling led to increased risk of local recurrence compared with ALND (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.94 to 2.12; 1404 participants; three studies). The relative effectiveness of axillary sampling and ALND for locoregional recurrence (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.20; 406 participants; one study) and distant metastasis was uncertain (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.49; 406 participants; one study). Lymphoedema was less likely after axillary sampling than after ALND (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.81; 80 participants; one study).
SLNB versus ALND
Seven trials involving 9426 participants compared SLNB with ALND. Moderate‐quality evidence showed similar overall survival following SLNB compared with ALND (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.25; 6352 participants; three studies; moderate‐quality evidence). Differences in local recurrence (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.24 to 3.77; 516 participants; one study), locoregional recurrence (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.24; 5611 participants; one study) and distant metastasis (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.53; 516 participants; one study) were uncertain. However, studies showed little absolute difference in the aforementioned outcomes. Lymphoedema was less likely after SLNB than ALND (OR ranged from 0.04 to 0.60; three studies; 1965 participants; low‐quality evidence). Three studies including 1755 participants reported quality of life: Investigators in two studies found quality of life better after SLNB than ALND, and in the other study observed no difference.
RT versus ALND
Four trials involving 2585 participants compared RT alone with ALND (with or without RT). High‐quality evidence indicated that overall survival was reduced among women treated with radiotherapy alone compared with those treated with ALND (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.21; 2469 participants; four studies), and local recurrence was less likely in women treated with radiotherapy than in those treated with ALND (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99; 22,256 person‐years of follow‐up; four studies). Risk of distant metastasis was similar for radiotherapy alone as for ALND (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.25; 1313 participants; one study), and whether lymphoedema was less likely after RT alone than ALND remained uncertain (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.44; 200 participants; one study).
Less surgery versus ALND
When combining results from all trials, treatment involving less surgery was associated with reduced overall survival compared with ALND (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16; 12,864 participants; 19 studies). Whether local recurrence was reduced with less axillary surgery when compared with ALND was uncertain (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.09; 24,176 participant‐years of follow up; eight studies). Locoregional recurrence was more likely with less surgery than with ALND (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.78; 26,880 participant‐years of follow‐up; seven studies). Whether risk of distant metastasis was increased after less axillary surgery compared with ALND was uncertain (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.20; 2665 participants; five studies). Lymphoedema was less likely after less axillary surgery than with ALND (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.46; 3964 participants; nine studies).
No studies reported on disease control in the axilla.
Authors' conclusions
This review confirms the benefit of SLNB and axillary sampling as alternatives to ALND for axillary staging, supporting the view that ALND of the clinically and radiologically uninvolved axilla is no longer acceptable practice in people with breast cancer.
In cases of isolated paralysis of the axillary nerve, dissection of the distal stump at the posterior deltoid border can be difficult because of scarring from an injury or previous surgery. To ...overcome this, we propose dissecting the anterior division of the axillary nerve (ADAN) using a deltoid-splitting approach. We investigated the anatomy of the ADAN as it pertains to the transdeltoid approach and report the clinical application of this approach in 9 patients with isolated axillary nerve injury.
The axillary nerve and its branches were dissected in 9 fresh cadaver specimens. In the clinical series, 1 patient with a lesion confined to the ADAN underwent nerve grafting. In the remaining 8 patients, the ADAN was repaired by transferring the triceps lower medial head and anconeus (TLMA) motor branch via a single-incision or double-incision posterior arm approach.
The posterior division of the axillary nerve does not travel around the humerus. It innervated the posterior deltoid and teres minor muscles. At the posterior margin of the humerus, the ADAN ran adjacent to the teres minor tendon. The ADAN’s trajectory on the lateral side of the humerus was 65 mm (SD ± 8 mm) from the midpoint of the acromion. One centimeter from the origin, the ADAN offered a prominent branch to the middle deltoid and wound around the humerus anteriorly at the surgical neck just distal to the infraspinatus tendon. A transdeltoid approach was feasible in all our patients. The TLMA was reached without any tension in the ADAN. Middle deltoid strength in 1 patient who had received a graft scored M3, while anterior and middle deltoid strength in the remaining patients who underwent nerve transfers scored M4.
With axillary nerve lesions, reinnervation of the ADAN is a priority. The transdeltoid approach between the posterior and middle deltoid offers a direct and feasible approach to the ADAN.
Therapeutic V.
PDF
