Preexisting malnutrition in critically ill patients is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Malnutrition can be diagnosed with the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition using parameters ...such as weight loss, muscle wasting, and BMI. International critical care nutrition guidelines recommend high protein treatment to improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients diagnosed with preexisting malnutrition. However, this recommendation is based on expert opinion.
In critically ill patients, what is the association between preexisting malnutrition and time to discharge alive (TTDA), and does high protein treatment modify this association?
This multicenter randomized controlled trial involving 16 countries was designed to investigate the effects of high vs usual protein treatment in 1,301 critically ill patients. The primary outcome was TTDA. Multivariable regression was used to identify if preexisting malnutrition was associated with TTDA and if protein delivery modified their association.
The prevalence of preexisting malnutrition was 43.8%, and the cumulative incidence of live hospital discharge by day 60 was 41.2% vs 52.9% in the groups with and without preexisting malnutrition, respectively. The average protein delivery in the high vs usual treatment groups was 1.6 g/kg per day vs 0.9 g/kg per day. Preexisting malnutrition was independently associated with slower TTDA (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98). However, high protein treatment in patients with and without preexisting malnutrition was not associated with TTDA (adjusted hazard ratios of 0.84 95% CI, 0.63-1.11 and 0.97 95% CI, 0.77-1.21). Furthermore, no effect modification was observed (ratio of adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58-1.20).
Malnutrition was associated with slower TTDA, but high protein treatment did not modify the association. These findings challenge current international critical care nutrition guidelines.
ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03160547; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov
Display omitted
The modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score was developed to identify patients most likely to benefit from nutritional therapies and to stratify or select subjects for clinical ...trials. However, the validity of the score and the association between that score and the prognosis of patients in surgical intensive care units (SICUs) remain unclear. This study explored whether the score was a useful prognostic indicator for SICU patients, and whether survival could be improved via nutritional interventions based on mNUTRIC status.
This retrospective observational study enrolled 123 patients admitted to our SICU for critical care from January 2018 to December 2019. Among these, mNUTRIC medical data were available for 116. In-hospital mortality rates were compared based on both mNUTRIC status and the adequacy of nutritional supplementation.
mNUTRIC-high status (5 points or more) was apparent in 16 % of all critically ill surgical patients. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in those with mNUTRIC-high scores (42.1 % vs. 15.5 %, P = 0.023). Both groups exhibited less mortality when nutrition was adequate vs. inadequate (5.0 % vs. 40.9 % and 26.7 % vs. 100 %, respectively). In multivariate analysis, mNUTRIC-high scores and inadequate nutritional support were significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality (hazard ratios 7.336 and 13.636, P = 0.027 and 0.002, respectively).
In critically ill surgical patients, those identified as nutritionally high-risk using the mNUTRIC classification had poor in-hospital survival. Moreover, patients who received adequate nutritional support had a better prognosis than those who did not.
•In critically ill surgical patients with mNUTRIC-high had poor in-hospital survival.•Patients who received adequate nutritional support had a better prognosis than those who did not.•Both patients with mNUTRIC-low and high require nutritional support, the absence of which causes poor survivals.
Abstract
Background
Although the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load in respiratory specimens has been widely used to diagnose coronavirus disease ...2019 (COVID-19), it is undeniable that serum SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid (RNAemia) could be detected in a fraction of COVID-19 patients. However, it is not clear whether testing for RNAemia is correlated with the occurrence of cytokine storms or with the specific class of patients.
Methods
This study enrolled 48 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the General Hospital of Central Theater Command, People’s Liberation Army, a designated hospital in Wuhan, China. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the Diagnosis and Treatment of New Coronavirus Pneumonia (sixth edition) guidelines issued by the National Health Commission of China. Clinical and laboratory data were collected, and the serum viral load and interleukin 6 (IL-6) level were determined.
Results
Analysis of clinical characteristics of 48 cases of COVID-19 showed that RNAemia was diagnosed only in the critically ill group and seemed to reflect the severity of the disease. Furthermore, the level of the inflammatory cytokine IL-6 in critically ill patients increased significantly, almost 10 times that in other patients. More importantly, the extremely high IL-6 level was closely correlated with the detection of RNAemia (R = 0.902).
Conclusions
Detectable serum SARS-CoV-2 RNA (RNAemia) in patients with COVID-19 was associated with elevated IL-6 concentration and poor prognosis. Because elevated IL-6 may be part of a larger cytokine storm that could worsen outcome, IL-6 could be a potential therapeutic target for critically ill patients with an excessive inflammatory response.
Detectable serum severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral load (RNAemia) was confirmed only in the group of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and appeared to reflect illness severity. Extremely high interleukin 6 level closely correlated with the incidence of RNAemia.
There is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on antimicrobial resistance, with few studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries. We ...investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) among critically ill patients and their clinical outcomes.
This was a retrospective observational study of patients admitted to the medical Intensive Care Unit at Jordan University Hospital and had blood, urine, or bronchoalveolar bacterial cultures taken during 2 time periods: prepandemic (ie, 1/2016 to 1/2019) and pandemic (ie, 1/2020 to 1/2023). We compared the clinical outcomes (ie, in-hospital deaths, the need for O2 devices, intubation, the length of hospital stay, and the occurrence of complications) and prevalence of MDROs between the 2 periods and conducted multivariate analyses.
There were 1,254 patients (479 prepandemic and 775 postpandemic. The percentage of patients who had MDROs was significantly higher among patients with a culture taken during the pandemic (82.4%) compared to before it (17.6%) (P-value=.000). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients cultured during the pandemic were more than 3 times as likely to have an MDRO (odds ratio = 3.210; 95% confidence interval: 2.236-4.609).
The increase in MDROs during the COVID-19 pandemic is an alarming threat to public health; thus, investigating the antibiotic resistance situation as the pandemic subsides is crucial.
•The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antibiotic resistance is controversial.•Patients cultured during the pandemic were 3 times more likely to have an MDRO.•Patients with cultures during the pandemic had worse clinical outcomes.
The purpose was to explore the correlation between refeeding hypophosphatemia and delirium and analyze the related factors in critically ill patients.
We conducted a retrospective review of ...critically ill patients admitted to Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between September 2019 and March 2021. The patients were divided into delirium and nondelirium groups. Demographic data, underlying diseases, laboratory findings, comorbidities, nutritional intake and overall prognosis were collected and analyzed.
In total, 162 patients were included and divided into delirium (n=54) and nondelirium (n=108) groups. Serum phosphorus levels in the two groups decreased significantly in the first three days (P1, P2, P3) after nutrient intake compared with baseline before nutrient intake (Ppre). P1 and P2 were significantly lower in the delirium group compared to the nondelirium group. The maximum blood phosphorus reduction (Pmax) in the first three days after nutrient intake was significantly higher in the delirium group than in the nondelirium group. The time of Pmax in the delirium group was on the first day after nutrient intake. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified starting route of nutrition and P1< 0.845 mmol/L as the independent predictors of delirium development in critically ill patients.
The incidence of delirium in critically ill patients is high and associated with refeeding hypophosphatemia. Delirium may occur with serum phosphorus levels less than 0.845 mmol/L on the first day.
It is well known that oxidative stress causes certain diseases and organ damage. However, roles of oxidative stress in the acute phase of critical patients remain to be elucidated. This study aimed ...to investigate the balance of oxidative and antioxidative system and to clarify the association between oxidative stress and mortality in critically ill patients. This cohort study enrolled 247 patients transported to our emergency department by ambulance. Blood was drawn on hospital arrival, and serum derivatives of reactive oxidant metabolites (dROMs, oxidative index) and biological antioxidant potential (BAP, antioxidative index) were measured. Modified ratio (MR) is also calculated as BAP/dROMs/7.51. There were 197 survivors and 50 non-survivors. In the non-survivors, dROMs were significantly lower (274 vs 311, p<0.01), BAP was significantly higher (2,853 vs 2,138, p<0.01), and MR was significantly higher (1.51 vs 0.92, p<0.01) compared to those in the survivors. The AUC of MR was similar to that for the APACHE II score. Contrary to our expectations, higher BAP and lower dROMs were observed on admission in non-survivors. This may suggest that the antioxidative system is more dominant in the acute phase of severe insults and that the balance toward a higher antioxidative system is associated with mortality.
This study aimed to explore the effects of dietary fiber (DF) supplement strategies on the incidence of acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) in critically ill patients.
A prospective observational ...study.
The study was conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from April 2021 to March 2023.
Using a five-day dietary log counted the amount of DF supplement. The best fitting trajectories of DF supplement were determined based on the latent class trajectory modelling (LCTM). The data of AGI were evaluated on the day 5 (D5) and day 7 (D7) after intensive care unit admission.
A total of 179 patients were included in the study. The LCTM yielded a four-trajectories of models, named; Sustained Low – Group, Slowly Rising – Group, Early Supplement & Slowly Rising – Group and Rapidly Rising – Group, respectively. The incidences of AGI on D5 and D7 were 51.4 % and 40.0 %, respectively. There was an increased risk in the grade of AGI in the Sustained Low – Group compared with the Rapidly Rising – Group on D5 odds ratio (OR), 4.8; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.9–12.1 and D7 (OR, 12.0; 95 % CI, 3.9–37.0); and an increased risk in the Slowly Rising – Group on D5 (OR, 3.6; 95 % CI, 1.3–9.9).
The supplement of DF in critically ill patients may be insufficient and the incidence of AGI is high. Sustained low and slow rising DF supplement may be associated with an increased risk in the AGI.
The clinical staff could focus on the supplementation of not only the three macronutrients, but also DF in critically ill patients.
Introduction
This is a state-of-the-art article of the diagnostic process, etiologies and management of acute right ventricular (RV) failure in critically ill patients. It is based on a large review ...of previously published articles in the field, as well as the expertise of the authors.
Results
The authors propose the ten key points and directions for future research in the field. RV failure (RVF) is frequent in the ICU, magnified by the frequent need for positive pressure ventilation. While no universal definition of RVF is accepted, we propose that RVF may be defined as a state in which the right ventricle is unable to meet the demands for blood flow without excessive use of the Frank–Starling mechanism (i.e. increase in stroke volume associated with increased preload). Both echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring play a central role in the evaluation of RVF in the ICU. Management of RVF includes treatment of the causes, respiratory optimization and hemodynamic support. The administration of fluids is potentially deleterious and unlikely to lead to improvement in cardiac output in the majority of cases. Vasopressors are needed in the setting of shock to restore the systemic pressure and avoid RV ischemia; inotropic drug or inodilator therapies may also be needed. In the most severe cases, recent mechanical circulatory support devices are proposed to unload the RV and improve organ perfusion
Conclusion
RV function evaluation is key in the critically-ill patients for hemodynamic management, as fluid optimization, vasopressor strategy and respiratory support. RV failure may be diagnosed by the association of different devices and parameters, while echocardiography is crucial.