•Breath hold techniques can efficiently reduce dose to organs at risk.•Patient compliance is essential to ensure reproducibility.•Image guidance should aim to capture interfraction and intrafraction ...variations.•Careful implementation is required to manage uncertainties.
The use of breath-hold techniques in radiotherapy, such as deep-inspiration breath hold, is increasing although guidelines for clinical implementation are lacking. In these recommendations, we aim to provide an overview of available technical solutions and guidance for best practice in the implementation phase. We will discuss specific challenges in different tumour sites including factors such as staff training and patient coaching, accuracy, and reproducibility. In addition, we aim to highlight the need for further research in specific patient groups. This report also reviews considerations for equipment, staff training and patient coaching, as well as image guidance for breath-hold treatments. Dedicated sections for specific indications, namely breast cancer, thoracic and abdominal tumours are also included.
Modern breast cancer techniques, such as the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique has been applied for left-sided breast cancer. Whether the DIBH regimen is the optimal solution for ...left-sided breast cancer remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to elucidate the differences of DIBH and free-breathing (FB) for patients receiving radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer and provide a practical reference for clinical practice.
Relevant research available on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science published before November 30, 2021 was independently and systematically examined by two investigators. Data were extracted from eligible studies for assessing their qualities and calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Review Manager software 5.4 (RevMan 5.4).
Forty-one studies with a total of 3599 left-sided breast cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with FB, DIBH reduced heart dose (
,
, V30, V10, V5), left anterior descending branch (LAD) dose (
,
), ipsilateral lung dose (
, V20, V10, V5), and heart volume significantly. Lung volume increased greatly, and a statistically significant difference. For contralateral breast mean dose, DIBH has no obvious advantage over FB. The funnel plot suggested this study has no significant publication bias.
Although DIBH has no obvious advantage over FB in contralateral breast mean dose, it can significantly reduce heart dose, LAD dose, ipsilateral lung dose, and heart volume. Conversely, it can remarkably increase the ipsilateral lung volume. This study suggests that soon DIBH could be more widely utilized in clinical practice because of its excellent dosimetric performance.
Abstract Background and purpose This study aims at evaluating the effect of deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) on target coverage and dose to organs at risk in a large series of breast cancer ...patients. Materials and methods Clinical dose plans for 319 breast cancer patients were evaluated: 144 left-sided patients treated with DIBH and 175 free-breathing (FB) patients (83 left-sided and 92 right-sided). All patients received whole breast irradiation with tangential fields, based on a forward-planned intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique. Dose to heart, ipsi-lateral lung and ipsi-lateral breast were assessed and median values compared between patient groups. Results Comparing group median values, DIBH plans show large reductions of dose to the heart compared with left-sided FB plans; V20Gy (relative volume receiving ⩾20 Gy) for the heart is reduced from 7.8% to 2.3% (−70%, p < 0.0001), V40Gy from 3.4% to 0.3% (−91%, p < 0.0001) and mean dose from 5.2 to 2.7 Gy (−48%, p < 0.0001). Lung dose also shows a small reduction in V20Gy ( p < 0.04), while median target coverage is slightly improved ( p = 0.0002). Conclusions In a large series of clinical patients we find that implementation of DIBH in daily clinical practice results in reduced irradiation of heart and lung, without compromising target coverage.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate three techniques of irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), hybrid Intensity-Modulated ...Radiotherapy (h-IMRT), and hybrid Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (h-VMAT, h-ARC), in terms of dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The second aim was to estimate the projected relative risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers for hybrid techniques.
Three treatment plans were prepared in 3D-CRT, h-IMRT, and h-VMAT techniques for each of the 40 patients, who underwent CT simulation in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). For hybrid techniques, plans were created by combining 3D-CRT and dynamic fields with an 80%/20% dose ratio for 3D-CRT and IMRT or VMAT. Cumulative dose-volume histograms were used to compare dose distributions within the PTV and OARs (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery LAD, left and right lung LL, RL, right breast RB). Projected risk ratios for secondary cancers were estimated relative to 3D-CRT using the organ equivalent dose (OED) concept for the Schneider's linear exponential, plateau, and full mechanistic dose-response model.
All plans fulfilled the PTV criterium: V95%≥95%. Compared to 3D-CRT, both hybrid techniques showed significantly better target coverage (PTV: V95%>98%, p < 0.001), and the best conformality was achieved by h-ARC plans (CI: 1.18 ± 0.09, p < 0.001). Compared to 3D-CRT and h-ARC, h-IMRT increased the average sum of monitor units (MU) over 129.9% (p < 0.001). H-ARC increased the mean dose of contralateral organs and the LL V5Gy parameter (p < 0.001). Both hybrid techniques significantly reduced the D
max
of the heart by 5 Gy. Compared to h-IMRT, h-ARC increased secondary cancer projected relative risk ratios for LL, RL, and RB by 18, 152, and 81%, respectively.
The results confirmed that both hybrid techniques provide better target quality and OARs sparing than 3D-CRT. Hybrid VMAT delivers less MU compared to hybrid IMRT but may increase the risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancies.
The purpose of the in silico study was to compare free breathing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to standard deep inspiration breath‐hold (DIBH) three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy ...(3DCRT) and determine whether the former is a viable option for elderly patients with left‐sided early stage breast cancer. Data from 22 patients with early‐stage left breast carcinoma requiring breast‐only radiation therapy were used for this planning study. The robustness of VMAT plans when using the free breathing method was compared to that of standard 3DCRT plans using the DIBH method. The endpoints for evaluation were the target dose coverage as well as doses to the organs‐at‐risk. The free breathing VMAT plans produced a significantly higher mean dose to the heart and right breast than the DIBH‐3DCRT plans. Free breathing VMAT plans resulted in significantly better target coverage than did 3DCRT using DIBH. The external volume that received more than 40 Gy was significantly smaller in the VMAT plans. Free breathing VMAT is a viable alternative to DIBH 3DCRT in elderly patients with a limited life expectancy and in subjects who are unable to perform DIBH. The choice of treatment should be individualized, and all relevant risks ought to be considered.
AIMSThe aim of TROG 14.04 was to assess the feasibility of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and its impact on radiation dose to the heart in patients with left-sided breast cancer undergoing ...radiotherapy. Secondary end points pertained to patient anxiety and cost of delivering a DIBH programme. MATERIALS AND METHODSThe study comprised two groups - left-sided breast cancer patients engaging DIBH and right-sided breast cancer patients using free breathing through radiotherapy. The primary end point was the feasibility of DIBH, defined as left-sided breast cancer patients' ability to breath hold for 15 s, decrease in heart dose in DIBH compared with the free breathing treatment plan and reproducibility of radiotherapy delivery using mid-lung distance (MLD) assessed on electronic portal imaging as the surrogate. The time required for treatment delivery, patient-reported outcomes and resource requirement were compared between the groups. RESULTSBetween February and November 2018, 32 left-sided and 30 right-sided breast cancer patients from six radiotherapy centres were enrolled. Two left-sided breast cancer patients did not undergo DIBH (one treated in free breathing as per investigator choice, one withdrawn). The mean heart dose was reduced from 2.8 Gy (free breathing) to 1.5 Gy (DIBH). Set-up reproducibility in the first week of treatment assessed by MLD was 1.88 ± 1.04 mm (average ± 1 standard deviation) for DIBH and 1.59 ± 0.93 mm for free breathing patients. Using a reproducibility cut-off for MLD of 2 mm (1 standard deviation) as per study protocol, DIBH was feasible for 67% of DIBH patients. Radiotherapy delivery using DIBH took about 2 min longer than for free breathing. Anxiety was not significantly different in DIBH patients and decreased over the course of treatment in both groups. CONCLUSIONAlthough DIBH was shown to require about 2 min longer per treatment slot, it has the potential to reduce heart dose in left-sided breast cancer patients by nearly a half, provided careful assessment of breath hold reproducibility is carried out.
•Heart exposure is a major cardiac risk factor in left-sided breast cancer survivors.•Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) significantly reduces the exposure of the heart.•Patients with high ...cardiovascular risk and favourable tumour prognosis benefit most.•Risk modelling showed that age has only minor impact on the related cardiac risk.
Aim of the current comparative modelling study was to estimate the individual radiation-induced risk for death of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) under free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) in a real-world population.
Eighty-nine patients with left-sided early breast cancer were enrolled in the prospective SAVE-HEART study. For each patient three-dimensional conformal treatment plans were created in FB and DIBH and corresponding radiation-induced risks of IHD mortality were estimated based on expected survival, individual IHD risk factors and the relative radiation-induced risk.
With the use of DIBH, mean heart doses were reduced by 35% (interquartile range: 23–46%) as compared to FB. Mean expected years of life lost (YLL) due to radiation-induced IHD mortality were 0.11 years in FB, and 0.07 years in DIBH. YLL were remarkably independent of age at treatment in patients with a favourable tumour prognosis. DIBH led to more pronounced reductions in YLL in patients with high baseline risk (0.08 years for upper vs 0.02 years for lower quartile), with favourable tumour prognosis (0.05 years for patients without vs 0.02 years for those with lymph-node involvement), and in patients with high mean heart doses in FB (0.09 years for doses >3 Gy vs 0.02 years for doses <1.5 Gy).
Ideally, the DIBH technique should be offered to all patients with left-sided breast cancer. However, highest benefits are expected for patients with a favourable tumour prognosis, high mean heart dose or high baseline IHD risk, independent of their age.
The growing acceptance and recognition of Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) as a promising imaging technique has supported its recent spread in a large number of radiation oncology facilities. ...Although this technology is not new, many aspects of it have only recently been exploited. This review focuses on the latest SGRT developments, both in the field of general clinical applications and special techniques.SGRT has a wide range of applications, including patient positioning with real-time feedback, patient monitoring throughout the treatment fraction, and motion management (as beam-gating in free-breathing or deep-inspiration breath-hold). Special radiotherapy modalities such as accelerated partial breast irradiation, particle radiotherapy, and pediatrics are the most recent SGRT developments.The fact that SGRT is nowadays used at various body sites has resulted in the need to adapt SGRT workflows to each body site. Current SGRT applications range from traditional breast irradiation, to thoracic, abdominal, or pelvic tumor sites, and include intracranial localizations.Following the latest SGRT applications and their specifications/requirements, a stricter quality assurance program needs to be ensured. Recent publications highlight the need to adapt quality assurance to the radiotherapy equipment type, SGRT technology, anatomic treatment sites, and clinical workflows, which results in a complex and extensive set of tests.Moreover, this review gives an outlook on the leading research trends. In particular, the potential to use deformable surfaces as motion surrogates, to use SGRT to detect anatomical variations along the treatment course, and to help in the establishment of personalized patient treatment (optimized margins and motion management strategies) are increasingly important research topics. SGRT is also emerging in the field of patient safety and integrates measures to reduce common radiotherapeutic risk events (e.g. facial and treatment accessories recognition).This review covers the latest clinical practices of SGRT and provides an outlook on potential applications of this imaging technique. It is intended to provide guidance for new users during the implementation, while triggering experienced users to further explore SGRT applications.
Radiotherapy (RT) is an important part in the treatment of gastric lymphomas and the prognosis after radiotherapy is very good with a good chance of long-term survival, so prevention of long-term ...adverse effects is important. In patients with gastric lymphomas cardiac late effects are of most concern. The aim of this study was to assess if the dose to the heart could be reduced with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) without compromising the dose to the target or increasing the risk of other late effects.
Fifteen patients with gastric lymphoma were included. RT plans were made using DIBH and Free breathing (FB)scans. Clinical target volume (CTV) was the stomach plus 1 cm margin. The heart and surrounding organs at risk (OAR) were contoured. Two sets of plan comparisons were made, one with 1 cm CTV to planning target volume (PTV) margin in both DIBH and FB and one set with an additional 5 mm CTV to PTV margin in cranio-caudal direction with FB. Datasets were analysed with Wilcoxon signed rank test for non-parametric paired data.
All patients tolerated the procedures and were treated with volumetric arc therapy technique in DIBH. Target coverage was kept equal between FB and DIBH, while a statistically significant reduction of the estimated does to the heart was seen with DIBH. Median mean heart dose was reduced from 7.1 Gy (5.7–12) to a median of 3.2 Gy (1.2–7.0) and heart V20 from a median of 54 (17–106) cm3 to 15. (0.0–78) cm3. The estimated mean doses to the liver, duodenum, pancreas and spinal cord were at the same level.
This clinical trial of RT with DIBH for gastric lymphomas showed that the heart dose could be reduced without compromising PTV coverage. The doses to abdominal OARs were similar with FB and DIBH.
Many institutions worldwide currently deliver left breast radiotherapy in free breathing mode, mostly due to the unavailability of a Deep Inspiration Breath Hold technique (DIBH). This study aims at ...quantifying the error in dose delivery (compared to treatment plan) due to respiratory motion in free breathing irradiation of left breast or chest wall. Since subfields often consist in small, fine-tuned, highly targeted fields, slight intrafractional target motion may compromise their subtle benefit. Thus we analyzed the respiratory motion effect on target dose coverage, dose homogeneity and left lung dose.
Treatment plans for twenty left breast or chest wall cancer patients previously treated at our center were retrieved and retrospectively planned with the introduction of an appropriate shift in isocenter location to simulate free breathing target motion.
No clinically significant dosimetric changes were found in all twenty cases when breathing motion was accounted for. Changes in target dose coverage (V95%), in target maximum dose (D2%) and in V20Gy lung dose were respectively less than 1.5%, 0.3% and 2.6%.
The findings suggest that breast irradiation in free breathing mode does not undermine the dosimetric merits of the field-in-field technique and does not produce clinically significant dosimetric differences in dose delivery for target and lung compared to plan.
•Breathing has a negligible effect on dose delivery accuracy in breast cancer radiotherapy.•Free breathing during breast radiotherapy treatment does not invalidate the use of field-in-field technique.•The dosimetric error from free breathing breast motion during radiotherapy treatment is clinically negligible.
PDF
