Purpose/Objective
Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) is now considered as the standard of care for many breast cancer patients. However, there are still uncertainties about the dose given to the ...heart, and it is unknown if patients may improve voluntary DIBH depth by gaining experience during treatment. In this study, we will examine the interfractional three-dimensional (3D) heart displacement throughout voluntary DIBH (vDIBH) radiotherapy by means of daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Material and methods
Two hundred twenty-five unique CBCTs from 15 patients treated in 15 fractions were analyzed. During CBCT, a vDIBH was conducted without any visual feedback. Patients performed their DIBH freely after receiving explanations and training. After daily CBCT matching to the chest wall (CW), surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) tracked DIBH depth to ensure that the CW position was the same as the daily acquired CBCT. The CBCTs were retrospectively registered to the DIBH planning-CT to calculate daily changes in heart displacement relative to the CW.
Results
The mean displacement of the heart during DIBH treatment relative to the DIBH planning-CT was as follows: 1.1 mm to the right, interquartile range (IQR) 8.0; 0.5 mm superiorly, IQR 4.8; and 0 mm posteriorly, IQR 6.4. The Spearman correlation coefficients (r
s
) were -0.15 (p=0.025), 0.04 (p=0.549), and 0.03 (p=0.612) for the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively. The differences in median heart displacement were significant: Friedmann rank sum test p=0.031 and pairwise comparison using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were p=0.008 for X and Y; p=0.33 for X and Z; and p=0.07 for Y and Z. The total median heart motion was δ
tot median
= 7.26 mm, IQR= 6.86 mm.
Conclusion
During DIBH, clinicians must be aware of the wide range of intra- and inter-individual heart position variations. The inter-individual heterogeneity shown in our study should be investigated further in order to avoid unexpected cardiac overexposure and to develop a more accurate heart dose-volume model.
•DIBH reduces radiation dose to the heart, left ventricle, coronary arteries and left lung.•Greatest dose reductions from DIBH were to the distal LAD (−14.4 Gy) and apical left ventricle (−12.1 Gy) ...segments.•Reducing dose to these cardiac structures may improve radiation-induced cardiac toxicity.
The risk of radiation-induced cardiac injury remains a challenging problem in the treatment of breast cancer. Certain cardiac structures receive higher doses than others, which results in variable frequencies of radiation-induced injuries across these structures. Radiation dose can be reduced using the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique. We aimed to investigate the dose reductions from DIBH in individual cardiac segments.
A dosimetric analysis was performed on left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery and whole breast irradiation. Radiation doses to the cardiac structures were compared between the DIBH and free-breathing (FB) techniques and the dose reductions with DIBH were correlated to the lung expansion.
For the 75 patients included in our study, DIBH effectively reduced doses to the heart, left lung, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and left ventricle (LV), but the degree of dose reductions was variable across different structures. The absolute dose reductions were greatest in the distal LAD (14.4 Gy) and apical LV (12.1 Gy) segments, compared with the other LAD (middle 9.7 Gy, proximal 1.6 Gy) and LV (anterior 5.3 Gy, lateral 2.9 Gy, septal 2.0 Gy, inferior 0.2 Gy) segments. Left lung expansion was significantly correlated with the dose reductions in the LAD (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, ρ, 0.304) and LV (ρ, 0.420) segments.
Our study demonstrates the dose-sparing effects of DIBH in various cardiac structures, especially the distal LAD and apical LV segments. The large dose reductions seen in the distal LAD and apical LV segments could potentially translate into clinical benefit of reduced cardiac toxicity, as these structures have been previously shown to receive the highest doses and are associated with radiation-induced injury.
•Multi-atlases can be used for contouring of cardiac structures in planning CT scans.•Atlas accuracy was at least similar to interobserver delineation variation.•Atlas performance depends on the ...breathing technique used in planning CT scans.•Separate atlases for scans made in DIBH and FB could benefit atlas performance.
Developing NTCP-models for cardiac complications after breast cancer (BC) radiotherapy requires cardiac dose-volume parameters for many patients. These can be obtained by using multi-atlas based automatic segmentation (MABAS) of cardiac structures in planning CT scans. We investigated the relevance of separate multi-atlases for deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free breathing (FB) CT scans.
BC patients scanned in DIBH (n = 10) and in FB (n = 20) were selected to create separate multi-atlases consisting of expert panel delineations of the whole heart, atria and ventricles. The accuracy of atlas-generated contours was validated with expert delineations in independent datasets (n = 10 for DIBH and FB) and reported as Dice coefficients, contour distances and dose-volume differences in relation to interobserver variability of manual contours. Dependency of MABAS contouring accuracy on breathing technique was assessed by validation of a FB atlas in DIBH patients and vice versa (cross-validation).
For all structures the FB and DIBH atlases resulted in Dice coefficients with their respective reference contours ≥ 0.8 and average contour distances ≤ 2 mm smaller than slice thickness of (CTs). No significant differences were found for dose-volume parameters in volumes receiving relevant dose levels (WH, LV and RV). Accuracy of the DIBH atlas was at least similar to, and for the ventricles better than, the interobserver variation in manual delineation. Cross-validation between breathing techniques showed a reduced MABAS performance.
Multi-atlas accuracy was at least similar to interobserver delineation variation. Separate atlases for scans made in DIBH and FB could benefit atlas performance because accuracy depends on breathing technique.
Proton therapy for breast cancer is usually given in free breathing (FB). With the use of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique, the location of the heart is displaced inferiorly, away from ...the internal mammary nodes and, thus, the dose to the heart can potentially be reduced. The aim of this study was to explore the potential benefit of proton therapy in DIBH compared to FB for highly selected patients to reduce exposure of the heart and other organs at risk. We aimed at creating proton plans with delivery times feasible with treatment in DIBH.
Sixteen patients with left-sided breast cancer receiving loco-regional proton therapy were included. The FB and DIBH plans were created for each patient using spot-scanning proton therapy with 2-3 fields, robust and single field optimization. For the DIBH plans, minimum monitor unit per spot and spot spacing were increased to reduce treatment delivery time.
All plans complied with target coverage constraints. The median mean heart dose was statistically significant reduced from 1.1 to 0.6 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) by applying DIBH. No statistical significant difference was seen for mean dose and V17Gy RBE to the ipsilateral lung. The median treatment delivery time for the DIBH plans was reduced by 27% compared to the FB plans without compromising the plan quality.
The median absolute reduction in dose to the heart was limited. Proton treatment in DIBH may only be relevant for a subset of these patients with the largest reduction in heart exposure.
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to identify high-risk factors for high cardiac radiation exposure, based on anatomical measurements taken from planning CT images of patients with left-sided ...breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and received radiotherapy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 45 patients with left-sided breast cancer who underwent whole-breast radiotherapy, either under free breathing (27/45) or deep inspiratory breath-holding (DIBH) (18/45), after breast-conserving surgery. Six anatomical parameters were measured from planning CT images, including treatment planning target volume (PTV), cardiopulmonary volume ratio (CVR), maximum cardiac margin distance, the relative distance between inferior boundaries of heart and PTV (DBIB(H2P)), axial cardiac contact distance, and para-sagittal cardiac contact distance (CCDps). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed using SPSS software to explore the correlation between the six parameters, body mass index (BMI), and the mean heart dose (MHD). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive power of the selected predictor of cardiac dose exposure. Results Significant correlations were observed between the MHD of patients and the CVR, DBIB(H2P), and CCDps parameters. Among them, the CVR was the most important predictor of cardiac dose exposure, with an area under the curve of 0.915 and a cut-off value of 0.17. Conclusions The study results indicated that CVR, DBIB(H2P), and CCDps are the primary parameters associated with the risk of cardiac dose exposure, with CVR being the most significant predictor. Further prospective studies are required to determine whether these parameters can be used to identify patients who would benefit from the DIBH technique.
•Deep inspiration breath hold reduced average lung dose by median 1.3 Gy.•Inter-fraction target coverage robustness was comparable to free breathing.•Risk of radiation pneumonitis with protons was ...half of risk with photons.•Risk of mortality was 9.5 percentage points lower with protons.
For locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) can reduce organ at risk (OAR) doses compared to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) reduces OAR doses compared to free breathing (FB) in IMRT. In IMPT, differences in dose distributions and robustness between DIBH and FB are unclear. In this study, we compare DIBH to FB in IMPT, and IMPT to IMRT.
Fortyone LA-NSCLC patients were prospectively included. 4D computed tomography images (4DCTs) and DIBH CTs were acquired for treatment planning and during weeks 1 and 3 of treatment. A new system for automated robust planning was developed and used to generate a FB and a DIBH IMPT plan for each patient. Plans were compared in terms of dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs). Dose recalculations on repeat CTs were used to compare inter-fraction plan robustness.
In IMPT, DIBH reduced median lungs Dmean from 9.3 Gy(RBE) to 8.0 Gy(RBE) compared to FB, and radiation pneumonitis NTCP from 10.9 % to 9.4 % (p < 0.001). Inter-fraction plan robustness for DIBH and FB was similar. Median NTCPs for radiation pneumonitis and mortality were around 9 percentage points lower with IMPT than IMRT (p < 0.001). These differences were much larger than between FB and DIBH within each modality.
DIBH IMPT resulted in reduced lung dose and radiation pneumonitis NTCP compared to FB IMPT. Inter-fraction robustness was comparable. OAR doses were far lower in IMPT than IMRT.
To analyze whether deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) would be dosimetrically beneficial irrespective of radiotherapy planning techniques for patients with left breast cancers requiring adjuvant ...radiotherapy.
Planning CT scans were taken in free-breathing (FB) as well as deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for patients requiring adjuvant radiotherapy for left breast cancers. After registration, three radiotherapy plans - 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity modulated RT (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc-therapy (VMAT) - were generated for both FB and DIBH scans for each patient. The dose-volume parameters were collected from the dose-volume histogram and analyzed. A paired
-test is used for statistical analysis of the parameters.
The study was conducted on thirteen patients. The mean dose of the left lung was reduced with DIBH by 32%, 24%, and 6% (8.6 Gy, 6.6 Gy, and 6.4 Gy) with 3DCRT, IMRT, and VMAT, respectively. The mean heart dose was reduced by 3.3 Gy (2.2 vs 5.5 Gy), 2.2 Gy (7.5 vs 9.7 Gy), and 1.2 Gy (5.8 vs 7 Gy) with 3DCRT, IMRT, and VMAT with DIBH. Similarly, the left anterior descending artery (LAD) mean dose was relatively reduced by 80%, 34%, and 20% when compared with the FB scans for 3DCRT, IMRT, and VMAT respectively, with max dose in the 3DCRT plan.
DIBH appears to have maximum benefit in achieving a better sparing of organs-at-risk for patients being considered for 3DCRT, and to a lesser extent with even IMRT and VMAT techniques.
•VMAT plans were more robust on average than 3DCRT to localization errors.•VMAT plans resulted in significantly better target coverage compared to 3DCRT.•Robust VMAT planning and DIBH improves on ...average the target homogeneity.•Mean setup-deviations for DIBH was less than 2 mm in all directions.
The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the robustness of treatment plans produced using the volumetric modulated arc-therapy (VMAT) and the standard three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) techniques by estimating perturbed doses induced by localization offsets for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) in locally advanced breast cancer radiation therapy.
Twenty patients with left breast carcinoma requiring radiation therapy were analysed in this planning study. Robust VMAT plans regarding minimum CTV doses and standard 3DCRT plans were produced, and perturbed doses were calculated in accordance with localization values from the weekly offline imaging protocol. Offsets from 5 weeks were summed to a perturbed overall treatment plan. Dose criteria for evaluation were coverage and homogeneity of the target, as well as doses to organs at risk.
VMAT plans resulted in significantly better target coverage compared to 3DCRT, as well as lowered doses to heart and left anterior descending artery, while the perturbed doses were less variable for VMAT than 3DCRT plans. Homogeneity was significantly improved in VMAT plans. The statistical analysis taking all organs into account found that VMAT plans were more robust than 3DCRT to localization offsets (p = .001). The overall mean setup-deviation for the DIBH-patients was less than 2 mm in all directions.
VMAT plans were more robust on average than conventional 3DCRT plans for DIBH when localization errors were taken into consideration. The combination of robust VMAT planning and DIBH generally improves the homogeneity and target doses.
Background Radiotherapy using the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique compared with free breathing (FB) can achieve substantial reduction of heart and lung doses in left-sided breast cancer ...cases. The anatomical organ movement in deep inspiration also cause unintended exposure of locoregional lymph nodes to the irradiation field. Methods From 2017-2020, 148 patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (ME) with axillary lymph node staging, followed by adjuvant irradiation in DIBH technique. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy was administered depending on hormone receptor and HER2-status. CT scans in FB and DIBH position with individual coaching and determination of the breathing amplitude during the radiation planning CT were performed for all patients. Intrafractional 3D position monitoring of the patient surface in deep inspiration and gating was performed using Sentinel and Catalyst HD 3D surface scanning systems (C-RAD, Catalyst, C-RAD AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Three-dimensional treatment planning was performed using standard tangential treatment portals (6 or 18 MV). The delineation of ipsilateral locoregional lymph nodes was done on the FB and the DIBH CT-scan according to the RTOG recommendations. Results The mean doses (D.sub.mean) in axillary lymph node (AL) level I, II and III in DIBH were 32.28 Gy (range 2.87-51.7), 20.1 Gy (range 0.44-53.84) and 3.84 Gy (range 0.25-39.23) vs. 34.93 Gy (range 10.52-50.40), 16.40 Gy (range 0.38-52.40) and 3.06 Gy (range 0.21-40.48) in FB (p < 0.0001). Accordingly, in DIBH the D.sub.mean for AL level I were reduced by 7.59%, whereas for AL level II and III increased by 22.56% and 25.49%, respectively. The D.sub.mean for the supraclavicular lymph nodes (SC) in DIBH was 0.82 Gy (range 0.23-4.11), as compared to 0.84 Gy (range 0.22-10.80) with FB (p = 0.002). This results in a mean dose reduction of 2.38% in DIBH. The D.sub.mean for internal mammary lymph nodes (IM) was 12.77 Gy (range 1.45-39.09) in DIBH vs. 11.17 Gy (range 1.34-44.24) in FB (p = 0.005). This yields a mean dose increase of 14.32% in DIBH. Conclusions The DIBH technique may result in changes in the incidental dose exposure of regional lymph node areas. Keywords: Breast cancer, Deep inspiration breath-hold radiation therapy, Incidental irradiation, Lymph nodes
PDF
