Diego Gracián de Alderete (1494-1584) published in 1552 a translation of the almost complete works of the Athenian historian Xephonon, an author highly appreciated for his teaching of Classical ...Greek during Humanism. Gracián dedicated his translation to Philip II thus continuing the Erasmian influence on the education of this bibliophile monarch. Diego Gracián de Alderete (1494-1584) publicó en 1552 una traducción de las obras casi completas del historiador ateniense Jefononte, autor muy apreciado para la enseñanza de griego durante el Humanismo. Gracián dedicó su traducción a Felipe II a fin de continuar con la influencia erasmista impresa en la educación del monarca bibliófilo. Keywords : Gracián, Xenophon, translation, Philip II, education Palabras clave: Gracián, Jenofonte, traducción, Felipe II, educación
Pays tribute to David McIntyre, who recently passed away and is remembered for his expertise on the military and constitutional histories of the Commonwealth of Nations and British Empire. Source: ...National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the Department of Internal Affairs for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand Licence.
Pays tribute to leading historian professor Ann Trotter. Looks back at her life and achievements. Source: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the Department of ...Internal Affairs for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand Licence.
As said by Alfred Korzybski, time-binding is the most prevalent ability, which is by and large clubbed the spiritual or mental ability of man as it makes erstwhile accomplishments subsist in the ...present and present enterprises in futurity. It is an ability that facilitates; it is an ability that brings about; it is an ability that can decipher the past and forecast the future; it is a historian as well as a prophet; it is an ability that loads abstract time, the vehicle of events, with an ever-accumulating obligation of double-dome accomplishments, of spiritual bushel predestined for the refinement of thought, manners, or taste of all future generations. But unfortunately, some people infelicitously employ this ability and because of that, they and the people around them face many disastrous causes as a consequence. Dharmaraja Yudhisthira is a failed time-binder, and a wrong evaluator as well. Even after getting horribly humiliated by the Kauravas, Yudhisthira accepts the second proposal sent by Duryodhana and Shakuni. Pitamah Bhishma warned Yudhisthira not to fall into their trap, but Yudhisthira, being a follower of Dharma and a King, accepts their second proposal and plays the dice game. He even evaluates Duryodhana wrongly while accepting the proposal. He accepts the punishment as it was declared without any objections. At that time, if he had allowed Pitamah Bhishma and other elders to have a talk over the given punishment, the consequences could have been in their part. But the latter never happened and it resulted into The Grand War of Kurukshetra.
In this article, the question 'Why Can't Banksy Be a Woman' is a point of departure to approach some of the pressing challenges regarding sex and gender in graffiti and street art studies, in order ...to contribute on the matter of the presence/absence of women graffiti and street artists in this epistemological field. To this aim, I summon feminist contributions on the invisibility of women in the established art world, namely from art historians Linda Nochlin and Griselda Pollock. I map important contributions on the question of women in graffiti, by referring to graffiti scholars Nancy MacDonald and Jessica PabonColon. As street art has been considered more gender inclusive in regards to conditions of production, I locate restrictions mainly in terms of reception. Finally, I suggest that the question of women in graffiti and street art studies is larger than sex and gender. Keywords: Women, Feminism, Graffiti, Street Art, Production, Reception.
Lewis's distrust of scientific laws for history, rather than undercutting his practice of literary history, existed alongside a basic, cautionary trust in representing the past. His methods of ...history writing included offering an overall plot, developing characters and corporate quasi-characters, and making analogies with the present to increase readerly sympathy (or antipathy) with long-gone cultures. Despite his strong rhetorical tendency to generalize, Lewis did not place absolute faith in his historical narratives. They were made to be argued with, supplemented, and even over-turned. The article pays particular attention to three documents from Lewis's career as a literary historian: 1) his 1945 essay, "Addison"; 2) his two-day address in 1956 to the Cambridge Zoological Laboratory, "Imagination and Thought in the Middle Ages"; and 3) the opening introduction to his monumental English Literature in the Sixteenth Century, Excluding Drama. Likewise, it examines his overall attitude toward historiography, which requires a theological structure to position his suspended middle of historical and ethical judgments.