V prispevku je predstavljeno razlikovanje med stvarnopravno in javnopravno ureditvijo na zavarovanih dobrinah, s poudarkom na vodnih območjih. Čeprav je na nepremičnini vzpostavljena omejitev v ...javnopravnem namenu, na njej obstajajo tudi stvarne pravice, vendar so dobrine zaradi doseganja varstva omejene. Najširša omejitev je uveljavljena s statusom javnega dobrega. Javno dobro se lahko vzpostavi neposredno z zakonom ali splošnim aktom vlade oziroma z razglasitvijo lokalne skupnosti in odločbo pristojnega organa. Glede na različno naravo dobrin zakon lahko določa obligatoren ali fakultativen status javnega dobrega. Argumentacija temelji tudi na primerjalnopravnih ureditvah javnega dobrega, pri čemer so izpostavljene tipične ureditve, ki temeljijo na lastninskem konceptu javnega dobrega. Opozorjeno je na posebnosti ureditve za različne kategorije vodnih dobrin, kot so celinsko in morsko območje, grajeno javno dobro in vodna infrastruktura ; This paper emphasizes the distinction between property and public law regimes on protected goods, with a focus on water areas. Although the limitation of ownership in private interest is created on immovable property, property rights do simultaneously exist, but they are limited in order to achieve the purpose of protecting the public good. The most extensive restriction enforces regimes of public good. Public good may be established directly by law or by general acts of the government or local community with the declaration of public good or with the decision of the competent authority. According to different natures of public goods, legislation provides compulsory or optional regimes of public good. This paper compares of such regimes, while exposing the typical regulations based on the ownership concept of public good. It also indicates specific regimes of water public goods, such as the mainland and marine area, as well as constructed public goods and water infrastructure.
V članku je opisana raziskava o obravnavi lastnine velikih lastnikov v projektu obveščanja. Oblikovan je bil vzorec sedmih lastnikov, ki jih lahko opredelimo kot reprezentativne predstavnike glede na ...lastnosti nepremičnin v njihovi lasti in »vrsto« lastništva. Na vzorcu teh sedmih lastnikov so bila obravnavana razmerja med njihovimi internimi evidencami in podatki registra nepremičnin ter opredeljene težave, s katerimi so se srečevali med obveščanjem o poskusnem izračunu vrednosti nepremičnin. V vzorec je bilo uvrščenih 26.792 sestavin nepremičnin, kar pomeni 0,4 % vseh sestavin nepremičnin v registru nepremičnin. Neskladja so bila uvrščena v štiri sklope, podane so značilnosti teh sklopov. V članku je predstavljena tudi vključitev zasebnega sektorja v projekt obveščanja. Rezultati analiz kažejo, da je vzrok za večino zaznanih neskladij odnos do lastnine, in sicer odnos do lastnine vsakega posameznika in naše družbe kot celote ; This article describes an examination of the property of large real estate owners in the Information of Test Property Value Calculation project. A pattern of seven owners has been made, which can be considered representatives of property, considering the characteristics of their property and the type of ownership. Based on this pattern, the relationships between their internal records and the real estate registry database have been analysed, and problems that occurred during the informing of the test property value calculation have also been noted. The pattern consisted of 26,792 constituent parts of real estate, which represents 0.4% of all the real estate parts noted in the real estate registry. Discrepancies have been divided into four sets, and characteristics of these sets have also been given. The article also presents the inclusion of the private sector in to the information process. Analysis results show that the cause of most of the detected discrepancies is the lack of responsibility of owners towards their property.
V prispevku je obravnavana umestitev lastninske pravice v prostor, ki je mogoča samo na podlagi podatkov zemljiškega katastra, pravzaprav njegovega grafičnega dela – zemljiškokatastrskega prikaza. ...Podana je definicija stopnje zaupanja v lociranje pravic na nepremičninah na podlagi zemljiškokatastrskega prikaza in način njenega določevanja. V prispevku je opredeljen tudi lastninski koncept v Republiki Sloveniji, katerega poznavanje je pomembno pri umeščanju lastninske pravice v prostor. Navedena so tudi neskladja, ki so bila zaznana v okviru projekta obveščanje o poskusnem izračunu nepremičnin zaradi »nepravilnega« umeščanja pravic v prostor. Predvsem smo se osredotočili na povezavo med parcelo in stavbo ter v ta namen preučili vzorec1784 stavb, ki so enakomerno porazdeljene po ozemlju Slovenije ; This article considers the placement of ownership rights into space, possible only with the help of the land cadastre graphical representation. A definition of trust for locating property rights on the land cadastre graphic presentation is given as well as a way of determining it. The ownership concept of the Republic of Slovenia is also defined, the knowledge of which is relevant to ownership rights placement. Discrepancies found in the Information of Test Property Value Calculation formed because of a false placement of rights are also stated. We especially focused on the link between a parcel and building and studied a pattern of 1,784 buildings that were equally distributed throughout Slovenia
