•Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a global health threat.•Number of suicidal deaths during times of COVID-19 is rising though data is limited.•Pandemics lead to several risk factors ...for suicidality like isolation, loneliness, economic fallout, domestic abuse, stigma and fear.•Biological vulnerabilities (family history of suicide, substance use, etc.) and psychosocial risks (migration, old age, low socio-economic class, etc.) amplify the suicidal risks of pandemics.•Stress and immune reaction to infections like COVID-19 are hypothesized as possible linking pathways to suicidal risk.•Suicide-prevention is discussed as an integral part of public health response to pandemics.
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a new global health threat. By increasing the risk of isolation, fear, stigma, abuse and economic fallout, COVID-19 has led to increase in risk of psychiatric disorders, chronic trauma and stress, which eventually increase suicidality and suicidal behavior. There is limited data on association of pandemics and suicides. Cases of suicides have been rising since COVID-19 first emerged in China. The association between suicides and pandemics can possibly be explained through various models like Durkheim's theory, Joiner's interpersonal theory, social stress theory, biological theories, etc. The frontline workers, elderly, migrants, homeless, socio-economically impoverished classes as well as those with pre-existing mental disorders, substance abuse and family history of suicides are at higher risk. Suicides are preventable and need early detection, awareness and socio-culturally tailored interventions. This narrative review draws global perspectives on the association of suicidality and pandemics, the theories and risk factors related to same based on the available evidence. It also hypothesizes neuroimmunity and immune based risk factors as possible links between the psychosocial vulnerabilities and suicide during outbreaks like COVID-19. Proposed strategies of suicide-prevention, as an integral part of public health response to the pandemic are subsequently discussed.
Suicide prevention in India Arya, Vikas
Mental health & prevention,
March 2024, 2024-03-00, Letnik:
33
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
India accounts for nearly 18 % of the global population but approximately 28 % of global suicides. Similar to many countries around the world, suicide in India is known to result from a complex ...interplay of social, economic, and personal factors. To address this important issue, India released its first national suicide prevention strategy in 2022. The strategy follows the WHO-recommended model of a multisectoral approach to suicide prevention, incorporating a mix of primary prevention interventions (focusing on whole populations), secondary prevention interventions (targeting 'high-risk' individuals), and tertiary prevention interventions (aimed at individuals affected by suicide). This paper delves into the details of these primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention interventions and explores how they apply to the Indian context, while arguing for the need to prioritize primary prevention interventions, at least in the short term, to reduce suicides.
Utilization of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline (Lifeline; formerly called the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline) was analyzed in relation to suicide deaths in U.S. states between 2007 and 2020 ...to identify states with potential unmet need for mental health crisis hotline services.
Annual state call rates were calculated from calls routed to the Lifeline during the 2007-2020 period (N=13.6 million). Annual state suicide mortality rates (standardized) were calculated from suicide deaths reported to the National Vital Statistics System (2007-2020 cumulative deaths=588,122). Call rate ratio (CRR) and mortality rate ratio (MRR) were estimated by state and year.
Sixteen U.S. states demonstrated a consistently high MRR and a low CRR, suggesting high suicide burden and relatively low Lifeline use. Heterogeneity in state CRRs decreased over time.
Prioritizing states with a high MRR and a low CRR for messaging and outreach regarding the availability of the Lifeline can ensure more equitable, need-based access to this critical resource.
This open access book focuses on the public health crisis of youth suicide and provides a review of current research and prevention practices. It addresses important topics, including suicide ...epidemiology, suicide risk detection in school and medical settings, critical cultural considerations, and approaches to lethal means safety. This book offers cutting-edge research on emerging discoveries in the neurobiology of suicide, psychopharmacology, and machine learning. It focuses on upstream suicide prevention research methods and details how cost-effective approaches can mitigate youth suicide risk when implemented at a universal level. Chapters discuss critical areas for future research, including how to evaluate the effectiveness of suicide prevention and intervention efforts, increase access to mental health care, and overcome systemic barriers that undermine generalizability of prevention strategies. Finally, this book highlights what is currently working well in youth suicide prevention and, just as important, which areas require more attention and support. Key topics include: The neurobiology of suicide in at-risk children and adolescents. The role of machine learning in youth suicide prevention. Suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention in schools. Suicide risk screening and assessment in medical settings. Culturally informed risk assessment and suicide prevention efforts with minority youth. School mental health partnerships and telehealth models of care in rural communities. Suicide and self-harm prevention and interventions for LGBTQ+ youth. Risk factors associated with suicidal behavior in Black youth. Preventing suicide in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID). Youth Suicide Prevention and Intervention is a must-have resource for policy makers and related professionals, graduate students, and researchers in child and school psychology, family studies, public health, social work, law/criminal justice, sociology, and all related disciplines.
Reviews the book, The Suicidal Person: A New Look at a Human Phenomenon by Konrad Michel (2023). According to the reviewer, this book is essential reading for all who provide clinical care. Flawed ...risk stratification through risk tools and scales and stories of harmful, punitive treatment when seeking help during a suicidal crisis are ever present. Effective suicide prevention requires compassionate recognition of the story of how things got to this. The overarching theme of this book takes the reader to this place (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
Reflections on Suicidal Ideation Jobes, David A; Joiner, Thomas E
Crisis : the journal of crisis intervention and suicide prevention,
07/2019, Letnik:
40, Številka:
4
Journal Article
Recenzirano
While suicidologists and public health officials are understandably preoccupied with suicides and suicide attempts, the authors have recently begun to reflect on those with suicidal ideation who too ...often escape the focused attention of their suicide prevention research, clinical treatments, and even national health-care policies. Upon reflection, the prevalence of suicidal ideation in the United States is truly staggering: 10,600,000 people experiencing thoughts of ending their lives is more than the population of the US state of Georgia. The authors state that in our singular pursuit to prevent suicide deaths, we need to stop trivializing the obvious and vital importance of attending to suicidal ideation. They therefore assert that suicidal ideation must become an essential intervention target in and of itself. Indeed, it can be argued that better identification and more effective treatment of suicidal ideation upstream would invariably lead to many fewer suicide attempts and many fewer suicide deaths downstream. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
Connecting suicidal individuals to appropriate mental health care services is a key component of suicide prevention efforts. This review aims to critically discuss the extant literature on ...help-seeking and mental health service utilization among individuals at elevated risk for suicide, as well as to outline challenges and future directions for research in this area. Across studies, the rate of mental health service use for those with past-year suicide ideation, plans, and/or attempts was approximately 29.5% based on weighted averages, with a lack of perceived need for services, preference for self-management, fear of hospitalization, and structural factors (e.g., time, finances) identified as key barriers to care. Studies also revealed facilitators to care, which include mental health literacy, positive views of services, and encouragement from family or friends to seek support. To address these low rates of help-seeking and barriers to care, a number of interventions have been developed, including psychoeducation-based programs, peer and gatekeeper training, and screening-based approaches. Despite these efforts, it appears that work is still needed to gauge the impact of these interventions on behavioral outcomes and to more rigorously test their effectiveness. Additional implications for future research on help-seeking among suicidal individuals are discussed.
•Mental health service use among suicidal individuals is notably low.•There are many significant barriers to help-seeking in this population.•A number of interventions to increase service use have been developed.•Additional research is needed to understand how to increase help-seeking.
Safety planning-type interventions (SPTIs) for patients at risk of suicide are often used in clinical practice, but it is unclear whether these interventions are effective.
This article reports on a ...meta-analysis of studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of SPTIs in reducing suicidal behaviour and ideation.
We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus from their inception to 9 December 2019, for studies that compared an SPTI with a control condition and had suicidal behaviour or ideation as outcomes. Two researchers independently extracted the data. To assess suicidal behaviour, we used a random-effects model of relative risk based on a pooled measure of suicidal behaviour. For suicidal ideation, we calculated effect sizes with Hedges' g. The study was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020129185).
Of 1816 unique abstracts screened, 6 studies with 3536 participants were eligible for analysis. The relative risk of suicidal behaviour among patients who received an SPTI compared with control was 0.570 (95% CI 0.408-0.795, P = 0.001; number needed to treat, 16). No significant effect was found for suicidal ideation.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to report a meta-analysis on SPTIs for suicide prevention. Results support the use of SPTIs to help preventing suicidal behaviour and the inclusion of SPTIs in clinical guidelines for suicide prevention. We found no evidence for an effect of SPTIs on suicidal ideation, and other interventions may be needed for this purpose.
Suicide prevention is a top clinical priority within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). While research consistently shows that suicide risk is associated with adverse social determinants of ...health (SDH, e.g., housing instability, unemployment, justice involvement), less is known about the extent to which suicide prevention staff are aware of and able to address these risk factors. This study aimed to understand the experiences of VA Suicide Prevention Coordinators (SPCs) with referring Veterans at risk of suicide to services that address SDH.
In January–February 2022, 171 VA SPCs completed a questionnaire about their experiences connecting Veterans with SDH-focused services. Descriptive statistics summarized closed-response items and a thematic analysis was conducted for open-ended responses.
The majority of SPCs agreed that adverse SDH contribute to suicide risk and that services to address SDH could reduce suicide risk for Veterans. While most SPCs were aware of on-site SDH services, many reported barriers to connecting Veterans with those services including insufficient resources, lack of staff time, and eligibility criteria.
Changes at the organizational and policy levels are needed to provide comprehensive suicide prevention services that connect at-risk Veteran with services to address adverse SDH.
PDF
