INTRODUCTIONRituximab (RTX) has been proven effective in managing refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), and its use is increasing worldwide. MG stabilization may initially require oral corticosteroid (CS) therapy, but its long-term side effects require the shortest duration of treatment. We studied the clinical effectiveness and usefulness of corticosteroids associated with RTX compared to RTX alone on MG remission.METHODSIn a monocentric retrospective cohort in the Nice University Hospital, we compared naïve MG patients treated with RTX as first-line therapy alone (G1) or associated with CS (G2). After the RTX induction, we evaluated efficacy with the Osserman score (OS) and the requirement for any rescue therapy (IVIg or plasmapheresis).RESULTSSixty-eight patients were treated with RTX, of which 19 (27.94%) benefited from an association with at least 0.5 mg/kg of corticosteroids. RTX-CS patients were more severe than RTX alone (OS for G1: 74.1 and G2: 64.94, p = 0.044). However, OS at 3 (83.44 and 83.12, p = 0.993), 6 (88.69 and 86.36, p = 0.545), 9 (82.91 and 85.73, p = 0.563), and 12 months (86.6 and 88.69, p = 0.761) from the treatment induction were similar. Rescue therapy following RTX induction was significantly higher for the RTX-CS (20.41% and 47.37%, p = 0.037). Regarding safety, adverse event rates were similar in the two groups (0% and 14.29%, p = 0.178).CONCLUSIONWe suggest that RTX alone is as effective as RTX-CS in MG patients, indicating that avoiding steroids could reduce side effects, decrease rescue therapies, and not affect MG outcomes.