UNI-MB - logo
UMNIK - logo
 
E-viri
Preverite dostopnost
Recenzirano
  • DE Felice, Francesca; Musio, Daniela; Iafrate, Franco; Caponnetto, Salvatore; Picone, Vincenzo; D'Ambrosio, Giancarlo; Magliocca, Fabio Massimo; Tozzi, Francesca; DE Toma, Giorgio; Tombolini, Vincenzo; Cortesi, Enrico

    Anticancer research 42, Številka: 2
    Journal Article

    To compare clinical outcomes following intensified total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and intensified neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Of the 79 patients with LARC admitted to our department, 51 received intensified neoadjuvant CRT (CRT group) and 28 received intensified TNT (TNT group). Intensified TNT was defined as multi-agent chemotherapy, including FOLFOXIRI regimen plus bevacizumab (mutated Ras-BRAF) or panitumumab/cetuximab (wild-type Ras-BRAF) followed by oxaliplatin-5-fluorouracil-based CRT and surgery. Kaplan-Meier and Log rank test were used for survival analysis. Survival rates of the two groups were compared using propensity score matching. Data from 28 TNT patients and 28 CRT patients were analyzed after a 1:1 propensity matching with replacement. Kaplan-Meier curve showed that overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates with TNT were comparable to those with CRT. The 5-year DMFS rates for TNT and CRT were 61.5% versus 63.0% (p=0.82), respectively. In the TNT group, 32.1% patients (n=9) achieved pathological complete response (pCR), whereas 21.4% patients (n=6) achieved pCR with CRT (p=0.37). Intensified TNT and CRT resulted in similar survival outcomes, while intensified TNT led to higher pCR, albeit not statistically significant.