All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-anonymous: authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s) Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? • 1. Does the paper address relevant scientific questions within the scope of the conference? • 2. Does the paper present novel concepts, ideas, tools, or data? • 3. Are the results sufficient to support the interpretations and conclusions and substantial conclusions reached? • 4. Is the overall presentation well structured and clear and the language fluent and precise? • 5. Do the authors give proper credit to related work and clearly indicate their own new/original contribution? Resubmission is allowed. • Conference submission management system: Easychair.org and ai-conf.org • Number of submissions received: 32 • Number of submissions sent for review: 32 • Number of submissions accepted: 20 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 62.5% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 4 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): Plagiarism check was performed on all accepted papers. • Contact person for queries: Igor Balk Global Innovation Labs, USA (science at ai-conf.org)