UNI-MB - logo
UMNIK - logo
 
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano
  • Optimization of methanol pr...
    GhasemiKafrudi, Esmaeil; Samiee, Leila; Mansourpour, Zahra; Rostami, Tayebe

    Journal of cleaner production, 11/2022, Letnik: 376
    Journal Article

    In this paper, the optimization of the methanol production process is investigated. For this purpose, the parameters affecting methanol production including catalyst type (4 cases), temperature, pressure, and GHSV have been investigated and then by selecting the appropriate catalyst and process conditions, possible process changes such as hydrogen injection as make up, applying two reactors and inert gases, the use of dry hydrogen, and adding recycle stream on methanol yield have been studied. Then, by selecting the appropriate process, simulating, and validating the simulation results, the selected catalyst is used for the process. The process is simulated in 8 cases with changes in the studied parameters and the amount of recycle flow. Then, the key parameters of the optimized process were compared with the baseline. The results showed that, the investment costs (smaller dimensions of process equipment such as compressors, reactors, and distillation columns, etc. due to recycling flow reduction) and current costs (including electricity and steam consumption), significantly improved. In general, the use of CuZnOAl2O3 catalyst in the methanol production process reduced the reactor temperature, decreased the recycle flow by about 38% and reduced the electrical energy consumption and steam consumption relative to the baseline by about 5% and 67%, respectively. Finally by the process optimization conducted in this work, in addition to reducing the recycle flow and reducing energy consumption, it is possible to annually reduce the GHG emissions of 7526.35 ton CO2eq and 19.43 tons of air pollutants (per 100 kton/y of methanol production). •The process parameters affecting methanol production were optimized.•The recycle flow and energy consumption were reduced by 38% and 17%, respectively.•The GHG and air pollutants were decreased by about 16.9% relative to the baseline.