UNI-MB - logo
UMNIK - logo
 
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Liposomal irinotecan plus f...
    Park, H.S.; Kang, B.; Chon, H.J.; Im, H.-S.; Lee, C.-K.; Kim, I.; Kang, M.J.; Hwang, J.E.; Bae, W.K.; Cheon, J.; Park, J.O.; Hong, J.Y.; Kang, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Lim, S.H.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, J.-W.; Yoo, C.; Choi, H.J.

    ESMO open, 04/2021, Letnik: 6, Številka: 2
    Journal Article

    There is no clear consensus on the recommended second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have disease progression following gemcitabine-based therapy. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (FL) and FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) in patients who had failed on the first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. From January 2015 to August 2019, 378 patients with MPC who had received nal-IRI/FL (n = 104) or FOLFIRINOX (n = 274) as second-line treatment across 11 institutions were included in this retrospective study. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups, except age and first-line regimens. With a median follow-up of 6 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months with nal-IRI/FL versus 4.6 months with FOLFIRINOX (P = 0.44). Median overall survival (OS) was 7.7 months with nal-IRI/FL versus 9.7 months with FOLFRINOX (P = 0.13). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the two regimens in the univariate and multivariate analyses. The subgroup analysis revealed that younger age (<70 years) was associated with better OS with FOLFIRINOX. In contrast, older age (≥70 years) was associated with better survival outcomes with nal-IRI/FL. Adverse events were manageable with both regimens; however, the incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy was higher in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX than with nal-IRI/FL. Second-line nal-IRI/FL and FOLFIRINOX showed similar effectiveness outcomes after progression following first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. Age could be the determining factor for choosing the appropriate second-line therapy. •This multicenter retrospective study investigated nal-IRI/FL and FOLFIRINOX outcomes after gemcitabine-based therapy.•We found no significant differences in outcome between nal-IRI/FL and FOLFIRINOX treatment.•Both regimens were well tolerated; however, neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were more frequent with FOLFIRINOX.•Age (cut-off, 70 years) showed differential efficacy between chemotherapy regimens.