U radu se analizira zahtjev za izvanredno preispitivanje zakonitosti pravomoćne presude – izvanredno pravno sredstvo uvedeno u hrvatsko upravno sudovanje Zakonom o upravnim sporovima iz 2010. U uvodnom poglavlju rada ističe se osnovni ratio te najvažniji problemi u primjeni zahtjeva za izvanredno preispitivanje zakonitosti pravomoćne presude. Nakon toga, institut se podrobnije razmatra, u prvom redu opisujući i analizirajući razvoj pozitivno-pravnog uređenja instituta. Posebno poglavlje rada posvećeno je analizi mogućnosti primjene zahtjeva za izvanredno preispitivanje zakonitosti pravomoćne presude protiv odluke Visokog upravnog suda kojom se odlučuje o zakonitosti općeg akta. U zaključnom poglavlju rada naglašava se važnost instituta za zaštitu subjektivnih prava i javnog interesa te ukazuje na moguća normativna poboljšanja instituta. This paper analyses the demand for extraordinary examination of the legality of enforceable judgements– extraordinary legal means introduced into Croatian Administrative adjudication with the Administrative Dispute Act of 2010. In the introductory chapter, the fundamental ratio is emphasised as are the most significant problems in the application of demands for extraordinary examination of the legality of enforceable judgements. Then, that institute in more detail is analysed by firstly describing and analysing the development of positive legal regulation of that institute. A separate chapter of this paper is dedicated to the analysis of the possible application of the demand for extraordinary examination of the legality of the enforceable judgement against the decision by the High Administration Court which decides on the legality of the general act. In the concluding chapter, the importance of the institute for the protection of subjective rights and public interest is emphasised and the possible normative improvements to this institute are shown.