UNI-MB - logo
UMNIK - logo
 
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Assessment of the use of a ...
    Nabi, Md Nurun; Rahman, S.M. Ashrafur; Bodisco, Timothy A.; Rasul, Mohammad Golam; Ristovski, Zoran D.; Brown, Richard J.

    Journal of cleaner production, 04/2019, Letnik: 217
    Journal Article

    This study reports on a turbo-charged diesel engine performance, combustion and exhaust emissions when fuelled with three non-edible biodiesel blends, a neat waste cooking biodiesel (WBD100) and a neat reference diesel (D100). Waste cooking biodiesel was chosen as the non-edible biodiesel for its availability and low cost. Diethylene glycol dimethyl ether (DGM) was introduced as an additive owing to its superior ignitability and high oxygen content. The three blends tested in this investigation were 70/30/0, 70/20/10 and 70/10/20 in proportions of diesel/waste cooking biodiesel/DGM. In all cases, a commercial diesel was taken as the reference fuel for comparative discussion about parameters of the engine performance, combustion and exhaust emissions. A fully-instrumented, 4-stroke, 6-cylinder, turbocharged diesel engine was utilised for the experiments. Without significantly deteriorating engine performance, the three biodiesel blends and WBD100 reduced both particulate matter (PM) and particulate number (PN) emissions remarkably with the expected increase of nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. •Compared to diesel fuel, all blends reduced brake thermal efficiency slightly.•All blends reduced blow-by and carbon monoxide emissions relative to diesel fuel.•Particulate matter and number emissions were reduced substantially with all blends.•Relative to diesel fuel, all tested blends increased nitrogen oxides emissions.