E-viri
Recenzirano
-
Patterson, D. C.; Mayne, C. S.; Gordon, F. J.; Kilpatrick, D. J.
Grass and forage science, September 1997, Letnik: 52, Številka: 3Journal Article
Herbage from the first regrowth of perennial ryegrass‐based swards was directly ensiled after treatment with a bacterial inoculant/enzyme preparation (SIL‐ALL, Alltech UK) at 3·0 1 t−1, formic acid (850 g kg−1) at 2·59 1 t−1 or no additive (Control). The mean dry matter (DM) and water‐soluble carbohydrate concentrations of the grass were 185 and 24·0 g kg−1 (fresh basis) respectively. Lactic acid concentrations after ensiling increased at a lower rate in formic acid‐treated herbage than with the other treatments. All silages were well preserved and formic acid‐treated silage had a lower ultimate concentration of lactic acid and higher concentration of water‐soluble carbohydrate. Effluent output was increased on a proportional basis by ≊0·06 with formic treatment, whereas the inoculant reduced effluent output by 0·05 in comparison with the mean effluent production of the control silage. The in vivo digestibilities of the silages were determined using sheep. The digestibilities of DM, organic matter and energy were significantly higher with inoculant‐treated silage than with formic acid treatment, whereas values for the control silage were intermediate. The three silages were offered ad libitum to forty dairy cows with individual recording of daily intakes for a 10‐week period in a randomized block experiment with four treatments. Sixteen animals were offered the control silage with half of these offered 3 kg concentrates per day (C3) and the other half offered 7 kg concentrates per day (C7). Twelve animals were allocated to each of the additive‐treated silages, with concentrates offered at 5 kg d−1. Treatment effects on animal performance were measured in weeks 7–10. To compare animal performance for the treated silages with the control, an estimate of performance at 5 kg concentrates per day was obtained by regression using values obtained at 3 and 7 kg concentrates. In comparison with estimated silage intake for the control silage with 5 kg d−1 concentrates, inoculant and formic acid treatment of the silages increased dry matter intake by 0·04 (P > 0·05) and 0·13 (P > 0·01) respectively. In comparison with estimated milk production and yield of fat plus protein for the control treatment with 5 kg d−1 concentrates, neither inoculant treatment nor formic acid treatment produced any significant differences.
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.