UP - logo
National and University Library, Ljubljana (NUK)
Naročanje gradiva za izposojo na dom
Naročanje gradiva za izposojo v čitalnice
Naročanje kopij člankov
Urnik dostave gradiva z oznako DS v signaturi
PDF
  • Understanding differences between equal public governance models
    Pečarič, Mirko
    Public administrations try to address changes in societies with various styles through various reforms based on different governance models, which are frequently transformed into domestic frames ... regardless of local specifics. The need for a tool with which the ideal types of governance models could be accommodated with national goals is, in times of increasing complexity, more and more relevant. As data as such are produced through numerous predispositions, the article proposes Ashby's variety to capture the latter, through which it is possible to get closer to a successful administration of goals. On the other hand, Douglas's grid and group model, Miles et al.'s organisational strategy, structure and process, and Hofstede's cultural dimensions are used for the identification of needs. Even though public bodies are aware of the impact that culture/ values has/have on models of public administration, countries base their decisions on it/them only indirectly. This article emphasises that certain values should be directly included in the governance models in accord' ance with their cultural backgrounds. The latter are always present in decisions' predispositions (from which decisions obtain their frames and weights), and a successful administrator should not disregard them.
    Source: Central European public administration review = Srednjeevropska revija za javno upravo. - ISSN 2591-2240 (Vol. 18, no. 1, May 2020, str. 69-88, 224-225)
    Type of material - article, component part
    Publish date - 2020
    Language - english
    COBISS.SI-ID - 12957955

    Link(s):

    http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/429/476
    Digitalna knjižnica Slovenije - dLib.si
    DOI

Shelf entry