Objective
To study a muscle-to-muscle standardised uptake value (SUV) ratio with FDG-PET/CT (FDG-PET) as a marker for the detection of disease activity in dermatomyositis (DM).
Methods
Patients with ...DM (
n
= 24) who met the
European Neuro-Muscular Centre
diagnostic criteria were retrospectively identified over a 3-year period through a national survey. Muscle biopsy was performed in all patients. Maximum SUV was measured in proximal muscles (SUV
PROX
) that had the highest radiotracer uptake on visual grading as well as in the musculus longissimus thoracis (SUV
MLT
), whereas mean SUV was measured for the liver (SUV
LIV
). Muscle-to-liver SUV ratios for either muscle group were compared and a SUV
PROX
/SUV
MLT
ratio was calculated. SUV
PROX
/SUV
MLT
of DM patients were compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects (
n
= 24) with melanoma who had received FDG-PET scans.
Results
DM patients presented with proximal and symmetrical muscle uptake. Differences in SUV
PROX
/SUV
LIV
and SUV
MLT
/SUV
LIV
ratios in DM subjects were significant (
p
< 0.001). SUV
PROX
/SUV
MLT
ratios in DM and their controls also differed significantly (
p
= 0.0012). The SUV
PROX
/SUV
MLT
ratio threshold between DM subjects and controls was 1.73 with a sensitivity of 50% (CI95%, 29.1 to 70.9%) and specificity at 83.3% (CI95%, 62.6 to 95.3%). When amyopathic DM patients were removed from the analysis, specificity was increased to 95% (CI95%, 75.1 to 99.9%) with a likelihood ratio of 10 and an AUC of 83.4% (CI95%, 71.4 to 95.4%).
Conclusion
A muscle-to-muscle SUV
PROX
/SUV
MLT
ratio with a cut-off value of 1.73 in FDG-PET imaging might serve as a non-invasive marker to determine disease activity in dermatomyositis.
Key Points
• 18F-FDG PET-scanner standardised uptake value (SUV) could reflect disease activity in dermatomyositis (DM).
•
A ratio of SUV in proximal muscles (SUV
PROX
) to SUV in musculus longissimus
thoracis
(SUV
MLT
) could be used to determine active DM.
• Active disease is suspected for SUV
PROX
/SUV
MLT
ratios greater than 1.73.
Eosinophils have widespread procoagulant effects. In daily practice, eosinophil-related cardiovascular toxicity consists of endomyocardial damage, eosinophilic vasculitis and arterial or venous ...thrombosis. Here we aim to report on the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with unexplained ophthalmic vascular manifestations and eosinophilia.
We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study and a literature review of patients with eosinophilia (≥0.5 x10
/L) and concomitant ophthalmic vascular manifestations independent of the underlying eosinophilic disease but with no alternative cause for ophthalmic manifestations.
Fifty-seven patients were included (20 from the observational study and 37 from the literature review). Ophthalmic vascular features were the initial manifestation of eosinophil-related disease in 34 (59%) patients and consisted of 29 central retinal artery occlusions, six branch retinal artery occlusions, five central retinal vein occlusions, two branch retinal vein occlusions, seven retinal vasculitides, two retinal vasospasms, 12 Purtscher's retinopathies, 13 anterior ischemic optic neuropathies and two posterior ischemic optic neuropathies. The median IQR absolute eosinophil count at onset of ophthalmic vascular manifestations was 3.5 1.7-7.8 x10
/L. Underlying eosinophil-related diseases included eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n=32), clonal hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) (n=1), idiopathic HES (n=13), lymphocytic HES (n=2), adverse drug reactions (n=3), parasitosis (n=2), polyarteritis nodosa (n=1), IgG4-related disease (n=1), eosinophilic fasciitis (n=1) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (n=1). Other extra-ophthalmologic arterial or venous thromboses related to eosinophilia were reported in four (7%) and nine (16%) patients, respectively. Visual prognosis was poor: only eight (10%) patients achieved full recovery of ophthalmologic symptoms. After a median follow-up of 10.5 1-18 months, one patient (3%) had a recurrence of an ophthalmic vascular manifestation, and three patients (10%) had a recurrence of other vascular symptoms (deep vein thrombosis in two and pulmonary embolism in one patient). At the time of recurrence, absolute eosinophil counts were above 0.5 x10
/L in all cases (n=4).
This study broadens the spectrum of vascular manifestations associated with hypereosinophilia by adding ophthalmic vascular manifestations. In patients with ophthalmological vascular manifestations and hypereosinophilia, aggressive treatment of the underlying pathology (and normalization of blood count) should be implemented.
Statement of Purpose. IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is usually associated to an increase of serum IgG4 levels. However other conditions have also been associated to high serum IgG4 levels. Methods. ...All IgG subclasses analyses performed in our hospital over a one-year period were analyzed. When IgG4 level were over 1.35 g/L, the patient’s clinical observation was analyzed and both final diagnosis and reason leading to IgG subclasses analysis were recorded. Only polyclonal increases of IgG4 were considered. Summary of the Results. On 646 IgG subclass analysis performed, 59 patients had serum IgG4 over 1.35 g/L. The final diagnosis associated to serum IgG4 increase was very variable. Most patients (25%) presented with repeated infections, 13.5% with autoimmune diseases, and 10% with IgG4-RD. Other patients presented with cancer, primary immune deficiencies, idiopathic interstitial lung disease, cystic fibrosis, histiocytosis, or systemic vasculitis and 13.5% presented with various pathologies or no diagnosis. Mean IgG4 levels and IgG4/IgG ratio were higher in IgG4-RD than in other pathologies associated to elevated IgG4 levels. Conclusions. Our study confirms that elevation of serum IgG4 is not specific to IgG4-RD. Before retaining IgG4-RD diagnosis in cases of serum IgG4 above 1.35 g/L, several other pathological conditions should be excluded.
Human babesiosis is a rare tick-borne infectious disease. The clinical presentation ranges from an asymptomatic form to a life threatening infection with severe hemolysis. Human babesiosis due to ...Babesia microti is the most common and is endemic in North America.
We report a European patient with severe pancytopenia and reactive hemophagocytosis related to a Babesia microti infection. Babesia infection was acquired during a travel in the USA.
Babesiosis should be considered in patients who traveled in endemic areas, especially North America for the most common agent Babesia microti.
BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a new pandemic disease caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The C5a anaphylatoxin and its receptor ...C5aR1 (CD88) play a key role in the initiation and maintenance of several inflammatory responses, by recruiting and activating neutrophils and monocytes in the lungs.MethodsWe provide a longitudinal analysis of immune responses, including immune cell phenotyping and assessments of the soluble factors present in the blood and broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of patients at various stages of COVID-19 severity: paucisymptomatic, pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)ResultsWe report an increase in soluble C5a levels proportional to COVID-19 severity and high levels of C5aR1 expression in blood and pulmonary myeloid cells, supporting a role for the C5a-C5aR1 axis in the pathophysiology of ARDS. Avdoralimab, an anti-C5aR1 therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) prevented C5a-mediated human myeloid cell recruitment and activation, and inhibited acute lung injury (ALI) in human C5aR1 knockin mice.ConclusionsThese results support the evaluation of avdoralimab to block C5a-C5aR1 axis as a mean of limiting myeloid cell infiltration in damaged organs and preventing the excessive lung inflammation and endothelialitis associated with ARDS in COVID-19 patientsAcknowledgementsThe Explore COVID-19 IPH group, the Explore COVID-19 Marseille Immunopole group.Ethics ApprovalHuman study protocol was approved by the Committee for the Protection of Persons Ile-de-France III – France (#2020-A00757-32). Animal experiments were approved by the ministere de l’enseignement superieur, de la recherche et de l’innovation – France (APAFIS#25418-2020051512242806 v2).