Aspirin for Prevention of Preeclampsia Atallah, A.; Lecarpentier, E.; Goffinet, F. ...
Drugs (New York, N.Y.),
11/2017, Volume:
77, Issue:
17
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Open access
Aspirin is currently the most widely prescribed treatment in the prevention of cardiovascular complications. The indications for the use of aspirin during pregnancy are, however, the subject of much ...controversy. Since the first evidence of the obstetric efficacy of aspirin in 1985, numerous studies have tried to determine the effect of low-dose aspirin on the incidence of preeclampsia, with very controversial results. Large meta-analyses including individual patient data have demonstrated that aspirin is effective in preventing preeclampsia in high-risk patients, mainly those with a history of preeclampsia. However, guidelines regarding the usage of aspirin to prevent preeclampsia differ considerably from one country to another. Screening modalities, target population, and aspirin dosage are still a matter of debate. In this review, we report the pharmacodynamics of aspirin, its main effects according to dosage and gestational age, and the evidence-based indications for primary and secondary prevention of preeclampsia.
Essentials
Pregnancy is a risk factor for thrombosis.
Management of thrombosis risk in pregnancy remains a challenge.
Prophylaxis needs to be personalized.
Our score may be a helpful tool for the ...management of pregnancies at high risk of thrombosis.
Summary
Background
Patients with thrombophilia and/or a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of thrombosis during pregnancy. A risk score for pregnancies with an increased risk of VTE was previously described by our group (Lyon VTE score).
Objectives
The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of our score‐based prophylaxis strategy in 542 pregnancies managed between 2005 and 2015 in Lyon University Hospitals.
Patients/Methods
Of 445 patients included in the study, 36 had several pregnancies during the study period. Among these 445 patients, 279 had a personal history of VTE (62.7%), 299 patients (67.2%) had a thrombophilia marker, and 131 (29.4%) thrombophilic women had a personal history of VTE. During pregnancy, patients were assigned to one of three prophylaxis strategies according to the risk scoring system.
Results
In the antepartum period, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis was prescribed to 64.5% of patients at high risk of VTE. Among them, 34.4% were treated in the third trimester only, and 30.1% were treated throughout pregnancy. During the postpartum period, all patients received LMWH for at least 6 weeks. Two antepartum‐related VTEs (0.37%; one with a score of < 3 and the other with a score of > 6) and four postpartum‐related VTEs (0.73%; three with scores of 3–5 and one with a score of > 6) occurred. No case of pulmonary embolism was observed during the study period. The rate of bleeding was 0.37%. No serious bleeding requiring transfusions or surgery occurred during the study period.
Conclusion
The use of a risk score may provide a rational decision process to implement safe and effective antepartum thromboprophylaxis in pregnant women at high risk of VTE.
This study was undertaken to investigate the reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station by using a newly designed birth simulator.
This prospective study involved 32 residents and ...25 attending physicians. Each operator was given all 11 possible fetal stations in random order. A fetal head mannequin was placed in 1 of the 11 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) stations (−5 to +5) in a birth simulator equipped with real-time miniaturized sensor. The operator then determined head position clinically using the ACOG classification. Head position was described as: (1) “engaged” or “nonengaged” (engagement code); (2) “high,” “mid,” “low,” or “outlet” (group code); and (3) according to the 11 ACOG ischial spine stations (numerical code). Errors were defined as differences between the stations given by the sensor and by the operator. We determined the error rates for the 3 codes.
“Numerical” errors occurred in 50% to 88% of cases for residents and in 36% to 80% of cases for attending physicians, depending on the position. The mean “group” error was 30% (95% CI 25%-35%) for residents and 34% (95% CI 27%-41%) for attending physicians. In most cases (87.5% for residents and 66.8% for attending physicians) of misdiagnosis of “high” station, the “mid” station was retained. Residents and attending physicians made an average of 12% of “engagement” errors, equally distributed between false diagnosis of engagement and nonengagement.
Our results show that transvaginal assessment of fetal head station is poorly reliable, meaning clinical training should be promoted. The choice not to perform vaginal delivery when the fetus is in the “mid” position strongly decreases the risk of applying instruments on an undiagnosed “high” station. Conversely, obstetricians who perform only “low” operative vaginal deliveries also deliver unrecognized “mid” station fetuses. Therefore, residency programs should offer training in “mid” pelvic operative vaginal deliveries. Birth simulators could be used in training programs.
Spontaneous adrenal hemorrhages (AH) are a rare condition with no consensus about their management.
Patients were identified using the Medicalization of the Information System Program database, ...imaging software and a call for observations to internists, intensivists and obsetricians working at our institution. Adult patients whose medical records were complete and whose diagnosis was confirmed by medical imaging were included.
From 2000 to 2007, 20 patients were identified, including 15 were women. The clinical onset of AH was non-specific. In five cases, AH occurred during pregnancy; four of them were unilateral and right sided. The etiology of the other fifteen (bilateral adrenal hemorrhage in 11) were as follows: antiphospholipid syndrome (n=8), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (n=4), essential thrombocythemia (n=3), spontaneous AH due to oral anticoagulants (n=1), complication of a surgical act (n=3), and sepsis (n=3). In seven cases, two causes were concomitant. The diagnosis of AH was often confirmed by abdominal CT. An anticoagulant treatment was initiated in 16 cases. Ten of the eleven patients presenting with bilateral adrenal hematomas were treated using a long-term substitute opotherapy. One patient died because of a catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome.
The clinical onset of HS is heterogeneous and non-specific. The confirmatory diagnosis is often based on abdominal CT. The search for an underlying acquired thrombophilia is essential and we found in this study etiological data comparable to the main series in the literature. Adrenal insufficiency is most of the time definitive in cases of bilateral involvement.