Aims
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in heart failure (HF) but may be underutilized. The reasons are unknown.
Methods and results
We linked the Swedish Heart Failure ...Registry to national registries with ICD‐10 (International Classification of Diseases‐10th Revision) co‐morbidity diagnoses and demographic and socio‐economic data. In patients with EF ≤39% and NYHA II–IV, we assessed prevalence of CRT indication and CRT use. In those with CRT indication, we assessed the association between 37 potential baseline covariates and CRT non‐use using multivariable generalized estimating equation (GEE) models. Of 12 807 patients (mean age 71 ± 12 years, 28% female), 841 (7%) had CRT, 3094 (24%) had an indication for but non‐use of CRT, and 8872 (69%) had no indication. Important variables independently associated with CRT non‐use were: HF duration <6 months risk ratio (RR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17–1.24; non‐cardiology planned follow‐up (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09–1.18); age >75 years (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09–1.18); non‐cardiology care at baseline (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07–1.14); small‐town non‐university centre (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05–1.12); female sex (RR 1.07 95% CI 1.03–1.10) (all P < 0.05); as was absence of AF, living alone; psychiatric diagnosis; smoking; and non‐use of HF drugs. Education, income, cancer, or HF characteristics were not independently associated with CRT non‐use.
Conclusion
In this population‐wide HF registry, CRT was underutilized. Non‐use was associated mostly with demographic and organizational, but not clinical or socio‐economic factors. This calls for programmes to raise awareness of CRT indications and improve access and referrals to cardiology specialists.
Objectives We sought to determine the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II heart failure (HF) and NYHA functional class I ...(American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage C) patients with previous HF symptoms. Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves left ventricular (LV) structure and function and clinical outcomes in NYHA functional class III and IV HF with prolonged QRS. Methods Six hundred ten patients with NYHA functional class I or II heart failure with a QRS ≥120 ms and a LV ejection fraction ≤40% received a CRT device (±defibrillator) and were randomly assigned to active CRT (CRT-ON; n = 419) or control (CRT-OFF; n = 191) for 12 months. The primary end point was the HF clinical composite response, which scores patients as improved, unchanged, or worsened. The prospectively powered secondary end point was LV end-systolic volume index. Hospitalization for worsening HF was evaluated in a prospective secondary analysis of health care use. Results The HF clinical composite response end point, which compared only the percent worsened, indicated 16% worsened in CRT-ON compared with 21% in CRT-OFF (p = 0.10). Patients assigned to CRT-ON experienced a greater improvement in LV end-systolic volume index (−18.4 ± 29.5 ml/m2 vs. −1.3 ± 23.4 ml/m2 , p < 0.0001) and other measures of LV remodeling. Time-to-first HF hospitalization was significantly delayed in CRT-ON (hazard ratio: 0.47, p = 0.03). Conclusions The REVERSE (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction) trial demonstrates that CRT, in combination with optimal medical therapy (±defibrillator), reduces the risk for heart failure hospitalization and improves ventricular structure and function in NYHA functional class II and NYHA functional class I (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage C) patients with previous HF symptoms. (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic Left vEntricular Dysfunction REVERSE; NCT00271154 ).
The benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) among patients with mild heart failure (HF), reduced left ventricular (LV) function and wide QRS is well established. We studied the long-term ...stability of CRT.
REVERSE was a randomized, double-blind study on CRT in NYHA Class I and II HF patients with QRS ≥120 ms and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%. After the randomized phase, all were programmed to CRT ON and prospectively followed through 5 years for functional capacity, echocardiography, HF hospitalizations, mortality, and adverse events. We report the results of the 419 patients initially assigned to CRT ON.
The mean follow-up time was 54.8 ± 13.0 months. After 2 years, the functional and LV remodelling improvements were maximal. The 6-min hall walk increased by 18.8 ± 102.3 m and the Minnesota and Kansas City scores improved by 8.2 ± 17.8 and 8.2 ± 17.2 units, respectively. The mean decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume index and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index was 23.5 ± 34.1 mL/m(2) (P < 0.0001) and 25.4 ± 37.0 mL/m2 (P < 0.0001) and the mean increase in LVEF 6.0 ± 10.8% (P < 0.0001) with sustained improvement thereafter. The annualized and 5-year mortality was 2.9 and 13.5% and the annualized and 5-year rate of death or first HF hospitalization 6.4, and 28.1%. The 5-year LV lead-related complication rate was 12.5%.
In patients with mild HF, CRT produced reverse LV remodelling accompanied by very low mortality and need for heart failure hospitalization. These effects were sustained over 5 years. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in addition to optimal medical therapy produces long-standing clinical benefits in mild heart failure.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00271154.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are associated with metabolic derangements, which may have different pathophysiological ...implications.
In new-onset HFpEF (EF of ≥50%, n = 46) and HFrEF (EF of <40%, n = 75) patients, 109 endogenous plasma metabolites including amino acids, phospholipids and acylcarnitines were assessed using targeted metabolomics. Differentially altered metabolites and associations with clinical characteristics were explored. Patients with HFpEF were older, more often female with hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes compared with patients with HFrEF. Patients with HFpEF displayed higher levels of hydroxyproline and symmetric dimethyl arginine, alanine, cystine, and kynurenine reflecting fibrosis, inflammation and oxidative stress. Serine, cGMP, cAMP, l-carnitine, lysophophatidylcholine (18:2), lactate, and arginine were lower compared with patients with HFrEF. In patients with HFpEF with diabetes, kynurenine was higher (P = .014) and arginine lower (P = .014) vs patients with no diabetes, but did not differ with diabetes status in HFrEF. Decreasing kynurenine was associated with higher eGFR only in HFpEF (Pinteraction = .020).
Patients with new-onset HFpEF compared with patients with new-onset HFrEF display a different metabolic profile associated with comorbidities, such as diabetes and kidney dysfunction. HFpEF is associated with indices of increased inflammation and oxidative stress, impaired lipid metabolism, increased collagen synthesis, and downregulated nitric oxide signaling. Together, these findings suggest a more predominant systemic microvascular endothelial dysfunction and inflammation linked to increased fibrosis in HFpEF compared with HFrEF. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03671122 https://clinicaltrials.gov
Over the last 10 years, several large, well-designed clinical trials have firmly established the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as a recommended treatment strategy for ...moderate-to-severe heart failure (HF). A review of the relevant results from the MUSTIC, MIRACLE, CONAK-CD, and MIRACLE ICD trials reveals that in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV HF, CRT produces consistent improvements in quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity while also providing strong evidence for reverse remodeling and diminished functional mitral regurgitation, resulting in reductions in both HF hospitalizations and all-cause morbidity and mortality. In patients with earlier NYHA class I-II HF, the benefit of CRT has been more controversial. The principal ongoing challenges addressed in this article include the substantial 30% of patients who receive a CRT device but fail to respond, the wide variations in how to define "response" vs "nonresponse," and how to identify patients who will benefit from CRT, especially narrow QRS (<120 ms), those with right bundle branch block, and those with mild-to-moderate (NYHA class I-II) HF. An important result of this uncertainty is the lack of a good sense of the optimal rate of CRT implantation, making consideration of the data reviewed in this article crucial for identifying important gaps of knowledge and mechanisms of action that need to be studied in the near future.
In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients with symptoms caused by left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), treatment options include negative inotropic drugs, myectomy, septal alcohol ...ablation and AV sequential pacing with or without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Pacing is rarely used in spite of its relative simplicity and promising results. In this review the current evidence of AV sequential pacing from observational, randomised studies and long and very long-term follow-up studies is given and put in the context of present guidelines recommendations. These studies indicate that AV sequential pacing improves symptoms and quality of life through decreases in LVOTO, systolic anterior movement and mitral regurgitation. Effects on morbidity and mortality are lacking. We describe the mechanisms of action, the prerequisites for successful pacing and provide practical advice on how to optimise therapy. Moreover, the role of the ICD for primary and secondary prevention is discussed with reference to the ESC HCM guidelines. In summary, AV sequential pacing for HOCM is underused in clinical practise despite evidence from two randomised controlled studies. This concept is currently the focus of two randomised studies: a planned randomised controlled study that will compare AV sequential pacing to TASH and an ongoing study that compares CRT to AAI pacing in HOCM patients. In this review we highlight the current evidence and the new interest for this therapy.
Background
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected patients with heart failure and is strongly recommended for such patients by guidelines. A ...European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CRT survey conducted in 2008–2009 showed considerable variation in guideline adherence and large individual, national and regional differences in patient selection, implantation practice and follow‐up. Accordingly, two ESC associations, the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association, designed a second prospective survey to describe contemporary clinical practice regarding CRT.
Methods and results
A survey of the clinical practice of CRT‐P and CRT‐D implantation was conducted from October 2015 to December 2016 in 42 ESC member countries. Implanting centres provided information about their hospital and CRT service and were asked to complete a web‐based case report form collecting information on patient characteristics, investigations, implantation procedures and complications during the index hospitalisation. The 11 088 patients enrolled represented 11% of the total number of expected implantations in participating countries during the survey period; 32% of patients were aged ≥75 years, 28% of procedures were upgrades from a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator and 30% were CRT‐P rather than CRT‐D. Most patients (88%) had a QRS duration ≥130 ms, 73% had left bundle branch block and 26% were in atrial fibrillation at the time of implantation. Large geographical variations in clinical practice were observed.
Conclusion
CRT Survey II provides a valuable source of information on contemporary clinical practice with respect to CRT implantation in a large sample of ESC member states. The survey permits assessment of guideline adherence and demonstrates variations in patient selection, management, implantation procedure and follow‐up strategy.
Background Dosing of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) may be modified to manage associated hyperkalemia risk; however, this approach could adversely affect cardiorenal ...outcomes. This study investigated real-world associations of RAASi dose, hyperkalemia, and adverse clinical outcomes in a large cohort of UK cardiorenal patients. Methods and Results This observational study included RAASi-prescribed patients with new-onset chronic kidney disease (n=100 572) or heart failure (n=13 113) first recorded between January 2006 and December 2015 in Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked Hospital Episode Statistics databases. Odds ratios associating hyperkalemia and RAASi dose modification were estimated using logistic generalized estimating equations with normal (<5.0 mmol/L) serum potassium level as the reference category. Patients with serum potassium ≥5.0 mmol/L had higher risk of RAASi down-titration (adjusted odds ratios, chronic kidney disease: 1.79 95% CI, 1.64-1.96; heart failure: 1.33 95% CI, 1.08-1.62). Poisson models were used to estimate adjusted incident rate ratios of adverse outcomes based on total RAASi exposure (<50% and ≥50% of the guideline-recommended RAASi dose). Incidence of major adverse cardiac events and mortality was consistently higher in the lower dose group (adjusted incident rate ratios: chronic kidney disease: 5.60 95% CI, 5.29-5.93 for mortality and 1.60 95% CI, 1.55-1.66 for nonfatal major adverse cardiac events; heart failure: 7.34 95% CI, 6.35-8.48 for mortality and 1.85 95% CI, 1.71-1.99 for major adverse cardiac events). Conclusions The results of this real-world analysis highlight the potential negative impact of suboptimal RAASi dosing and the need for strategies that allow patients to be maintained on appropriate therapy, avoiding RAASi dose modification or discontinuation.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) decreases mortality, improves functional status, and induces reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in selected populations. However, the effect of CRT on ...ventricular arrhythmias is controversial. This is particularly important among patients with mild heart failure (HF), in whom sudden death is a leading cause of mortality.
This study sought to assess the impact of CRT on ventricular arrhythmias in mild HF.
The REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study is a multicenter randomized, double-blind trial of CRT among patients with mild systolic HF. The time to first appropriate, treated ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) episode or spontaneous sustained VT in cardiac resynchronization therapy plus defibrillation device (CRT-D) patients was compared between groups, as were predictors of VT/VF.
The study randomized 508 patients who received CRT-D devices. There were no significant demographic differences between groups. There were no differences in VT/VF episodes or VT storm between groups. Specifically, in the CRT ON group, the estimated event rate was 18.7% at 2 years, compared with 21.9% in the CRT OFF group (hazard ratio 1.05, P = .84). However, among CRT ON patients, those with reverse remodeling had a reduced incidence of VT/VF compared with those without remodeling (5.6% vs. 16.3%, hazard ratio 0.31, P = .001).
CRT for up to 2 years does not impact VT/VF in mild HF despite marked clinical and remodeling effects of pacing. This neutral effect may be attributable to competing antiarrhythmic effects of reverse remodeling and proarrhythmic effect of pacing.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00271154.
PDF
