Thorough Overview Identifies and Addresses Critical Gaps in the Treatment of Several Chronic Diseases With increasing numbers of patients suffering from Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs), ...and with the increasing reliance on biopharmaceuticals to treat them, it is imperative that researchers and medical practitioners have a thorough understanding of the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of therapeutic proteins as well as translational pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling for them. This comprehensive volume answers that need to be addressed. Featuring eighteen chapters from world-renowned experts and opinion leaders in pharmacology, translational medicine and immunology, editors Honghui Zhou and Diane Mould have curated a much-needed collection of research on the advanced applications of pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology to the development of biotherapeutics and individualized treatment strategies for the treatment of IMIDs. Authors discuss the pathophysiology of autoimmune diseases in addition to both theoretical and practical aspects of quantitative pharmacology for therapeutic proteins, current translational medicine research methodologies and novel thinking in treatment paradigm strategies for IMIDs. Other notable features include: • Contributions from well-known authors representing leading academic research centers, specialized contract research organizations and pharmaceutical industries whose pipelines include therapeutic proteins • Chapters on a wide range of topics (e.g., pathophysiology of autoimmune diseases, biomarkers in ulcerative colitis, model-based meta-analysis use in the development of therapeutic proteins) • Case studies of applying quantitative pharmacology approaches to guiding therapeutic protein drug development in IMIDs such as psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis and lupus Zhou and Mould's timely contribution to the critical study of biopharmaceuticals is a valuable resource for any academic and industry researcher working in pharmacokinetics, pharmacology, biochemistry, or biotechnology as well as the many clinicians seeking the safest and most effective treatments for patients dealing with chronic immune disorders.
Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic inflammatory disorders resulting from immune dysregulation. Patients who fail conventional medical therapy require biological treatment with ...monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Although mAbs are highly effective for induction and maintenance of clinical remission, not all patients respond, and a high proportion of patients lose response over time. One factor associated with loss of response is immunogenicity, whereby the production of antidrug antibodies accelerates mAb clearance. However, other factors related to patient and disease characteristics also influence the pharmacokinetics of mAbs. These factors include gender, body size, concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents, disease type, serum albumin concentration, and the degree of systemic inflammation. Because it is important to maintain clinically effective concentrations to provide optimal clinical response and drug exposure is affected by patient factors, a better understanding of the pharmacology of mAbs will ultimately result in better patient care.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2012); 91 4, 635–646. doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.328
Infliximab (IFX) is effective therapy for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, but it may be associated with side effects and loss of response. One loss of response mechanism is increased IFX ...clearance (IFX-CL), resulting in short half-life and decreased troughs.
Patients were recruited, and relevant demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were recorded. IFX serum concentrations and antibodies against IFX (ATI) were measured for therapeutic drug monitoring and modeled using NONMEM.
There were 169 IFX concentrations (Crohn's disease = 73, ulcerative colitis = 92, and diagnosis undetermined = 4). Patient factors significantly associated with high IFX-CL were low albumin, high body weight, and the presence of ATI (P ≤ 0.001). Disease type did not affect IFX-CL. The typical IFX-CL was 0.381 L/d. ATI formation was associated with a 259% increase in IFX-CL. The estimated median IFX effective half-life was 5.6 ± 2.4 days. Patients with low weight are more likely to have low troughs because IFX CL is not linearly related to weight, but IFX dosing is weight-based (in mg/kg). Simulations investigating alternative dose strategies suggested that more reliably measurable concentrations over the dose interval were achieved when the dose interval was shortened than by increasing administered dose.
IFX-CL is significantly influenced by patient factors, specifically, albumin, body weight, and ATI. There should be a decreasing IFX dose interval strategy, particularly for low albumin patients. Higher starting doses may benefit low body weight patients. Pharmacokinetic models and therapeutic drug monitoring may ensure that patients maintain measurable concentrations throughout dose intervals. Individualized dosing may improve outcomes for IFX-treated patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
Nearly two decades after the Peck and Cross article '"Getting the dose right: facts, a blueprint, and encouragements" was published, a review of dose recommendations for biologics shows that the ...success in getting the dose right appears to have improved given the relatively low incidence of drug withdrawals and dosing/label changes. However, the clinical experience with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) following approval has been less than perfect. In inflammatory diseases, the disease burden changes with time and high treatment failure rates have been reported. In addition, the use of concomitant steroids and immunosuppressant drugs with MAbs is common. These concomitant agents have their own safety issues and many immunosuppressant agents are not well-tolerated although they have been shown to reduce the incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). This same complexity is seen in MAbs used in oncology as well, although with these agents the doses appear to be higher than needed, which results in high treatment costs and incidence of adverse events. Given the complexity of MAb pharmacokinetics, which makes providing a detailed description of dose options difficult, product labeling should include the options for alternative dose strategies and potentially include the use of therapeutic drug monitoring with dose individualization which have been shown to improve clinical response and reduce the incidence of ADA. So, while the recommended dosing for biologics seems improved over the issues noted 17 years ago, we still have some work to do.
The antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) brentuximab vedotin consists of the CD30‐directed antibody attached to the microtubule‐disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). In pharmacokinetic models, ...including data from six studies (380 patients with classical Hodgkin's, systemic anaplastic large‐cell, and cutaneous T‐cell (CTCL) lymphomas), lower clearance of ADC and modestly higher ADC exposure in CTCL patients did not translate into higher MMAE exposure. In CTCL patients from the phase III ALCANZA study (n = 66), improved progression‐free survival with brentuximab vedotin vs. controls was not related to ADC exposure. ADC exposure was a predictor of grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results support the consistent benefit observed with brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks across the range of exposures in ALCANZA and support dose reductions in patients experiencing TEAEs at the starting dose.
Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have become a substantial part of many pharmaceutical company portfolios. However, the development process of MAbs for clinical use is quite different than for ...small-molecule drugs. MAb development programs require careful interdisciplinary evaluations to ensure the pharmacology of both the MAb and the target antigen are well-understood. Selection of appropriate preclinical species must be carefully considered and the potential development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) during these early studies can limit the value and complicate the performance and possible duration of preclinical studies. In human studies, many of the typical pharmacology studies such as renal or hepatic impairment evaluations may not be needed but the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these agents is complex, often necessitating more comprehensive evaluation of clinical data and more complex bioanalytical assays than might be used for small molecules. This paper outlines concerns and strategies for development of MAbs from the early in vitro assessments needed through preclinical and clinical development. This review focuses on how to develop, submit, and comply with regulatory requirements for MAb therapeutics.
To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of voriconazole and anidulafungin in patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA) in comparison with other populations, sparse PK data were obtained for 305 adults ...from a prospective phase 3 study comparing voriconazole and anidulafungin in combination versus voriconazole monotherapy (voriconazole, 6 mg/kg intravenously IV every 12 h q12h for 24 h followed by 4 mg/kg IV q12h, switched to 300 mg orally q12h as appropriate; with placebo or anidulafungin IV, a 200-mg loading dose followed by 100 mg q24h). Voriconazole PK was described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and mixed linear and time-dependent nonlinear (Michaelis-Menten) elimination; anidulafungin PK was described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. For voriconazole, the normal inverse Wishart prior approach was implemented to stabilize the model. Compared to previous models, no new covariates were identified for voriconazole or anidulafungin. PK parameter estimates of voriconazole and anidulafungin are in agreement with those reported previously except for voriconazole clearance (the nonlinear clearance component became minimal). At a 4-mg/kg IV dose, voriconazole exposure tended to increase slightly as age, weight, or body mass index increased, but the difference was not considered clinically relevant. Estimated voriconazole exposures in IA patients at 4 mg/kg IV were higher than those reported for healthy adults (e.g., the average area under the curve over a 12-hour dosing interval AUC0-12 at steady state was 46% higher); while it is not definitive, age and concomitant medications may impact this difference. Estimated anidulafungin exposures in IA patients were comparable to those reported for the general patient population. This study was approved by the appropriate institutional review boards or ethics committees and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00531479).
Vedolizumab is a gut-selective biologic that has shown efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We studied the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability, and ...efficacy of a new formulation of vedolizumab produced by an improved manufacturing process.
UC patients were randomized to receive vedolizumab (2, 6, or 10 mg/kg) or placebo on days 1, 15, 29, and 85. Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity evaluations were performed at multiple timepoints through day 253. Partial Mayo Scores and fecal calprotectin levels were used to assess efficacy.
In all, 46 patients (9 placebo, 37 vedolizumab) received at least one dose of study medication. The vedolizumab serum concentration declined monoexponentially until concentrations reached 1-10 μg/mL, and then fell nonlinearly. Vedolizumab maximum serum concentration (C(max) ) and area under the curve (AUC) increased approximately proportionally as a function of dose. Vedolizumab maximally saturated α(4) β(7) receptors on peripheral serum lymphocytes at all measurable serum concentrations. Vedolizumab was well tolerated, with no deaths and no adverse events leading to discontinuation. At every assessment from day 29 through day 253, over 50% of vedolizumab-treated patients were in clinical response, while placebo response rates generally ranged between 22% and 33%. Vedolizumab treatment reduced fecal calprotectin levels compared with placebo.
Vedolizumab demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and maximally saturated α(4) β(7) receptors over the tested dose range. Multiple dosing up to 10 mg/kg was well tolerated. Over the course of follow-up a greater proportion of patients treated with vedolizumab were in clinical response than those who were assigned to placebo.
Imagine it is 2030, and the drug label is in the cloud, is interactive, and can provide model‐informed precision dosing support based on an individual's genomic and physiologic makeup that is ...uploaded via a user‐friendly interface. Precision medicine has vastly improved our ability to provide tailored therapeutics, and groundbreaking advances in noninvasive systems have generated smart wearable devices that can follow our physiologic state and drug exposure in real time. One device consists of a microfluidic drug biosensor with a transmitter attached to the skin and a mobile app that displays concentration values and trends while issuing alerts and providing suggestions on dose changes when out of range. This sounds compelling, but why has model‐informed precision dosing not yet become common clinical reality in 2020?
Standard of care (SOC; combination of 5–10 mg/kg and an interval every 6–8 weeks) dosing of infliximab (IFX) is associated with significant loss of response. Dashboards using covariates that ...influence IFX pharmacokinetics (PK) may be a more precise way of optimizing anti-TNF dosing. We tested a prototype dashboard to compare forecasted dosing regimens with actual administered regimens and SOC. Fifty IBD patients completing IFX induction were monitored during maintenance (weeks 14–54). Clinical and laboratory data were collected at each infusion; serum was analyzed for IFX concentrations and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) at weeks 14 and 54 (Prometheus Labs, San Diego). Dosing was blinded to PK data. Dashboard-based assessments were conducted on de-identified clinical, laboratory, and PK data. Bayesian algorithms were used to forecast individualized troughs and determine optimal dosing to maintain target trough concentrations (3 μg/mL). Dashboard forecasted dosing post-week 14 was compared to actual administered dose and frequency and SOC. Using week 14 clinical data only, the dashboard recommended either a dose or an interval change (<0.5 mg/kg or <1 week difference) in 43/50 patients; only 44% recommended to have SOC dosing. When IFX14 concentration and ADA status were added to clinical data, dose and/or interval changes based on actual dosing were recommended in 48/50 (96%) patients; SOC dosing was recommended in only 11/50 (22%). Dashboard recommended SOC IFX dosing in a minority of patients. Dashboards will be an important tool to individualize IFX dosing to improve treatment durability.
PDF
