Dedicated emergency general surgery (EGS) service models were developed to improve efficiency of care and patient outcomes. The degree to which the EGS model delivers these benefits is debated. We ...performed a systematic review of the literature to identify whether the EGS service model is associated with greater efficiency and improved outcomes compared to the traditional model.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science (Core Collection) databases from their earliest date of coverage through March 2017. Primary outcomes for efficiency of care were surgical response time, time to operation and total length of stay in hospital. The primary outcome for evaluating patient outcomes was total complication rate.
The EGS service model generally improved efficiency of care and patient outcomes, but the outcome variables reported in the literature varied.
Development of standardized metrics and comprehensive EGS databases would support quality control and performance improvement in EGS systems.
Objective
Synoptic reporting (SR) is one solution to improve the quality of operative reports. However, SR has not been investigated in bariatric surgery despite an identified need by bariatric ...surgeons. SR for RYGB was developed using quality indicators (QIs) established by a national Delphi process. The objective of this study is to assess the completeness, accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of synoptic versus narrative operative reports (NR) in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).
Methods
A NR and SR were completed on 104 consecutive RYGBs. Two evaluators independently compared the reports to QIs. Completeness and accuracy measures were determined. Reliability was calculated using Bland–Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LOA). Time to complete SR and NR was also compared.
Results
The mean completion rate of SR was 99.8% (±SD 0.98%) compared to 64.0% (±SD 6.15%) for NR (
t
= 57.9,
p
< 0.001). All subsections of SR were >99% complete. This was significantly higher than for NR (
p
< 0.001) except for small bowel division details (
p
= 0.530). Accuracy was significantly higher for SR than NR (94.2% ± SD 4.31% vs. 53.6% ± SD 9.82%, respectively,
p
< 0.001). Rater agreement was excellent for both SR (0.11, 95% LOA −0.53 to 0.75) and NR (−0.26, 95% LOA −4.85 to 4.33) (
p
= 0.242), where 0 denotes perfect agreement. SR completion times were significantly shorter than NR (3:55 min ± SD 1:26 min and 4:50 min ± SD 0:50 min, respectively,
p
= 0.007).
Conclusion
The RYGB SR is superior to NR for completeness and accuracy. This platform is also both reliable and efficient. This SR should be incorporated into clinical practice.
Background
Despite excellent reported outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), a percentage of patients go on to have a secondary bariatric surgery to manage side-effects or address ...weight regain after LSG. Reported weight loss outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) after previous LSG are variable. We sought to determine the weight-loss outcomes of patients undergoing LRYGB after LSG in the largest bariatric surgical network in Canada and to determine whether outcomes differ according to indications for conversion.
Methods
The Bariatric Registry is a multi-center database with prospectively collected standardized data on patients undergoing bariatric surgery at ten Bariatric Centers of Excellence within the Ontario Bariatric Network in Ontario, Canada. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent LRYGB after previous LSG between 2012 and 2019. Weight loss outcomes were compared between patients who underwent LRYGB for insufficient weight loss/weight regain and those who underwent conversion to LRYGB for other reasons.
Results
Excluding patients with multiple revisions and those without follow-up data, 48 patients were included in the analysis: 33 patients (69%) underwent conversion to LRGYB for insufficient weight loss/weight regain (Group 1) and 15 patients (31%) underwent conversion for other reasons (Group 2). Mean body mass index (BMI) measured pre-LSG, pre-LRYGB, and at mid-term follow-up after LRYGB was 61, 48, and 43 kg/m
2
in Group 1 and 51, 39, and 34 kg/m
2
in Group 2, respectively. ΔBMI and %total weight loss (TWL) at mid-term follow-up were not significantly different between the groups.
Conclusions
Conversion to LRYGB after previous LSG resulted in an additional loss of 4 kg/m
2
in BMI points at mid-term follow-up. Patients lost a similar number of BMI points and cumulative %TWL was similar regardless of reason for conversion. This can help inform surgical decision-making in the setting of weight regain after LSG.
Graphical abstract
Purpose
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has declined in popularity due to poor weight loss and high revision rates. The study aim was to evaluate complication rates following LAGB ...removals, including conversions to other bariatric procedures.
Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LAGB removal, identified from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database from the Toronto Western Hospital site. Patients were filtered using principal procedure and concurrent procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patients converted to other bariatric procedures were also included. Outcomes were evaluated for 30-day morbidity, mortality, readmissions, and costs.
Results
From 2012 to 2018, 93 patients met inclusion. 96.77% had elective surgery, and 3.23% were emergent. Thirty-day postoperative complication rate was 11.83%, with 4.30% readmissions and no deaths. Surgical site infections accounted for 81.82% of complications (54.55% superficial, 27.27% deep). Thirty-day complication rate for LAGB removal alone was 17.50% and 33.33% following emergent explantation. 56.99% LAGBs were converted to other bariatric procedures: 48.39% laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and 8.6% sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Conversion to LSG had a significantly higher 30-day complication rate (all Clavien–Dindo class I–II) compared to conversion to LRYGB (37.50% versus 2.22%,
p
< 0.009). Direct costs of LAGB explantation to the healthcare system were $665,443, amounting to $7,155 per patient.
Conclusion
Thirty-day complication rates for LAGB explantation and conversion to other bariatric procedures are significant and may be higher than previously reported for LAGB removal alone. Conversion to LSG may have the highest complication rate, amounting to significant costs.
Graphical abstract
Operative reporting is the foundation of surgical communication. The quality indicators (QIs) contained in these reports can be used to document the performance of processes that affect patient care ...and may afford quality assurance with improvement in healthcare.
We assessed the degree to which the electronic synoptic report (SR) documents the operative QIs compared with narrative reports (NR) for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The time to report availability on patient chart was also identified as a secondary measure.
Academic center, public hospital, Canada.
A total of 40 prospectively collected RYGB synoptic reports and 40 case-matched historical NRs were compared against checklist QIs that were established by a national Delphi process. These checklist QIs are validated and have high interrater agreement at our institution. Time from dictation to report availability on patient chart was measured.
SR had a mean completion of 99.7% (±standard deviation SD 1.3%) compared with 64.0% (±SD 6.3%) for NR (t = 36.0, P<.0001). All subsections of SR were>99% complete and significantly higher than NR (P<.001). The mean time from NR dictation to report availability was 4.14 days (SD±3.17, range 0-10 d). All SRs were in the operative area after the procedure and were available immediately.
The RYGB synoptic report is superior to the narrative report for inclusion of accepted quality indicators and time to availability. Important elements, including process of care, demographic characteristics, and anatomic-related data, were often missing from the NR. SR is a promising method for improving documentation for RYGB.
Introduction Surgeons must dictate the important components of any invasive procedure in a comprehensive, yet concise, operative report. This documentation is vital for communicating operative events ...and has implications for providing additional healthcare and planning future operations. The quality of surgical care may be impaired in the absence of such communication. Evidence suggests that the quality of reports dictated by trainees and surgeons is poor despite its importance. This investigation analyzed and compared the quality of fellow and staff surgeon Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) narrative dictations against validated and reliable quality indicators (QIs) for this procedure. Methods A total of 40 bariatric fellow reports and 40 attending RYGB narrative reports were retrospectively analyzed. Results Fellows had a mean completion of 66.4% +/- 3.1% as compared to 61.5% +/- 7.6% for attendings (p<0.0001). Fellows statistically outperformed attendings on all subsections except patient, closure, and postoperative details. Attendings statistically outperformed fellows on closure details only (63.8 +/- 7.5 vs 50.5 +/- 12.0, p=0.002). Conclusions Bariatric surgery trainees outperform attending surgeons in RYGB operative dictation. The clinical significance of this difference is unknown. However, both groups are deficient in reporting at least one-third of items deemed essential to RYGB operative reporting. This indicates a need for further education in RYGB dictation for practicing surgeons and trainees. It also lends interest in exploring alternative forms of operative communication such as synoptic operative reporting in bariatric surgery.
The quality of narrative operative notes is poor. No investigation has previously addressed operative reporting specifically in bariatric surgery.
To evaluate surgeons' perceptions of the quality of ...operative reporting in bariatric surgery and compare this to an audit of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) narrative reports using validated quality indicators.
University hospital, Canada.
A Web-based survey was distributed to bariatric surgeons across Canada. Perceptions regarding the quality of reporting were gathered using a Likert scale (modified Structured Assessment Format for Evaluating Operative Reports) and free text fields. Forty RYGB narrative reports were analyzed against established quality indicators and compared to respondent's perceptions based on themes.
Twenty-four of 34 bariatric surgeons (71%) completed the survey. The most commonly performed procedures were RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy (96% and 100%, respectively). Currently, 70.8% perform a traditional narrative report. The average Structured Assessment Format for Evaluating Operative Reports score for narrative dictations by bariatric surgeons was neutral (27.9/40). The lowest scoring items were the "description of indications" (2.9/5) and "succinctness" (3.3/5). Opinions reflected a need for an immediately generated, standardized, template-based report to improve the quality and accessibility of operative documentation. The quality audit reinforced respondents' perceptions. Reports included only 62.0%±6.6% of quality indicators, with the lowest scoring areas being "patient details," "preoperative events," and "postoperative details" (41.1%, 32.4%, and 31.7%, respectively).
This survey revealed a perception of mediocre quality of narrative dictations. This was reinforced by an audit of RYGB operative reports. Future investigations should focus on improving this form of operative communication.
Background: Despite excellent reported outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), a sizable proportion of patients go on to have a secondary bariatric surgery to manage adverse effects or ...address weight recidivism after LSG. Reported weight loss outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) after previous LSG are variable. We sought to determine the weight loss outcomes of patients undergoing LRYGB after LSG in the largest bariatric surgical network in Canada and to determine whether outcomes differ according to indications for conversion. The Bariatric Registry is a multicentre database with prospectively collected standardized data on patients undergoing bariatric surgery at 10 Bariatric Centers of Excellence comprising the Ontario Bariatric Network in Ontario, Canada. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent LRYGB after previous LSG between 2012 and 2019. Weight loss outcomes were compared between patients who underwent LRYGB for insufficient weight loss/weight regain and those who underwent conversion to LRYGB for other reasons. Results: Excluding patients with multiple revisions and those without follow-up data, 48 patients were included in the analysis: 33 patients (69%) underwent conversion to LRGYB for insufficient weight loss/weight regain (group 1) and 15 patients (31%) underwent conversion for other reasons (group 2). Mean body mass index (BMI) measured preLSG, pre-LRYGB, and at mid-term follow-up after LRYGB was 61, 48, and 43 kg/m2, respectively, in group 1 and 51, 39, and 34 kg/m2, respectively, in group 2. ABMI and %total weight loss (%TWL) at mid-term follow-up were not significantly different between the groups. Conversion to LRYGB after previous LSG resulted in an additional loss of 4 kg/m2 in BMI points at mid-term follow-up. Conclusion: Patients lost a similar number of BMI points, and cumulative %TWL was similar regardless of reason for conversion. This can help inform surgical decision making after failed LSG.
Background
Synoptic operative reporting has been used as a solution to the poor quality of narrative reports. The aim of this study was to develop operative report quality indicators for the ...laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and to generate parameters by which these reports can be evaluated and improved.
Methods
A Delphi protocol was used to determine quality indicators for LSG. Bariatric surgeons across Canada were recruited along with key physician stakeholders to participate via a secure web-based platform. Transferrable consensus items for LSG from previously developed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operative indictors were put forward for consideration. Participants also initially submitted potential QIs. These were grouped by theme. Items were rated on 5-point Likert scales in subsequent rounds. Scores of 70% or higher were used for inclusion and 30% or less denoted exclusion. Elements scoring 30% to 70% agreement were recirculated by runoff in subsequent rounds to generate the final list of quality indicators.
Results
Seven bariatric surgeons, representing all regions preforming LSG in Canada, were invited to participate in the Delphi group. Multidisciplinary invitees included one academic minimally invasive/acute care surgeon, one tertiary abdominal radiologist, and one academic gastroenterologist with bariatric expertise. Two rounds were required to achieve consensus. Both rounds achieved a 100% response (10/10). In round 1, forty items reached consensus. In Round 2, an additional 28 items reached consensus, with three items excluded, bringing the total number of quality indicators to 65.
Conclusion
This study establishes consensus-derived multidisciplinary quality indicators for LSG operative reports. Application of these findings aims to advance the quality and completeness of operative reporting in LSG in order to improve communication of important surgical details and quality measures to the multidisciplinary team involved in bariatric surgery care.
PDF
