The PROfound trial evaluated the PARP inhibitor olaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers harboring alterations in BRCA1/2 and ATM (cohort A) and in 12 other homologous ...recombination repair genes (cohort B). Olaparib led to more objective responses and longer radiographic progression-free survival than the control in cohort A and when cohorts A and B were combined. The efficacy of olaparib in cohort B was a secondary objective prespecified in the trial protocol but was not reported. Reconstructing patient-level data for cohort B, two of 54 patients (4%) in the olaparib arm and two of 24 patients (8%) in the control arm had a radiographic response, and there was no evidence that olaparib prolonged radiographic progression-free survival in cohort B (hazard ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.58–1.34). These results are in strong contrast to cohort A.
A large clinical study concluded that treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib benefits men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose tumors harbor alterations in 15 different DNA repair genes. In contrast to the group dominated by BRCA alterations, any potential benefit from olaparib was considerably less, if present at all, for men with prostate cancers harboring one of the 12 other, non-BRCA DNA repair alterations.
The phase 3 PROfound trial allows assessing the prespecified secondary objective of olaparib's efficacy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with non-BRCA DNA repair alterations. Reconstructed patient data indicate that olaparib is less likely to be effective in these tumors.
is both the most frequently altered gene in primary prostate cancer and a critical factor enabling cellular infection by coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2. The modulation of its expression by sex ...steroids could contribute to the male predominance of severe infections, and given that
has no known indispensable functions, and inhibitors are available, it is an appealing target for prevention or treatment of respiratory viral infections.
Aneuploidy, defined as chromosome gains and losses, is a hallmark of cancer. However, compared with other tumor types, extensive aneuploidy is relatively rare in prostate cancer. Thus, whether ...numerical chromosome aberrations dictate disease progression in prostate cancer patients is not known. Here, we report the development of a method based on whole-transcriptome profiling that allowed us to identify chromosome-arm gains and losses in 333 primary prostate tumors. In two independent cohorts (n = 404) followed prospectively for metastases and prostate cancer-specific death for a median of 15 years, increasing extent of tumor aneuploidy as predicted from the tumor transcriptome was strongly associated with higher risk of lethal disease. The 23% of patients whose tumors had five or more predicted chromosome-arm alterations had 5.3 times higher odds of lethal cancer (95% confidence interval, 2.2 to 13.1) than those with the same Gleason score and no predicted aneuploidy. Aneuploidy was associated with lethality even among men with high-risk Gleason score 8-to-10 tumors. These results point to a key role of aneuploidy in driving aggressive disease in primary prostate cancer.
Previous sequencing studies revealed that alterations of genes associated with DNA damage response (DDR) are enriched in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
, a DDR and ...cancer susceptibility gene, is frequently deleted (homozygous and heterozygous) in men with aggressive prostate cancer. Here we show that patients with prostate cancer who have lost a copy of
frequently lose a copy of tumor suppressor gene
; importantly, for the first time, we demonstrate that co-loss of both genes in early prostate cancer is sufficient to induce a distinct biology that is likely associated with worse prognosis.
We prospectively investigated underlying molecular mechanisms and genomic consequences of co-loss of
and
in prostate cancer. We used CRISPR-Cas9 and RNAi-based methods to eliminate these two genes in prostate cancer cell lines and subjected them to
studies and transcriptomic analyses. We developed a 3-color FISH assay to detect genomic deletions of
and
in prostate cancer cells and patient-derived mCRPC organoids.
In human prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP and LAPC4), loss of
leads to the castration-resistant phenotype. Co-loss of
-
in human prostate cancer cells induces an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, which is associated with invasiveness and a more aggressive disease phenotype. Importantly, PARP inhibitors attenuate cell growth in human mCRPC-derived organoids and human CRPC cells harboring single-copy loss of both genes.
Our findings suggest that early identification of this aggressive form of prostate cancer offers potential for improved outcomes with early introduction of PARP inhibitor-based therapy.
.
Metastases are the main cause of morbidity and mortality from solid tumors. Surprisingly, population-based cancer registries in various countries, including the National Cancer Institute's ...Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program in the United States, only capture data on individuals diagnosed with cancers that are metastatic at diagnosis (M1). Metastatic recurrences of previously diagnosed, initially nonmetastatic tumors are missed. Devasia and colleagues specify an illness-death model for chronic disease and estimate that in prostate cancer, which has a large pool of primary disease that may or may not progress to metastases, about half of all metastatic cancers arise as recurrences from initially nonmetastatic disease. Capturing all incident metastatic cancer cases across all tumor types in population-based cancer registries, not only based on initial stage at diagnosis, would be critical to better understand the disparities in metastatic disease burden and the effectiveness of primary prevention, screening, and therapies for primary and metastatic disease. See related article by Devasia et al., p. 659.
Multivitamin use is common among cancer patients. Whether post-diagnostic multivitamin supplementation is beneficial for prostate cancer survival is largely unknown, and some evidence even suggests ...potential harm.
We prospectively assessed post-diagnostic multivitamin use in relation to prostate cancer survival among 4756 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2016). Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between post-diagnostic multivitamin use and frequency and risk of lethal prostate cancer (distant metastases or prostate cancer-specific death) and all-cause mortality.
We observed 438 lethal prostate cancer and 2609 deaths during a median follow-up of 11 years. Compared to non-users, post-diagnostic multivitamin use was not associated with risk of lethal prostate cancer (HR 95% CI, 0.98 0.74-1.30) or all-cause mortality (1.00 0.88-1.12), after adjustment for potential confounders. Similarly, null associations were observed across various categories of use frequency. Compared to non-users, men who used multivitamins regularly (6-9 tablets/week) after cancer diagnosis had similar risk of lethal prostate cancer (0.96 0.72-1.28) and all-cause mortality (0.99 0.88-1.12).
We found no evidence that post-diagnostic multivitamin use among men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer was associated with better or worse survival in a well-nourished population.
Somatic Y chromosome loss in hematopoietic cells is associated with higher mortality in men. However, the status of the Y chromosome in cancer tissue is not fully known due to technical limitations, ...such as difficulties in labelling and sequencing DNA from the Y chromosome. We have developed a system to quantify Y chromosome gain or loss in patient-derived prostate cancer organoids. Using our system, we observed Y chromosome loss in 4 of the 13 (31%) patient-derived metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) organoids; interestingly, loss of Yq (long arm of the Y chromosome) was seen in 38% of patient-derived organoids. Additionally, potential associations were observed between mCRPC and Y chromosome nullisomy. The prevalence of Y chromosome loss was similar in primary and metastatic tissue, suggesting that Y chromosome loss is an early event in prostate cancer evolution and may not a result of drug resistance or organoid derivation. This study reports quantification of Y chromosome loss and gain in primary and metastatic prostate cancer tissue and lays the groundwork for further studies investigating the clinical relevance of Y chromosome loss or gain in mCRPC.