Aim To explore the potential of scanned helium ion beam therapy ((4)He) compared to proton therapy in a comparative planning study focusing on pediatric patients. This was motivated by the superior ...biological and physical characteristics of (4)He. Material and methods For eleven neuroblastoma (NB), nine Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), five Wilms tumor (WT), five ependymoma (EP) and four Ewing sarcoma (EW) patients, treatment plans were created for protons and (4)He. Dose prescription to the planning target volume (PTV) was 21 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) (NB), 19.8 Gy (RBE) (HL), 25.2 Gy (RBE) for the WT boost volume and 54 Gy (RBE) for EP and EW patients. A pencil beam algorithm for protons (constant RBE = 1.1) and (4)He was implemented in the treatment planning system Hyperion. For (4)He the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was calculated with a 'zonal' model based on different linear energy transfer regions. Results Target constraints were fulfilled for all indications. For NB patients differences for kidneys and liver were observed for all dose-volume areas, except the high-dose volume. The body volume receiving up to 12.6 Gy (RBE) was reduced by up to 10% with (4)He. For WT patients the mean and high-dose volume for the liver was improved when using (4)He. For EP normal tissue dose was reduced using (4)He with 12.7% of the voxels receiving higher doses using protons. For HL and EW sarcoma patients the combination of large PTV volumes with the position of the organs at risk (OARs) obliterated the differences between the two particle species, while patients with the heart close to the PTV could benefit from (4)He. Conclusion Treatment plan quality improved with (4)He compared to proton plans, but advantages in OAR sparing were depending on indication and tumor geometries. These first results of scanned (4)He therapy motivate comprehensive research on (4)He, including acquisition of experimental data to improve modeling of (4)He.
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare two techniques of irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy ...technique (3D-CRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), in terms of dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The second aim of the study was estimation of the projected risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer for both radiotherapy techniques.
Materials and methods
For 25 patients who underwent CT simulation in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), three treatment plans were generated: one using a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique and two using volumetric modulated arc therapy. First VMAT-DIBH geometry consisted of three partial arcs (ARC-DIBH 3A) and second consisted of four partial arcs (ARC-DIBH 4A). Cumulative dose–volume histograms (DVHs) were used to compare dose distributions within the PTV and OARs (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery LAD, ipsilateral and contralateral lung IL, CL, and contralateral breast CB). Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) and organ equivalent doses (OEDs) were calculated using the differential DVHs. Excess absolute risks (EARs) for second cancers were estimated using Schneider’s full mechanistic dose–response model.
Results
All plans fulfilled the criterium for PTV V95% ≥ 95%. The PTV coverage, homogeneity, and conformity indices were significantly better for VMAT-DIBH. VMAT showed a significantly increased mean dose and V5Gy for all OARs, but reduced LAD D
max
by 15 Gy. For IL, CL, and CB, the 3D-CRT DIBH method achieved the lowest values of EAR: 28.38 per 10,000 PYs, 2.55 per 10,000 PYs, and 4.48 per 10,000 PYs (
p
< 0.001), compared to 40.29 per 10,000 PYs, 15.62 per 10,000 PYs, and 23.44 per 10,000 PYs for ARC-DIBH 3A plans and 41.12 per 10,000 PYs, 15.59 per 10,000 PYs, and 22.73 per 10,000 PYs for ARC-DIBH 4A plans. Both techniques provided negligibly low NTCPs for all OARs.
Conclusion
The study shows that VMAT-DIBH provides better OAR sparing against high doses. However, the large low-dose-bath (≤ 5 Gy) is still a concern due to the fact that a larger volume of normal tissues exposed to lower doses may increase a radiation-induced risk of secondary cancer.
Definitive pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in cervical cancer is susceptible to geographic miss due to daily positional and volumetric variations in target and organs at risk. ...Hence, despite evidence of reduced acute and late treatment-related toxicities, implementation of image-guided IMRT (IG-IMRT) with a reasonable safety margin to encompass organ motion is challenging.
In this prospective, nonrandomized phase 2 study, patients with cervical cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) stage IB2-IIIB between the ages of 18 and 65 years were treated with definitive pelvic chemoradiotherapy with a prespecified organ (bladder and rectum) filling protocol. Reproducibility of organ filling was assessed along with the implementation of daily comprehensive adaptive image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), with a library of 3 IMRT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) plans with incremental expansions of clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) (primary) margins (small, 0.7 cm; adequate, 1 cm; and large, 1.5 cm) and a backup motion robust 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plan; the appropriate plan is chosen based on pretreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) ("plan of the day" approach).
Fifty patients with a median age of 49 years (IQR, 45-56 years) received definitive radiation therapy (45-46 Gy in 23-25 fractions to pelvis, with simultaneous integrated boost to gross nodes in 15 patients) with the aforementioned IGRT protocol. In the analysis of 1171 CBCT images (in 1184 treatment sessions), the mean planning computed tomography (CT) and CBCT bladder volumes were 417 and 373 cc, respectively. Significant interfractional variation in bladder volume was noted with a mean absolute dispersion of 29.5% with respect to planning CT; significant influential random factors were postchemotherapy sessions (P ≤ .001), pre-CBCT protocol duration (P = .001), and grades of chemotherapy induced nausea vomiting (P = .001). Significantly higher variation in bladder filling was noted in patients with older age (P = .014) and larger planning CT bladder volume (P ≤ .001). Time trend analysis of fraction-wise bladder volume revealed an absolute systemic reduction of 16.3% in bladder volume means from the first to the fifth week. Variation in rectal diameter was much less pronounced, with 19.2% mean dispersion and without any significant factors affecting it. Although in 19% and 2% of sessions large IMRT PTV and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy were necessary to cover the primary target, respectively, reduction in treated volume was possible in 43% of sessions with small PTV selection instead of standard adequate PTV (36% sessions). Plan of the day selection had a moderate to strong correlation with nonabsolute dispersion of bladder filling (Spearman ρ =0.4; P = .001) and a weak (but significant) correlation with grades of acute toxicities. The planned protocol was well tolerated with no radiation-induced local grade 3 toxicity.
Interfractional variation in organ filling (especially bladder) is inevitable despite fixed pretreatment protocol in definitive settings (intact cervix). Despite the logistical challenges, adaptive IGRT in the form of plan of the day based on incremental CTV-to-PTV margins is a relatively simple and feasible strategy to minimize geometric uncertainties in radical IG-IMRT of cervical cancer.
Guide for paediatric radiotherapy procedures Laprie, A.; Bernier, V.; Padovani, L. ...
Cancer radiothérapie,
February-April 2022, 2022 Feb-Apr, 2022-02-00, 20220201, Volume:
26, Issue:
1-2
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
A third of children with cancer receive radiotherapy as part of their initial treatment, which represents 800 paediatric irradiations per year in France carried out in 15 specialized centres approved ...on the recommendations of the French national cancer institute in decreasing order of frequency, the types of cancer that require irradiation are: brain tumours, neuroblastomas, Ewing's sarcomas, Hodgkin's lymphomas, soft tissue sarcomas including rhabdomyosarcomas, and nephroblastomas. The treatment guidelines follow the recommendations of the French society for childhood cancers (SFCE) or the French and European prospective protocols. The therapeutic indications, the technical and/and ballistic choices of complex cases are frequently discussed during bimonthly paediatric radiotherapy technical web-conferences. All cancers combined, overall survival being 80%, long-term toxicity logically becomes an important concern, making the preparation of treatments complex. The irradiation methods include all the techniques currently available: 3D conformational irradiation, intensity modulation radiation therapy, irradiation under normal or hypofractionated stereotaxic conditions, brachytherapy and proton therapy. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on the indications, the technical methods of realization and the organisation and the specificities of paediatric radiation oncology.
Un tiers des enfants atteints d’un cancer reçoivent de la radiothérapie dans leur prise en charge initiale, ce qui représente 800 irradiations pédiatriques par an en France, réalisées dans 15 centres spécialisés agréés sur les recommandations de l’Institut national du cancer. Par ordre de fréquence décroissante, les types de cancers qui nécessitent une irradiation sont: les tumeurs cérébrales, les neuroblastomes, les sarcomes d’Ewing, les lymphomes de Hodgkin, les sarcomes des parties molles dont les rhabdomyosarcomes, et les néphroblastomes. Les protocoles de traitement suivent les recommandations de la Société française de lutte contre les cancers et les leucémies de l’enfant et de l’adolescent (SFCE) ou les protocoles prospectifs français et européens. Les indications thérapeutiques, les choix techniques ou/et balistiques de cas complexes sont fréquemment discutés lors de web-conférences techniques de radiothérapie pédiatrique bimensuelles. Tous cancers confondus, la probabilité de survie globale étant de 80 %, la toxicité à long terme devient logiquement une préoccupation importante, rendant la préparation des traitements complexe. Les modalités d’irradiation incluent toutes les techniques disponibles actuellement : irradiation conformationnelle tridimensionnelle, irradiation avec modulation d’intensité, irradiation en conditions stéréotaxiques normo- ou hypofractionnée, curiethérapie et protonthérapie. Nous présentons la mise à jour des recommandations de la Société française de radiothérapie oncologique sur les indications, les modalités techniques de réalisation et l’organisation et les spécificités de l’oncologie radiothérapie pédiatrique.
To review and assess ongoing proton beam therapy (PBT) clinical trials and to identify major gaps.
Active PBT clinical trials were identified from clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization ...International Clinical Trials Platform Registry. Data on clinical trial disease site, age group, projected patient enrollment, expected start and end dates, study type, and funding source were extracted.
A total of 122 active PBT clinical trials were identified, with target enrollment of >42,000 patients worldwide. Ninety-six trials (79%), with a median planned sample size of 68, were classified as interventional studies. Observational studies accounted for 21% of trials but 71% (n=29,852) of planned patient enrollment. The most common PBT clinical trials focus on gastrointestinal tract tumors (21%, n=26), tumors of the central nervous system (15%, n=18), and prostate cancer (12%, n=15). Five active studies (lung, esophagus, head and neck, prostate, breast) will randomize patients between protons and photons, and 3 will randomize patients between protons and carbon ion therapy.
The PBT clinical trial portfolio is expanding rapidly. Although the majority of ongoing studies are interventional, the majority of patients will be accrued to observational studies. Future efforts should focus on strategies to encourage optimal patient enrollment and retention, with an emphasis on randomized, controlled trials, which will require support from third-party payers. Results of ongoing PBT studies should be evaluated in terms of comparative effectiveness, as well as incremental effectiveness and value offered by PBT in comparison with conventional radiation modalities.
This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of spot size and the addition of apertures and range compensators on the treatment quality of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy and to define ...when PBS could improve on passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT).
The patient cohort included 14 pediatric patients treated with PSPT. Six PBS plans were created and optimized for each patient using 3 spot sizes (∼12-, 5.4-, and 2.5-mm median sigma at isocenter for 90- to 230-MeV range) and adding apertures and compensators to plans with the 2 larger spots. Conformity and homogeneity indices, dose-volume histogram parameters, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and integral dose were quantified and compared with the respective PSPT plans.
The results clearly indicated that PBS with the largest spots does not necessarily offer a dosimetric or clinical advantage over PSPT. With comparable target coverage, the mean dose (Dmean) to healthy organs was on average 6.3% larger than PSPT when using this spot size. However, adding apertures to plans with large spots improved the treatment quality by decreasing the average Dmean and EUD by up to 8.6% and 3.2% of the prescribed dose, respectively. Decreasing the spot size further improved all plans, lowering the average Dmean and EUD by up to 11.6% and 10.9% compared with PSPT, respectively, and eliminated the need for beam-shaping devices. The NTCP decreased with spot size and addition of apertures, with maximum reduction of 5.4% relative to PSPT.
The added benefit of using PBS strongly depends on the delivery configurations. Facilities limited to large spot sizes (>∼8 mm median sigma at isocenter) are recommended to use apertures to reduce treatment-related toxicities, at least for complex and/or small tumors.
Chemo-radiotherapy with curative intent for anal cancer has high complete remission rates, but acute treatment-related gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity is significant. Toxicity occurs due to ...irradiation of surrounding normal tissue. Current radiotherapy requires the addition of large planning margins to the radiation field to ensure target coverage regardless of the considerable organ motion in the pelvic region. This increases the irradiated volume and radiation dose to the surrounding normal tissue and thereby toxicity. Online adaptive radiotherapy uses artificial intelligence to adjust the treatment to the anatomy of the day. This allows for the reduction of planning margins, minimizing the irradiated volume and thereby radiation to the surrounding normal tissue.This study examines if cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided oART with daily automated treatment re-planning can reduce acute gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with anal cancer.
The study is a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial conducted at Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark. 205 patients with local only or locally advanced anal cancer, referred for radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy with curative intent, are planned for inclusion. Toxicity and quality of life are reported with Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events and patient-reported outcome questionnaires, before, during, and after treatment. The primary endpoint is a reduction in the incidence of acute treatment-related grade ≥ 2 diarrhea from 36 to 25% after daily online adaptive radiotherapy compared to standard radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include all acute and late toxicity, overall survival, and reduction in treatment interruptions.
Accrual began in January 2022 and is expected to finish in January 2026. Primary endpoint results are expected to be available in April 2026.
This is the first study utilizing online adaptive radiotherapy to treat anal cancer. We hope to determine whether there is a clinical benefit for the patients, with significant reductions in acute GI toxicity without compromising treatment efficacy.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05438836. Danish Ethical Committee: H-21028093.
Our objective was to report initial results of a dose escalation trial of single-fraction carbon ion radiotherapy for peripheral stage I NSCLC.
Between April 2003 and February 2012, a total of 218 ...patients were treated. The total dose was raised from 28 to 50 Gy (relative biological effectiveness RBE). There were 157 male and 61 female patients, with a median age of 75 years. Of the tumors, 123 were stage T1 and 95 were stage T2. A total of 134 patients (61.5%) were medically inoperable. By histological type, there were 146 adenocarcinomas, 68 squamous cell carcinomas, three large cell carcinomas, and one mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
The median follow-up was 57.8 months (range 1.6–160.7). The overall survival rate at 5 years was 49.4%. The local control (LC) rate was 72.7%. A statistically significant difference in LC rate (p = 0.0001, log-rank test) was seen between patients receiving 36 Gy (RBE) or more and those receiving less than 36 Gy (RBE). In 20 patients irradiated with 48 to 50 Gy (RBE), the LC rate at 5 years was 95.0%, the overall survival rate was 69.2%, and the progression-free survival rate was 60.0% (median follow-up was 58.6 months). With dose escalation, LC tended to improve. As for adverse lung and skin reactions, there were no patients with grade 3 or higher reactions, and less than 2% had a grade 2 reaction. Regarding chest wall pain, only one patient had grade 3 late toxicity.
We have reported the outcome of a dose escalation study of single-fraction carbon ion radiotherapy for stage I NSCLC, showing the feasibility of obtaining excellent results comparable to those with previous fractionated regimens.
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT), proton radiation therapy (PRT), and photon‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the ...treatment of sinonasal malignancies. We identified studies through systematic review and divided them into three cohorts (CIRT group/PRT group/IMRT group). Primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and local control (LC). We pooled the outcomes with meta‐analysis and compared the survival difference among groups using Chi2 (χ2) test. A representative sample of 2282 patients with sinonasal malignancies (911 in the CIRT group, 599 in the PRT group, and 772 in the IMRT group) from 44 observation studies (7 CIRT, 16 PRT, and 21 IMRT) was included. The pooled 3‐year OS, LC, distant metastasis–free survival, and progression‐free survival rates were 67.0%, 72.8%, 69.4%, and 52.8%, respectively. Through cross‐group analysis, the OS was significantly higher after CIRT (75.1%, 95% CI: 67.1%‐83.2%) than PRT (66.2%, 95% CI: 57.7%‐74.6%; χ2 = 13.374, P < .0001) or IMRT (63.8%, 95% CI: 55.3%‐72.3%; χ2 = 23.814, P < .0001). LC was significantly higher after CIRT (80.2%, 95% CI: 73.9%‐86.5%) than PRT (72.9%, 95% CI: 63.7%‐82.0%; χ2 = 8.955, P = .003) or IMRT (67.8%, 95% CI: 59.4%‐76.2%; χ2 = 30.955, P < .0001). However, no significant difference between PRT and IMRT for OS and LC was observed. CIRT appeared to provide better OS and LC for patients with malignancies of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. A prospective randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm the superiority of CIRT in the treatment of sinonasal tumors.
Carbon‐ion radiation therapy achieved higher overall survival and local control rates as compared to both proton radiation therapy and photon based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy through meta‐analysis of 2, 282 patients with sinonasal malignancies from the real world. CIRT appeared to provide better OS and LC for patients with malignancies of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.
PDF
