Mental ill‐health represents the main threat to the health, survival and future potential of young people around the world. There are indications that this is a rising tide of vulnerability and need ...for care, a trend that has been augmented by the COVID‐19 pandemic. It represents a global public health crisis, which not only demands a deep and sophisticated understanding of possible targets for prevention, but also urgent reform and investment in the provision of developmentally appropriate clinical care. Despite having the greatest level of need, and potential to benefit, adolescents and emerging adults have the worst access to timely and quality mental health care. How is this global crisis to be addressed? Since the start of the century, a range of co‐designed youth mental health strategies and innovations have emerged. These range from digital platforms, through to new models of primary care to new services for potentially severe mental illness, which must be locally adapted according to the availability of resources, workforce, cultural factors and health financing patterns. The fulcrum of this progress is the advent of broad‐spectrum, integrated primary youth mental health care services. They represent a blueprint and beach‐head for an overdue global system reform. While resources will vary across settings, the mental health needs of young people are largely universal, and underpin a set of fundamental principles and design features. These include establishing an accessible, “soft entry” youth primary care platform with digital support, where young people are valued and essential partners in the design, operation, management and evaluation of the service. Global progress achieved to date in implementing integrated youth mental health care has highlighted that these services are being accessed by young people with genuine and substantial mental health needs, that they are benefiting from them, and that both these young people and their families are highly satisfied with the services they receive. However, we are still at base camp and these primary care platforms need to be scaled up across the globe, complemented by prevention, digital platforms and, crucially, more specialized care for complex and persistent conditions, aligned to this transitional age range (from approximately 12 to 25 years). The rising tide of mental ill‐health in young people globally demands that this focus be elevated to a top priority in global health.
IntroductionCompulsory mental health care remains a controversial practice. The many difficulties in performing Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT) on the topic means there is limited evidence to ...support its effectiveness. For ethical and legal reasons, compulsory mental health care should only be used when necessary. Yet, geographical variations, which can indicate both overuse and underuse, have been observed. In the funded research project “Controversies in Psychiatry” we intend to use this variation as a source of knowledge production. We propose that this naturally occurring variation mimics randomisation, and can therefore permit causal inference from registry data.ObjectivesWe will estimate the causal effect of compulsory inpatient mental health care on a range of outcomes, including injuries, self-harm, and all-cause mortality; violent crime; employment vs benefit allowance; rehospitalisation and outpatient commitment.MethodsObserved variation in register data on all episodes of compulsory inpatient mental health care in Norway between 2015-2016 (N ≈ 300 000), will serve as a source of as-random variation. Provider-preference for compulsion usage will be used as an instrumental variable (IV).ResultsOutcomes will be observed from 2017-2025. If assumptions underlying IV-analysis do not hold, the project will still provide important and complete descriptive data on long-term outcomes for a whole population.ConclusionsGeographical variation is a cause for concern if people are treated differently depending on area of residence. But it also presents an opportunity to use differences in service provider’s preference for using compulsory care as an instrumental variable to estimate the causal effect of compulsory care on multiple short and long-term outcomes. This approach can help resolve controversies that are difficult or even impossible to investigate through RCTs. After presenting the project plan we invite to a discussion of the feasibility of using an instrument variable approach to explore if relatively low versus high rates of compulsory care produce favorable outcomes for patients.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
The delivery of mental health care worldwide often involves compulsory treatment, a practice encountered by early career psychiatrists from the outset of their training. Despite its prevalence, ...little research has explored the challenges faced by trainees and early career psychiatrists when compelled to administer treatment without patient’s consent. This presentation will synthesize research data and offer personal reflections on the author’s experiences.Challenges that early career psychiatrists can face regarding compulsory treatment can be categorized into personal, professional, and institutional. Personal challenges encompass the emotional stress associated with applying coercive measures, coping with negative emotions, and managing service users’ attitudes toward treatment without consent. There is also concern that compulsory treatment may elevate the risk of emotional burnout. Professional challenges involve the administrative burden associated with organizing compulsory treatment, often exacerbated by the formalization of the process as a bureaucratic procedure in many European countries. Additionally, dealing with legal processes, including interactions with lawyers and courts, can pose significant difficulties, even though it is clearly done to protect the rights of the persons receiving care. Institutional challenges encompass the overall policy of providing compulsory psychiatric care in the psychiatrist’s home country and the specific practices of coercive measures in a given treatment facility. Furthermore, the lack of dedicated time for ethics of coercion during training is a common issue.In the current landscape of mental health care, early career psychiatrists must undergo training to handle coercive measures. While these measures are sometimes unavoidable, ethical principles must guide their administration. Additionally, access to supervision/mentoring is crucial for early career professionals facing challenging cases.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
IntroductionCrisis resolution teams (CRTs) are a crucial component of mental health care, providing timely support to individuals experiencing acute mental health crises. This abstract delves into ...the concept of crisis and seeks to identify the patients who stand to benefit from these specialized services.ObjectivesDefining crisis within the context of CRTs can be complex. It encompasses not only immediate emergencies but also broader mental health distress.Research suggests that suitable candidates for CRT interventions are those facing acute mental health crises : This includes individuals experiencing suicidal ideation, severe agitation, or severe emotional distress.La “Escala de Evaluación de Resolución de Crisis” (Crisis Resolution Team Assessment Tool, CRTAT) de Sonia Johnson es una herramienta diseñada para para medir la efectividad de los CRT y la duración de la intervención en crisis. Establece un límite de seis semanas como el período máximo durante el cual se debe ofrecer la atención en crisis.Existen otras escalas de evaluación para medir la eficacia de la resolución de crisis:1. Escala de Intensidad de Crisis (CIS): se utiliza para medir la gravedad de la crisis y la necesidad de intervención inmediata.2. Escala de Evaluación de Crisis de Brage Hansen (BCES): se enfoca en la evaluación de crisis suicidas y evalúa la intensidad de la ideación suicida y la urgencia de la intervención.3. Escala de Evaluación de Crisis de Eriksson (ECAS): Diseñada para evaluar la intensidad de la crisis en pacientes psiquiátricos, la ECAS se centra en la agitación, la ansiedad y la angustia emocional.Methods- Studies have explored the effectiveness of CRTs and the perspectives of service users. Understanding how patients perceive crisis and CRT services is crucial for tailoring interventions effectively.ResultsConclusions- CRTs play a vital role in mental health care, offering timely support to individuals experiencing crises. While defining crisis is complex, suitable candidates often include those in acute distress requiring immediate intervention. Understanding the perspectives of service users and the diverse nature of crisis experiences informs effective crisis resolution strategies.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
Telepsychiatry has emerged as a transformative force in the field of mental health care, addressing disparities in service delivery and increasing access to care. This exploration focuses on the role ...of telepsychiatry in achieving equitable mental health care for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). Intellectual disabilities affect millions globally, posing significant public health challenges. This vulnerable population encounters numerous barriers in accessing quality mental health care, including geographical isolation, limited transportation options, and a shortage of specialized providers. Telepsychiatry offers a promising solution, leveraging technology to overcome these challenges. The presentation reviews the current landscape of mental health care for individuals with intellectual disabilities and the specific barriers they encounter. It highlights the potential benefits of telepsychiatry, including increased availability of specialized care, reduced geographical barriers, and enhanced caregiver support. Ethical considerations and best practices associated with implementing telepsychiatry in the context of intellectual disabilities are discussed. Case studies and success stories illustrate how telepsychiatry positively impacts individuals with intellectual disabilities and their families. In conclusion, telepsychiatry plays a promising role in promoting equitable mental health care for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Embracing technology and adopting best practices pave the way for a more inclusive and accessible mental health care system, leaving no one behind.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
IntroductionThere is a national movement to reduce restrictive interventions due to the harm and distress they can cause which has been reflected in NHS trust policies and practices. NHS trust ...policies state that all in-patients who may require restrictive interventions must have a Positive Behaviour Support Plan (PBSP) based on a functional analysis of what drives and triggers their behaviour. A PBSP is intended to facilitate understanding and help manage behaviours that challenge by teaching new skills and ways to communicate a person’s needs. Previous research on the use of PBSPs on adult acute mental health wards is limited but research on PICU wards has shown PBSPs have not been implemented into mental health care as intended.ObjectivesTrust policies identify that PBSPs should be implemented to reduce the use of restrictive interventions. However, it is unknown whether PBSPs are being used as part of routine practice on the acute mental health ward. The degree to which staff are aware of patients PBSPs and how they use them to guide their practice is unclear. The service evaluation aims to understand the perspectives, attitudes, and experiences of staff who are responsible for using and implementing PBSPs on the ward. The evaluation aims to investigate how PBSP informs practice and to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing PBSPs on the ward.MethodsA volunteer sample of clinical staff members (including Doctors, Nurses, Psychotherapists, Occupational Therapists, and Clinical Support Workers) who are responsible for implementing PBSPs on an acute mental health ward in the East of England took part in a focus group which lasted up to an hour. There were four focus groups with between two and four participants per group. A total of thirteen staff members participated in the focus groups. The focus groups lasted up to one hour and were guided by a topic guide. Two members of the project team facilitated the group. Focus groups were audio recorded.ResultsThematic synthesis will be the overarching approach used to synthesise the qualitative data from the focus groups. The audio recordings will be transcribed. Analysis will be conducted on a within-case basis prior to cross-case analysis aimed to identify common themes. Two evaluators will work together to code, analyse, and synthesise the extracted data.ConclusionsBased on the results, training may be developed to improve the understanding and implementation of the PBSPs on the ward. The findings may also result in changes to the way PBSPs are used. The results will be presented to the trust chief executives and used to inform how to best support individuals who may be at risk of requiring restrictive interventions.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
IntroductionLittle research has been conducted on outcomes in mental health care by intensity of level of service. Mental health care has evolved in the United States to psychiatrists or psychiatric ...nurse-practitioners overseeing medications in 15-minute appointments while non-physicians provide the psychotherapy.ObjectivesWe wished to compare these two models when one psychiatrist worked in two settings, providing the medication management alone model in one setting and the medication + psychotherapy model in the second setting.MethodsAll patients were seen by the same psychiatrist at (1) a community mental health center (CMHC) and (2) a private practice (PP) providing services to the same type of patients over 2 years. Patients were assessed with the My Medical Outcomes Profile (MYMOP2) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). In the CMHC, patients were seen for a 15 – minute visits every 1 to 3 months. Patients were offered psychotherapy, ranging from 1/2 hour monthly to 1 hour every other week. Some patients received weekly psychotherapy due to an interest by the clinician. In the PP, patients were seen every 1 to 4 weeks by the psychiatrist who also provided psychotherapy when that was desired. Visits ranged from 15 to 75 minutes. Other practitioners could have also provided psychotherapy. Analysis was conducted for patients who completed at least four outcome ratings. Multi-level modeling techniques as implemented in SPSS were used to determine if patients improved over time.ResultsThere were no differences in age, socioeconomic status, type of insurance, and type of diagnosis among the two groups. Follow-up occurred for two years. On average, no improvement occurred in outcome measurements in the CMHC setting while statistically significant improvement occurred in the PP setting. The cost of care was statistically significantly greater in the CMHC setting, due to the facility fees billed and collected for each patient (and approved by the government) of $176 additional per visit.ConclusionsFurther work can be done on establishing minimal levels of service delivery that can produce improvement for large populations in community settings. Since it is unlikely that we can generate control groups of no treatment, perhaps analyses like this one, comparing treatment models, can establish a benchmark from which we can understand the necessary level of treatment. The PP setting may have afforded more attention for patients than the CMHC setting, though at a lower cost to the government. The psychiatrist believed that he wanted patients to improve equally in both settings, but he could have been more enthusiastic in the setting in which he also did psychotherapy and therefore had better relationships with patients. On the other hand, this may be the point – better relationships with patients may be associated with better outcomes.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
In Europe there is significant variability of attitudes, procedure and strategies in clinical care between psychiatrists and settings across different regions and countries. However, there is a ...significant overrepresentation of data from mental health services from Western and Northern European countries, due a lack of data from Eastern and Central European countries as it has been suggested the Eastern and Central European regions are a “blind spot on the global mental health map”. In respect to community mental health services, Northern and Western countries introduced a large array of multidisciplinary community-based services for people with mental health problems and reorganized the mental health care services towards the community mental health care, replacing largely large hospitals and hospital-based care following recovery-oriented care models with introduction of numerous services which supported full recovery, including supported employment and housing. This process is only in the beginning in the majority of countries in the South and East of Europe. Here we present the data from these countries including the results of the RECOVER-E study (Large-scale implementation of community based mental health care for people with severe and enduring mental ill health in Europe), which incorporated the implementation of community mental health services in five South-eastern European countries.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
Telepsychiatry has emerged as a transformative force in the field of mental health care, addressing disparities in service delivery and increasing access to care. This exploration focuses on the role ...of telepsychiatry in achieving equitable mental health care for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). Intellectual disabilities affect millions globally, posing significant public health challenges. This vulnerable population encounters numerous barriers in accessing quality mental health care, including geographical isolation, limited transportation options, and a shortage of specialized providers. Telepsychiatry offers a promising solution, leveraging technology to overcome these challenges. The presentation reviews the current landscape of mental health care for individuals with intellectual disabilities and the specific barriers they encounter. It highlights the potential benefits of telepsychiatry, including increased availability of specialized care, reduced geographical barriers, and enhanced caregiver support. Ethical considerations and best practices associated with implementing telepsychiatry in the context of intellectual disabilities are discussed. Case studies and success stories illustrate how telepsychiatry positively impacts individuals with intellectual disabilities and their families. In conclusion, telepsychiatry plays a promising role in promoting equitable mental health care for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Embracing technology and adopting best practices pave the way for a more inclusive and accessible mental health care system, leaving no one behind.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
Shared decision making (SDM) in mental health care involves clinicians and patients working together to make decisions. The key elements of SDM have been identified, decision support tools have been ...developed, and SDM has been recommended in mental health at policy level. Yet implementation remains limited. Two justifications are typically advanced in support of SDM. The clinical justification is that SDM leads to improved outcome, yet the available empirical evidence base is inconclusive. The ethical justification is that SDM is a right, but clinicians need to balance the biomedical ethical principles of autonomy and justice with beneficence and non‐maleficence. It is argued that SDM is “polyvalent”, a sociological concept which describes an idea commanding superficial but not deep agreement between disparate stakeholders. Implementing SDM in routine mental health services is as much a cultural as a technical problem. Three challenges are identified: creating widespread access to high‐quality decision support tools; integrating SDM with other recovery‐supporting interventions; and responding to cultural changes as patients develop the normal expectations of citizenship. Two approaches which may inform responses in the mental health system to these cultural changes – social marketing and the hospitality industry – are identified.
PDF
