The development of administrative judiciary in the Republic of North Macedonia went through various phases after its independence in 1991. 16 years after itsindependence, in late 2007 the Administrative Court was established as one of the holders of the judiciary in judicial system. Before the establishment of this court, the administrative dispute was under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The Administrative Court appears as a guarantor for exercising the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the laws beforethe administrative bodies, which provide court protection in the event of an unlawful conduct by the administration. For this reason, administrative justice plays a key role in thelives of citizens who seek it when they consider that state authorities are preventing the enjoyment of a constitutional or legal right, or that they are imposing an obligation outside the legal rules. With this paper the author by explaining the process of development of theadministrative judiciary using: normative legal method, comparative legal method, systematic and objective interpretative methods, will focus on the specific analysis of ineffectiveness of administrative justice in the practice, which is due, first of all, to the lack of a mechanism for implementing the judgments of the Administrative Court.