E-resources
Peer reviewed
-
Jenista, Elizabeth R.; Jensen, Christoph J.; Wendell, David; Spatz, Deneen; Darty, Stephen; Kim, Han W.; Parker, Michele; Klem, Igor; Chen, Enn‐Ling; Kim, Raymond J.; Rehwald, Wolfgang G.
NMR in biomedicine, October 2021, 2021-10-00, 20211001, Volume: 34, Issue: 10Journal Article
Despite clinical use of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for two decades, an efficient, robust fat suppression (FS) technique still does not exist for this CMR mainstay. In ischemic and non‐ischemic heart disease, differentiating fibrotic tissue from infiltrating and adjacent fat is crucial. Multiple groups have independently developed an FS technique for LGE, double spectral attenuated inversion recovery (DSPAIR), but no comprehensive evaluation was performed. This study aims to fill this gap. DSPAIR uses two SPAIR pulses and one non‐selective IR pulse to enable FS LGE, including compatibility with phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR). We implemented a magnitude (MAGN) and a PSIR variant and compared them with LGE without FS (CONTROL) and with spectral presaturation with inversion recovery (SPIR) in simulations, phantoms, and patients. Fat magnetization by SPIR, MAGN DSPAIR, and PSIR DSPAIR was simulated as a function of pulse B1, readout (RO) pulse number, and fat TI. A phantom with fat, fibrosis, and myocardium compartments was imaged using all FS methods and modifying pulse B1, RO pulse number, and heart rate. Signal was measured in SNR units. Fat, myocardium, and fibrosis SNR and fibrosis‐to‐fat CNR were obtained. Patient images were acquired with all FS techniques. Fat, myocardium, and fibrosis SNR, fibrosis‐to‐fat CNR, and image and FS quality were assessed. In the phantom, both DSPAIR variants provided superior FS compared with SPIR, independent of heart rate and RO pulse number. MAGN DSPAIR reduced fat signal by 99% compared with CONTROL, PSIR DSPAIR by 116%, and SPIR by 67% (25 RO pulses). In patients, both DSPAIR variants substantially reduced fat signal (MAGN DSPAIR by 87.1% ± 10.0%, PSIR DSPAIR by 130.5% ± 36.3%), but SPIR did not (35.8% ± 25.5%). FS quality was good to excellent for MAGN and PSIR DSPAIR, and moderate to poor for SPIR. DSPAIR provided highly effective FS across a wide range of parameters. PSIR DSPAIR performed best. Double spectral attenuated inversion recovery (DSPAIR) provided highly effective fat suppression for late gadolinium enhancement across a wide range of parameters while offering compatibility with phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR). The DSPAIR magnitude and PSIR variants outperformed the common spectral presaturation with inversion recovery (SPIR) technique regarding fat signal reduction and fibrosis‐fat CNR, in simulations, phantoms, and patients. PSIR DSPAIR scored best, with a 131% fat signal reduction (magnitude DSPAIR 87%, SPIR 36%) in patients.
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Shelf entry
Permalink
- URL:
Impact factor
Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.
Year | Impact factor | Edition | Category | Classification | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Select the library membership card:
If the library membership card is not in the list,
add a new one.
DRS, in which the journal is indexed
Database name | Field | Year |
---|
Links to authors' personal bibliographies | Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system |
---|
Source: Personal bibliographies
and: SICRIS
The material is available in full text. If you wish to order the material anyway, click the Continue button.