E-resources
-
Kovačević, Astrid
FLUMINENSIA, 2021, Volume: 33, Issue: 1Journal Article, Paper
Odupiranje Oriane Fallaci svakom obliku edipskog totalitarizma i hegemonije, kao i odustajanje od etabliranih žanrovskih konvencija, rezultira atipičnim žanrovskim entitetima s izraženim psihološkim otiskom autorice (Porzio). Takvi, formalno neodređeni, tekstovi prate program tzv. antiedipske estetike (Irigaray), unutar koje predvidljivost i cjelovitost, jedinstvo i totalitet, red i sustavnost ustupaju mjesto spontanosti i fragmentiranosti, varijabilnosti i mnogostrukosti, preklapanju i preplitanju. Aricò naglašava da je u Fallacinu slučaju došlo do formalnoga kreativnog nereda, do gotovo potpune fuzije stvarnosti i fikcije, nejasnog prijelaza pisane i izgovorene riječi, do preklapanja ekstradijegetskih i intradijegetskih razina, odnosno do uspostave čvrste semantičko-sintaktičke veze između autora i pripovjedača (167).Takva neuniformirana tekstualna struktura rezultat je nepostojanja univerzalnog i sveznajućeg, superiornog i nadređenog, autorskog sebstva izvan granica tekstualnog. Fallacina lingvistička kreativnost suprotstavlja se faličkom hijerarhijskom sustavu, koji podrazumijeva unaprijed izgrađen autorski identitet. Priklanjajući se poststrukturalističkoj metodologiji, koja autora i pripovjedača čini rezultatima retoričkih strategija, odnosno čini tekst nadređenim i povlaštenim pojmom (Cavarero), te odbacujući kanonski metodološki pristup (Aricò 171–173), izgovarajući, no istodobno i osluškujući tekst (Derrida, The Ear of the Other, 13), autorica subjekt pretvara u objekt, tekst u „verbalnu projekciju vlastitog sebstva” (Aricò 587).Fallacina autorska i pripovjedačka subverzija tekstualno pretvara u vokalno (Spinazzola), biografsko u autobiografsko (Rosa 77–80), stvarnost u fikciju (Aricò 167). Na tragu francuskog poststrukturalizma, Fallaci odustaje od afirmacije autorskog subjekta kao svemoćnog ekstradijegetskog identiteta, distanciranog od vlastitog teksta. Prema njezinu mišljenju, autorski je subjekt retorički konstrukt, uspostavljen hermeneutičkim procesima, trenucima u kojima subjekt teksta i subjekt čitanja zamjenjuju svoja mjesta (Aricò 172). Odustajanje od unaprijed izgrađene autorske osobnosti ukazuje na proces pisanja kao na proces rekonstrukcije vlastitog bića (Gusdorf 10). Putem pisanja, umetanja krhotina i fragmenata jezične stvarnosti, omogućava se (re)konstrukcija autorskog subjekta i njegovo/njezino pozicioniranje u odnosu na stvarnost koju opisuje (Cavarero; Battersby). Prema Cavarero, ovakve diskurzivne metode odraz su utjecaja ženskog i ženstvenog, a rezultirat će beskonačnim procesom jezične semioze (100–101). Fallacini tekstovi, nabijeni snažnim vokalnim pečatom postaju tako zrcalni prostor unutar kojeg se autoričino sebstvo mise en abîme efektom reflektira i umnožava, prostor performativnih jezičnih strategija (Finci 119). Oriana Fallaci’s refusal of all forms of Oedipal totalitarianism and hegemony, as well as moving away from the already established genre conventions, results in atypical genre entities bearing a pronounced psychological stamp of the author (Porzio). These formally undefined texts follow the program of the so-called non-Oedipal aesthetics (Irigaray), within which predictability and completeness, integrity and totality, order and system give up their places to spontaneity and fragmentariness, variability, and heterogeneousness, overlapping and interweaving. Aricò emphasizes how in Fallaci’s case this resulted in a formal creative mess, an almost complete fusion of reality and fiction, a blurred transition from the written to the spoken word, an overlapping of extradiegetic and intradiegetic levels, i.e., in the constitution of a firm semantic and syntactic connection between the author and the narrator (167).This incongruous and asymmetrical textual structure is a result of the complete absence of the universal, omniscient, and superior author’s self existing outside the textual borders. Fallaci’s linguistic creativity opposes the phallic hierarchic system, which includes an already constructed author’s identity. Inclined towards poststructuralist methodology, which sees the author and the narrator as results of rhetorical strategies, i.e. sees the text as a superior and privileged term (Cavarero), as well as rejecting the conventional methodological approach (Aricò 171-173), pronouncing but at the same time overhearing the text (Derrida, The Ear of the Other, 113), the author turns the subject into an object, the text into a “verbal projection of her own self” (Aricò 587). Fallaci’s subversion of the author and the narrator turns the textual into vocal (Spinazzola), biography into autobiography (Rosa 77-80), reality into fiction (Aricò 167). In line with French poststructuralism, Fallaci gives up the affirmation of the authorial subject as an omniscient extradiegetic identity, distanced from his/her own text. In her opinion the authorial subject is a rhetorical construct, constituted by interpretative procedures, moments in which the subject of the text and the subject of reading exchange their places (172). Giving up an already constructed authorial personality reveals the process of writing as a process of reconstruction of one’s own being (Gusdorf 10). Through writing, and injecting of pieces and fragments of linguistic reality, a (re)construction of the authorial subject is enabled, as well as his/her positioning related to the reality that he/she describes (Cavarero; Battersby). In Cavarero’s opinion such discursive methods reflect the influence of the female and the feminine and will result in a never-ending process of linguistic semiosis (100-101). Fallaci’s texts, charged with a strong vocal imprinting become, in this way, a mirror space in which the author’s self, by a mise an abîme effect, reflects and multiplies, a space of performative linguistic strategies (Finci 119).
Author
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Shelf entry
Permalink
- URL:
Impact factor
Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.
Year | Impact factor | Edition | Category | Classification | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Select the library membership card:
If the library membership card is not in the list,
add a new one.
DRS, in which the journal is indexed
Database name | Field | Year |
---|
Links to authors' personal bibliographies | Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system |
---|
Source: Personal bibliographies
and: SICRIS
The material is available in full text. If you wish to order the material anyway, click the Continue button.